NUR355 2024 Marking Rubric: AT2 Written Paper
NUR355 2024 Marking Rubric: AT2 Written Paper
Criteria High Distinction (80-100%) Distinction (70-79%) Credit (60-69%) Pass (50-59%) Fail (0-49%)
Criterion 1
Examines the impact the topic has on two different child developmental stages.
(15%) Comprehensively examines the impact the topic has on two child developmental stages, displaying exceptional knowledge of child development. Provides a detailed examination of the impact the topic has on two child developmental stages, displaying advanced knowledge of child development.
Provides an examination of the impact the topic has on two child developmental stages, displaying sound knowledge of child development.
Provides an overview of the impact the topic has on two child developmental stages, displaying knowledge of child development.
Impact of the topic on child development is poorly discussed and/or not related to identified developmental stages.
Limited knowledge of child development/ the topic and/or only refers to 1 stage of child development.
Criterion 2
Critiques an evidence informed intervention that supports the chosen topic, in one of the selected stages of child development.
(15%) Provides an exceptional and insightful critique of an appropriate evidence informed intervention that supports the chosen topic and is
explicitly relevant to the chosen developmental stage.
All aspects of discussion strongly supported by evidence from research and scholarly sources.
Provides a detailed critique of an appropriate evidence informed intervention that supports the chosen topic and is
highly relevant to the chosen developmental stage.
Discussion supported by evidence from research and scholarly sources.
Provides some critique of an appropriate evidence informed intervention that supports the chosen topic and is relevant to the chosen developmental stage.
References from scholarly sources support most of the discussion.
Provides a description of an appropriate evidence-informed intervention that is related to the chosen topic and is linked to the chosen developmental stage, although this may be limited.
Some use of references to support discussion.
Poor description of an evidence-informed intervention OR intervention not identified or not relevant to chosen topic. Very limited linkage of intervention to developmental stage OR intervention lacks relevance to developmental stage. Limited use of references to support discussion.
NUR355 2024 NSP2 AT2 Marking Rubric
Criterion 3
Adheres to academic writing principles
(10%) Demonstrates comprehensive, concise and insightful writing throughout with a logical and consistent structure. Writing is virtually free of errors in spelling, grammar, punctuation and/or terminology.
Accurately uses the SoN approved referencing style for in-text citations and reference list.
Demonstrates a high standard of writing throughout with minimal errors in spelling, grammar, punctuation and/or terminology, with a logical structure.
Accurately uses the SoN approved referencing style for in-text citations and reference list.
Maintains a sound standard of writing. The work may have some errors in spelling, grammar, punctuation and/or terminology.
Accurately uses the SoN approved
referencing style with minimal errors for intext citations and reference list.
Maintains a satisfactory standard of writing. The work has some errors in spelling, grammar, punctuation and/or terminology and this may affect the clarity of the writing.
Some errors in the referencing style for in-text citations and/or reference list
Information is not presented in a clear and succinct manner without logical flow. Multiple errors in spelling, grammar, punctuation and/or terminology which
affects the clarity of the writing and makes it difficult to read.
Incorrect referencing style and/or multiple errors in in-text citations and/or reference list
NUR355 2024 NSP2 AT2 Marking Rubric
