NRS274 Assessment item 2 GUIDE

NRS274 Assessment item 2 GUIDE

Please refer directly to your Subject Outline when completing this task. Any inconsistency between the guide and the Subject Outline, the Subject Outline should be seen as true and correct.

Assessment item 2

Value: 60%

Due Date: 15-May-2024

Return Date: 06-Jun-2024

Length: 2200 words (There is a +/- 10% word count allowance).

Group Assessment: No

Submission method options: Turnitin assignment portal

7-Day Automatic Extension availability: Yes

This assessment task asks you to integrate the feedback received from Health Challenge Essay 1 to address the following health challenges and associated questions.

For each of the following health challenges, address the following:

Provide a brief explanation of the health challenge.

Explain the underlying pathophysiology that results in one (1) of the abnormal assessment findings in the context of the health challenge.

Explain one (1) example of evidence-based nursing care that could be applied to prevent and/or manage the health challenge.

Identify and explain one (1) example of collaborative care that could be applied to prevent and/or manage the health challenge.

Gastrointestinal health challenge: Mild diverticulitis.

Abnormal assessment findings (select one (1)):

Abdominal distension.

Nausea and vomiting.

Cramping pain in the left lower quadrant of abdomen.

Haematological health challenge: Lower limb deep vein thrombosis (DVT) in a post-operative patient.

Abnormal assessment findings (select one (1)):

Calf pain.

Oedema of the affected extremity

Cyanosis of the affected extremity.

Musculoskeletal health challenge: Hip fracture post fall, in an elderly patient.

Abnormal assessment findings (select one (1)):

Shortened and externally rotated limb.

Blood pressure 87/50 mm Hg.

Muscular spasms.

Renal health challenge: Urinary calculi

Abnormal assessment findings (select one (1)) :

Haematuria.

Flank pain.

This assessment item must be presented as a scholarly paper and include an introduction, body, conclusion, supporting research evidence in-text, and a reference list. A minimum of 10 sources should be integrated to support the discussion. It is strongly recommended that subheadings are used to organise the paper.

Guide:

If you are providing an introduction (optional), please limit the words to approximately 100 words.

Example:

This paper will provide an explanation of a number of health challenges relating to the respiratory, cardiovascular, musculoskeletal and endocrine systems. The underlying pathophysiology of one abnormal assessment finding that may exist for each health challenge is then explained. One example of evidence-based nursing care and one example of collaborative care are then explained within the context of the health challenge.

Gastrointestinal health challenge: Mild diverticulitis

Provide a brief explanation of the health challenge (100 words).

Example:

Mild diverticulitis is a condition that affects the _________ and occurs when there is _______ of the _________. In this health challenge the _________affected and there will be formation of _________ (Reference).

Explain the underlying pathophysiology that results in one (1) of the abnormal assessment findings in the context of the health challenge. (250 words)

Example:

Patients with mild diverticulitis would experience_________ in_________. This abnormal assessment finding is related to _________of the muscles. The_________ of the affected muscles will lead to_________ (Reference). This will result in _______ and the patient experiences_______ (Reference).

Explain one (1) example of evidence-based nursing care that could be applied to prevent and/or manage the health challenge. (100 words)

Example:

One example of evidence-based nursing care that could be applied to manage mild diverticulitis is supported by (Reference) and involves ensuring that the patient is_______. This is further supported by (Reference) and explains that this promotes_______ provided in the form of _______. This intervention is within the scope of_______ and this nursing care would ensure that the patient is provided with _______to manage the health challenge (Reference).

Identify and explain one (1) example of collaborative care that could be applied to prevent and/or manage the health challenge. (100 words)

Example:

One example of collaborative care that could be applied to manage the health challenge is the involvement of a _______ (Reference). Collaboration with a _______will help manage this health challenge by _______ This collaboration would support the_______ of the gastrointestinal tract by providing _______to the patient (Reference).

