Workplace Integrated Learning: Professional Practice and Diversity WIB601

CATEGORY

MARKS

Introduction,conclusion

2.5

Backgroundandneedfordiversity/multi-culturalenvironment

2.5

CDUsstepsandprocessestowardssupportingandpromotingdiversity

5

InformationanddetailsaboutCDUsinitiatives

5

PreparationforyourupcominginternshipandjobinAustralia

5

Similaritiesordifferencesbetweenyourhomecountry/cultureandAustralia.

5

FormattingandReferences

5

UseofJournalarticles/theories/models/images/evidence

5

Research 20%

Evidence of broad, systematic and creative research. Selection of data goes beyond the mainstream literature/tutorial/textbook.

Evidence of controlled and systematicresearch. Demonstrates selectionofcredible, relevant data from quality literature/tutorial notes/textbooks.

Evidenceofgood research skills.

Information is gathered from a good range of electronicandnon- electronic sources.

Researchconducted demonstrates an attempt to collect credible and/or relevant data.

Information is gathered from a limitedrangeof

electronicandnon- electronic sources.

Limitedresearch skills demonstrated.

Poorly selecteddata.

Referencing 10%

Consistent and accurate referencing used throughout,showingability to reference a range of source types. Ideas and words of others acknowledged.

Mostly accurate referencing demonstrates an abilitytoreferencea variety of source types. Ideas and words of others are acknowledged

Referencingisat times inconsistent or demonstrates

abilitytoreference only some source types accurately Words, but not alwaystheideasof others are

acknowledged.

Overuse of anotherswordsor ideas which may also

inconsistentlyor inaccurately referenced.

Failure to acknowledge the wordsandideasof others.Plagiarised: reads like a

datadumpfrom

othersources.

Format,structure, Expression

10%

Clearandfluentexpression indicates the essay has been successfully edited and proofread before submission. Correct form for text type:

(headings, indentations etc.);spelling,punctuation

error-

Masteryofsentence patterns demonstrated; may have

occasional grammatical errors on the sentencelevel

Sentence patterns most often successfully used; several grammaticalerrors at the sentence level. Occasional errors in, form,

punctuation,

Clear and fluent expression indicatestheessay has been successfullyedited and

proofreadbefore submission.

Runonsentences, attempts

atsimplesentences often

notsuccessful; many errors

insentence structures

detractfrom

free.

suggesting that some closer proofreading was needed. Form, punctuation, and spellingmostlyerror free.

and spelling; sometimes distracting. Some additional editing andproofreadingis warranted.

Correct form for text type: (headings, indentations etc.); spelling, punctuationerror- free.

communication purpose. Form, punctuationand spelling, errors throughout.

Introduction 10%

Excellent ability to introduce the main topic succinctlyandengagethe

reader.

Good introduction with aspects includedtoengage

thereader.

Introductionneeds a sharper focus.

Introduction covers the main points but ispoorly articulated.

Introductionis difficult to understand.

Application 10%

Excellent application of communicationmodels.

Goodapplicationof communication models.

Application of communication models is sometimes

confusing.

Application of communication models is superficial.

Poorapplicationof theory.

Content 30%

Clear, controlled and focussed direction. Clearly linkedandlogicallyordered points and highly relevant andwell-developeddetails. Extensive critical analysis. Sound use of examples to explain argument.

Focusseddirection and a good logical order of points.

Good critical analysis. A good useofexamplesto make argument.

Focusseddirection and basic

logicalorderof points.

Reasonableattempt to critically analyse. Reasonableattempt to use example to

explainargument.

Directionisnotvery focussed. Flow of content is a

bit flawed. The essay lacks succinctness.Some analysis

evident,mainly descriptive.

Anattemptmadeto use

examplestoexplain

argument.

Nodirection.Flow of essay

ismajorlyflawed. No critical analysis evident. Mainly definitional. No example

usedorminimal used to

developargument.

Conclusion 10%

Excellent ability to interpret, evaluate and formulatelogicalsound conclusions.

Gooddemonstration of the

capacitytocritically analyseinformation and formulate

ownconclusions.

Able to draw warranted conclusionsand generalisations.

Limitedabilityto draw conclusions.

Nocriticalanalysis, poor conclusions and no original thought.