-65253-4706600 Rating
- University :
Melbourne University Exam Question Bank is not sponsored or endorsed by this college or university.
-65253-4706600 Rating
Criteria (4) (3) (2) (1) (0) Mark =
Rating/4 x Criteria %
Evidence of research (individual work) (25%) Excellent evidence of wider reading and exhaustive research effort relating to the relevant topic(s). Excellent examples/evidence used to support the infrastructure needs assessment report findings
8 or more references provided. Very good evidence of wider reading and research effort.
Very good examples/evidence used to support the infrastructure needs assessment report findings
6 to 7 references provided Good evidence of wider reading and research effort.
Good examples/evidence used to support the infrastructure needs assessment report findings
4 to 5 references provided Adequate/Basic evidence of wider reading and research effort.
Adequate examples/evidence used to support the infrastructure needs assessment report findings
2 to 3 references provided. No substantial evidence of wider reading and research effort or heavy reliance on improvisation.
Provides little evidence/examples to support the infrastructure needs assessment report findings.
Less than 2 references provided. Analysis of information (25%)
Excellent demonstration of deep and complex analysis relevant to the assessment. Excellent range of issues linked to the analysis provided.
8 or more references provided.
Very good demonstration of deep analysis relevant to the assessment. A very good range of issues linked to the analysis provided.
6 to 7 references provided Sound demonstration of deep analysis relevant to the assessment. Good range of issues linked to the analysis provided.
4 to 5 references provided. Adequate/Basic demonstration of analysis, however, not in sufficient depth. Basic range of issues provided. 2 to 3 sources provided.
Poor or superficial demonstration of analysis. Issues identified were not linked to the analysis provided. Less than 2 sources provided.
Conclusion
(10%) Excellent conclusion strongly linked to the analysis provided. Very good conclusion well linked to the analysis provided Good conclusion linked to the analysis provided. Basic conclusion somewhat linked to the analysis provided No conclusions provided or recommendations not linked to the analysis provided. Document Quality
(15%)
Excellent variety of sentence structures and lengths, showing excellent control of word choice with a powerful, confident and precise use of language.
Very good variety of sentence structures showing control of word choice with a clear style. Language use demonstrates precision and expressiveness as well as clarity.
Good variety of sentence structures, showing adequate control of word choice, however with an inconsistently clear writing style.
Clear enough to be understood, some confused or unclear expression. Spelling, punctuation and grammar are generally satisfactory but may need attention.
Language is unclear and poorly expressed, making it difficult to understand. Spelling and grammar require major attention.
Report Structure
(15%) Report fulfills all requirements: Table of contents, Correct headings used, Correct use of grammar and spelling, Page numbers supplied and Times New Roman Pt 12, 1.5 line spacing. Report fulfills majority of report requirements: Table of contents, Correct headings used, Correct use of grammar and spelling, Page numbers supplied and Times New Roman Pt 12, 1.5 line spacing Report fulfills most of report requirements: Table of contents, Correct headings used, Correct use of grammar and spelling, Page numbers supplied and Times New Roman Pt 12, 1.5 line spacing. The report includes some of the report requirements. Some elements missing: Table of contents, Correct headings used, Correct use of grammar and spelling, Page numbers supplied and Times New Roman Pt 12, 1.5 line spacing. The report does not include most of the report requirements set out by this rubric. Many elements missing from report: Table of contents, Correct headings used, Correct use of grammar and spelling, Page numbers supplied and Times New Roman Pt 12, 1.5 line spacing. Referencing Harvard Reference Style
(10%) Excellent use of references, wide variety of relevant (including academic) references sourced, correctly referenced with no errors, 8 or more references appropriately applied within the report.
In-text, Tables and Figures citation properly done.
Reference list provided, listed in alphabetical order Very Good use of references, wide variety of relevant (including academic) references sourced, correctly referenced with no errors, 6 to 7 references appropriately applied within the report.
Very good use of in-text, Tables and Figures citation.
Reference list provided, listed in alphabetical order Good use of references, good variety of relevant (including academic) references sourced, correctly referenced with no errors, 4 to 5 references appropriately applied within the report.
Good use of in-text, Tables and Figures citation.
Reference list provided, listed in alphabetical order Basic use of references, basic variety of relevant (including academic) references sourced.
Mostly correctly referenced with some errors, 2 to 3 references appropriately applied within the report.
In-text citation and citation to Tables and Figures not properly done.
Reference list provided, listed in alphabetical order Complete reliance on web references (non-academic)
Over reliance of one reference
No in-text, Tables and Figures citation.
Less than 2 references provided. No bibliography added at the end. Total mark /100
Additional comments: