diff_months: 10

RESR101 Assignment 1: Literature Review and Research Gap Analysis

Flat 50% Off Order New Solution
Added on: 2024-11-25 23:00:41
Order Code:
Question Task Id: 488425

Ass1 Lit Review

Start Assignment



  • Dueby23:59




  • Points30




  • Submittinga file upload




  • Availableafter 14 Mar at 0:00



This assignment builds towards your final assignment which is a full research proposal. The literature review is an essential step in undertaking research and also essential in refining what the research will be. You need to do some research to decide what you will research! You also need to review the available literature to find a 'gap' to offer new knowledge.

Read the Assignment 1 handoutHERE

You can also check more detail on what is required with the checklistHERE

Please be reminded that extensions for the assignments will require a request to be made. Find the appropriate formHERE

This assignment comprises:

project title + abstract/summary (~100 words) + annotated bibliography (minimum 7 works) + precedent/primary source analysis (3 x ~50 words or graphic equivalent) + preliminary literature review (500-600 words)

The aim of the assignment is to develop skills to systematically survey and read into a particular area or topic of research interest relevant to your professional discipline. The specific objective of this assignment is to make a critical assessment of the state of the existing knowledge in that area, and to identify a particular gap, or unanswered question, that could indicate where further research is needed.

Rubric

Assignment 1 (DR) (1)


Assignment 1 (DR) (1)


Criteria


Ratings


Pts


This criterion is linked to a learning outcomeProject Title












5to >4.0Pts


Excellent


Clear and precise in focus and scope


4to >2.0Pts


Satisfactory


Catchy but not clear in scope, or, too long and needs refining, or, does not reflect the abstract.


2to >0.0Pts


Unsatisfactory


vague or otherwise ineffective


0Pts


No title


5pts


This criterion is linked to a learning outcomeAbstract/summary













6to >5.0Pts


Outstanding


Efficiently identifies a topic (what), states the research aims/objectives and significance (why), approach (how) and expected outcomes of a small conventional or studio-based research project.


5to >4.0Pts


Proficient


States the research topic, aims/objectives, significance, approach and outcomes of a small conventional or studio based research project, however, 1 of these are missing or is not clearly defined.


4to >2.0Pts


Competent


describes the research topic, aims/objectives, significance, approach and expected outcomes of a small conventional or studio-based research project, however 2 or more of these elements are missing or not clearly defined.


2to >0.0Pts


Inadequate


Abstract is overly descriptive of other scholars' research and does not clearly define the aims/objectives. significance, approach or expected outcomes of the student's own project.


0Pts


No marks


No abstract provided.


6pts


This criterion is linked to a learning outcomeAnnotated bibliography INCLUDING project precedents













7to >6.0Pts


Outstanding


Covers a total of 10 (or more) publications and projects as appropriate representing a range of primary and secondary sources relevant to the research topic/focus, and of high academic and/or critical quality with strong annotations


6to >4.0Pts


Proficient


Covers an adequate number (at least 10) and a range of primary and secondary sources. Relevance in some instances is unclear or sources are narrow in scope.


4to >2.0Pts


Competent


Covers a range of secondary sources (less than 10). Sources are narrow in scope and the relevance is unclear. Insufficient references of academic quality. Unhelpful annotations.


2to >0.0Pts


inadequate


Covers a range of secondary sources (less than 10). Sources are extremely narrow in scope and the relevance to the student's own project is undefined - or no annotations. Relies too heavily on websites.


0Pts


No marks


Covers a small range of sources (less than 5) which are all or mostly websites. No annotation


7pts


This criterion is linked to a learning outcomeLiterature Review - description and critical assessment













7to >6.0Pts


Outstanding


Provides a concise, focused account of current theory, practice and debates in the area/issue of research interest based on the selected literature, and interprets the critical and/or methodological relevance of these sources to for the proposed research. The 'gap in knowledge' is clear


6to >4.0Pts


Proficient


Provides an account of the current theory and practice in the area of research based on the selected literature. Interpretation of critical and or methodological relevance of these sources, however, could be strengthened. The 'gap in knowledge' is beginning to be evident.


4to >2.0Pts


Competent


Provides a broad account of the current theory and practice in the area of research. Some critical or methodological comments relevant to the research topic. Some effort has been made to find the 'gap in knowledge', however, not yet clear.


2to >0.0Pts


Inadequate


Only describes the selected literature with little critical interpretation of source content and method. The current theory, practices and debates in the area of research are not engaged with. The 'gap in knowledge' is unclear.


0Pts


No marks


No critical description or discussion apart from basic bibliographic information.


7pts


This criterion is linked to a learning outcomeWriting/Language












5to >4.0Pts


Excellent


Clear, concise and logically structured


4to >2.0Pts


Competent


Writing is generally good, however, could be improved by refining the expression or style of writing. Ie: too informal/conversational or could be more concise.


2to >0.0Pts


Satisfactory but needs improvement


Writing has grammar or spelling mistakes, or is hard to follow in places. Seek guidance from the Writing Centre.


0Pts


Unsatisfactory


Writing has grammar and spelling mistakes, does not adhere to writing conventions, the structure is illogical or hard to follow, the expression is too informal. Please seek help from the Writing Centre.


5pts


Total points:30

  • Uploaded By : Akshita
  • Posted on : November 25th, 2024
  • Downloads : 0
  • Views : 128

Order New Solution

Can't find what you're looking for?

Whatsapp Tap to ChatGet instant assistance

Choose a Plan

Premium

80 USD
  • All in Gold, plus:
  • 30-minute live one-to-one session with an expert
    • Understanding Marking Rubric
    • Understanding task requirements
    • Structuring & Formatting
    • Referencing & Citing
Most
Popular

Gold

30 50 USD
  • Get the Full Used Solution
    (Solution is already submitted and 100% plagiarised.
    Can only be used for reference purposes)
Save 33%

Silver

20 USD
  • Journals
  • Peer-Reviewed Articles
  • Books
  • Various other Data Sources – ProQuest, Informit, Scopus, Academic Search Complete, EBSCO, Exerpta Medica Database, and more