Multiculturalism, Diversity, and Offshore Detention in Australia: Socio-Political and Human Rights Perspectives
Socio-political, social justice and human rights aspects of multiculturalism and diversity in Australia on Offshore detention
Multiculturalism is the belief that amid a prevailing political culture, traditions, ethnic backgrounds,especially those of minority groups should enjoy preference for the features that make them distinctive (Lin, 2019). One of Australia's greatest strengths is its lively, contemporary diverse population. A vital component of the common Australian identity is multiculturalism, which exists alongside with the country's First Nations customs & British organizations. The Australian history is essentially one of migration. It promotes society's growing diversity & sustains itsprosperity fiscally (Department Of Home Affairs, 2023). A vibrant multicultural environment has been shaped & altered by several waves of migration.
Diversity refers to the elements that create each of us distinctive, such as our personalities, histories, situations, & beliefs all the factors that shape whoever we are. The convergence of our disparities determines the viewpoint, method, & outlook. Acknowledging, honoring, & appreciating disparities caused by age, ethnic background, gender, religion, disabilities, & sexual preference is an additional aspect of diversity. It also involves a limitless array of personal traits along with experiences that are distinctive to each individual, like manner of communication, professional path, life events, educational attainment, geographic area, financial standing, marriage status, & parenting position, among other factors which influence opinions (State Government of Victoria, 2019).
Australia's handling of those seeking asylum has come into careful examination, with particular consideration paid to the perspectives held by the Coalition & Labor administrations, Australia'stwo majorpolitical parties. By evaluating various strategies to offshore processing/detention, this article addresses the socio-political, equitable treatment, & rights-related dimensions of multiculturalism & diversity in Australia. Furthermore, ittakes into account the repercussions for social service providers who utilize culturally competent methods to advocate for equitable treatment & social justice (Pattison & Davidson, 2019).
In regard to forbidden boat immigrants, the Coalition & Labor administrations have kept up strict border control measures after2001. Boat turnbacks, compulsory detention, & offshore processing are some of these approaches. In 2001, the government of Howard (Coalition) unveiled the "Pacific Solution," which envisaged the setting up of offshore detentionhubs in Papua New Guinea& Nauru. These regulations were first dropped by the Rudd (Labor) Government in 2008, however increasing boat landings resulted to their reintroduction in 2010 during the Gillard leadership (Briskman, 2019).
There are several policy similarities between the two political parties, when it comes to those seeking asylum, the Coalition & Labor regimes have both supported deterrent-focused strategies like offshore processing, boat turnbacks, & compulsory detention for immigration violations. The two parties' policies exhibit a dedication towards working alongside other nations to boost upborder security & prevent the trafficking of people. Though their rhetoric has frequently shifted the two parties have primarily believed that those actions must be taken for regulating the flow of asylum seekers (Lippi et al., 2024).
Boat turnbacks, which Labor formally authorized in 2015, entail capturing up with & bringing the boats to their departure sites. Along with stressing regional collaboration & counter-people-smuggling efforts, both parties took part in programs such as the Bali Procedure, which attempts to improve border protection & fight the trafficking of people in Southeast Asia. Nevertheless,the parties deviatedconsiderably oversubjects. The approach that is used for offering asylum seekers forshort periodas compared with long-term protection is one major distinction. Labor partyhas been against temporary protection visas & argued for permanent safeguarding, whereas the Coalition has stood by temporary protection visasas a deterrence (Schloenhardt & Craig, 2015). Here have also been discrepancies in the yearly total of refugees acknowledged, with Labor partyconsistently seeking greater quotas than the Coalition party.
The two major parties also have different views on the scale that Australia should take in assistance from abroad. Labor Partyhas consistently supported larger consumption scales; under the Gillard management, for instance the yearly limit was raised. In 2015, Labor's partypolicy called for an additional rise by 2025. The Coalition party, on the other hand, has consistently been more cautious, originally dropping the intake to lower level however then recognizing to gradual rises, involving a temporary extra intake for refugees coming from Syria & Iraq (Mendes, 2022).
Visas for temporary protection have become particularly controversial. Opponents allegedthat Temporary Protection Visasput asylum seekers at more risk, locking them in a cycle of uncertainty &possibly worsening their psychological condition. The Coalition parycontends that Temporary Protection Visasdiscourage boat entries. By allowing asylum seekersto start again, Labor party'slong-term security policy aims to promote social fairness & human rights by promoting stability & assistance for integration (CNN, 2013).
Both parties' policies are an indication of Australia's larger sociopolitical forces. The Coalition partylays considerable emphasis on controlling borders & prevention, which is aligned with a nationalistic & security-focused approach. Voters who have concerns about national security &restrictions on immigrationare going to consider this approach intriguing. Labor party'spolicies, which indicate a more accepting viewpoint about diversity, aim to strike a balance between humanitarian needs and border protection whilst still supporting the former.
