Assessment #1: Contextualising a health-related human rights issue.

Assessment #1: Contextualising a health-related human rights issue.

Assessment Task Due Date Weighting Marked out of Learning Outcomes

Contextualising a health-related human rights issue 28th March 24

11:59AM (MIDDAY) 30% 30 marks 1,2,3

Task Description

For this task you need to write a 1000-word report. The report will provide ashort descriptionof a major health issue in a population of your choice and offer anin-depthanalysis of why you consider it to be a health-related human rights issue. This is anindividualtask.

Criteria and Marking

Background(political,historical, economic,and culturalcontext)of thechosen populationand rationale forthe chosenhealth issue10/30

Descriptionofrelevanthuman rightsinternational agreements(covenants,treaties)in relation tothehealth issue and determinants 5/30

Analysisof the human rights context:Has the country signed or ratified the relevant humanrightsagreements?Does the countrys policies support or contravene the human rights of the population?Is the country in the position to address the issue, why, why not?Recommendations.15/30

Please note that this assignment will form the basis of Assignment#3

Submission

You are required to submit your written work as a Word document via Turnitin. Please note that there are three attempts available for you to submit. The final submission is the one that will be marked. I will not be reading drafts; this is for your benefit only to ensure that you do not have high levels of plagiarism.

Please adhere to the HEALTH Writing and Referencing Guide regarding formatting, use of cover pages, word count and referencing. This can be found on the Learning@Griffth course website.

Resubmission

Students will be offered the opportunity to resubmit on the following grounds:

Failureto address the human rights aspect of the assessmentwith the focusonly on the health issue.

High levels of (unintentional) plagiarism.

A failmark.

Poor referencing andin-textcitations.

How to Guide

Step 1: Identify a population within a nation/ state: For example: men in India, Rohingya in Bangladesh, mothers in Ethiopia, the elderly in Australia.

Step 2: Identify the most pressing health issues affecting this population. Choose at least 3.

Step 3. Choose one health issue.

Step 4: Identify the determinants of this health issue.

Step 5: Analyse how the determinants of this health issue is related to equity and human rights. You may want to focus on a major determinant such as food insecurity resulting in malnutrition. Please mention the other determinants so that your issue is well contextualised.

Use the following as a guide to structure your report.

Introduction

Introduce the topic and the population you have chosen, provide an outline or signpost the sections of the report and note the main conclusion/s.

Background

Set the context (historical, cultural, economic) for this population and describe the population. You may consider issues of power, social structure, equity, or conflict.

Health issue

Outline the major health issues for this population.

Choose one health issue and discuss its determinants and justify your choice using academic and grey literature to justify your choice.

Human rights issues

Analyse how the identified health issue is related to equity and human rights.

Specify whether any human rights are being violated or any that are not being addressed, and refer to relevant literature, including human rights documents, to support your claim.

Analyse the human rights context. Has the country signed or ratified any relevant human rights documents? Are there any human rights violations? Is the country in a position to address these issues? What are some recommendations that you suggest the state can make/ needs to consider to improve the health-related human right?

Conclusion

Summarise the findings of the report, noting the most important evidence/support.

Highlight the significance of your findings or conclusions and any broader implications.

References

List references, adhering to APA 7 referencing style.

NB. Please note that you are exploring and analysing the issue for this assessment task. In Assessment 3 you will identify rights-based approaches to address the issue.

Marking Rubric

Criteria Weighting of the criteria within this assessment item only

Background (political, historical, economic, and cultural context) of the chosen population and rationale for the chosen health issue 10/30

Description of relevant human rights international agreements (covenants, treaties) in relation to the health issue 5/30

Analysis of the human rights context: Has the country signed or ratified the relevant human rights agreements? Does the countrys policies support or contravene the human rights of the population? Is the country in the position to address the issue, why, why not? Recommendations. 15/30

Total 30/30

Rubric

Criteria Excellent Very Good Good Satisfactory Not Satisfactory

Background (political, historical, economic, and cultural context) of the chosen population and rationale for the chosen health issue The political, historical, economic, and cultural context of the chosen population is comprehensively described with strong evidence of critical reflections regarding links between this context and the health issue identified. The student identifies relevant issues such as power, social structure, equity, or conflict, and identifies clear links between them and their contribution to the current situation.

The student has clearly outlined the major health issues. The student has identified one of the most significant health issues to address and justified their choice using logical arguments backed by research.

The student has outlined the relevant determinants related to this health issue and analysed in depth how they are related to the context.

The political, historical, economic, and cultural context of the chosen population is clearly described with good evidence of critical reflections regarding links between this context and the health issue identified. The student identifies some relevant issues such as power, social structure, equity, or conflict, and identifies some links between them and their contribution to the current situation.

The student has outlined most major health issues. The student has identified a significant health issue to address but it may not be the most significant or their justification could be more clearly and logically argued or fully backed by research.

The student has outlined most of the relevant determinants related to this health issue and analysed how they are related to the context. The political, historical, economic, and cultural context of the chosen population is described with some evidence of critical reflections regarding links between this context and the health issue identified. The student identifies relevant issues such as power, social structure, equity, or conflict, but is descriptive and the links between them and their contribution to the current situation is not as clear as it could be.

The student has outlined some major health issues. The student has identified a health issue to address but it may not be the most significant or their justification is not sufficient or not clearly and logically argued or fully backed by research.

The student has described a few relevant determinants related to this health issue with some analysis regarding how they are related to the context. The political, historical, economic, and cultural context of the chosen population is described but the picture is incomplete, and the analysis is basic. There is little to no evidence of critical reflections regarding links between different aspects of the context and the current situation. The population is described but the characteristics may not be the most relevant ones. The student identifies some relevant issues of power, social structure, equity, or conflict but neglects some important elements. They do not draw clear relationship between the issues and the current situation.

