Assessment Brief
This is an individual coursework with a weightage of 50% of the overall module marks.
In this assessment, students are to produce multimedia products of professional quality for a Business Client.
Additional Information (if any)
indu@gulfcollege.edu.om
Ms Indu Govinda Pillai
Weighting: 50%
-
Term: Mid-term
-
Assessment ID: WRIT1
-
Level & Block: L5 - B2
-
Term: July 2025 2nd semester
-
Academic Year: AY 2024-2025
-
Module Credits: 20
-
Module Title: Multimedia & Interaction
-
Module Code: GIS5009
Contents
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE MODELS GUIDANCE FOR THIS ASSESSMENT
FURTHER INFORMATION
ASSESSMENT DETAILS
SUBMISSION DETAILS
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA
MARKING/ASSESSMENT CRITERIA
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF THE USE OF AI
MARKING CRITERIA / RUBRICS
Artificial Intelligence Models Guidance for this assessment:
Artificial Intelligence (AI) models can be a powerful tool to support your learning. The University has provided some resources to support you in its appropriate usage:
Library Services AI Hub
Student Guide to AI and Assessment
Code of Conduct for Students on the use of AI
Cite Them Right resource on citing materials relating to AI (if permitted)
As per the academic regulations (Academic Handbook Ah1_08), in all cases you must submit work that is your own, acknowledging any part of it that has been informed by another source including that which is AI generated. Upon submission of work, you will be asked to confirm the following statement:
I confirm that this assignment is my own work, except where I have acknowledged the use of works from other sources, including the use of any artificial intelligence (AI) tools, in accordance with what is allowable as described in the assessment brief.
Please note the following:
AI should not be used as a substitute for your own knowledge, and you should never include any material that you do not understand and could not explain if asked.
Not being able to explain your work when asked is likely to be a key factor when considering cases of academic misconduct related to AI.
The following information provides specific guidance for this assessment about what level of AI use is appropriate for this assessment. Remember that in all cases you must submit work that is your own, acknowledging any part of it that has been provided by another source.
NO USE OF GENERATIVE AI EXPECTED
Your assignment should be produced using information sourced by you from your learning materials and academic sources and cited appropriately
AI tools for checking spelling, grammar and referencing may be used.
ACKNOWLEDGED
You can use AI tools to learn about your topic, as part of your study, or in preparing initial guidance on assignments (e.g. headline structure, suggestions for inclusion of topics).
Any materials that you have sourced from AI should be rewritten or reconfigured and integrated into your own work and referenced appropriately. It is recommended that this is confirmed by a relevant academic source.
Any support gained from AI should be acknowledged in a statement at the end of the assignment, making clear what the support was, and how you used it and developed it for your own work. Example statements are available in the Student Code of Conduct.
EMBEDDED
Use of AI is an integral and expected part of the assessment.
The explicit inclusion of AI within the assessment means that instructions on the expected use will be part of the assessment brief.
Your assessment brief will describe how you should acknowledge the way in which you used AI tools.
Further Information
Who can answer questions about my assessment?
Questions about the assessment should be directed to the staff member who has set the task/assessment brief. This will usually be the Module Leader. They will be happy to answer any queries you have.
Referencing and independent learning (Not applicable for Examination)
Please ensure you reference a range of credible sources, with due attention to the academic literature in the area. The time spent on research and reading from good quality sources will be reflected in the quality of your submitted work.
Remember that what you get out of university depends on what you put in. Your teaching sessions typically represent between 10% and 30% of the time you are expected to study for your degree. A 20-credit module represents 200 hours of study time. The rest of your time should be taken up by self-directed study.
Unless stated otherwise you must use the HARVARD referencing system. Further guidance on referencing can be found on Moodle. Correct referencing is an easy way to improve your marks and essential in achieving higher grades on most assessments.
Technical submission problems (Not applicable for Examination)
It is strongly advised that you submit your work at least 24 hours before the deadline to allow time to resolve any last minute problems you might have. If you are having issues with IT or Turnitin you should contact the IT Helpdesk on (+968) 92841521/ 92841217. You may require evidence of the Helpdesk call if you are trying to demonstrate that a fault with Turnitin was the cause of a late submission.
