Marker

Student Name:

Levels of Achievement

Performance Criteria

Excellent (A+)

Very Good/Good (A,A-)

Satisfactory (B,B,B-)

Needs Improvement (C+,C)

Unsatisfactory

Mark

Warehouse Operations

Clear and concise analysis of warehouse layout and storage equipment, realistic recommendations, well linked.

Assumptions clearly and concisely identified.

No gaps in understanding/accuracy.

Reasoning is concise and critical.

Analysis of warehouse layout and storage equipment is systematic and recommendations are mostly realistic and linked.

Assumptions clearly identified.

Few gaps in understanding/accuracy.

Reasoning clear with little error, minimal criticality.

Analysis of warehouse layout and storage equipment is provided but recommendations not realistic or linked in places.

Identification of some assumptions.

Some gaps in understanding/accuracy.

Reasoning clear but with some errors.

Analysis of warehouse layout and storage equipment is provided but recommendations are not realistic and poorly linked.

Identification of assumptions limited.

Several gaps in understanding and accuracy.

Reasoning contains omissions and errors.

Content missing. Sources not cited. Reasoning negligible. Difficult to understand

/ 5

4.1- 5

3.6 - 4

3.1 3.5

2.5 - 3

<2>

Warehouse Procedures & Processes

Clear and concise description and analysis of cross docking and product placement, realistic recommendations, well linked.

Assumptions clearly and concisely identified.

No gaps in understanding/accuracy.

Reasoning is concise and critical.

Description and analysis of cross docking and product placement is systematic and recommendations are mostly realistic and linked.

Assumptions clearly identified.

Few gaps in understanding/accuracy.

Reasoning clear with little error, minimal criticality.

Description and analysis of cross docking and product placement is provided but recommendations not realistic or linked in places.

Identification of some assumptions.

Some gaps in understanding/accuracy.

Reasoning clear but with some errors.

Description and analysis of cross docking and product placement is provided but recommendations are not realistic and poorly linked.

Identification of assumptions limited.

Several gaps in understanding and accuracy.

Reasoning contains omissions and errors.

Content missing. Sources not cited. Reasoning negligible. Difficult to understand

/ 5

4.1- 5

3.6 - 4

3.1 3.5

2.5 - 3

<2>

Warehouse Technologies

Describes and analyses order picking technologies and WMS concisely.

Describes and analyses order picking technologies and WMS.

Describes and analyses most order picking technologies and WMS.

Describes and analyses some order picking technologies and WMS.

Content missing.

Sources not cited.

/ 10

Two WMSs appropriate for the operation are recommended and fully justified and providers are identified

ROI and payback calculated with no error.

No errors in understanding/accuracy.

Two WMSs appropriate for the operation are recommended and justified, with providers identified.

Few gaps in understanding/accuracy.

Reasoning clear with little error, minimal criticality.

Two WMSs appropriate for the operation are recommended, while not clearly justified, with providers identified.

Some gaps in understanding/accuracy.

Reasoning clear but with some errors.

Two WMSs are recommended while providers are not identified.

Some elements missing or inaccurate.

Reasoning contains omissions and errors.

Reasoning negligible. Difficult to understand

ROI and payback calculated with error

Reasoning is concise and critical.

8.1 - 10

7.1 - 8

6.1 -7

5 - 6

<5>

Academic rigor (written expression and referencing)

Excellent depth of research using reputable or authoritative sources.

Effective use of citations wherever appropriate.

APA 7 convention is followed without error.

Good depth of research using reputable or authoritative sources.

Citations provided appropriately.

APA 7 convention is followed with minor errors.

Acceptable depth of research using reputable or authoritative sources.

Some missing citations.

APA 7 convention is followed with some errors.

Some research using reputable or authoritative sources.

Many missing citations.

APA 7 convention is followed with several errors.

Insufficient depth of research using reputable or authoritative sources.

Citations missing, or misrepresenting the cited source (false citation).

Poor use of APA 7 convention.

/ 5

Formatting and written expression is clear and concise.

Formatting and written expression is mostly clear.

Formatting and written expression is clear but with room for improvement.

Formatting and written expression is understandable but difficult to follow.

Formatting not appropriate to the task.

Expression difficult to understand

4.1 - 5

3.6 - 4

3.1 3.5

2.5 - 3

<2>

Total

/ 25

Percentage

%