Part 1 Info and Summary.
Part 1 Info and Summary.
Introduction.
This essay is based on William Mattisons book called Introducing Moral Theology (2008), chapter 12 called Sin: Corruption of Human Happiness, specifically pages 235-239.
Sin in Christian and Catholic religion is very complex and conveys very profound philosophical meanings.
Throughout this essay, I will be examining the notion of Sin using a philosophical perspective, drawing from ideas and arguments that are demonstrated throughout the chosen text.
I have chosen this text as I am completing a Nursing degree, and acting in a sinful and selfish way is the opposite to how a nurse should deliver care.
Summary of Argument 1.
Mattisons text defines sin as a violation against reason, truth, and conscience, essentially manifesting from a misguided attachment to materialistic items.
This argument alludes to the idea that ultimate human happiness is supressed by prioritising those materialistic items over lifes fundamental necessities such as food, water, shelter etc, which eventually leads to a mislead idea of what is defined as a good life
Through demonstrating the idea of how society and people are interconnected, Mattisons text points out that when a person commits an act of wrongdoing, it creates a cascade affect leading to negative outcomes for how people operate and exist in society.
This is highlighted through Mattisons idea of although relatively harmless, the act of watching pornography will create mistrust in society and disrespect human worth.
Summary of Argument 2.
Mattisons text highlights the idea that sin is not only disrespecting moral rules and values, but it is also a direct wrongdoing against God and his plan.
This idea alludes to the fact that by committing sinful acts it shows a lack of trust in Gods guidance and love as humans choose to disregard the idea of what they believe God wants for them.
A main argument demonstrated throughout Mattisons text is how pride is known to be the root cause of sin.
It demonstrates a selfish way of existing by prioritising those materialistic items or mentality over what is really considered good.
Part 2A Your views.
Previous/current views on Argument 1.
My idea of sin was just based on the effect of individual moral wrongdoings, not how it also affects society.
I did not understand how what would usually be considered insignificant acts of sin, usually undermine human harmony.
Previous/current views on Argument 2.
I did not realise that sin was also an offence against God and his plan, rather it was just a negative impact on the individual.
I had not even considered how sin rejects gods knowledge and power.
Part 2B Impact on your beliefs.
How the argument in the chosen text affects my views on topic of Argument 1.
Mattisons text has opened my mind up to the notion of sin through highlighting its negative effects on society.
It has allowed me to deeply consider how ones choices can contribute to the societal component of sin.
How the argument in the chosen text affects my views on topic of Argument 2.
Through engaging with this text, it has allowed me to challenge my own opinions on sin, leading me to the realisation that it has such profound philosophical components.
It has also allowed me to recognise a newfound realisation of how pride and sin are closely related.
Part 2C Pursuit of Truth, Goodness, and Beauty.
Impact on pursuit of truth.
Mattisons text has allowed me to reflect deeper on the idea of moral beliefs and preconceived ideas.
It has allowed me to critically examine different philosophical ideas.
It has further enriched my own understanding of personal and collective truths.
Impact on pursuit of goodness.
This text has allowed me to reconsider my own current motivation to aim for the upmost moral integrity
It has inspired me to consider the idea of how individuals and the community must work together and treat one another with respect.
It has encouraged me to consider reflection on my own moral growth and ethical choices.
Impact on pursuit of beauty.
Mattisons reading has allowed for my own enhanced appreciation of philosophical ideas.
It has promoted my curiosity into the notion of moral and spiritual growth.
It has further deepened my understanding of the close connection between the ideas of truth, goodness, and beauty.
Information about this task
Type of assessment: individual
Length: 1500 words
Rationale: This task gives students the opportunity to demonstrate understanding of a basic philosophical or theological text on an area of their choice. They will consider how the ideas and arguments in this text confirm, deepen or challenge their own ideas about what is true, good, or beautiful, and how it potentially affects their own pursuit of human flourishing.
Task description:
Part 1 (approx. 300-400 words)
1. Choose a portion of text from one of the required weekly readings from weeks 2 10.
CORE1000, Semester One 2024
2. Identify and present the central argument or point of the text. This will include its key conclusion/s, and
the reasons, evidence or examples the author has used in support of them.
Part 2 (approx. 1100-1200 words)
Present your own previous (or current) beliefs on the particular topic being discussed.
Show how the chosen reading confirms, deepens or challenges your own position on this topic.
Does this task affect your own pursuit of truth, goodness, or beauty. Be sure to present reasons for your answer.
Students should refer to at least two other academic sources as part of their research to help understand concepts in the chosen article or chapter, explain other relevant concepts which are introduced or demonstrate wider reading. It is recommended (but not required) that they use for their other academic sources the supplementary readings provided on the CORE1000 course site on Blackboard.
