Technology, Innovation and Intrapreneurship TII604BM
- Subject Code :
TII604BM
- University :
Torrence university of Australia Exam Question Bank is not sponsored or endorsed by this college or university.
ASSESSMENT 2 BRIEF |
|
|
Subject Code and Title |
TII604BM Technology, Innovation and Intrapreneurship |
|
Assessment |
Project Report |
|
Individual/Group |
Individual |
|
Length |
2,500 Words +/? 10% |
|
Learning Outcomes |
This assessment addresses the following subject learning outcomes: a) Critically evaluate the major disruptive technologies that are changing the hotel industry. c) Evaluate the concept of intrapreneurship and the role of disruptive innovations in a hotel context. |
|
Submission |
Due by 11:55 PM AEST/AEDT Sunday end of Week 6 |
|
Weighting |
40% |
|
Total Marks |
100 marks |
Assessment Task
You are tasked with a project report detailing the implementation of disruptive technologies or innovations within the hotel industry. Your report must evaluate the technologies/innovations and focus on the benefits and challenges of their implementation.
Please refer to the Instructions for details on how to complete this task.
Context
Ongoing technological advancements, particularly over the last few years, are changing the hotel industry. The implementation of new innovations in organisations have improved efficiency and filled service delivery gaps. This has assisted these organisations to gain competitive advantage by better serving their customers. In addition, technology innovations in hotel organisations have improved efficiency, enhanced guest experience, lowered staff workload and minimised costs.
Task Instructions
- Identify one or two hotel organisations that have implemented disruptive technologies or disruptive innovations in the last five (5) years.
- In the selected organisation(s), research examples of the entrepreneurial/intrapreneurial mindset and leadership of intrapreneurs.
- Evaluate the success of the technologies/innovations implemented in terms of guest
Please follow the below proposed structure:
- Torrens University Individual Assessment Cover Sheet
- Executive Summary highlights of your report
- Table of contents
- Introduction aim of the report
- Entrepreneurial/intrapreneurial mindset discussion of entrepreneurial/intrapreneurial traits for successful intrapreneurship
- Leadership qualities identification of enabling leadership qualities for innovation
- Examples hotel organisations and illustrations researched
- Evaluation success or failure of the technologies/innovations
- Conclusion summarise the key findings of the report
- Reference list
- Appendices attach, if any
You are encouraged to use diagrams, graphs or visuals in the preparation of your report. Make it visually attractive, use consistent font throughout and ensure no spelling or grammatical errors are presented.
Referencing
It is essential that you use current APA style for citing and referencing the sources that you use. Please see more information on citing and referencing guidelines on the Academic Skills webpage.
Assessment Support
For a range of additional resources and support to help you complete your assessment, please consult the Study Support page on the Student Hub.
Academic Integrity
All students are responsible for ensuring that all work submitted is their own, is academically written and appropriately referenced following the Academic Writing Guide. Students need to have read and be aware of the Torrens University Australia Academic Integrity Policy and Academic Integrity Procedure and subsequent penalties for academic misconduct. For more information, please refer to the Academic Integrity guidelines.
Students must also keep all required evidence in making an assessment; a copy of all submitted material and any assessment drafts.
Submission Instructions
Submit this task via Assessments > Briefs & Submissions in the main navigation menu in TII604BM: Technology, Innovation and Intrapreneurship. Please name your file using the following format:
o Subject Code Surname First Name Initial Assessment Number
e.g. MGMT6002_Jones_S_Assessment 2.docx Your marked assessment can be viewed in My Learn.
Assessment Due Dates and Late Penalties
You can submit your assessment on or before the due date.
Late penalties apply for assessments that are submitted after the due date, unless an Application for Assessment Special Consideration Form has been submitted to your learning facilitator.
For information on the Torrens University Australia late penalties policy, please consult the Assessment Policy for Higher Education Coursework and ELICOS.
Please consult with your learning facilitator if you need to submit your assessment after the due date.