Mitigating circumstances
Short extensions on assessment deadlines can be requested in specific circumstances. If you are encountering particular hardship which has been affecting your studies, then you may be able to apply for mitigating circumstances. This can give the teachers on your programme more scope to adapt the assessment requirements to support your needs. Mitigating circumstances policies and procedures are regularly updated. You should refer to your Academic Advisor for information on extensions and mitigating circumstances.
Academic Misconduct
Cardiff Met takes issues of unfair practice extremely seriously. The University has procedures and penalties for dealing with unfair academic practice. These are explained in full in the University's Unfair Practice regulations and procedures under Volume 1, Section 8 of the Academic Handbook. The Module Leader reserves the right to interview students regarding any aspect of their work submitted for assessment.
Types of Academic Misconduct include:
Plagiarism, which can be defined as using without acknowledgement another persons words or ideas and submitting them for assessment as though it were ones own work, for instance by copying, translating from one language to another or unacknowledged paraphrasing. Further examples include:
Use of any quotation(s) from the published or unpublished work of other persons, whether published in textbooks, articles, the Web, or in any other format, where quotations have not been clearly identified as such by being placed in quotation marks and acknowledged.
Use of another persons words or ideas that have been slightly changed or paraphrased to make it look different from the original.
Summarising another persons ideas, judgments, diagrams, figures, or computer programmes without reference to that person in the text and the source in a bibliography/reference list.
Use of assessment writing services, essay banks and/or any other similar agencies (NB. Students are commonly being blackmailed after using essay mills).
Use of unacknowledged material downloaded from the Internet.
Re-use of ones own material except as authorised by your degree programme.
Collusion, which can be defined as when work that has been undertaken with others is submitted and passed off as solely the work of one person. Modules will clearly identify where joint preparation and joint submission are permitted; in all other cases they are not.
Fabrication of data, making false claims to have carried out experiments, observations, interviews or other forms of data collection and analysis, or acting dishonestly in any other way.
How is my work graded?
Gulf College uses Cardiff Metropolitan Universitys Generic Band Descriptors (GBD), in conjunction with programme-specific and/or assessment-specific descriptors that are developed in accordance with the principles underpinning the generic descriptors, as a reference in marking student work outputs. This is to ensure that marking is consistent across all Cardiff Met students work, including the work outputs of students in Gulf College.
Assessment marking undergoes a meticulous process to make sure that it is fair and truly reflects the performance of students in their modules. Marking of work at each level of Cardiff Met degree programmes are benchmarked against a set of general requirements set out in Cardiff Mets Guidance on Assessment Marking. https://www.cardiffmet.ac.uk/registry/academic handbook/Documents/AH1_04_03.pdf
To find out more about assessments and key academic skills that can have a significant impact on your marks, download and read your Module Handbook from Moodle and your Programme Handbook from the college website.
Assessment Details
Assessment title
Coursework
Abbreviation
WRIT1
Weighting
50%
Pass marks for undergraduate work is 40%, unless stated otherwise.
Task/assessment brief:
Aim
To produce a multimedia product of professional quality for a Business Client. In the process you will
Research and implement the multimedia production cycle.
Analyse their requirements, and write a specification of selected products.
Research and explain similar products in terms of advantages and disadvantages concerning your product.
Mention the audience of your product.
Capture/digitise and edit the different media to a professional standard and assemble the media into multimedia products using multimedia software.
Test your product.
Write a reflective report which incorporates the above steps.
Cousework Description
Shoe Store company is an emerging company in Oman. The company is rising gradually from medium to large scale, with increasing customer base, quality products and genuine services. As the management aims to grow their mark and presence globally, they decided to do a re-branding.
Consider yourself the marketing manager of the company and are in charge of the digitalised re-branding. You have to produce the following items:
TASK 1: Logo/emblem/crest (5 marks)
Create a brand new logo for the company. You need to do the following:
List down the general rules in designing the logo for any company or event.
Research about the existing logo to establish what has been created in the past.
