d you go through, what data might you need and so on

d you go through, what data might you need and so on

Submission format

A basic layout for this type of paper includes:

Introduction: The introduction should reveal some broad knowledge of the overall topic.

Part 1

Review of the literature: A literature review of how systems thinking approaches have been used to address the topic you have selected. Synthesise information from a variety of significant sources related to the major topic of the paper.

Part 2

Propose a method (with justification): Within this section you should propose a systems thinking method you would employ to address the issue. (You could also indicate how you would amend, innovate and/or build upon a systems thinking method that has already been used.) Justify why you are proposing the use of a method which has not been used (or innovation of a method that has already been used).

Conclusion: The conclusion should reinforce the major claims in a way that is not just a summary. Indicate the significance of what you are proposing beyond the scope of the paper. For example, clarify the significance of the method (or innovation) you have suggested: what new information will the application generate? how might it inform interventions and/or decision-makers? etc.

References.

When submitting the paper please include a cover page with your submission which includes the following information:Student IDNameAssessment numberWord count (excluding cover page and references)

Please consider the video below, which provides Assessment Task 3 advice.

Assessment criteria / grading rubric

CRITERIA A: Excellent

(>80%) B: Very good

(7079%) C: Good

(6069%) D: Acceptable

(5059%) N: Unacceptable

(<50%)

Review of literature

(25 marks) Comprehensive review of the credible literature relevant for the chosen topic.

(20-25 marks) Very good review of the literature relevant for the chosen topic.

(18-20 marks) Good review of the literature relevant for the chosen topic, with most key work included.

(15-17marks) Adequate review of the credible literature relevant for the chosen topic, but missing some key work.

(13-14 marks) Poor or missing review of the literature relevant for the chosen topic.

(<12 marks)

Applying systems thinking

(25 marks) Excellent discussion of how to a systems thinking method (or innovate a method) to the chosen situation or problem.

(20-25 marks) Very good discussion of how to apply a systems thinking method (or innovate a method) to the chosen situation or problem.

(18-20 marks) Good discussion of how to apply a systems thinking method (or innovate a method) to the chosen situation or problem.

(15-17marks) Adequate discussion of how to apply a systems thinking method (or innovate a method) to the chosen situation or problem.

(13-14 marks) Poor or missing discussion of how to apply a systems thinking method (or innovate a method) to the chosen situation or problem.

(<12 marks)

Justification of proposed methods

(25 marks) Outstanding justification for choosing the proposed method (or innovation) over others.

(20-25 marks) Very good justification for choosing the proposed method (or innovation) over others.

(18-20 marks) Good justification for choosing the proposed method (or innovation) over others.

(15-17marks) Acceptable justification for choosing the proposed method (or innovation) over others.

(13-14 marks) Poor or missing justification for choosing the proposed method (or innovation) over others.

(<12 marks)

Possible outcomes from applying systems thinking

(25 marks) Excellent discussion on what the proposed systems thinking approach might reveal or help address the chosen situation or problem.

(20-25 marks) Very good discussion on what the proposed systems thinking approach might reveal or help address the chosen situation or problem.

(18-20 marks) Good discussion on what the proposed systems thinking approach might reveal or help address the chosen situation or problem.

(15-17marks) Adequate discussion on what the proposed systems thinking approach might reveal or help address the chosen situation or problem.

(13-14 marks) Poor or missing discussion on what the proposed systems thinking approach might reveal or help address the chosen situation or problem.

(<12 marks)