PresentationYou can choose the mode of your presentation; consider a format which relates to your own future discipline / profession. Audio-visual p

PresentationYou can choose the mode of your presentation; consider a format which relates to your own future discipline / profession. Audio-visual presentations should be10 minutes.Written packages should be1200 words. All presentations must include references within the document / presentation and in a Reference List.

Here are some examples:

A website (eg. usingHYPERLINK "https://www.wix.com/" t "_blank"Wixor similar)

A blog usingCSU Thinkspaceor another blogging platform

A newsletter (eg.HYPERLINK "https://sway.office.com/" t "_blank"Microsoft Sway)

A presentation using YouTube, Prezi or CSU replay

A podcast

A narrated PowerPoint

If you are more comfortable submitting a standard written EoI in the submission portal then that is completely acceptable. Contact your subject coordinator if you would like to check your format. More information is available in the Assessment 3 tab in the subject site.

If you choose to develop an EoI that is in a non-written format the text of your presentation must be included in the submission portal for this assessment (not as a link). Your work cannot be marked if this is not included as it is important for academic integrity.

Reference requirements

You must use a minimum of five (5) Required Readings from the IKC101 modules.

You must use at least two (2) reference sources in each of these sections. Use at least seven (7) reference sources in total. Your Reference List is not included in the word count but your in-text references are.

You must cite and reference two (2) additional sources. These sources can be from the Required Readings or ones that you have located yourself. These texts must be of academic standard, such as a journal article, textbook, or book chapter. Assess the quality of content in web sources very carefully. In general, website references are unlikely to provide reliable, researched information suitable for this task.

Do not reference informational sources such as Creative Spirits, Wikipedia, or Australians Together.

Assessable component HD

34 40 / 40 D

30 33 / 40 CR

26 29 / 40 P

20 25 / 40 F

0 19 / 40

Professional standpoint statement demonstrates ongoing self-reflection from the students baseline articulated in Tasks 1 & 2. The student has considered and clearly linked this reflection on their own positioning to their future profession.

10 marks

Examines and reflects on standpoint and progression from Assessment Items 1 & 2 to discuss influence on this emerging professional standpoint, and your potential contribution toYindyamarra Winhanganha.

Develops original ideas on how you could respond to these issues in your future professional setting.

Addresses ethical dimensions impacting on professional standpoint.

Research / sources are used to support your discussion. Examines standpoint and reflects on progression from Assessment Items 1 & 2 to discuss influence on this emerging professional standpoint, and your potential contribution toYindyamarra Winhanganha.

Research / sources are used to support your discussion. Discusses standpoint to describe progression from Assessment Items 1 & 2 to your current understandings.

Discusses some of the ways that your understandings link to your emerging professional standpoint and your potential contribution toYindyamarra Winhanganha.

Research / sources are used to support your discussion. Identifies progression from Assessment Items 1 & 2 to current understandings.

Makes links between these current understandings, your emerging professional standpoint, and your potential contribution toYindyamarra Winhanganha.

Research / sources are used to support your discussion. Limited to no evidence of self-reflection in relation to your standpoint or progression within the subject. Approach to the issue is in egocentric or socio-centric terms. Does not identify progression from Assessment Items 1 & 2. No links made between current understandings, emerging professional standpoint, and potential contribution toYindyamarra Winhanganha.

Research/sources cited are inappropriate and/orare not used to support the discussion.

Analyses how social, institutional, and historical factors influence understandings about cultural norms in the profession in which the selected organisation operates. Demonstrates understandings about these factors and relevant ethical issues to examine and apply to the discipline/profession.

12 marks

Applies reflection on standpoint to examine and analyse the impact of social, institutional, and historical factors in relation to the profession and Indigenous Australian experiences of Australian history, constructions of Indigenous Australians as divergent from and/or aligned with a dominant cultural norm, and how these factors construct in the profession in which the selected organisation operates.

Analyses how cultural norms are overtly and covertly evident in the profession and construct relevant ethical issues.

Demonstrates higher order critical thinking in the application of standpoint concerns citing research/sources to develop your analysis. Reflects on standpoint to analyse the impact of social, institutional, and historical factors in relation to the profession and Indigenous Australian experiences of Australian history, constructions of Indigenous Australians as divergent from and/or aligned with a dominant cultural norm, and how these factors present in the profession in which the selected organisation operates.

Analyses whether cultural norms are overtly evident in the profession and how these norms relate to relevant ethical issues.

Demonstrates critical thinking in the application of standpoint citing research/sources to support your analysis. Discusses the impact of social and historical factors on standpoint and positioning in relation to the profession and Indigenous Australian experiences of Australian history, constructions of Indigenous Australians as divergent from a dominant cultural norm, and describes how these factors are evident in the profession in which the selected organisation operates.

There is a clear discussion of institutional forces and relevant ethical issues.

Applies standpoint and cultural competence concerns citing research/sources to support your discussion. Describes the impact of social and/or historical factors on positioning within the profession in relation to Indigenous experiences of Australian history, constructions of Indigenous Australians as divergent from OR aligned with a dominant cultural norm, and identifies the factors evident in the profession in which the selected organisation operates.