Produce 2 designs for the emblem/logo/crest. You can hand draw these first if you wish before implementing them.
For each of your design concepts, ensure that the logo appears aesthetically well-designed, that it is clear graphically, and has a strong and evident relationship to the selected event.
As much as possible and throughout, show originality in your design work.
To support the created design concepts, write a 250-word design rationale.
Use this designed logo in all other tasks.
This designed logo should be a part of a web application which will be designed in the other task.
Do the critical evaluation and review of created media elements and applications in this task in relation to their aesthetic and functional qualities.
TASK 2: Poster Design (5 marks)
Research existing posters relevant to your study as a piece of evidence and then carry out the following:
Create a new original poster to promote the company and its products. The poster must be different from any existing ones.
Your poster needs to carefully consider typography, visual layout, graphics design and usage, and photograph inclusion/adoption to make a good aesthetic design.
The poster must contain the logo that you have designed in task 1.
The colour of the poster should be in harmony with the colour combination of the logo.
As much as possible and throughout, show originality in your design work.
It is up to you if you do a preliminary rough draft designs on paper, but you must note that your final submission needs to be created in applications such as Canva, InDesign, Illustrator, and Photoshop.
To support the created poster, write a 250-word design rationale.
These posters should be part of a web application which will be designed in the other task.
Do the critical evaluation and review of created media elements and applications in this task in relation to their aesthetic and functional qualities.
TASK 3: 2D Animation or Video (5 marks)
Create a one minute of 2D animation or video using any animation or video editor.
Create an animation or video that can be used to market the company and its products. Include any relevant background, stage props, audio, and additional characters that may enhance the animation.
Show originality in all your animation work.
To support your created design, write a 250-word design rationale.
Do the critical evaluation and review of created media elements and applications in this task in relation to their aesthetic and functional qualities.
TASK 4: Still Images Production and Editing (5 marks
Create a minimum of 4 original photographs of the products that come under the selected categories.
Edit these 4 photographs so they are of professional quality. Apply different editing on each photograph. Show the original and edited photographs.
Ensure that originality is evident in all your work.
To support this task, conduct research on existing photo galleries, photography principles, and the quality of photographs used on professional sites.
TASK 5: Storyboard (10 marks)Complete the following:
Design a storyboard of a website including four pages as Home, Product Categories, Products, and Services detailed in task 6.
The storyboard should be clear, interesting, and traceable. The steps should be evident.
Show originality in all your designs.
It is up to you if you do preliminary rough draft designs on paper, but you must note that your final submission is created in applications such as Canva, InDesign, Illustrator, and Photoshop or any other drawing application.
To support your created design, write a 250-word design rationale.
Do the critical evaluation and review of created media elements and applications in this task in relation to their aesthetic and functional qualities.
TASK 6: Web Page Design
Create a website using any web page support editor. To support your concept for this task, write a 250-word design rationale.
Do the critical evaluation and review of created media elements and applications in this task in relation to their aesthetic and functional qualities.
Home Page (5 marks)
Create a web-based home page to promote the event.
The Home Page must be created for the selected event and must have links to other pages.
Use the designed poster as slider in the home page.
Product Categories (5 marks)
Create at least 4 different product categories.
Each category should consist of a category name and brief details.
Appropriately classify the following into each of the created category:
Products (5 marks)
Present the still images produced in Task 4, with product name and brief details.
Services (5 marks)
Create at least 2 different services provided by the company.
Each created service should consist of a service name and brief details.
TASK 7: Evaluation (10 marks)
Once your website is completed, do a beta testing by showing it to a group of audiences and get the feedback. Improve your multimedia products based on the feedback received and note down any of the improvements done.
TAS 8: Presentation (15 marks)
Present and demonstrate the completed website, focusing on the produced multimedia components. Discuss the process of producing and editing of the multimedia components and how you utilise them in the website. Video-record the presentation and submit in the appropriate link in OneDrive. Each presentation must be 1015 minutes in length only.
