Subject Name: Health Variations 3 - Acute Exacerbations of Chronic Conditions
Presentation Assessment 2
Subject Name: Health Variations 3 - Acute Exacerbations of Chronic Conditions
Weight: 30%
Type of Collaboration: Individual
Due: Week 12 -Monday 7th October 2024 at 23:59 hours
Submission: Refer to instructions below
Format: Presentation
Length: 10 minutes
Use of Artificial Intelligence: In this assessment task, you will not be able to meet the learning outcomes related to analysing the causes, pathogenesis, clinical manifestations and appropriate selection and prioritisation of nursing interventions as appropriate to NURS2016 by using generative artificial intelligence (AI) tools. Working with another person or technology in order to gain an unfair advantage in assessment or improperly obtaining answers from a third party including generative AI to questions in an examination or other form of assessment may lead to sanctions under the Student Misconduct Rule. Use of generative AI tools may be detected. More information is available on the Library web page.
Instructions:
Aim of the assessment- The purpose of this assessment is to enable you to:
Demonstrate knowledge of a comprehensive assessment for a patient with exacerbation of COPD, using the A to E (Airway, Breathing, Circulation, Disability, Exposure)
Identify and discuss relevant diagnostic results to inform clinical decision-making and implementing high-priority interventions to optimise patient outcomes.
Identify and discuss key evidence based high priority nursing interventions for managing a patient with exacerbation of COPD
Demonstrate effective management to optimise the care of a patient with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) by administering prescribed therapies and medications
Students are to use evidence-based literature to support answers for the following questions.
Q1. Discuss the A to E (Airway, Breathing, Circulation, Disability, Exposure) assessment approach for Mr. David Nazzal, who is experiencing an exacerbation of COPD. In your discussion, integrate relevant vital signs and explain how they inform your clinical decision-making.
Q2. List four high priority nursing interventions for managing Mr David Nazzals exacerbation of COPD and briefly discuss your rationales for each.
Q3. Discuss the nursing considerations (i.e., Assessment, Administration and Side Effects) when administering the following therapies and medications to Mr Nazzal.
Oxygen therapy
Salbutamol (Ventolin)
Ipratroprium (Atrovent) Prednisolone
Azithromycin (Zithromax)
Nirmatrelvir and Ritonavir
Oral Presentation Details:
You are to record and submit your oral presentation based on the case study from assessment one; Mr David Nazzal
For your oral presentation: - you can use a slide show (such as PowerPoint) to support your presentation by sharing your screen. You can record your presentation in ZOOM. If you have difficulties with ZOOM or technology in general, there will be webinars and workshops to help you. Please check announcements for dates and times.
The recorded presentation should take no more than 10 minutes. There is no word limit however as a guide 1000 word is the suggested maximum. If you exceed the time limit by more than 10%, the marker will stop marking at 11 minutes.
References: You must include references. These should be listed at the end of your presentation using APA 7 referencing style
A note on ACADEMIC references: References to support your discussion must be from peer-reviewed and/or published sources that are less than 10 years old. This includes textbooks, journal articles, MIMS and evidence-based guidelines produced by expert bodies such the COPD-X Plan:Australian and New Zealand Guidelines for the management of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease 2021 https://copdx.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/COPDX-V2-63-Feb-2021_FINAL-PUBLISHED.pdf Please do not refer to patient information sites to support your discussion (example WebMD). Your presentation should be uploaded to the Turnitin Assessment 2 link available on vUWS
Marking Criteria:
Criteria High Distinction Distinction Credit Pass Unsatisfactory
Criteria 1
Question 1
Discuss the A to E assessment approach for Mr.
