Identified possible Regulated Restrictive Practice (including type) Is this practice required to be reported to the NDIS Commission? What process is

Submission template

Identified possible Regulated Restrictive Practice (including type) Is this practice required to be reported to the NDIS Commission? What process is required to be followed to report to the Commission? What questions or concerns do you have about the use of the practice meeting legislative and policy requirements? Where the practice does not promote human rights or meet legislative and policy requirements, briefly suggest an alternative approach.

Steps Descriptions

4 Submit your individual summary using theSubmissionprocess described above.

View Rubric

Rubric for assessment 2

Rubric for assessment 2

Criteria Ratings Pts

Accurately identify restrictive practices present in report and scenario (30%) 30 pts

Achieved

Learner accurately identifies 70% or more of the restrictive practices present in the report and scenario presented.

0 pts

Not Achieved / 30 pts

Recommend appropriate processes for reporting and authorisation (20%) 20 pts

Achieved

Learner recommends appropriate processes for reporting and authorisation for 70% or more of the regulated restrictive practices present in the report and scenario.

0 pts

Not achieved / 20 pts

Identify if practices meet legislative and policy requirements for restrictive practices and recommend appropriate alternatives (50%) 50 pts

Achieved

Learner analysis of each restrictive practice identifies at least 70% of the uncertainties or concerns where the use of the practice does not meet legislative and policy requirements and recommends an appropriate alternative approach or action.

0 pts

Not achieved / 50 pts

Total Points: 0

Assessment task 2 (AT2): Analyse, recommend, and report regulated restrictive practices within ethical, legal and policy requirements.

Due: Sun Jul 14, 2024 23:59Due: Sun Jul 14, 2024 23:59

Missing

Ungraded, 100 Possible Points100Points Possible

Attempt

In Progress

NEXT UP: Submit Assignment

Add Comment

Unlimited Attempts Allowed

Details

Due: Sunday end of Week 8

Length: 500 words (+/- 10%)

Weight: 40%

Submission: Submit your assignment file by dragging it into the Upload area at the bottom of this page, then clicking the checkbox to agree to the user agreement, and finally clicking 'Submit Assignment'. You can select more than one file to upload. Go to thisStep-by-step guideLinks to an external site.. for more information.

Grading and feedback: Use the progress tracker at the top of this page to see the status of your assignment submission. You will receive feedback on your result 14 days after submission.

Task description

For this task, you will examine the behaviour support plan of an NDIS participant and a scenario involving the participant being supported by an NDIS provider.

In your analysis you will:

Identify all practices that may be considered regulated restrictive practices present

Assess whether the approach being used towards the person promotes human rights and adheres to the legislative and policy requirements

Recommend appropriate processes, authorisation and reporting of regulated restrictive practices

Recommend alternative approaches where the use of the restrictive practice was not the least restrictive.

Skill

Completion of this assessment task will contribute to the development of the following skills/capabilities:

Identify & seek authorisation for restrictive practices: Identify the use of restrictive practices and gather appropriate authorisation documents. Promote the least restrictive practice.

Assessment criterion related to skills

The criterion you will be assessed on are listed below. All relate to the skill linked to this assessment task.

Criterion Skill

Accurately identify restrictive practices present in report and scenario. Identify & seek authorisation for restrictive practices: Identify the use of restrictive practices and gather appropriate authorisation documents. Promote the least restrictive practice.1

Recommend appropriate processes for reporting and authorisation. Identify if practices meet legislative and policy requirements for restrictive practices and recommend appropriate alternatives. 1FromNDIS Self-assessment Resource Guide for Positive Behaviour Support Capability FrameworkLinks to an external site., Core to Proficient level skills.

Intended learning objective

This assessment task is aligned with the following learning objective:

ILO3:Analyse regulated restrictive practices and recommend appropriate uses that promote human rights and are within legislative requirements.

Instructions

Steps Descriptions

1 Read the following:

Behaviour support plan for Maria, and

Scenario for Maria2 Analyse the information provided and consider the following:

What practices present may need to be reviewed to determine if it is a regulated restrictive practice?

Which of the possible regulated restrictive practices are required to be reported to the NDIS Commission and if so, what process would be followed to do this?

What questions or concerns do you have about the use of the practice meeting legislative and policy requirements and promoting human rights for Maria?

Where the practice does not promote human rights, or meet legislative and policy requirements, what alternative approach would you suggest?

NOTE: For this analysis, consider using the tools provided in Module 4, such as the restrictive practice decision making trees, behaviour support plan authorisation and quality checklists in your analysis.

3 Copy the Submission template below to a Word document and complete it. Please also include your name on the word document.

You may use dot points in the table, where appropriate, to stay below the word limit of 500 words.

Please have only one restrictive practice per row in the table and consider the questions for each restrictive practice individually.

Submission template

Identified possible Regulated Restrictive Practice (including type) Is this practice required to be reported to the NDIS Commission? What process is required to be followed to report to the Commission? What questions or concerns do you have about the use of the practice meeting legislative and policy requirements? Where the practice does not promote human rights or meet legislative and policy requirements, briefly suggest an alternative approach.

Steps Descriptions

4 Submit your individual summary using theSubmissionprocess described above.

View Rubric

Rubric for assessment 2

Rubric for assessment 2

Criteria Ratings Pts

Accurately identify restrictive practices present in report and scenario (30%) 30 pts

Achieved

Learner accurately identifies 70% or more of the restrictive practices present in the report and scenario presented.

0 pts

Not Achieved / 30 pts

Recommend appropriate processes for reporting and authorisation (20%) 20 pts

Achieved

Learner recommends appropriate processes for reporting and authorisation for 70% or more of the regulated restrictive practices present in the report and scenario.

0 pts

Not achieved / 20 pts

Identify if practices meet legislative and policy requirements for restrictive practices and recommend appropriate alternatives (50%) 50 pts

Achieved

Learner analysis of each restrictive practice identifies at least 70% of the uncertainties or concerns where the use of the practice does not meet legislative and policy requirements and recommends an appropriate alternative approach or action.

0 pts

Not achieved / 50 pts

Total Points: 0

Choose a submission type.

Submission type Upload, currently selectedUploadMore submission optionsMore