Some points about Graphics Implementation
You should design/collect the images/videos/logos to support the building of your product and then to combine all those graphics and other interactive screens to produce a meaningful required final product. Here are some points about graphics Implementation:
Collection of still images /videos /interactive product material
Use of your own taken images gets more marks
Create some composite images (collages or other) that make use of layers in Photoshop
Imaginative use of filters, feather selections, and other Photoshop edits
Combining images /videos /interactive screens to produce the final product
Animation of text and/or objects (movement: sizing, visual effects such as fade-blurs, etc.), in interactive or video or banner products
The design of the web pages is important
Appropriate use of Screen fonts is one of the points that must be considered in designing multimedia products, besides margins, font animations and readability of texts.
Deliverables
After the development and submission of the above design, submit and present a reflection report outlining the methods you used in your production. The report structure is given on page 9 of this coursework paper.
Upload your report to Turnitin on the date specified in this coursework paper.
Upload your completed website and produced multimedia elements in OneDrive. Link to OneDrive will be emailed.
The quality of your work will be carefully assessed (Please see marking scheme and marking criteria)
Additional instructions:
Your student identification number must be clearly stated at the top of each page of your work
Where appropriate, a contents page, a list of tables/figures, and a list of abbreviations should precede your work.
Each page must be numbered.
Use Calibri font:
size 14, bold for main titles
size 12, bold for subtitles
size 11, regular for the body of each section
size 9, italics for the image, chart or graph captions or labels
A word count must be stated at the end of your work.
All referencing and citations should adhere with the Harvard Style of Referencing.
All tables and figures must be corre
Upload your draft report to MS Teams for formative feedback
Report Structure
Your report lay-out must be as follows:
GC Coursework Front Cover Table of contents
Table of figures
Report body should include the following:
- write a brief description about the projectIntroduction
- Identify at least two (2) similar projects and do a comparative analysis their mentioning their pros and cons in terms of customers interests.Review of Similar Project
- Include screenshots of the web pages that contain the produced multimedia products, supported with textual narratives.Multimedia product(s)
- A proper report of the designed multimedia products (logos, posters, animation or video, still images) in alignment with the design of web pages.
- Write a brief account on how you evaluated the completed website and how you improved you improved it based on the feedback received. Also, include the status of the completion of the planned improvement.Evaluation
Word count (or equivalent):
This a reflection of the effort required for the assessment. Word counts will normally include any text, tables, calculations, figures, subtitles and citations. Reference lists and contents of appendices are excluded from the word count. Contents of appendices are not usually considered when determining your final assessment grade.
Submission
Details
Submission Deadline: MID-TERM 8th of May 2025
Estimated Feedback Return Date Main - 27th July 2025 7th August 2025
Submission Time: By 23:59 pm on the deadline day.
Moodle/Turnitin: Any assessments submitted after the deadline will not be marked and will be recorded as a non-attempt unless you have had an extension request agreed or have approved mitigating circumstances.
See the Gulf College website for more information on submission details and mitigating circumstances.
File Format: The assessment must be submitted as a word document and submit through the Turnitin submission point.
Your assessment should be titled with your:
Student ID number, Module code and Assessment ID
,
e.g. 2410500 GAC3000 WRIT
Feedback Feedback for the assessment will be provided electronically via Turnitin / MS Teams / Face to Face. Feedback will be provided with comments on your strengths and the areas which you can improve. Module tutors give students two types of assessment feedback: formative, which is given when the student is working on the completion of an assignment or coursework, and summative, which is given upon completion of the module. A comprehensive assessment feedback on your performance will be given after the announcement of the results (10 Working Days).
