NG3S424 Aviation maintenance resource and planning management
- Subject Code :
NG3S424
- University :
Other Exam Question Bank is not sponsored or endorsed by this college or university.
- Country :
Malaysia
Assessment Cover Sheet and Feedback Form 2022-23
Module Code: NG3S424 |
Module Title: Aviation maintenance resource and planning management |
Module Team: Martin Sims |
|
Assessment Title and Tasks: Report 1 |
Assessment No. 1 |
||
Date Set: 28-Feb-23
|
Submission Date: 26-Mar-23
|
Return Date: 26-Apr-23
|
|
IT IS YOUR RESPONSIBILITY TO KEEP RECORDS OF ALL WORK SUBMITTED
Marking and Assessment |
This assignment will be marked out of 100% This assignment contributes to 50% of the total module marks.
|
Learning Outcomes to be assessed (as specified in the validated module descriptor https://icis.southwales.ac.uk/ ): 1. Critically evaluate the internal and external management issues that impact aircraft maintenance. 2. Demonstrate a critical understanding of the methods employed to manage resources and assist in maintenance scheduling. |
Provisional mark only: subject to change and / or confirmation by the Assessment Board |
Scenario:
Your team works for an MRO that has an operation of a fleet of 5 aircraft consisting of two aircraft from different manufacturers of type A and 3 aircraft of type B operating routes in Northern Europe and based in the UK, the organization is also planning to start a daily flight from CWL(ICAO) to HEAT(ICAO)
As individuals research the topics below, individually creating an outline draft report approx. 1500 words, then working as a team integrate your findings into a single group presentation.
Task 1:
Research and critically evaluate at least 3 software packages that could be utilised to support maintenance planning.
(30 Marks)
Task 2:
From the above list, select one package, giving an overview of how it could support and optimize maintenance planning in your organisation.
(20 Marks)
Task 3:
Can one of these software packages be expanded to operate in other area of the MRO to improve efficiency, what would be the benefits to the organisation?
(30 Marks)
Additional Information
- Presentation time approx. 20 mins
- Submit each group members draft report on Turnitin
- A copy of the presentation (one per group) must be submitted on Blackboard before your presentation slot
- Presentation slots will be allocated.
- Distance Learning Groups you can either deliver live online/ in the classroom or create a self-running PowerPoint.
100 80 % |
70 79 % |
60 69 % |
50 59 % |
40 49 % |
35 39 % FAIL |
0 34 % FAIL |
|
Task 1 (30 Marks) |
Critical insightful evaluation and synthesis of issues and material which includes an original and reflective approach |
Critical evaluation and synthesis of issues and material which includes original and reflective thinking |
Critical evaluation and synthesis of issues and material |
Accurate description of main issues and material, with some critical evaluation |
Limited evaluation and description of main issues and material |
Omission of some relevant material |
Insufficient and largely irrelevant material |
Task 2 (20 Marks) |
Critical insightful evaluation and synthesis of issues and material which includes an original and reflective approach |
Critical evaluation and synthesis of issues and material which includes original and reflective thinking |
Critical evaluation and synthesis of issues and material |
Accurate description of main issues and material, with some critical evaluation |
Limited evaluation and description of main issues and material |
Omission of some relevant material |
Insufficient and largely irrelevant material |
Task 3 (30 Marks) |
Critical insightful evaluation and synthesis of issues and material which includes an original and reflective approach |
Critical evaluation and synthesis of issues and material which includes original and reflective thinking |
Critical evaluation and synthesis of issues and material |
Accurate description of main issues and material, with some critical evaluation |
Limited evaluation and description of main issues and material |
Omission of some relevant material |
Insufficient and largely irrelevant material |
Referencing (10 Marks) |
Outstanding referencing and bibliography |
Excellent referencing and bibliography |
Comprehensive referencing and bibliography |
Adequate referencing and bibliography |
Limited referencing and bibliography |
Inadequate referencing and bibliography |
Little or no referencing and bibliography |
Presentation Individuals Score (10 Marks) |
Presentation is well structured, imaginative and engaging. Audibility and pace are appropriate to audience and used with good effect to enhance the presentation |
Presentation is well structured and engaging. Audibility and pace are appropriate to audience. |
Clearly structured and addressed to audience. Pace and audibility are good. |
Presentation has a sound structure. Pace and audibility are satisfactory most of the time. |
Pace, audibility and/or structure of presentation are adequate but limited. |
Delivery is disorganised and/or pace and audibility is poor. |
Presentation is not understandable and/or inaudible and/or not an oral presentation. |
