Assessment 1 for SA students ( All 10 weeks (week-1 to 10)

Assessment 1 for SA students ( All 10 weeks (week-1 to 10)

Submit in One Document file only

Due date Friday 4th July 2022 by 10 am.

Assessment type: Individual reflective journal (500 words)

Purpose: A reflective journal is a personal record of a student's learning experiences. It is a space where a learner can record and reflect upon their observations and responses to situations, which can then be used to explore and analyse ways of thinking. The purpose of the assessment is to test your understanding of Human Computer Interface Design and its principles applied in the development of a prototype design. The aim of a reflective log is to give you an opportunity to keep a record of the work you undertake, note any existing skills you develop, and learn to identify areas in which you would like to improve. This assessment contributes to learning outcomes a, b, c and d.

Value: 10%

Submission requirements details: Week 2 (2%) + Week 4 (2%) + Week 6 (2%) + Week 8 (2%) + Week 10 (2%) = Total (10%)

Assessment topic: Reflective journal on two week in class activities

33007304671060

00

56356254529455

00

91440437705500Task Details: The template for writing biweekly reflective journals will be provided on Moodle. Students will be expected to prepare the reflective journal accordingly.

Marking Rubric for Assessment 1 (biweekly)

Criteria Fail

(0 - 49%) Pass

(50 - 64%) Credit (65 - 74%) Distinction (75 - 84%) High Distinction (85 - 100%)

Content

Reflection

0.5 Marks Reflection lacks critical thinking. Superficial

connections are made with key course concepts and course materials, activities, and/or assignments Reflection

demonstrates limited critical thinking in applying, analysing, and/or evaluating key course concepts and theories from readings, lectures, media, discussions, activities, and/or assignments Minimal connections made through explanations, inferences, and/or examples. Reflection

demonstrates some degree of critical thinking in applying, analysing, and/or evaluating key course concepts and theories from readings, lectures, media, discussions activities, and/or assignments. Connections made through explanations, inferences, and/or examples. Reflection

demonstrates a high degree of critical thinking in applying, analysing, and evaluating key course concepts and theories from readings, lectures, media, discussions activities, and/or assignments.

Insightful and relevant connections made through contextual explanations, inferences, and examples. Exceptional reflection demonstrates a high degree of critical thinking in applying, analysing, and evaluating key course concepts and theories from readings, lectures, media, discussions activities, and/or assignments.

Personal growth 1 Marks Conveys inadequate evidence of reflection on own work in response to the selfassessment questions posed. Personal growth and awareness are not evident and/or demonstrates a neutral experience with negligible personal impact.

Lacks sufficient inferences, examples, personal insights and challenges, and/or future implications are overlooked. Conveys limited evidence of reflection on own work in response to the selfassessment questions posed. Demonstrates less than adequate personal growth and awareness through few or simplistic inferences made, examples, insights, and/or challenges that are not well developed.

Minimal thought of the future implications of current experience. Conveys evidence of reflection on own work with a personal response to the selfassessment questions posed.

Demonstrates satisfactory personal growth and awareness through some inferences made, examples, insights, and challenges. Some thought of the future implications of current experience. Conveys strong evidence of reflection on own work with a personal response to the self- assessment questions posed. Demonstrates significant personal growth and awareness of deeper meaning through inferences made, examples, well developed insights, and substantial depth in perceptions and challenges.

Synthesizes current experience into future implications. Exceptionally conveys strong evidence of reflection on own work with a personal response to the selfassessment questions posed.

Demonstrates significant personal growth and awareness of deeper meaning through inferences made, examples, well developed insights, and substantial depth in perceptions and challenges.

Synthesizes current experience into future implications.

Writing Quality 0.5 Marks Poor writing style lacking in standard English, clarity, language used, and/or frequent errors in grammar, punctuation, usage, and spelling. Needs work. Average and/or casual writing style that is sometimes unclear and/or with some errors in grammar,

punctuation, usage, and spelling. Above average writing style and logically organized using standard English with minor errors in grammar, punctuation, usage, and spelling. Well written and clearly organized using standard English, characterised by elements of a strong writing style and basically free from grammar, punctuation, usage,

and spelling errors. Exceptionally well written and clearly organised using standard English, characterized by elements of a strong writing style and basically free from grammar, punctuation, usage,

and spelling errors.