Assessment Criteria
Learning outcomes assessed
On successful completion of the module, a student should be able to
- Identify and apply appropriate design and interaction
- Develop multimedia prototypes using appropriate software, tools and
- Demonstrate awareness of production standards and test for compliance with industry
Other skills/attributes developed
Graduate Attribute
|
Description
|
Discipline Expertise
|
Ability to use various strategies to form an objective judgment
|
Ability to break down complex information to interpret or evaluate a
problem or situation
|
Global Citizenship
|
Ability to consider the wider global and social aspects of their chosen
profession and how these impact an organisation and the society at large
|
Marking/Assessment Criteria
Tasks
|
Weight
|
Presentation
|
15
|
Introduction
|
5
|
Research on similar products
|
10
|
Multimedia Production report and documentation of the creation/editing of: Logo/Crest/Emblem (5 marks)
Poster (5 marks)
Video (5 marks)
Still Images (5 marks)
|
20
|
Storyboard
|
10
|
Final Multimedia Product Creation of Website Home Page (5 marks)
Product Categories (5 marks) Products (5 marks)
Services (5 marks)
|
20
|
Testing and Evaluation Report
|
10
|
Quality of documentation
|
10
|
Total Marks
|
100
|
Grade
|
% Mark
|
Requirements
|
F
(Fail)
|
0
|
No answer has been attempted or there is evidence of unfair practice.
|
1 9
|
The work presented for assessment may be incomplete and/or irrelevant and demonstrates a serious lack of comprehension and/or engagement with the set task. Attainment of the learning outcomes is minimal and assessment criteria are not
addressed.
|
10 19
|
Misunderstanding or misinterpretation of the set task, providing a short and/or largely irrelevant response. Consequently, no learning outcomes are met in full
although there may be minimal attainment in relation to one or two.
|
20 - 29
|
Minimal understanding of the set task and little knowledge and understanding of the field of study relevant to the task is demonstrated. Limited ability to communicate simple concepts and/or factual information is shown. Significant difficulties in the reports structure and organisation detract from the clarity and meaning overall.
Evidence of individual reading and investigation is negligible, and the limited referencing of literature and other sources is frequently inaccurate. Some ability to describe and report knowledge gained but very little evidence is available to indicate an ability to engage in critical evaluation and reflection.
|
|
|
|
30 39
|
Partial understanding of the set task and some of the associated learning outcomes are met at a basic level. Factual inaccuracies, errors and misconceptions are evident in important areas and elements of the assessed work which may be irrelevant to the task. If attempted, the presentation of arguments and more complex ideas may be confused and clumsily expressed. Some enquiry and analysis relevant to the task attempted but outcomes may be nave, simplistic and/or unconvincing. Limited knowledge of current research/scholarship in the discipline is demonstrated. A restricted range of sources are used but overall, there is an over-reliance on programme materials with little evidence of individual reading and investigation.
There are frequent errors in the referencing of literature and other sources. The work is largely descriptive and arguments, if attempted, are rarely substantiated.
|
D
(Third)
|
40 - 49
|
Demonstrates a basic understanding of the set task and an ability to have met the associated learning outcomes. Assessment criteria are addressed at a threshold level. Basic knowledge and understanding of many aspects of the field of study relevant to the task is displayed. Errors and misconceptions are evident, but these are outweighed by the degree of knowledge and understanding demonstrated overall.
More success is achieved in describing and reporting factual information rather than communicating complex ideas. Generally, the work is appropriately structured although key points may not be logically sequenced. Some limited analysis and enquiry relevant to the task/discipline are included and has intermittent success in presenting and commenting on outcomes. A limited ability to critically evaluate and reflect is shown. Although some critical reflection is evident, the balance within the
work is likely to be in favour of description and factual presentation.
|
C
(Lower Second)
|
50 - 59
|
A secure understanding of the set task and an ability to have met the associated learning outcomes is demonstrated. Assessment criteria are addressed at a satisfactory level. A sound knowledge and understanding of most key aspects of the field of study relevant to the task are evident as well as an ability to apply such knowledge. Some evidence of independent thinking beyond programme notes is also shown. Overall, the structure and format of the work are appropriate. There are occasional faults in the presentation of work, but overall, these do not detract from the clarity of expression. Examples of research/scholarship referred to in the work demonstrate individual reading and investigative ability to critically evaluate and reflect although there may be some over-reliance on description and factual
presentation. Arguments are usually substantiated.
|
B
(Upper Second)
|
60-69
|
A full understanding of the set task and an ability to have met the learning outcomes is demonstrated. Assessment criteria are addressed at a good level. A detailed knowledge and thorough understanding of key aspects of the field of study relevant to the task are shown. There is clear evidence of an ability to apply such knowledge and, in some contexts, to extend and transform it. Discussion of complex concepts is often tackled successfully and there is evidence of independent thinking. An ability to communicate information, ideas and concepts clearly and succinctly is displayed.