Haematological health challenge: Lower limb deep vein thrombosis (DVT) in a post-operative patient.

Provide a brief explanation of the health challenge. (100 words)

Explain the underlying pathophysiology that results in one (1) of the abnormal assessment findings in the context of the health challenge. (250 words)

Explain one (1) example of evidence-based nursing care that could be applied to prevent and/or manage the health challenge. (100 words)

Identify and explain one (1) example of collaborative care that could be applied to prevent and/or manage the health challenge. (100 words)

Musculoskeletal health challenge: Hip fracture post fall, in an elderly patient

Provide a brief explanation of the health challenge. (100 words)

Explain the underlying pathophysiology that results in one (1) of the abnormal assessment findings in the context of the health challenge. (250 words)

Explain one (1) example of evidence-based nursing care that could be applied to prevent and/or manage the health challenge. (100 words)

Identify and explain one (1) example of collaborative care that could be applied to prevent and/or manage the health challenge. (100 words)

Renal health challenge: Urinary calculi

Provide a brief explanation of the health challenge. (100 words)

Explain the underlying pathophysiology that results in one (1) of the abnormal assessment findings in the context of the health challenge. (250 words)

Explain one (1) example of evidence-based nursing care that could be applied to prevent and/or manage the health challenge. (100 words)

Identify and explain one (1) example of collaborative care that could be applied to prevent and/or manage the health challenge. (100 words)

If you are providing a conclusion (optional), please limit the words to approximately 100 words.

Reference List (not included in the word count, start on a new page)

Provide credible references both in-text, and the reference list. The in-text references (Smith et al., 2021) contribute to the word count, but your Reference List at the end of the work does not. Generally, every idea you present in the work needs to be supported by a reference. If all the ideas are presented consecutively and are from the same source, then you could put the reference at the end of the paragraph or the end of that section. Everything we say has to be backed up by a source of information, always acknowledge the source of information. Use prescribed textbooks and other scholarly literature like peer-reviewed journals.

A minimum of 10 sources should be integrated to support the assessment. This refers to 10 different sources. You would expect that each source is used more than once, usually. So you need 10 different sources listed in the Reference List, but we would expect many more than 10 episodes of in-text referencing. These can be text books, journal articles and other high-quality sources of information. Websites would usually not be acknowledged as they are either not peer-reviewed or are not scrutinised at the same level as our primary sources of information or texts. The Readings List tab is a great place to start when building your literature to support the task.

The references must be within 5 years for textbooks and within 7-10 years for journal articles.

Remember to follow the presentation guidelines:

Leave 2 cm margins and double line space your work; Use 12pt font, unless otherwise indicated; Number all pages; No use of colour. That is for a Word document, use black font unless otherwise directed; Insert student name and number in header or footer of every page of every assignment;

Include a title page that includes the subject name and code, title of the assessment task, due date, lecturers name, students name, and students number.

Subheadings can be used to organise your paper; The reference list is begun on a new page; Minimise the use of direct quotes and paraphrase instead; Where a source is quoted, please use quotation marks, and include the page number in the in-text reference.

Write in the third person; avoid the use of I, we, our etc.

Scholarly papers, reports, or other similar assessment items must be word processed (must be submitted as a Microsoft Word document) and not handwritten or submitted in any other format (e.g. pdf or PAGES files are not acceptable).

Abbreviations should always be written out in full in the first use of the word.

Correct and consistent referencing is an important component of producing professional and credible academic work. Marks will be awarded for high quality referencing.

Please refer to the following text for information on how to reference your paper:

American Psychological Association (APA). (2020). Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association (7th ed.). Washington DC: APA.

You may also access CSUs Academic Referencing Tool (ART) which provides detailed referencing examples for the referencing style - APA 7. This resource can be accessed athttps://apps.csu.edu.au/reftool/apa-7Examples of sources which are not academic and not suitable as resources include blogs, magazines, newsletters, Better Health Channel, Wikipedia and commercial websites (e.g. with .com or .co included in the web link).

