NAME: UDAY KUMAR BONALA (12183944)

NAME: UDAY KUMAR BONALA (12183944)

Author: Andrew Wilson & Lucie Rychetnik, 2022 Wednesday, July 13.

A Centre for Disease Prevention and Control lets work together to be clear on the problems it must solve.

https://preventioncentre.org.au/news/july-2022/ IMPROVE NATIVE HEALTH

PREVENTING CHRONIC DISEASE

PUBLIC HEALTH WORKFORCE

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2021.104311NAME: UDAY KUMAR BONALA (12183944)

Landscape and Urban PlanningIMPROVE MENTAL HEALTH

ECONOMIC BENEFITS

BIODIVERSITY

(Threlfall et al., 2022)

Threlfall, C.G., Gunn, L.D., Davern, M. and Kendal, D. (2022). Beyond the luxury effect: Individual and structural drivers lead to urban forest inequity in public street trees in Melbourne, Australia.Landscape and Urban Planning, 218, p.104311. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2021.104311.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2021.104311

PBHL 20006 Individual Assessment 1

Due: Thursday Week 5, 5:00pm

Weighting: 30%

From Week 2 to Week 5, you will be learning about the foundations of participatory research. Prior to attending each week's tutorial class, you will need to find and analyse one article (can be peer-reviewed e.g. journal article or non-peer-reviewed e.g. news article) related to this weeks topic. The following are examples of where you can access your weekly articles:

Public Health in your news feed

Croakey https://www.croakey.org/

The Prevention Centre https://preventioncentre.org.au/news/

The Conversation https://theconversation.com/au/topics/public-health-136

The Guardian https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/health

CQU Library https://www.cqu.edu.au/student-life/library

For this assessment, you will need to submit five short critiques (300 words each).

Four critiques will be related directly to the articles you find (i.e. one article for each week starting in Week 2). In addition to explaining your chosen article in relation to the week's topic, you will compare your article to one of your classmates articles as far as meaning.

The final critique summarises what the four critiques mean for you as a participatory health researcher.

You need to analyse a reference PRIOR to attending the tutorial class. Your critique is based on the tutorial class discussions. If you do not view the lecture and secure an article prior to attending the tutorial class, you will not be able to participate fully in discussions which may impede your ability to undertake the critique. Please post your Harvard reference of the article, haiku, and your name here:

Week 2: https://wakelet.com/i/invite?code=8eczezvaWeek 3 https://wakelet.com/i/invite?code=p6z6c0rp

Week 4: https://wakelet.com/i/invite?code=8e5pjuzj

Week 5: https://wakelet.com/i/invite?code=k85iofzv

Examples of Harvard Refencing

Surname, A 2020, Title of publication, Title of Journal, vol. 00, no. 0, pp. 1-10.

Cattell, V, Dines, N,Gesler, W & Curtis, S 2008, Mingling, observing, and lingering: Everyday public spaces and their implications for well-being and social relations,Health & Place,vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 544-561.

Bowles, N, 2020.In lockdown, a neighbourhoodopens up,The New York Times. 30 May.Available at:https://www.nytimes.com/2020/05/30/technology/bernal-heights.html(Accessed 5 June 2020).Haiku

A Haiku is a Japanese form of short poetry. It typically has three sentences with a total of 17 syllables. Syllables are the sound of words. For example, Syllable has three syllables. Hello has two syllables. Play has one syllable. A haiku will help you distil the importance of your readings, narrowing concepts into a digestible sentence. Try your name, how many syllables does your name have? If you are still unsure https://syllablecounter.net/Warm up

Write 6 adjectives related to the topic

Write 6 nouns related to the topic

Write 6 verbs related to the topic

Write 6 concepts related to the topic

Write a haiku poem related to public health.

TITLE Line 1 (5 syllables) Line 2 (7 syllables) Line 3 (5 syllables) Example

PANDEMIC

Very infectious

Physical distance, wash hands

Still unknown the cure

FORMAT FOR EACH WEEK (WEEK 2,3,4,5)

Harvard reference article

Haiku

Critique

You need to write a short critique of each of your tutorial class discussions. A critique is a detailed analysis of something. This means you cannot simply describe the discussion. You need to think about the discussion and write a concise, coherent interrogation of the discussion. For example, these are some questions you should answer.

How does your haiku reflect this weeks topic?

How does your haiku compare to someone elses haiku as far as meaning?

What do the discussed articles mean for the future of public health research?

Now write your critique. It should be approximately 300 words (excluding references).