David Nazzal Accurately and comprehensively discusses the primary survey considering each stage of the A to E process. Students accurately and comprehensively integrates relevant vital signs and explains how they inform clinical decision-making and high priority interventions. Synthesises the information in a logical sequence. Supported by relevant academic references. Accurate explanation discussing the primary survey and considering each stage of the A to E process. Students accurately integrates relevant vital signs and explains how they inform clinical decision-making and high priority interventions. Mostly synthesises the information in a logical sequence. Supported by relevant academic references Provides a good level of knowledge discussing the primary survey and considering each stage of the A to E process. Students integrates relevant vital signs and explains how they inform clinical decision-making and high priority interventions. The discussion is mostly developed in a logical sequence but there may be one or two omissions of significant information. Supported by relevant academic references. Provides a basic description of the primary survey and considering each stage of the A to E process. Students integrates the vital signs and explains how they inform clinical decision-making and high priority interventions however may have minor inaccuracies, omissions or repetition of information, lack of clarity or logical flow of the process. Supported by relevant academic references. Provides a superficial description of the primary survey considering each stage of the A to E process.
Students attempts to integrate the vital signs and explains how they inform clinical decision-making and high priority interventions however has a significant number of inaccuracies, repetition, or lack of
clarity or logical flow of the process. Not supported by relevant academic sources
Mark: /30 25.5-30 22.5-25 19.5-22 15-19 14.5
Criteria 2
Question 2
List four (4) high priority nursing
interventions for managing Mr David Nazzals exacerbation of COPD and briefly discuss your rationales for each. Accurate and comprehensive discussion of 4 high priority nursing
interventions for managing
exacerbation of
COPD.
The information is synthesised and presented in a succinct way. Discussion of rationales for each intervention were accurately and comprehensively provided. Information is technically accurate and supported by relevant academic references Accurate discussion of 4 high priority nursing interventions for managing
exacerbation of
COPD.
The information is mostly synthesised and presented in a succinct way Discussion of rationales for each intervention were accurately provided. Information is technically accurate and supported by relevant academic references Good summary of
4 high priority nursing interventions for managing
exacerbation of
COPD.
Good discussion of rationales for each nursing intervention provided. Information is synthesised in a somewhat succinct way. Good discussion of rationales for provided for each intervention. Responses are supported by relevant academic references Basic summary of at least 2 high priority nursing
interventions for managing
exacerbation of
COPD.
Information is synthesised in a somewhat succinct way.
Some high priority nursing
interventions were identified and or details of rationales missing. Responses are somewhat supported by relevant academic references Poor summary of nursing interventions for managing
exacerbation of
COPD.
Information is not synthesised or poorly presented. Nursing interventions are missing or inaccurate. Responses and rationales are NOT supported by relevant academic references
Mark: /20 17-20 15-16.5 13-14.5 10-12.5 9.5
Criteria High Distinction Distinction Credit Pass Unsatisfactory
Criteria 3
Question 3
Discuss the nursing
considerations (i.e., Assessment,
Administration and Side Effects) when administering the following therapies and medications to Mr Nazzal.
Oxygen therapy
Salbutamol (Ventolin)
Ipratropium (Atrovent)
Prednisolone
Azithromycin (Zithromax)
Nirmatrelvir and
Ritonavir Accurate and comprehensive discussion of the nursing
considerations when administering the therapies and medications to Mr Nazzal.
The information is synthesised and presented in a succinct way. Nursing considerations are clearly identified. Information is technically accurate and supported by relevant academic references Accurate discussion of the nursing considerations when administering the therapies and medications to Mr Nazzal.
The information is synthesised and presented in a mostly succinct way. Nursing considerations are clearly identified. Information is technically accurate and supported by relevant academic references Good summary of the nursing considerations when administering the therapies and medications to Mr Nazzal.
The information is synthesised and presented in a somewhat succinct way. Nursing considerations are identified with some details missing. Responses are supported by relevant academic references Basic summary of some nursing considerations when administering the therapies and medications to Mr Nazzal.
Information is synthesised in a somewhat succinct way.
Some nursing considerations were identified with many details missing. Responses are supported by relevant academic references Poor summary of nursing
considerations when administering the therapies and medications to Mr Nazzal.
Information is not synthesised or poorly presented
Nursing considerations are missing or inaccurate.
Responses are NOT supported by relevant academic references.
Mark: /30 25.5-30 22.5-25 19.5-22 15-19 14.5
Criteria 4
Presentation Style Engaging presentation style. Discussion is supported by visual aids that are of very high quality and
effective in relaying
complex
information (i.e., diagrams/ pictures).