Text-matching

TURNITIN is a plagiarism checking service which checks the assessment for unoriginal content and improper citation. In the School of Nursing, Paramedicine and Healthcare Sciences, students have the option to submit their work for checking, prior to submitting their task for marking.

Students can access the portal for their draft assessment here-https://www.csu.edu.au/current-students/learning-resources/information-planning/assignments/plagiarism-checkingAll written assessment tasks in the School of Nursing, Paramedicine and Healthcare Sciences are submitted for marking through TURNITIN, unless stated otherwise in the Subject Outline. The TURNITIN portal for submission of your assessment is located in the subject Interact2 site and is separate from the link listed above.

__________________________________________________

Criteria High Distinction

(85-100%) Distinction

(75-84.5%) Credit

(65-74.5%) Pass

(50-64.5%) Fail

(0-49.5%) Mark

Provide an explanation of the health challenge.

Gastrointestinal health challenge The student has assessed the health challenge.

The assessment contains no errors.

4.5-5 marks The student has examined the health challenge.

The examination contains no errors.

4 marks The student has explained the health challenge.

The explanation has no errors or inaccuracies.

3.5 marks The student has explained the health challenge.

The explanation has 1 or 2 minor errors.

2.5-3 marks The student has not provided a brief explanation of the health challenge

Or

The explanation contains significant errors or inaccuracies.

0-2.4 marks /5

Provide an explanation of the health challenge.

Haematological health challenge. The student has assessed the health challenge.

The assessment contains no errors.

4.5-5 marks The student has examined the health challenge.

The examination contains no errors.

4 marks The student has explained the health challenge.

The explanation has no errors or inaccuracies.

3.5 marks The student has explained the health challenge.

The explanation has 1 or 2 minor errors.

2.5- 3 marks The student has not provided a brief explanation of the health challenge Or

The explanation contains significant errors or inaccuracies.

0-2.4 marks /5

Provide an explanation of the health challenge.

Musculoskeletal health challenge The student has assessed the health challenge.

The assessment contains no errors.

4.5-5 marks The student has examined the health challenge.

The examination contains no errors.

4 marks The student has explained the health challenge.

The explanation has no errors or inaccuracies.

3.5 marks The student has explained the health challenge.

The explanation has 1 or 2 minor errors.

2.5-3 marks The student has not provided a brief explanation of the health challenge

Or

The explanation contains significant errors or inaccuracies. 0-2.4 marks /5

Provide an explanation of the health challenge.

Renal health challenge. The student has assessed the health challenge.

The assessment contains no errors.

4.5-5 marks The student has examined the health challenge.

The examination contains no errors.

4 marks The student has briefly explained the health challenge.

The explanation has no errors or inaccuracies.

3.5 marks The student has briefly explained the health challenge.

The explanation has 1 or 2 minor errors.

2.5-3 marks The student has not provided a brief explanation of the health challenge

Or

The explanation contains significant errors or inaccuracies. 0-2.4 marks /5

Explain the underlying pathophysiology that results in one (1) of the abnormal assessment findings in the context of the health challenge.

Gastrointestinal health challenge. The student has assessed the underlying pathophysiology that results in the abnormal assessment finding in the context of the health challenge.

The assessment contains no errors or inaccuracies.

4.5-5 marks The student has examined the underlying pathophysiology that results in the abnormal assessment finding in the context of the health challenge.

The examination contains no errors or inaccuracies.

4 marks The student has explained the underlying pathophysiology that results in the abnormal assessment finding in the context of the health challenge.

The explanation has no errors or inaccuracies.

3.5 marks The student has explained the underlying pathophysiology that results in the abnormal assessment findings in the context of the health challenge.

The explanation has 1 or 2 minor errors.