The student has outlined some health issues, but they may not be the major ones. The student has identified a health issue to address but it may not be the most significant or their justification could be more clearly and logically argued and backed by research.

The student has described limited determinants related to this health issue with sufficient but limited analysis regarding how they are related to the context. The political, historical, economic, and cultural context of the chosen population is not described to enable the reader to contextualise the health and human rights issues to be presented in the next sections.

There is no critical reflection nor justification for the health issue identified.

The student has outlined some health issues, but they may not be the major ones. The student has identified a health issue to address but it may not be the most significant or their justification is not sufficient nor clearly and logically argued or backed by research.

The student has described limited determinants related to this health issue with insufficient analysis regarding how they are related to the context.

There is insufficient use of literature to support claims.

Description of relevant human rights international agreements (covenants, treaties) in relation to the health issue All relevant human rights documents identified, and relevance to health issue and population identified very clear. Many relevant human rights documents identified, and relevance to health issue and population identified clear. Most relevant human rights documents identified, and relevance to health issue and population identified clear. Human rights documents identified, but relevance to health issue and population identified not clear.

Major relevant documents not identified. No human rights documents identified, or limited relevant documents identified. Unclear relevance to health issue and population identified.

Analysis of the human rights context: Has the country signed or ratified the relevant human rights agreements? Does the countrys policies support or contravene the human rights of the population? Is the country in the position to address the issue, why, why not? Recommendations. The student has deeply analysed how the identified health issue is related to equity and human rights.

The student has identified any human rights that are being violated or that have failed to be addressed and referenced the relevant articles of the human rights documents.

The student has analysed the human rights context by identifying whether the country signed or ratified any relevant human rights documents, whether the country is able to address these issues or what impediments there might be. The student made comprehensive recommendations based on the evidence presented.

The student has analysed how the identified health issue is related to equity and human rights.

The student has identified any human rights that are being violated or that have failed to be addressed and referenced some relevant articles of the human rights documents.

The student has analysed the human rights context by identifying whether the country signed or ratified any relevant human rights documents, whether the country is able to address these issues or what impediments there might be. The student made relevant recommendations based on the evidence presented.

The student has briefly analysed how the identified health issue is related to equity and human rights, but the links could be clearer.

The student has identified some human rights that are being violated or that have failed to be addressed and referenced the relevant articles of the human rights documents although this could be clearer or more thorough.

The student has basically analysed the human rights context by identifying whether the country signed or ratified any relevant human rights documents. There is some evidence that the student has addressed whether the country is able to address these issues or what impediments there might be, but this could be more thorough. The student made some relevant recommendations but a clearer link to the evidence is needed.

The student has made some attempt to analyse how the identified health issue is related to equity and human rights, but the links could be much clearer.

The student has identified limited human rights that are being violated or that have failed to be addressed. The student has referenced the relevant articles of the human rights documents, but some errors are evident, or the articles are not clearly relevant.

The student has made some attempt to analyse the human rights context by identifying whether the country signed or ratified any relevant human rights documents but have provided little to no analysis regarding whether the country is able to address these issues or what impediments there might be. The student made some relevant recommendations but there was minimal reference to the evidence. The student has made little to no attempt to analyse how the identified health issue is related to equity and human rights.

The student has not identified human rights that are being violated or that have failed to be addressed. The student has not referenced the relevant articles of the human rights documents or has identified irrelevant.

The student has made limited to no attempt to analyse the human rights context by identifying whether the country signed or ratified any relevant human rights documents and provided little to no analysis regarding whether the country is able to address these issues or what impediments there might be. The student made some relevant recommendations but there was minimal reference to the evidence or was not logical.

All sections Used high quality academic references.

Demonstrates a depth of understanding by providing adequate details or examples of the key concepts.

Thorough critiques of the main issues are evident.

Both in text and end of report references are presented clearly in APA 7.

Appropriate human rights documents are used and correctly referenced.

No plagiarism evident via text matching tool. Appropriate academic literature is referenced with evidence of good research.

Demonstrates some depth of understanding by providing adequate details or examples of the key concepts.

Critiques of the main issues are evident but could be more thorough.

Both in text and end of report references are presented APA 7, but a few errors are evident.

Appropriate human rights documents are used and correctly referenced.

No plagiarism evident via text matching tool. Academic literature is referenced but occasionally may not be high level academic sources. There is little evidence of research and the use of academic sources beyond those provided in class.

Demonstrates a little depth of understanding but lacks adequate details or sufficient examples of the key concepts.

Critiques of the main issues are evident but could be much more thorough.

Both in text and end of report references are presented APA 7 but errors are evident.

Some appropriate human rights documents are used with some errors in referencing.

No plagiarism evident via text matching tool. Academic literature is referenced but is not of consistent quality. The research and use of academic sources are mainly limited to those provided in class.

Demonstrates minimal depth of understanding and provides only basic definitions or details or examples of the key concepts.

Critiques of the main issues are superficial.

The concepts, arguments and data are presented in language that demonstrates ambiguity in several areas. Formatting is clear in parts but demonstrates some inconsistency or errors in others. Both in text and end of report references are presented but the student may not be using the correct style or multiple errors are evident.

Significant unintentional plagiarism evident via text matching tool. Academic literature is referenced but is not of the standard required for academic work. The research and use of academic sources are mainly limited to those provided in class.

Demonstrates little to no understanding and provides only basic definitions or details or examples of the key concepts.

Critiques of the main issues are missing or very superficial.

The concepts, arguments and data are not presented clearly or logically. Sentence and paragraph structure is poor.

Both in text and end of report references are consistently incorrect or APA 7 was not used.

Significant intentional plagiarism evident via text matching tool.