Work is well presented and the format appropriate. Key points are appropriately organised, and the writing style is fluent and arguments are well articulated. Detailed analysis and critical enquiry relevant to the task/discipline is undertaken by making use of appropriate techniques and has considerable success in presenting and commenting on outcomes. There is some linkage between theory and practice.
Examples referred to indicate a breadth and depth of individual reading and investigation that extend beyond the sources provided. The referencing of literature and other sources is almost always accurate. Arguments are clearly considered and
substantiated and there is evidence of an ability to make appropriate judgements and to suggest solutions to problems.
|
A
(First)
|
70 79
|
A full and detailed understanding of the set task and an ability to have met the learning outcomes is demonstrated. Assessment criteria are addressed at a very good level. A detailed knowledge and systematic understanding of key aspects of the
field of study relevant to the task are evident. There is strong evidence of an ability to extend, transform and apply such knowledge. The student also demonstrates an
|
|
|
|
|
|
ability to engage in confident discussion of complex concepts and to recognise the limitations and ambiguity of disciplinary knowledge. Independent thinking and original insights are also present in the report. Ability shown in communicating information, complex ideas and concepts in a coherent and succinct manner is shown. The standard of presentation is high and the format appropriate. Key points are logically organised and in written work, the style is lucid and mature. Detailed and thorough knowledge of current research/advanced scholarship in the discipline are evident. The use of scholarly reviews/primary sources is confident and a breadth and depth of individual reading and investigation, extending beyond the sources provided, is apparent. The referencing of literature and other sources is accurate and in line with academic conventions. An ability to engage in critical evaluation of concepts/arguments/data and to make appropriate and informed judgements is shown. Arguments are well developed, sustained and substantiated. Where relevant, assumptions are challenged and there is clear recognition of the complexities of academic debate. Appropriate and sometimes innovative solutions are offered to
problems.
|
80 - 89
|
Beyond the above, a full and detailed understanding of the set task and an ability to have met the learning outcomes is demonstrated. Assessment criteria are addressed
at an excellent level.
|
90 - 100
|
Beyond the above, demonstrates a full and detailed understanding of the set task and an ability to have met the learning outcomes and address the assessment criteria at an outstanding and exceptional level. Work is of a standard deemed to be worthy of publication. Reference citations extend significantly beyond the main body of
reading normally expected in the discipline/field of study.
|
|
Acknowledgement of the Use of AI
Student Name:
|
|
Student ID Number:
|
|
Module Code:
|
Multimedia & Interaction
|
Assignment Title:
|
Multimedia & Interaction
|
Date:
|
Enter a date.
|
Acknowledgement (Check mark the appropriate)
|
No content generated by Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies has been presented as my
? own work.
? I acknowledge the use of [name of AI + URL] to generate materials for background research and self-study in the drafting of this assessment.
? I acknowledge the use of [name of AI + URL] to generate materials that were included within my final assessment in modified form.
|
The following prompts were input into [name of AI + URL]:
|
List prompts here
|
The output was changed by me in the following ways:
|
Explain the actions taken here
|
Students Signature (Digital)
Marking Criteria / Rubrics
SN
|
Item
|
5 - Excellent
|
4 - Very Good
|
3 - Good
|
2 - Satisfactory
|
1 - Poor
|
0 - Very Poor
|
1
|
Presentation - 15%
|
- Gives an appropriate introduction and establishes a framework for the rest of the presentation.
- Information is presented in a logical manner.
- Uses a clear, audible voice.
- Uses well-defined technical terms and appropriate language.
- Exhibits expertise in navigating and simulating the presented product.
|
- One item from the Excellent column is missing
|
- Two items from the Excellent column are missing
|
- Three items from the Excellent column are missing
|
There is an attempt of doing this section, however only one or none of the items in the Excellent column is met.
|
None found.
|
|
Introduction 5%
|
- The project is clearly introduced.