Presenter was confident with their material and covered each section within the time permitted. Presentation style at times engaging. Discussion supported by visual aids that are effective in relaying
complex
information (i.e., diagrams/ pictures).
Presenter was confident with their material and covered each section within the time permitted. Presentation style was effective and, easy for the listener to engage.
Visual aids are used to support the presentation.
Presenter was confident with their material and covered each section within the time permitted. Presentation style was effective but basic.
Minimal use of visual aids.
Presenter was confident with their material and covered each section within the time permitted. Presentation style does not engage the listener. No use of visual aids or they are not effectively used throughout the presentation.
Presenter was not confident with their material presented.
Mark: /5 4.5-5 4 3.5 2.5-3 2
Criteria 5
Oral
Communication Spoke fluently and consistently coherent at a continuous rate of connected speech. Exceptional range of vocabulary to express meaning. Exceptional grammatical accuracy in sentence structuring throughout the presentation . Consistently pronounced a range of words and sounds
comprehensible to the listener. Spoke somewhat fluent and coherent, continuous and connected speech. Very good range of vocabulary to express meaning. Very good grammatical accuracy in sentence structuring throughout the presentation. Pronounced a range of words and sounds
comprehensible to the listener. Spoke coherently at a continuous rate of connected speech. Uses a range of vocabulary to express meaning. Demonstrates mostly good grammatical accuracy in sentence structuring throughout the presentation. Mostly pronounced a range of words and sounds comprehensible to the listener. Spoke coherently at a continuous rate of connected speech at most. Uses range of basic vocabulary to express meaning. Demonstrates basic grammatical accuracy in sentence structuring throughout the presentation. Pronounced a limited range of words and sounds but comprehensible to the listener. Had difficulty speaking fluently and coherently. Uses limited vocabulary to express meaning. Did not demonstrate grammatical accuracy in sentence structuring consistently. Had difficulty pronouncing words and sounds and words sometimes incomprehensible to the listener.
Mark: /5 4.5-5 4 3.5 2.5-3 2
Criteria High Distinction Distinction Credit Pass Unsatisfactory
Criteria 6
Referencing and in-text citations:
Uses a minimum of ten recent academic sources such as journal articles, textbooks, government reports, or creditable organisational websites). All sources of information must be clearly relevant and accurately cited applying conventions of in-text referencing for APA 7 style. A complete
reference list is correctly formatted according to APA style. Referencing technique is flawless and follows APA 7 conventions both in-text and in the reference list. Uses a selection of appropriate references. Evidence of cited sources are always clear and accurate Referencing technique follows APA 7 conventions but contains infrequent minor errors.
Uses a selection of appropriate references. Evidence of cited sources are mostly clear and accurate. Referencing technique follows APA 7 conventions but contains infrequent errors. Uses at least the
minimum number
of required references.
Evidence of cited sources are clear and accurate. There may be frequent minor errors in APA 7 referencing convention in in-text referencing and/or the reference list. Uses at least the required number of required references. Evidence of cited sources may not consistently be clear. There may be absent or incorrect use of APA referencing technique. Does not use the minimum number
of required references or uses predominantly inappropriate or non-authoritative sources.
Evidence of cited sources are not clear or correctly acknowledged.
Mark: /5 4.5-5 4 3.5 2.5-3 2
Criteria 7
Academic writing Writes in a clear succinct academic style using correct grammar, spelling and punctuation. Writes in an advanced style exhibiting highly coherent and logical flow of ideas. No errors in spelling or grammar.
Organisation of material exhibits an advanced level of clarity. Writes clearly and succinctly with a coherent, logical flow of ideas exhibiting advanced clarity. No errors in spelling, or grammar. Writes clearly and uses language that enables effective flow of ideas. Minor, infrequent errors in spelling or grammar that do not impede flow of ideas. Writing is reasonably clear, but at times the effective flow of ideas and meaning is hindered. Minor, frequent errors in spelling or grammar sometimes impedes the flow of ideas. Writes in an elementary style with very basic use of language and poor articulation of ideas. Writing may be verbose, convoluted or difficult to read. Organisation of material and main points is unclear. The errors in spelling, punctuation, grammar and sentence construction impede meaning.
Mark: /5 4.5-5 4 3.5 2.5-3 2
