Reflective Analysis of Cambridge Analyticas Role in US Elections and Brexit LAW302

Criterion mode: points

High Distinction

Distinction

Credit

Pass

Unsatisfactory

Percentage

80

Percentage

70

Percentage

60

Percentage

50

Percentage

0

Response to the Topic/Question: Consider the topic or question and articulate your understanding of the central elements requiring discussion

The student provides a nuanced explanation of the question/ topic and skilfully identifies and evaluates critical elements to be discussed.

(8 - 10 points)

The student clearly explains the question/ topic and identifies critical elements that will be discussed.

(7 - 7.9 points)

The student clearly explains the question/topic and responds to the majority of the elements in the question/ topic.

(6 - 6.9 points)

The student explains the question/topic and responds to a sufficient number of elements in the question/topic.

(5 - 5.9 points)

There is little evidence in the assignment of an understanding of the question/topic and the student has not responded to a sufficient number of elements in the question/topic.

(0 - 4.9 points)

Essay structure: Design/Structure your essay in an effective way so that your response to the essay question/topic is clear and easy to follow for your reader

This essay is logically structured throughout and the response to the essay/topic is clear, concise and easy to follow.

(8 - 10 points)

This essay is logically structured throughout and the response to the essay/topic is clear, reasonably concise and easy to follow.

(7 - 7.9 points)

This essay is logically structured for the most part and the response to the essay/topic is generally clear and easy to follow.

(6 - 6.9 points)

This essay is logically structured for the most part and the response to the essay/topic is for the most part generally clear and easy to follow.

(5 - 5.9 points)

There is little evidence in the assignment of structure and the response to the assignment is not clear.

(0 - 4.9 points)

Research: Effectively apply resources from the unit and your own research to help you respond to the essay question/topic demonstrating an understanding of the resources you are using

The student demonstrates a sophisticated use and knowledge of relevant resources.

(32 - 40 points)

The student demonstrates a broad and detailed use and knowledge of relevant resources.

(28 - 31.9 points)

The student demonstrates a broad or detailed use and knowledge of relevant resources.

(24 - 27.9 points)

The student demonstrates an adequate use and knowledge of relevant resources.

(20 - 23.9 points)

There is little evidence in the assignment of use and knowledge of relevant resources.

(0 - 19.9 points)

Persuasive argument and writing: Present a persuasive response to the essay question/topic using your academic or scholarly voice

The student makes a compelling argument and there is strong evidence of a consistent and sophisticated academic voice.

(24 - 30 points)

The student presents a strong argument and there is evidence of a consistent academic voice.

(21 - 23.9 points)

The student presents a good argument and there is evidence of an academic voice.

(18 - 20.9 points)

The student presents an argument and there is evidence of a consistent academic voice for most of the assignment.

(15 - 17.9 points)

The argument is not persuasive and there is little or no evidence of an academic voice.

(0 - 14.9 points)

Follow the task requirements

The student has followed all task requirements in a thorough way.

(8 - 10 points)

The student has followed all task requirements in an effective way.

(7 - 7.9 points)

The student has followed all task requirements in a clear way.

(6 - 6.9 points)

The student has followed all task requirements to some extent.

(5 - 5.9 points)

The student has not followed task requirements.

(0 - 4.9 points)

Total Points

100