2.5-3 marks The student has not explained the underlying pathophysiologyOr

The explanation does not consider the specific health challenge

Or

The discussion contains multiple errors and inaccuracies that do not demonstrate the students ability to explain the related pathophysiology.

0-2.4 marks /5

Explain the underlying pathophysiology that results in one (1) of the abnormal assessment findings in the context of the health challenge.

Haematological health challenge. The student has assessed the underlying pathophysiology that results in the abnormal assessment finding in the context of the health challenge.

The assessment contains no errors or inaccuracies.

4.5-5 marks The student has examined the underlying pathophysiology that results in the abnormal assessment finding in the context of the health challenge.

The examination contains no errors or inaccuracies.

4 marks The student has explained the underlying pathophysiology that results in the abnormal assessment finding in the context of the health challenge.

The explanation has no errors or inaccuracies.

3.5 marks The student has explained the underlying pathophysiology that results in the abnormal assessment findings in the context of the health challenge.

The explanation has 1 or 2 minor errors.

2.5-3 marks The student has not explained the underlying pathophysiology Or

The explanation does not consider the specific health challenge

Or

The discussion contains multiple errors and inaccuracies that do not demonstrate the students ability to explain the related pathophysiology.

0-2.4 marks /5

Explain the underlying pathophysiology that results in one (1) of the abnormal assessment findings in the context of the health challenge.

Musculoskeletal health challenge. The student has assessed the underlying pathophysiology that results in the abnormal assessment finding in the context of the health challenge.

The assessment contains no errors or inaccuracies.

4.5-5 marks The student has examined the underlying pathophysiology that results in the abnormal assessment finding in the context of the health challenge.

The examination contains no errors or inaccuracies.

4 marks The student has explained the underlying pathophysiology that results in the abnormal assessment finding in the context of the health challenge.

The explanation has no errors or inaccuracies.

3.5 marks The student has explained the underlying pathophysiology that results in the abnormal assessment findings in the context of the health challenge.

The explanation has 1 or 2 minor errors.

2.5-3 marks The student has not explained the underlying pathophysiology

Or

The explanation does not consider the specific health challenge

Or

The discussion contains multiple errors and inaccuracies that do not demonstrate the students ability to explain the related pathophysiology.

0-2.4 marks /5

Explain the underlying pathophysiology that results in one (1) of the abnormal assessment findings in the context of the health challenge.

Renal health challenge. The student has assessed the underlying pathophysiology that results in the abnormal assessment finding in the context of the health challenge.

The assessment contains no errors or inaccuracies.

4.5-5 marks The student has examined the underlying pathophysiology that results in the abnormal assessment finding in the context of the health challenge.

The examination contains no errors or inaccuracies.

4 marks The student has explained the underlying pathophysiology that results in the abnormal assessment finding in the context of the health challenge.

The explanation has no errors or inaccuracies.

3.5 marks The student has explained the underlying pathophysiology that results in the abnormal assessment findings in the context of the health challenge.

The explanation has 1 or 2 minor errors.

2.5- 3 marks The student has not explained the underlying pathophysiology Or

The explanation does not consider the specific health challenge

Or

The discussion contains multiple errors and inaccuracies that do not demonstrate the students ability to explain the related pathophysiology.

0-2.4 marks /5

Explain one (1) example of evidence-based nursing care that could be applied to prevent and/or manage the health challenge.

Gastrointestinal health challenge. The student has assessed one (1) example of evidence-based nursing care that could be applied to prevent and/or manage the health challenge.

The example is within the scope of practice of a Registered Nurse.

The assessment contains no errors or inaccuracies.

4.5-5 marks The student has examined one (1) example of evidence-based nursing care that could be applied prevent and/or manage the health challenge.

The example is within the scope of practice of a Registered Nurse.

The examination contains no errors or inaccuracies.

4 marks The student has explained one (1) example of evidence-based nursing care that could be applied to prevent and/or manage the health challenge.

The example is within the scope of practice of a Registered Nurse.