Notwithstanding the distinctions between them, the policies of bothsides have caused increasedserious worries over human rights, particularly in connection to the compulsory & protracted detention of asylum seekers, such as kids (Lippi et al., 2024). Specifically the confinement of minors received widespread condemnation for breaching international human rights law & having an enormous negative effect on their emotional & mental wellness (CNN, 2013). Official authorities, both past & present, have recognized the harm that protracted confinement triggers, but the rules still persist. Likewise, Australia's duties within international treaties, such as the Refugee Convention & the Convention on the Rights of the Child, are breached by the confinement of those seeking asylum (Australian Human Rights Commission, 2004). These responsibilities consist of making sure that detention is utilized only as the last option, assessing detentions in a timely & efficient manner, & keeping children's best interests before anything else.
Australia's attitude toward asylum seekers puts into question its multicultural strategy. Limited visa laws & harsh detention methods may be viewed as at variance with the country's commitment to inclusiveness & diversity. Policies which uphold & safeguard the rights of everyone, such as refugees & asylum seekers, constitute a prerequisite to foster successful multiculturalism. Labor partyis more aligned with encouraging a diverse & inclusive community with regard topermanent safeguarding & enhanced humanitarian inflow. On the contrary, it could occur that the Coalition party'sstrict policies might promote marginalization & exclusion (Hartley & Pedersen, 2015).
Higher humanitarian intake & improved cooperation between regions were some of the combined short- & long-term initiatives suggested by the Expert Panel on Asylum Seekers, that was formed in 2012. Although both sides have reached an understanding on temporary deterrents, long-term solutions like enhanced migration routes & regional protection structures continue to be in the early phases of implementation. Because asylum moves are worldwide in character, viable approaches must focus on shared responsibility & international cooperation.
Given these fears, social workers are essential in supporting culturally competent attitudes & fighting for the fundamental liberties of asylum seekers. Social service providers may challenge harmful practices & promote solutions that respect constitutional rightsvalues by taking part in advocacy campaigns. Itmight include collaborating with other parties who are interested, informing the public, & influencing lawmakers to amend statutes.
Social professionals can also aid in the creation of culturally sensitive policies that put asylum seekers' dignity & well-being foremost. Itentails appreciating and honoring cultural variances, attending to the particular demands of other communities, & supporting laws that encourage social justice & inclusiveness (Lippi et al., 2024).
The article aboveoffered shows a thorough comprehension of the fundamental principles of social equity & human rights in connection with Australian immigration regulations. The reportfinds & emphasizes howAustralian rules on asylum specifically, the obligatory detention of minors violates worldwide constitutional rights. The necessity of using culturally competent techniques to meet the demands of numerous groups, in particular those who are seeking asylum are acknowledged. It underlines how essential it is to safeguard the rights safeguarded by treaties like the Refugee Convention & the Convention on the Rights of the Child (Parliament Of Australia, 2013). In light of refugee regulations,the importance of social workers' advocacy for social human rights & fairness is emphasized.
Conclusion
Examining multiculturalism &diversity in Australia from the angles of sociopolitics, equity in society, & equality for all, especially in light of offshore detention, discloses that both major political parties Labor & the Coalition have shaped regulations that represent wider societal values & priorities. One of Australia's strongest assets is its multiculturalism, that cherishes diversity & acknowledges the varied contributions of people with various cultural, religious, and racial histories. Yet, the Coalition & Labor governments' practices toward individuals seeking asylum &offshore detention have recently come under criticism for their impacts on social justice & human rights (Lippi et al., 2024).
Both parties' policies favour border security collaboration & deterrent initiatives,but there are disparities in how they address offering asylum & refuge. Labor, in line with an additional humane & inclusive point of view, has argued for greater refugee intake & permanent parental custody. By opposition, the Coalition governmenthas taken asecurity-oriented attitude, demanding more robust border controls & temporary protection visas.
Social professionals are vital in guiding the rights & welfare of asylum seekers with these intricate obstacles. Social workers can support policies that safeguard human rights goals while supporting culturally responsive approaches tobuild a more equitable & inclusive society (Parliament Of Australia, 2013). To further confront structural injustices & bring about significant change, campaigns of advocacy & coordination with other interested parties are crucial.
Are you struggling to keep up with the demands of your academic journey? Don't worry, we've got your back!
Exam Question Bank is your trusted partner in achieving academic excellence for all kind of technical and non-technical subjects. Our comprehensive range of academic services is designed to cater to students at every level. Whether you're a high school student, a college undergraduate, or pursuing advanced studies, we have the expertise and resources to support you.
To connect with expert and ask your query click here Exam Question Bank