FIFTH CRITIQUE

Review your four critiques and the various articles you have read. What have you learned in relation to participatory health research?

Justify taking a participatory health approach to public health research

Discuss the challenges associated with taking a participatory approach to public health research

Write your reflection. It should be approximately 300 words (excluding references).

Write a haiku poem about your reflection.

TITLE Line 1 (5 syllables) Line 2 (7 syllables) Line 3 (5 syllables) Criteria Critique Week 2,3,4,5

Mark HD (5.0-4.3) D (4.2-3.8) C (3.7-3.3) P (3.2-2.5) F (2.4-0)

Critique of content Methodically discriminates information substantiated by robust evidence. Identifies and rectifies logical flaws. Viewpoints of experts are questioned analytically. Critically synthesises and evaluates information and identifies gaps in knowledge to develop a comprehensive critical analysis: a distinct originality of thought. Discriminates information substantiated by robust evidence. Identifies and rectifies logical flaws. Information is taken from source(s) with excellent interpretation to develop a comprehensive critical analysis. Viewpoints of experts are questioned analytically. Uses information substantiated by robust evidence. Identifies logical flaws.

Information is taken from source(s) with appropriate interpretation to develop a comprehensive critical analysis. Uses information substantiated by evidence. Information is taken from source(s) with appropriate interpretation to develop a critical analysis. Often confuses personal opinion with information substantiated by evidence. Information is taken from source with some interpretation but not enough to develop a coherent analysis or synthesis

Criteria Summary Critique

Mark HD (10.0-8.5) D (8.4-7.5) C (7.4-6.5) P (6.4-5.0) F (4.9-0)

Justification of Participatory Health Research (PHR) Reflexively analyses learning to consistently, clearly, succinctly and expertly justify PHR. Organises and synthesises evidence to reveal insightful patterns about the challenges associate with a participatory approach. Reflectively analyses learning to consistently, clearly and expertly justify PHR. Organises and synthesises evidence to reveal patterns about the challenges associate with a participatory approach. Analyses learning to clearly and expertly justify PHR. Organises and synthesises complex evidence to reveal obvious patterns about the challenges associate with a participatory approach. Clearly justifies PHR and/or its challenges. Organises and synthesises some evidence to reveal some subtle patterns, differences or similarities. Rarely or does not clearly describe PHR without ambiguities. Unable or rarely able to organise and evidence.

EXAMPLE SUBMISSION

WEEK 2

Freed, J.S., Kwon, S.Y., El, H.J., Gottlieb, M. and Roth, R., 2020. Which Country is Truly Developed? COVID-19 has Answered the Question. Annals of global health, 86(1).

The infrastructure

Prevents and causes outbreaks

How soon will we learn?

Szreter (1999) highlights that deprivation, disease, and death only occur after disruption when there is an inadequate response. COVID-19, as a disruption, has shown where the most crucial shortcomings of the current public health system lie (Zhang et al. 2020). And this occurrence has come about before as Freed (2020) mentions, during the European Refugee Crisis. It highlighted that the so called developed countries lacked infrastructure or preparedness to deal with a pandemic.

I think this idea relates to Irenes haiku when she mentions lessons from the past. She talked about a chain of events that happened in regard to the public health act of 1848. Chadwick warned of cholera outbreak because of water/sewage impurities (Hassan 1985). As the Public Health Act of 1848 came too late to stop the outbreak of Cholera in 19th century Britain, so has the response to the COVID 19 pandemic on a national and international global public health scale. Cholera, the refugee crisis, and now COVID-19 can serve as lessons from the past to ideally inform future planning, policy, and action.

It seems historically and now presently, queries into the strength of our public health infrastructures are made only after a disruption (i.e. pandemic, outbreak, etc.) when in reality, measures should be taken routinely to assess weaknesses with or without a global pandemic in the backdrop. This requires a perspective shift, from what are we trying to solve? to what are trying to prevent? While both questions are relevant and necessary in assessing public health, I think the real issue, stemming historically and presently, is how do we compensate for both?

References

Freed, J.S., Kwon, S.Y., El, H.J., Gottlieb, M. & Roth, R., 2020. Which country is truly developed? COVID-19 has answered the question. Annals of Global Health, 86(1), 51.

Hassan, J.A., 1985. The growth and impact of the British water industry in the 19th century. Economic History Review 38, pp. 531-547.

Zhang S., Wang Y., Rauch A., & Wei F., 2020. Unprecedented disruption of lives and work: Health, distress, and life satisfaction of working adults in China one month into the COVID-19 outbreak. Psychiatry Research 288, 112958.