Assessment Rubric
|
Assessment Criteria |
High Distinction (Exceptional) 85-100% |
Distinction (Advanced) 75-84% |
Credit (Proficient) 65-74% |
Pass (Functional) 50-64% |
Fail (Yet to achieve minimum standard) 0- 49% |
|
Development and depth of an executive summary that is representative of the individual report Percentage for this criterion = 10% |
Expert overview of the technologies and hotel organisations, evaluation, and conclusion. |
Excellent overview of the technologies and hotel organisations, evaluation, and conclusion. |
Clear and concise overview of the technologies and hotel organisations, evaluation, and conclusion. |
Adequate overview of the technologies and hotel organisations, evaluation, and conclusion. |
Limited overview of the technologies and hotel organisations, evaluation, and conclusion. |
|
Identification and description of disruptive technologies or innovations Percentage for this criterion = 10% |
Identification and descriptive information at an excellent level. Demonstrates an in? depth understanding of disruptive technologies or innovations. |
Identification and descriptive information at a high level. Demonstrates a solid understanding of disruptive technologies or innovations. |
Identification and descriptive information at a very good level. Demonstrates a very good understanding of disruptive technologies or innovations. |
Identification and descriptive information at a good level. Demonstrates good understanding of disruptive technologies or innovations. |
Identification and/or descriptive information is wrong. Demonstrates limited understanding of disruptive technologies or innovations. |
|
Discussion of entrepreneurial/ intrapreneurial mindset Percentage for this criterion = 15% |
Exceptional discussion of salient features of entrepreneurial/ intrapreneurial mindset |
Excellent discussion of salient features of entrepreneurial/ intrapreneurial mindset |
Very good discussion of salient features of entrepreneurial/ intrapreneurial mindset |
Discussion of salient features of entrepreneurial/ intrapreneurial mindset at satisfactory level |
Discussion pf salient features of entrepreneurial/ Intrapreneurial mindset demonstrates poor conceptual grasp or lacks depth |
|
Identification of leadership qualities enabling innovation Percentage for this criterion = 15% |
Exceptional identification of leadership qualities enabling innovation |
Excellent identification of leadership qualities enabling innovation |
Very good identification of leadership qualities enabling innovation |
Identification of leadership qualities enabling innovation at a satisfactory level |
Identification of leadership qualities enabling innovation is wrong, irrelevant and lacks conceptual grasp or depth |
|
Evaluation of the success of the technology or innovations, with regards to guest experience Percentage for this criterion = 30% |
Evaluations are insightful and extremely well supported. Excellent examples of benefits and challenges are provided. |
Evaluations are insightful and very well supported. Clear and detailed examples of benefits and challenges are provided. |
Evaluations are insightful and well supported. Clear examples of benefits and challenges are provided. |
Most evaluations are well- supported. Good examples of benefits and challenges are provided. |
Evaluations are missing, inappropriate, and/or unsupported. Examples of benefits and challenges are poor. |
|
Correct citation of key resources and evidence Percentage for this criterion = 10% |
Exceptional use of independent, credible and relevant resources to support and develop ideas. APA 7 referencing is free from errors. |
Excellent use of independent, credible and relevant resources to support and develop ideas. APA 7 referencing is free from errors. |
Demonstrates very good use of independent, credible and relevant resources to support and develop ideas. APA 7 referencing is free from errors. |
Demonstrates good use of credible and relevant resources to support and develop ideas. APA referencing is mostly free from errors. |
Demonstrates inconsistent use of good quality, credible and relevant resources to support and develop ideas. Referencing is omitted, wrong or irrelevant. |
|
Report structure and effective written communication Percentage for this criterion = 10% |
Exceptional use of graphics, photos, diagrams, drawings or visuals Extremely creative report. Accurate grammar, with no mistakes. Always displays cohesive and coherent report structure. |
Excellent use of graphics, photos, diagrams, drawings or visuals. Accurate grammar, with no mistakes. Displays excellent cohesive and coherent report structure. |
Very good use of graphics, photos, diagrams, drawings or visuals Accurate grammar, with no mistakes. Displays very good cohesive and coherent report structure. |
Good use of graphics, photos, diagrams or visuals Minimal grammatical errors, not obscuring meaning. Displays mostly cohesive and coherent report structure. |
Limited use of photos, diagrams or visuals Grammatical errors obscuring meaning. Displays some incoherent and disorganised report structure. |
