diff_months: 5

Evaluating the Effectiveness of Sustainable Strategies in [Industry/Location] SUS301

Flat 50% Off Order New Solution
Added on: 2025-04-29 06:50:19
Order Code: LD527304
Question Task Id: 0

Assignment 1: Essay (Individual) 30%


Learning outcomes


Develop an in-depth understanding of various sustainable development approaches. Critically examine diverse perspectives and their associated challenges and provide a well- founded argument.


Due Date


27/04/2025 Sunday 11:55pm


Word document must be submitted to Moodle by Sunday 27/04/2025 Sunday 11:55pm


Name your file as Assignment 1 Name_ID.docx as Assignment 1 Jon_123456789.docx

Details of Assessment Task

Write an academic essay on the following topic:

Research and analyse the sustainable strategies implemented within a specific industry, field, or location of your choice. Evaluate the effectiveness of these strategies in promoting sustainability, taking into account their environmental, social, economic, and cultural impacts. Explore both successful implementations and shortcomings of these approaches, derive lessons learned, provide recommendations for enhancing existing strategies or propose alternative approaches to further sustainability goals.

GUIDELINES:

Weight: This assignment is worth 30% of your final grade

Word count: Approx. 2000 words (+/-10%)

Margins: Normal

Font: Times New Roman 12;

1.5 spacing

(List of References = single spacing, with a line between each entry).

Format: Please upload as a WORD file.

Sources: Include at least 10 scholarly sources in your assignment. Referencing: Citations and reference list must follow APA 7th reference style.

Structure a few tips!

Introduction:

Make sure it grabs attention, clarifies the issues. Your title, thesis and first paragraph are vital!

Body:



  • Make sure each Main Point and indeed, each paragraph, focuses on one idea and flows from your

  • Begin paragraphs with topic sentences, support assertions with evidence, and expound your ideas

  • Use subheadings for each new topic / subsection to make your essay more reader friendly!



Conclusion:

Round off professionally; summarise the answer to your question, ending on some a final thought (quotation, another question, a challenge to think or call to action etc.).

Language:

Before uploading your essay be sure to



  • Run it through a grammar / spelling

  • Proofread it - polish structure, check vocabulary, consider alternative wording to give it more flow!



Style:



  • Tone should be friendly; conversational but not too informal

  • Speak to your reader as if theyre in front of Instead of writing the essay, try talking it!



General tips for writing essays Research:

Begin the essay writing process by researching your topic, making yourself an expert. Utilize the internet, the academic databases, and the library. Take notes and immerse yourself in the words of known experts in the field etc.

Analysis:

Now that you have a good knowledge base, start analyzing the arguments of the essays you're reading. Clearly define the claims, write out the reasons, the evidence. Look for weaknesses of logic, and also strengths. Learning how to write an essay begins by learning how to analyze essays written by others.

Brainstorming:

Your essay will require insight of your own, genuine essay-writing brilliance. Ask yourself a dozen questions and answer them. Meditate with a pen in your hand. Take walks and think and think until you come up with original insights to write about.

Use your essay as a springboard:

Pick your best idea and pin it down in a clear assertion that you can write your entire essay around. Your essay is your main point, summed up in a concise sentence that lets the reader know where you're going, and why. It's practically impossible to write a good essay without a clear essay.

Outline your essay first.

Sketch out your essay before straightway writing it out. Use one-line sentences to describe paragraphs, and bullet points to describe what each paragraph will contain. Play with the essay's order. Map out the structure of your argument, and make sure each paragraph is unified.

Introduction:

Now sit down and write the essay. The introduction should grab the reader's attention, set up the issue, and lead in to your essay. Your intro is merely a buildup of the issue, a stage of bringing your reader into the essay's argument. The title and first paragraph are probably the most important elements in your essay. In the first paragraph you either hook the reader's interest or lose it.

Paragraphs:

Each individual paragraph should be focused on a single idea that supports your essay. Begin paragraphs with topic sentences, support assertions with evidence, and expound your ideas in the clearest, most sensible way you can. Speak to your reader as if he or she were sitting in front of you. In other words, instead of writing the essay, try talking the essay.

Misc Points:

Explore the evidence. Any assertion you or others settle on requires a certain amount of evidence, be it in the form of studies, facts, reasoning, personal anecdotes, or authoritative quotations. First locate the assertion; then ask what evidence there is to believe it. Assess the strength of this evidence. What issues or flaws are associated with this evidence? How could it be stronger? Should you believe it? Why or why not?

