diff_months: 10

Network Design and Monitoring: Virtual Environment Implementation and Help Desk Analysis

Download Solution Now
Added on: 2024-12-22 22:00:20
Order Code: SA Student Sushant IT Computer Science Assignment(10_22_30034_732)
Question Task Id: 472541
  • Subject Code :

    BIT233

BIT233: Network Design

Assignment 2 (30%)

Total 20 Marks

Due Date: Week 12

Assignment Overview

For this assignment you will observe network performance, restrictions with a production network monitor. In a virtual environment with at least 3 virtual machines including a networking monitor software. Implement and demonstrate five (5) network monitoring features. Marks will be awarded based on the sophistication and the difficulties the demonstration explored.

Your task is to complete and make a 3-6 page report on the following:

  1. Download and install a Hypervisor with Virtual Machines and legally available Network Monitor (e.g. Nagios or Zabbix or Spiceworks).
  2. Demonstrate (narration of your actions recorded by video) five (5) tasks the software can perform. (3x5 = 15 Marks)
  3. Implement a Help Desk (e.g. OTRS). Demonstrate three (3) tasks with the software. (3x3 = 9 Marks)
  4. Summarize your findings. (6 Marks)
  5. Present the results in report. (15 + 9 + 6 = 20)

You may use any of the legally available software. Additional marks may be gain by using advance techniques not taught in the laboratories. The following are suggested:

  • Zabbix http://www.zabbix.com/download
  • Nagios (nagios.org) (you will need to install agents)
  • Spiceworks (Windows only, put in the computer name instead of IP address)
  • Pandora
  • Any Linux Distribution (distrowatch.com)

The following resources may be of use:

  • Textbooks
  • Youtube Videos: CBT Nuggets, HakTip, SeurityTube

Plagiarism

All used sources must be properly acknowledged with references and citations, if you did not create it. Quotations and paraphrasing are allowed but the sources must be acknowledged. Failure to do so is regarded as plagiarism and the minimum penalty for plagiarism is failure for the assignment. The act of given your assignment to another student is classified as a plagiarism offence. Copying large chucks and supplying a reference will result in zero marks as you have not contributed to the report. Copying from Youtube or other videos is also plagiarism (including transcripts). Citation in a video can be included as credits at the end.

ASSESSMENT OVERVIEW AND FEEDBACK SUMMARY

All assessments (except for final examination) and feedback are provided via the MOODLE site and in classes.

Assessment Tasks:

Due Date

Subject Learning Outcomes

Course Learning Outcomes

MP Graduate Attributes

Weight

(%)

Comments

Test

Week 4 (see MOODLE for exact times)

a

1,2,3

A, B, C

10%

Individual

Assignment 1

Week 8 (see MOODLE for exact times)

c, d.

1,2,3

A, B, C

20%

Individual

Assignment 2

Week 12 (see MOODLE for exact times)

c, d.

1,2,3

A, B, C

30%

Individual

Exam

End of Semester

a, b, c, d.

1,2,3

A, B, C

40%

Individual

Due Date & Submission

The report is due in week 12. Please see MOODLE for the exact times.

By the due date, you must submit:

  1. Name your file with your student number and name.
  2. Upload to MOODLE
  3. Fail to submit will result in a fail.


Late submission of assignments will be penalised as follows:

  • For assignments 1 to 5 days late, a penalty of 10% (of total available marks) per day.
  • For assignments more than 5 days late, a penalty of 100% will apply.

Your submission must be compatible with the software (PDF/Word) in Melbourne Polytechnic, Computer Laboratories/Classrooms.

Extensions:Under normal circumstances extensions will not be granted. In case of extenuating circumstancessuch as illnessa Special Consideration form, accompanied by supporting documentation, must be received before 3 working days from the due date. If granted,an extension will be only granted only by the time period stated on the documentation; that is, if the illness medical certificate was for one day, an extension will be granted for one day only.Accordingly the student must submit within that time limit.

Penalties may apply for late submission without an approved extension.

Penalties:Academic misconduct such ascheatingandplagiarismincur penalties ranging from a zero result to program exclusion.

Marking criteria:

Marks are allocated as indicated on each question, taking the following aspects into account:

Aspects

Description

Analysis (if appropriate)

Investigation, comparison, discussion

Explanation/justification

Description/answer to the question

Presentation

Inadequate structure, careless presentation, poor writing

Reference style

Proper referencing if required

Plagiarism

Copy from another student, copy from internet source/textbook, copy from other sources without proper acknowledgement

Marking Rubric for Exercise Answers

Grade

Mark

HD

80%+

D

70%-79%

CR

60%-69%

P

50%-59%

Fail

< 50>

Excellent

Very Good

Good

Satisfactory

Unsatisfactory

Analysis

Logic is clear and easy to follow with strong arguments

Consistency logical and convincing

Mostly consistent and convincing

Adequate cohesion and conviction

Argument is confused and disjointed

Effort/Difficulties/

Challenges

The presented solution demonstrated an extreme degree of difficulty that would require an expert to implement.

The presented solution demonstrated a high degree of difficulty that would be an advance professional to implement.

The presented solution demonstrated an average degree of difficulty that would be an average professional to implement.

The presented solution demonstrated a low degree of difficulty that would be easy to implement.

The presented solution demonstrated a poor degree of difficulty that would be too easy to implement.

Explanation/

justification

All elements are present and well-integrated.

Components present with good cohesion

Components present and mostly well integrated

Most components present

Lacks structure.

Reference style

Clear styles with excellent source of references.

Clear referencing/ style

Generally good referencing/style

Unclear referencing/style

Lacks consistency with many errors

Presentation

Proper writing. Professionally presented

Properly spoken, with some minor deficiencies

Mostly good, but some structure or presentation problems

Acceptable presentation

Poor structure, careless presentation

  • Uploaded By : Nivesh
  • Posted on : December 22nd, 2024
  • Downloads : 0
  • Views : 183

Download Solution Now

Can't find what you're looking for?

Whatsapp Tap to ChatGet instant assistance

Choose a Plan

Premium

80 USD
  • All in Gold, plus:
  • 30-minute live one-to-one session with an expert
    • Understanding Marking Rubric
    • Understanding task requirements
    • Structuring & Formatting
    • Referencing & Citing
Most
Popular

Gold

30 50 USD
  • Get the Full Used Solution
    (Solution is already submitted and 100% plagiarised.
    Can only be used for reference purposes)
Save 33%

Silver

20 USD
  • Journals
  • Peer-Reviewed Articles
  • Books
  • Various other Data Sources – ProQuest, Informit, Scopus, Academic Search Complete, EBSCO, Exerpta Medica Database, and more