The explanation has no errors or inaccuracies.

3.5 marks The student has explained one (1) example of evidence-based nursing care that could be applied to prevent and/or manage the health challenge.

The example is within the scope of practice of a Registered Nurse.

The explanation has 1 or 2 minor errors.

2.5-3 marks The student has not explained one (1) example of nursing care that could be applied to prevent and/or manage the health challenge and promote wound healing Or

Evidence has not been incorporated to demonstrate the nursing care is evidence-based Or

There is no clear link between the nursing care and the health challengeOr

The care explained is not within the scope of practice of a Registered Nurse.

0-2.4 marks /5

Explain one (1) example of evidence-based nursing care that could be applied to prevent and/or manage the health challenge.

Haematological health challenge. The student has assessed one (1) example of evidence-based nursing care that could be applied to prevent and/or manage the health challenge.

The example is within the scope of practice of a Registered Nurse.

The assessment contains no errors or inaccuracies.

4.5-5 marks The student has examined one (1) example of evidence-based nursing care that could be applied prevent and/or manage the health challenge.

The example is within the scope of practice of a Registered Nurse.

The examination contains no errors or inaccuracies.

4 marks The student has explained one (1) example of evidence-based nursing care that could be applied to prevent and/or manage the health challenge.

The example is within the scope of practice of a Registered Nurse.

The explanation has no errors or inaccuracies.

3.5 marks The student has explained one (1) example of evidence-based nursing care that could be applied to prevent and/or manage the health challenge.

The example is within the scope of practice of a Registered Nurse.

The explanation has 1 or 2 minor errors.

2.5-3 marks The student has not explained one (1) example of nursing care that could be applied to prevent and/or manage the health challenge and promote wound healing Or

Evidence has not been incorporated to demonstrate the nursing care is evidence-based Or

There is no clear link between the nursing care and the health challengeOr

The care explained is not within the scope of practice of a Registered Nurse.

0-2.4 marks /5

Explain one (1) example of evidence-based nursing care that could be applied to prevent and/or manage the health challenge.

Musculoskeletal health challenge. The student has assessed one (1) example of evidence-based nursing care that could be applied to prevent and/or manage the health challenge.

The example is within the scope of practice of a Registered Nurse

The assessment contains no errors or inaccuracies.

4.5-5 marks The student has examined one (1) example of evidence-based nursing care that could be applied prevent and/or manage the health challenge.

The example is within the scope of practice of a Registered Nurse.

The examination contains no errors or inaccuracies.

4 marks The student has explained one (1) example of evidence-based nursing care that could be applied to prevent and/or manage the health challenge.

The example is within the scope of practice of a Registered Nurse.

The explanation has no errors or inaccuracies.

3.5 marks The student has explained one (1) example of evidence-based nursing care that could be applied to prevent and/or manage the health challenge.

The example is within the scope of practice of a Registered Nurse.

The explanation has no errors or inaccuracies.

2.5-3 marks The student has not explained one (1) example of nursing care that could be applied to prevent and/or manage the health challenge and promote wound healing Or

Evidence has not been incorporated to demonstrate the nursing care is evidence-based Or

There is no clear link between the nursing care and the health challengeOr

The care explained is not within the scope of practice of a Registered Nurse.

0-2.4 marks /5

Explain one (1) example of evidence-based nursing care that could be applied to prevent and/or manage the health challenge.

Renal health challenge. The student has assessed one (1) example of evidence-based nursing care that could be applied to prevent and/or manage the health challenge.

The example is within the scope of practice of a Registered Nurse.

The assessment contains no errors or inaccuracies.

4.5-5 marks The student has examined one (1) example of evidence-based nursing care that could be applied prevent and/or manage the health challenge.

The example is within the scope of practice of a Registered Nurse.

The examination contains no errors or inaccuracies.

4 marks The student has explained one (1) example of evidence-based nursing care that could be applied to prevent and/or manage the health challenge.