There is broad discussion of institutional forces.

Applies reflection on cultural competence to discussion citing research/sources to support your ideas. Limited to no evidence of a discussion of the relationship between social, institutional, and/or historical forces on the profession. Does not consider how constructions of Indigenous Australians are divergent from and/or aligned with cultural norm/s. Does not identify factors evident in the profession in which the selected organisation operates.

Research/sources cited are inappropriate and/or are not used to support the discussion.

Demonstrated understanding of the history of Indigenous Australian input into institutionalised processes in the profession. Analyses the benefits of Indigenous contributions to the field.

10 marks

An integrated analysis which links principles to understandings of the historical impact of the extent of Indigenous Australian input on policy and approaches in Australian professions and industry.

This further links to an analysis of the benefits of Indigenous contributions to the profession in which your selected organisation operates.

Provides a critical framework for building partnerships with Indigenous communities to realise the goals of the project concerned.

Integrates research/sources into your analysis to support your contentions.

Principles identified are informed by a range of evidence.

Analyses understandings of the historical impact of the extent of Indigenous Australian input on policy and approaches in Australian professions and industry.

Discusses the benefits of Indigenous contributions to the profession in which your selected organisation operates.

Analyses and describes the value of building partnerships with Indigenous communities to realise the goals of the project concerned.

Uses research / sources to support your analysis and contentions.

Principles identified consider the benefits of Indigenous contributions to the profession in which your selected organisation operates.

Discusses the value of building partnerships with Indigenous communities to realise the goals of the project concerned.

Discusses the historical impact of Indigenous Australian input into policy and approaches in Australian professions and industry.

Research / sources are used to support your discussion.

Identifies principles which will be applied to establish and build collaborative partnerships.

Outlines the benefits of Indigenous contributions to the profession in which your selected organisation operates.

Discusses the value of building partnerships with Indigenous communities.

Describes the historical impact of Indigenous Australian input into policy and approaches in the profession and industry.

Research / sources are used to support your discussion.

Does not identify principles which will be applied to establish and build collaborative partnerships. Limited to no evidence of a consideration of the historical impact of Indigenous Australian input into the selected profession. Does not include discussion of the benefits of collaboration with Indigenous communities and professional groups.

Limited evidence that research has informed your response.

Fulfillstechnical aspects of the task8 Marks

Information is presented creatively, and clearly, with use of multiple modes of communication to support audience/reader engagement, in the time frame/word allowance provided. Evidence of consideration of appropriate format for information. Content shows control and skilful construction of expression to convey specific understandings. Seamlessly integrates citations and referencing into content. Sources are relevant, reliable, and from varied sources. Uses a style that effectively integrates personal reflection into academic analysis. All language and terminology uses are appropriate and informed. Information is presented creatively, and clearly, with use of multiple modes of communication, in the time frame/word allowance provided. expression and referencing show clear organisation. Uses a variety of techniques to incorporate source material and citations.

At least 7 sources (including 5 required readings) are cited and referenced.

Language and terminology choices allow for diversity and do not generalise Indigenous people or cultures. Uses a style that demonstrates the links between personal reflection and academic analysis. Language and terminology

choices allow for diversityand do not generaliseIndigenous people or cultures. Information is presented creatively, and clearly, in the time frame/word allowance provided. There are few errors relating to writing and references. Uses formal expression consistently without errors. There are no imprecise or unsupported statements or generalisations. Uses the APA reference system with only minor errors.

At least 7 sources (including 5 required readings) are cited and referenced.

Any racial or historical terms used are accompanied by an explanation. Demonstrates professional communication. Refers to the project and organisation. If the EoI is in any format other than written, the written component is copied into the submission portal for this assessment. Information is presented clearly, in the time frame/word allowance provided. There are few errors,. An attempt is made to demonstrate an awareness of professional communication by avoiding common terminology issues. Uses clear formal written expression with fewer than 6 instances of slang, contractions, spelling, punctuation, or grammatical errors. Content is accurate and supported. Ideas supported by required readings and/or relevant academic sources. Shows judgement in choosing reliable, relevant, academic sources of information. Uses the APA (7th) referencing system; there may be some errors however there is consistency in approach. Within specified word count/time limit. At least 7 sources (including 5 required readings) are cited and referenced. Within specified word count. Does not refer to specific project and organisation. Written component is not copied into the submission portal for this assessment in the case of alternative presentation.

Informal or inappropriate expression is evident and there are more than 6 instances of slang, contractions, spelling, punctuation or grammatical errors. Phrases or run-on sentences are used habitually. Paragraphs

or discussion points

are unfocused, too long or too short, or links between paragraphs or discussion points are undeveloped. Content is not supported, there are more than three instances of unsupported assertions and / or inaccuracies. Fewer than 7 sources (including 5 required readings) are cited and referenced. Use of modules as references.

APA (7th ed.) referencing is not used. Referencing style is inconsistent showing a lack of understanding of its purpose. One or more task requirements are unmet or missing. Under or over specified word count. Common terminology issues are evident, such as

non-capitalisation, use of inappropriate words without context or explanation.

Close

Presentation