MBA Corporate Finance Midterm Project: Company MBA-FIN602
- Subject Code :
MBA-FIN602
MBA Corporate Finance Midterm Project Company Valuation
Project Overview
For this midterm project, you will conduct a valuation of a publicly traded company of your choice using:
- Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Valuation (50%)
- Relative Valuation using Comparable Companies (30%)
- Short Essay & Data Source Disclosure (20%)
You must use real-world financial data from reputable sources (e.g., SEC filings, company annual reports, Bloomberg, Yahoo Finance). No hypothetical data is allowed.
Project Requirements
-
Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Valuation (50 points)
Using real financial data, construct a complete DCF model that includes:
- Free Cash Flow (FCF) Forecast:
- -Project FCF for at least five years using logical and well-supported growth
- Terminal Value Calculation:
- Terminal Value Calculation:
- -Choose between Gordon Growth Model or Exit Multiple Method, and explain your choice.
- Discount Rate (WACC) Calculation:
- Discount Rate (WACC) Calculation:
- -Use the Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM) to estimate WACC with real- world inputs (risk-free rate, market return, beta, capital structure).
- Sensitivity Analysis:
- Sensitivity Analysis:
- -Perform at least one sensitivity analysis on a key assumption (e.g., discount rate, growth rate, margin).
- Excel File Requirements:
- -Must contain clear labels, intact formulas, and references to data
2. Relative Valuation (30 points)
Compare your chosen company to at least three real comparable firms, using:
- Key Valuation Multiples:
- -P/E (Price-to-Earnings)
- -EV/EBITDA (Enterprise Value to EBITDA)
- Comparable Firm Selection:
- Comparable Firm Selection:
- -Justify why you selected the peer firms and any necessary adjustments made to account for differences in size, industry, or risk.
- Analysis & Comparison:
- Analysis & Comparison:
- -Discuss whether the relative valuation aligns with your DCF result and explain any discrepancies.
- Excel File Requirements:
- Excel File Requirements:
- -Well-organized spreadsheet with proper calculations.
3. Short Essay & Data Source Disclosure (20 points)
Write a 2-4 page essay discussing:
- DCF Assumptions:
- -Justify key inputs (revenue growth, discount rate, margin assumptions, ).
- Selection of Comparable Firms:
- Selection of Comparable Firms:
- -Explain why you chose the peer companies and any adjustments
- Valuation Methodology & Limitations:
- Valuation Methodology & Limitations:
- -Compare DCF Relative Valuation, and discuss strengths and weaknesses of each approach.
- -Identify potential sources of error or uncertainty in your
- Disclosure of References & Data Sources:
- - Clearly cite all sources used, including financial statements, industry reports, and databases (e.g., SEC filings, Bloomberg, Yahoo Finance, FactSet, Capital IQ, Reuters, or Macrotrends).
- -Submissions without proper citations will be
- AI Usage Disclosure:
- AI Usage Disclosure:
- -If you use AI tools (e.g., ChatGPT, Excel AI, Bloomberg GPT), disclose how you used them in the essay.
- -Over-reliance on AI without demonstration of financial reasoning will negatively impact your grade.
Submission Guidelines
- ExcelFile: Clearly labeled with structured calculations and source
- ShortEssay: Submit as a PDF or Word document with proper
- Deadline: March 2 2025 11:59pm Late submissions will be penalized unless prior approvalis Every day delayed will result in a 10?duction to your full points.
Grading Rubric (100 Points Total)
Category |
Excellent (A) (90-100%) |
Good (B) (80- 89%) |
Adequate (C) (70-79%) |
Needs Improvement (D/F) (<70> |
DCF Valuation (50 pts) |
Realistic assumptions, well-supported calculations, accurate WACC & terminal value estimation. |
Minor flaws in assumptions or calculations; reasonable valuation output. |
Some errors in methodology or missing justification for key inputs. |
Major errors in calculations or unrealistic assumptions. |
Relative Valuation (30 pts) |
Well-chosen comparables, clear justification, correct multiple calculations. |
Comparables mostly reasonable but some justification is weak; minor errors. |
Comparables not well explained or missing key multiples. |
Poor choice of comparables or major errors in calculations. |
Short Essay & Data Sources (20 pts) |
Well- structured, insightful discussion of assumptions, methodology, and properly cited data sources. |
Adequate discussion, but lacking depth or missing some citations. |
Basic discussion with limited justification; weak citation. |
Weak or incomplete explanations, missing citations. |
AI Disclosure & Academic Integrity |
AI used thoughtfully with proper disclosure. |
AI used but lacks clear integration with original work. |
AI reliance evident; weak original input. |
AI-generated content with no original thought. |