The example is within the scope of practice of a Registered Nurse.

The explanation has no errors or inaccuracies.

3.5 marks The student has explained one (1) example of evidence-based nursing care that could be applied to prevent and/or manage the health challenge. The example is within the scope of practice of a Registered Nurse.

The explanation has 1 or 2 minor errors.

2.5-3 marks The student has not explained one (1) example of nursing care that could be applied to prevent and/or manage the health challenge and promote wound healing Or

Evidence has not been incorporated to demonstrate the nursing care is evidence-based Or

There is no clear link between the nursing care and the health challengeOr

The care explained is not within the scope of practice of a Registered Nurse.

0-2.4 marks /5

Identify and explain one (1) example of collaborative care that could be applied to prevent and/or manage the health challenge.

Gastrointestinal health challenge. The student has assessed one (1) example of evidence-based collaborative care that could be applied to prevent and/or manage the health challenge.

The assessment contains no errors or inaccuracies.

4.5-5 marks The student has examined one (1) example of evidence-based collaborative care that could be applied to prevent and/or manage the health challenge.

The examination contains no errors or inaccuracies.

4 marks The student has explained one (1) example of evidence-based collaborative care that could be applied to prevent and/or manage the health challenge.

The explanation has no errors or inaccuracies.

3.5 marks The student has explained one (1) example of evidence-based collaborative care that could be applied to prevent and/or manage the health challenge.

The explanation has 1 or 2 minor errors.

2.5-3 marks The student has not explained one (1) example of evidence-based collaborative care that could be applied to prevent and/or manage the health challenge. Or

There is no clear link between the collaboration and the health challenge.

0-2.4 marks /5

Identify and explain one (1) example of collaborative care that could be applied to prevent and/or manage the health challenge.

Haematological health challenge. The student has assessed one (1) example of evidence-based collaborative care that could be applied to prevent and/or manage the health challenge.

The assessment contains no errors or inaccuracies.

4.5-5 marks The student has examined one (1) example of evidence-based collaborative care that could be applied to prevent and/or manage the health challenge.

The examination contains no errors or inaccuracies.

4 marks The student has explained one (1) example of evidence-based collaborative care that could be applied to prevent and/or manage the health challenge.

The explanation has no errors or inaccuracies.

3 marks The student has explained one (1) example of evidence-based collaborative care that could be applied to prevent and/or manage the health challenge.

The explanation has 1 or 2 minor errors.

2.5-3 marks The student has not explained one (1) example of evidence-based collaborative care that could be applied to prevent and/or manage the health challenge. Or

There is no clear link between the collaboration and the health challenge.

0-2.4 marks /5

Identify and explain one (1) example of collaborative care that could be applied to prevent and/or manage the health challenge.

Musculoskeletal health challenge. The student has assessed one (1) example of evidence-based collaborative care that could be applied to prevent and/or manage the health challenge.

The assessment contains no errors or inaccuracies.

4.5-5 marks The student has examined one (1) example of evidence-based collaborative care that could be applied to prevent and/or manage the health challenge.

The examination contains no errors or inaccuracies.

4 marks The student has explained one (1) example of evidence-based collaborative care that could be applied to prevent and/or manage the health challenge.

The explanation has no errors or inaccuracies.

3.5 marks The student has explained one (1) example of evidence-based collaborative care that could be applied to prevent and/or manage the health challenge.

The explanation has 1 or 2 minor errors.

2.5-3 marks The student has not explained one (1) example of evidence-based collaborative care that could be applied to prevent and/or manage the health challenge. Or

There is no clear link between the collaboration and the health challenge.

0-2.4 marks /5

Identify and explain one (1) example of collaborative care that could be applied to prevent and/or manage the health challenge.

Renal health challenge. The student has assessed one (1) example of evidence-based collaborative care that could be applied to prevent and/or manage the health challenge.

