Matthew Visa Case Study & Department of Home Affairs Law Assignment Help

Assignment Task

Matthew Case Study 

Matthew is currently the holder of a Class VC, Subclass 485 Temporary Graduate (VC 485) visa which is due to expire in 3 years. Matthew has come to you after lodging a Class SN, Subclass 190, Skilled — Nominated ('SN 190') visa in July 2021. Matthew received formal correspondence (dated 18 October 2021) from a delegate of the Department of Home Affairs advising him that they have reason to believe the IELTS test provided with the new application is not genuine and referred specifically to Matthew's ability to meet Public Interest Criteria 4020. The natural justice letter provides Matthew with an opportunity to comment on the adverse information. The IELTS test in question was not provided with the VC 485 visa. Matthew has advised that the IELTS document is not genuine and he panicked as he believed the state sponsorship for New South Wales was closing and he would be unable to lodge the SN 190 visa in time. Matthew is a qualified Biomedical Engineer from his home country (Hong Kong) and has been studying Bachelor of Medicine in Australia in order to become a qualified medical practitioner (which he obtained two years ago in June 2019). Matthew has an exceptional skill-set and has been working in a clinic in Sydney developing a Covid-19 cure for the last 12 months. Matthew has advised that he is the only member in the team with his skill-set and they are close to a break-through. 
Please advise Matthew of the following in a formal letter of advice: 
a) Is Matthew's SN 190 visa at risk of refusal in accordance with Public Interest Criteria 4020? If so, why? 
b) What should the natural justice letter contain from the Department of Home Affairs in accordance with the law? 
c) Provide submissions on why Matthew may be able to satisfy subclause 190.216, having regard only to Public Interest Criteria 4020. 
d) Advise Matthew in relation to his SN 190 visa application (you must include what potential ramifications Matthew could face in the future, having regard to Public Interest Criteria 4020). 
 

This Law Assignment has been solved by our Law Experts at Exam Question Bank. Our Assignment Writing Experts are efficient to provide a fresh solution to this question. We are serving more than 10000+Students in Australia, UK & US by helping them to score HD in their academics. Our Experts are well trained to follow all marking rubrics & referencing style.
    
Be it a used or new solution, the quality of the work submitted by our assignment Experts remains unhampered. You may continue to expect the same or even better quality with the used and new assignment solution files respectively. There’s one thing to be noticed that you could choose one between the two and acquire an HD either way. You could choose a new assignment solution file to get yourself an exclusive, plagiarism (with free Turnitin file), expert quality assignment or order an old solution file that was considered worthy of the highest distinction.