Look beyond the obvious. Having an insight means to have an idea others don't already see or realize themselves. We almost always have some obvious observations about issues. Your job in writing an essay is to come up with something new, something original and exciting. Your job is to tell the reader: It's not about X. Instead, it is really about Y!

Identify assumptions. An assumption is any unstated assertion that one assumes to be true, but which may actually not be true. Every issue or problem has a few assumptions related to it. Usually these assumptions are part of the reason why the problem is a problem in the first place. Ask yourself what is being assumed in the topic or problem? What do people take for granted to be true? What if this assumption were false?

Define the problem. Figure out what the problem is. Until you figure this out, your brainstorming won't have any direction or purpose. Ask yourself not only what the problem is, but why it is indeed a problem. A problem for whom? When did it first become a problem? What is the root of the problem?

Ask questions. Write down ten questions about the problem or issue. They can be any ten questions, just write them down (e.g., What caused X?, How is X defined? What can X be compared to?). Asking these questions will generate answers that may contain useful ideas. Some questions won't lead to fruitful answers, but the few that do may lead you to a major insight that could form the basis of your paper.

Examine biases. Recognize that you have some unconscious biases in the way you view the world around you. These biases could be social, economic, religious, environmental, ethnic, or cultural predispositions that prevent you from seeing the issue in another light. Ask yourself how a person from another walk of life (a Buddhist monk in Nepal, for example) might view the same problem. What about an elderly person, or a child? An American versus an Egyptian? Step outside yourself.

Make it arguable

Your essay must make an arguable assertion. To test whether your assertion is arguable, ask yourself whether it would be possible to argue the opposite. If not, then it's not a essay -- it's more of a fact. For example:



  • Not Arguable: "Computers are becoming an efficient mechanism for managing and transmitting information in large businesses." (Who's going to dispute this? It's not an arguable assertion -- it's a fact.)




  • Arguable: "Heavy use of computers may disrupt family cohesion and increase divorce in " (This is arguable because many people may not believe it. It would make a good essay!)



Be specific

The essay must also be specific. Avoid broad, vague generalizations. Your essay should include detail and specificity, offering the reader the why behind your reasoning.



  • Poor Specificity: "We should not pass the microchip bill." (Hey, not specific enough! It's just a value statement and doesn't provide enough reasoning for the reader.)

  • Good Specificity: "Because the microchip insert causes serious health hazards such as cancer and brain tumors to those who use it, the microchip should not be passed." (Now the essay is much more specific, and the reader gets a clear idea of what the essay is going to be about.



GRADING CRITERIA: 100 marks (30%)


NAME & ID:


1. INTRODUCTION: The extent to which this section demonstrates the following characteristics:


Description


Unsatisfactory


Pass


Excellent


Mark


0


1-2


3-4


5-6


7-8


9


10


/10


Identify the focus of the discussion/essay


statement


No attempt at introduction


Topic to be discussed not introduce


Has attempt to introduce topic but vague


Introduces topic but is wordy


Introduces topic but sometime unclear


Introduces topic in general but interesting way


Clear focus and concise


Rationale of the discussion


Rationale not included


Rationale included but vague


Rationale included but is wordy


Rationale included but sometime unclear


Clear but not concise rationale included


Concise rationale included


Structure of the essay


Outline not included


Outline included but vague


Outline included but is wordy


Outline included but sometime


unclear


Clear but not concise outline


included


Concise outline included


2. DISCUSSION: The extent to which this section demonstrates the following characteristics:


Description


Unsatisfactory


Pass


Excellent


Mark


0


1-12


13-24


25-36


37 - 48


49


50


/50


Focus of the discussion


Key concepts are not identified


Very Poor identification and understanding of the key concepts


Weak/insufficient identification and understanding of the key concepts


A sufficient number of relevant key concepts identified and discussed


A good understanding of the key concepts demonstrated


A very good understanding of the key concepts demonstrated


A strong understanding of the key concepts demonstrated.


