Clinical Effectiveness and Safety of Health Technology HLT5005
- Subject Code :
HLT5005
- University :
Southern Cross University Exam Question Bank is not sponsored or endorsed by this college or university.
- Country :
Australia
High Distinction |
Distinction |
Credit |
Pass |
Fail (minor and major fail criteria) |
|
Discuss the clinical effectiveness of the health technology. (500 words) |
The student has provided an excellent explanation how the health technology will improve/support the provision of health services in response to a natural disaster. Excellent description detailing the appropriateness of the health technology to support a communitys (a community can be geographical or population specific) health response to a natural disaster. Excellent choice of relevant evidence regarding the health technologys effectiveness. |
The student has provided a very good explanation how the health technology will improve/support the provision of health services in response to a natural disaster. Very good description detailing the appropriateness of the health technology to support a communitys (a community can be geographical or population specific) health response to a natural disaster. Very good choice of relevant evidence regarding the health technologys effectiveness. |
The student has provided a good explanation how the health technology will improve/support the provision of health services in response to a natural disaster. Good description detailing the appropriateness of the health technology to support a communitys (a community can be geographical or population specific) health response to a natural disaster. Good choice of relevant evidence regarding the health technologys effectiveness. |
The student has provided a superficial explanation how the health technology will improve/support the provision of health services in response to a natural disaster. Shallow description detailing the appropriateness of the health technology to support a communitys (a community can be geographical or population specific) health response to a natural disaster. The choice of evidence regarding the health technologys effectiveness is somewhat relevant. |
The student has failed to explain how the health technology will improve/support the provision of health services in response to a natural disaster. Little to no description detailing the appropriateness of the health technology to support a communitys (a community can be geographical or population specific) health response to a natural disaster. Irrelevant or inaccurate choice of evidence regarding if the health technology effectiveness. |
Is the chosen health technology safe? (200 words) |
Excellent description of any concerns about the safety or risks associated with health technology. |
Very good description of any concerns about the safety or risks associated with health technology. |
Good description of any concerns about the safety or risks associated with health technology. |
Superficial description of any concerns about the safety or risks associated with health technology. |
Concerns about the safety or risks associated with health technology are missing or inaccurate. |
Other consideration about the health technology (200 words) |
Excellent description of the barriers or facilitators that are associated with the health technology. |
Very good description of the barriers or facilitators that are associated with the health technology. |
Good description of the barriers or facilitators that are associated with the health technology. |
Basic description of the barriers or facilitators that are associated with the health technology. |
Missing or inaccurate description of the barriers or facilitators that are associated with the health technology. |
Writing Style/Grammar Grammar, spelling, punctuation Coherency |
Clear, coherent writing style with an excellent structured, easy to follow essay. Outstanding attention to spelling, punctuation and grammar. |
Clear, coherent style with a very good structure. Comprehensive attention to spelling, punctuation and grammar. Only a very few errors. |
Good style with a reasonable structure Competent attention to spelling, punctuation and grammar. A few grammatical errors. |
Fairly well written however needed more attention to spelling, punctuation and grammar. Grammatical errors. |
Poor style. Pattern of ungrammatical writing Confused structure. Little attention to spelling and punctuation. Errors. |
Referencing sources (number and quality) and reference list APA 7th only Alphabetical order in reference list |
All in-text citations follow required style. Excellent sources Correct reference list. |
The majority of in-text citations follow required style. Comprehensive sources Near correct reference list. |
Most in-text citations follow required style. Good sources Generally correct reference list. |
Some in-text citations follow required style. Adequate resources Reference list contains errors |
In-text citations do not follow required style. Poor or missing sources Reference list is incomplete or missing. |