- The purpose of doing this project is discussed.
- The introduction is written in clear sentences, using appropriate words and terminologies as well as correct grammar and punctuation.
- Selected company is clearly introduced.
- Required tools of doing this project are mentioned.
-
|
- One item from the Excellent column is missing
|
- Two items from the Excellent column are missing
|
- Three items from the Excellent column are missing
|
There is an attempt of doing this section, however only one or none of the items in the Excellent column is met.
|
None found.
|
3
|
Research on similar Project 10%
|
- Research on similar Project is included, and at least two similar projects are identified, and analysed.
- Relevant multimedia products of similar projects are identified correctly.
- Screenshots taken of related multimedia products of similar projects is provided.
- Screenshots are aligned with proper explanation of them.
- Similar projects are analysed with pros and cons to get the knowledge about the developing product.
|
- One item from the Excellent column is missing
|
- Two items from the Excellent column are missing
|
- Three items from the Excellent column are missing
|
There is an attempt of doing this section, however only one or none of the items in the Excellent column is met.
|
None found.
|
4
|
Storyboard 10%
|
- All requirement pages are designed.
- Right components are defined based on the coursework requirements.
- Components are outlined properly in the pages.
- The designs are professional looking and reflect the project requirements.
- Adequate information is provided to this section at all.
|
- One item from the Excellent column is missing
|
- Two items from the Excellent column are missing
|
- Three items from the Excellent column are missing
|
There is an attempt of doing this section, however only one or none of the items in the Excellent column is met.
|
None found.
|
5
|
Multimedia Products Design 20%
|
- All requirement items are designed.
- The designs are professional looking and reflect the project requirements.
They have the following features as well:
- Uses of all own images for the designing of the product.
- Create some composite images (collages or other) that make use of layers in Photoshop.
- Imaginative use of filters, feather selections, and other Photoshop edits.
|
- One item from the Excellent column is missing
|
- Two items from the Excellent column are missing
|
- Three items from the Excellent column are missing
|
There is an attempt of doing this section, however only one or none of the items in the Excellent column is met.
|
None found.
|
6
|
Final Product Design
20%
|
- An excellent representation of the designed multimedia products in the final product (website/slides) is provided.
- The webpages are well designed.
- An appropriate use of fonts, themes, slideshows, font animations, etc. considered.
- An excellent representation of the pages align with interactivity are
consideration.
|
- One item from the Excellent column is missing
|
- Two items from the Excellent column are missing
|
- Three items from the Excellent column are missing
|
There is an attempt of doing this section, however only one or none of the items in the Excellent column is met.
|
None found.
|
SN
|
Item
|
5 - Excellent
|
4 - Very Good
|
3 - Good
|
2 - Satisfactory
|
1 - Poor
|
0 - Very Poor
|
|
|
- Audio (voiceover or music or both) with the facility to turn sound on and
off in the interactive product. Some slides have been used to link to other relevant external web pages on the website.
|
|
|
|
|
|
7
|
Evaluation Report 10%
|
- An excellent approach of the testing is reported.
- Test cases are reported properly were appropriate.
- Product evaluation has by getting feedback from customers through questionnaire methods.
- Questions designed for survey are appropriate.
- A result analysis of conducted questionnaire is represented align with appropriate charts.
|
- One item from the Excellent column is missing
|
- Two items from the Excellent column are missing
|
- Three items from the Excellent column are missing
|
There is an attempt of doing this section, however only one or none of the items in the Excellent column is met.
|
None found.
|
8
|
Quality of the documentation 10%
|
- The report is well-organized.
- The documentation is well-formatted at all.
- Provided information in each section are clear and relevant.
- In-text citations are included where appropriate. In-text citations are in proper format of Harvard.
- References list included. Referenced are in Harvard format.
|
- One item from the Excellent column is missing
|
- Two items from the Excellent column are missing
|
- Three items from the Excellent column are missing
|
There is an attempt of doing this section, however only one or none of the items in the Excellent column is met.
|
None found.
|