Additional relevant concepts identified and linked to the


discussion


Depth & analysis


Analysis are off topic


Present only one side of the argument, no connections with any other material


Little attempts made at analysis, connections with other materials are limited and vague


Substantial information, evidence of analysis, connections are made but sometimes not clear


Substantial information, evidence of analysis, connections are made and clear


Rich in content, insightful analysis, clear connections made to the previous content


Rich in content, insightful analysis, clear connections made to the real- life situations or to the previous


content


3. CONCLUSION: The extent to which this section demonstrates the following characteristics:



Description


Unsatisfactory


Pass


Excellent


Mark


0


1-2


3-4


5-6


7-8


9


10


/10


Reviews and articulate the main points raised in the discussion


No attempt at conclusion


Conclusion may be attempted, but does not review the main points


Conclusion provided a summary of main point but vague


Conclusion provided a summary of main points, but wordy


Conclusion provided a summary of the main points, but citations was


included


Conclusion provided summary of the main points and clear


Conclusion was focused, critical, and convincing


4. STRUCTURE, STYLE, & PRESENTATION: The extent to which this section demonstrates the following characteristics:



Description


Unsatisfactory


Pass


Excellent


Mark


0


1-4


5-7


7.5 - 10


11-13


14


15


/15


Structure of essay


Essay structure not followed


Essay lacked a clear or logical conceptual structure


Basic structure presented


Structure of essay was evident but difficult to follow at times


Structure of essay was good and but sometime


difficult to follow


Structure of essay was very good and easy to follow


Structure of essay was clear and logical


Sentence & Paragraph construction


Incomplete sentences throughout; Poor/Unclear construction of paragraph


Numerous incomplete sentences; Numerous short and/or long paragraph


Many incomplete sentences;


Many short and/or long paragraphs


Some incomplete sentences;


Some short and/or long paragraphs; and/or long paragraph may


contain multiple ideas


Most sentences well- constructed; Most paragraphs were correctly constructed and


contained one idea


Good sentence and paragraph construction; Paragraph contained one idea


Strong & clear sentences; Paragraph were clear-focused and well- constructed


Written Presentation


e.g. spelling, punctuation, grammar


Significant errors throughout


Many errors throughout, often repeated


Many errors throughout, seldom repeated


Some errors throughout


Some errors, mostly minor


Very few errors, mostly minor


Flawless


5. SOURCE MATERIALS: The extent to which this section demonstrates the following characteristics:


Description


Unsatisfactory


Pass


Excellent


Mark


0


1-4


5-7


7.5-10


11-13


14


15


/15


Use of support material to support discussion


No sources used to support the discussion


Very limited use of literature e.g. 1-2 source used, and/or overuse of quotations, and/or non-scholarly sources


used


Limited use of literature e.g. 3-4 sources used to support the discussion, and overuse of


quotations


Basic use of literature e.g. 5-6 sources to support the discussion


Good use of literature to support ideas


e.g. 7-8 sources used


Good use of wide range literature


e.g. 9 sources used


Excellent use of literature e.g. 10+ sources used


Quality of resources used


Variation of resources used not evident


Poor quality of sources sources lacked relevance to the topic


Limited quality, and/or overreliance on dated sources, and/or non- scholarly sources


Adequate quality and variety including journal articles, and/or some overreliance on texts or dated sources


Most sources of good quality, and/or some evidence of independently sourced and


relevant materials


Good quality and variety of materials used, and/or additional relevant materials sourced and integrated


Excellent quality and variety of sources used


In-text citation


No in-text citation


Significant errors


A number or errors


Some errors


Some minor errors


Few minor errors


Flawless


Reference list


No reference list included


Significant errors


A number or errors


Some errors


Some minor errors


Few minor errors


Flawless


TOTAL


/100


Deduction for lateness & plagiarism



FINAL TOTAL


/100

  • Uploaded By : Akshita
  • Posted on : April 29th, 2025
  • Downloads : 0
  • Views : 134

Order New Solution

Can't find what you're looking for?

Whatsapp Tap to ChatGet instant assistance

Choose a Plan

Premium

80 USD
  • All in Gold, plus:
  • 30-minute live one-to-one session with an expert
    • Understanding Marking Rubric
    • Understanding task requirements
    • Structuring & Formatting
    • Referencing & Citing
Most
Popular

Gold

30 50 USD
  • Get the Full Used Solution
    (Solution is already submitted and 100% plagiarised.
    Can only be used for reference purposes)
Save 33%

Silver

20 USD
  • Journals
  • Peer-Reviewed Articles
  • Books
  • Various other Data Sources – ProQuest, Informit, Scopus, Academic Search Complete, EBSCO, Exerpta Medica Database, and more