The assessment contains no errors or inaccuracies.

4.5-5 marks The student has examined one (1) example of evidence-based collaborative care that could be applied to prevent and/or manage the health challenge.

The examination contains no errors or inaccuracies.

4 marks The student has explained one (1) example of evidence-based collaborative care that could be applied to prevent and/or manage the health challenge.

The explanation has no errors or inaccuracies.

3.5 marks The student has explained one (1) example of evidence-based collaborative care that could be applied to prevent and/or manage the health challenge.

The explanation has 1 or 2 minor errors.

2.5-3 marks The student has not explained one (1) example of evidence-based collaborative care that could be applied to prevent and/or manage the health challenge. Or

There is no clear link between the collaboration and the health challenge.

0-2.4 marks /5

Communicates Professionally (Academic writing and presentation). Language features and structures are used to convey meaning effectively, clearly, unambiguously, concisely, and in a formal academic style, with few spelling, grammatical, or punctuation errors.

Presentation guidelines have been followed.

8.5 10 marks Language features and structures are used to convey meaning effectively, clearly, unambiguously, and in a formal academic style, with occasional minor spelling, grammatical, or punctuation errors. Presentation guidelines have been followed.

7.5 8 marks The meaning is apparent to the reader, although the text contains minor errors in spelling, grammar, word choice, and/ or structure, and lacks clarity occasionally. Presentation guidelines have been followed.

6.5 7 marks The meaning is apparent to the reader, although the text contains many errors in spelling, grammar, word choice, and/ or structure, and lacks clarity occasionally. Presentation guidelines have been followed.

5-6 marks Presentation guidelines have not been followed with multiple errors.

Frequent, intrusive errors in spelling, grammar, punctuation, word choice and/or structure prevent the meaning from being apparent to the reader.

0 4.5 marks /10

Uses evidence to support and build knowledge in practice (Academic referencing). The assessment is supported by & related to a wide variety of peer reviewed references which include journal articles, professional manuals and documents, textbooks, and module readings.

Referencing is comprehensive, demonstrates academic integrity, and is error free for the APA 7th ed. style conventions.

8.5 10 marks The assessment is supported by & related to a variety of peer-reviewed references which include journal articles, professional manuals and documents, textbooks, and module readings.

Referencing is comprehensive, demonstrates academic integrity, and conforms to APA 7th ed. style conventions, with one or two errors. 7.5 8 marks The assessment is supported by more than 10 peer reviewed references from module readings, textbooks, and professional manuals and documents.

Referencing is comprehensive and mostly accurate according to APA 7th ed. style conventions.

Up to 3 minor errors or omissions in style and formatting choices have no impact on the transparency and traceability of the source, or the demonstration of academic integrity.

6.5 7 marks The assessment is supported by at least 10 peer reviewed references from module readings, textbooks, and professional manuals and documents.

Referencing is comprehensive and mostly accurate according to APA 7th ed. style conventions with few minor errors.

Up to 5 minor errors or omissions in style and formatting choices that have no impact on the transparency and traceability of the source, or the demonstration of academic integrity.

5-6 marks The assessment is supported by less than 10 peer reviewed references from module readings, textbooks, and professional manuals and documents, and/or no references are evident Referencing is not accurate according to APA 7th ed. style conventions. Errors or omissions in style and formatting choices have an impact on the transparency and traceability of the source, or the demonstration of academic integrity.

0-4.5 marks /10

Academic Integrity

Turnitin report indicates adherence to academic integrity principles and referencing conventions. Turnitin similarity report indicates a clear attempt has been made to adhere to academic integrity and referencing conventions and avoid plagiarism. It is evident that the student has taken steps to show respect for and acknowledge others work appropriately, as per the Charles Sturt Academic Integrity Policy https://policy.csu.edu.au/document/view-current.php?id=387SY Turnitin similarity report indicates the student has not adhered to the Academic Integrity Policy.

US SY/ US