2013HSV Assessment Two Marking Criteria
2013HSV Assessment Two Marking Criteria
Criteria HD: 20-18 D: 17-15 C: 14- 13 P: 12 -10 F: 9 - 0 Mark
Introduction and Background
The presentation begins with a clear, specific, and succinct introduction background that provides a coherent understanding of the target group. The presentation begins with a clear background, although it could be more specific or succinct. The presentation begins with a limited background, although clarity could be enhanced The background to the presentation is apparent, although not stated clearly. The background does not relate to the task. / 20
Criteria HD: 30 - 26 D: 25 - 23 C: 22 - 20 P: 19 - 15 F: 14 - 0 Mark
Research: Accurate and relevant information supported with high quality sources.
Minimum 15 sources of information including course materials (satisfactory) The presentation uses empirical evidence to support factual claims. Relevant theory and research is incorporated into the presentation. A wide range of high-quality sources is included The presentation uses empirical evidence to support factual claims. Unsupported generalisations and anecdotes are avoided. Most of the material included is relevant. A wide range of high-quality sources is included with some poor-quality sources. Empirical evidence is used to support most factual claims, although there may be some generalisations or anecdotal evidence. Relevant material is included, although there may be some tendency to include additional irrelevant or background information as well. A good range of sources is included, mostly of high-quality. Good attempt to support claims with evidence, although there may be a tendency to make unsupported generalisations or rely on anecdotal evidence or personal viewpoint. Material is related to the topic but not always relevant to the argument put forward. A fair range of sources used, including some scholarly literature, although there may be a tendency to rely on grey literature and non-academic sources Factual claims are inaccurate or not supported with evidence. Material included is not relevant to the topic. The range of sources is limited and/or of poor-quality, which demonstrates a lack research or engagement with literature. /30
Criteria HD: 40 - 35 D: 34 - 30 C: 29 25 P: 24 - 20 F: 19 - 0 Mark
Critical analysis:
Application of theory, evidence, and logic to construct an early intervention and prevention strategy The presentation sets out a clear strategy. The argument is logically coherent. The presentation engages with evidence critically by evaluating strengths and limitations of current strategies and identifies gaps. Uses theory and research to organise and explain the strategy. The presentation sets out a clear strategy. The logic of the argument is mostly coherent. The presentation engages with evidence by evaluating strengths and limitations of current strategies and identifies the gaps. There is a good attempt to use theory and research to organise and/or explain the strategy. The strategy presented is limited in its application. There is a good attempt to engage with evidence by evaluate to critically by evaluating strengths and limitations of current strategies and identifies some gaps. Uses theory and research to organise and explain the strategy. The strategy presented is not coherent, nor is it based on evidence for the literature. There is a tendency to accept information contained in sources uncritically. Uses limited theory and research to explain the strategy. The strategy is purely descriptive, is not comprehensible, or is fundamentally invalid. The presentation contradicts, ignores, or omits evidence for claims. The presentation fails to make a meaningful response to the task. / 40
Criteria HD: 10-9 D: 8-7 C: 6-5.5 P: 5 F: 4 - 0 Presentation:
Structure, gramma, syntax, and spelling support clear communication.
Referencing and formatting of essay conform to APA 7th style. Presentation is accessible, legible, and conveys useful information to the audience efficiently and persuasively.
Citations provided where required within the presentation. Conforms to APA 7 style with virtually no errors in the text or the reference list. Presentation is mainly accessible, legible, and conveys useful information to the audience efficiently and persuasively.
Citations provided where required within the presentation. Conforms to APA 7 style with few minor errors in the text or the reference list. Material is mostly relevant to the audience. Information is legible and conveys information to the audience, although presentation could be streamline or clarity could be improved.
Citations mostly provided where required. Mostly accurate use of APA 7style with some errors. Some material not directly relevant to the audience is included. Information is legible, although clarity could be enhanced. Too much or too little information is included, poor timing.
Citations mostly provided where required within the presentation. Some incorrect referencing. Material is not relevant to the audience. Presentation is not legible or is confusing and fails to communicate useful information to the audience.
Significant portions of material are not referenced. Referencing style is incorrect / 10
Total Mark
. / 100
3013HSV Assessment Two- Presentation Outline
Due Date:30 May 23 17:00Weight: 50%Marked out of: 50Title: Early Intervention and Prevention StrategyTask: Digital Presentation (15 minutes)You are working as a youth worker in a small local NGO that supports vulnerable children and young people. You have been asked by the Director to develop and present an early intervention strategy to the Board for the development of a multidisciplinaryteam in your service.
Devise a feasible, evidence-informed early intervention and prevention strategy to divert vulnerable children and young people from antisocial behaviours and substance misuse. Your 15-minute recorded presentation explains and justifies your proposed strategy.
Your presentation:
Content Approximate time
Introduction to the presentation
Background
Who are Qlds Youth?
What do young people tell us about their situation?
What is early prevention and intervention?
What is going on for young people that are at risk or engaged in anti-social behaviours?
What are we doing now to support young people at risk? What works? What are the gaps?
Proposed Strategy
1 minute
6 minutes
6 minutes
Describe how you will measure your strategy for success. 2 minutes
You must have a reference list on your last slide. Refer to the marking criteria for allocation of marks and other related information.
Useful resource:
https://www.des.qld.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0020/231095/qld-youth-strategy.pdf
