Legal Case Analysis Assignment LAWS1002

Legal Case Analysis Assignment Case Law Research (20%)

Word Count:1000 words
Weight:20% of final grade
Due Date:Sunday, 6th April 2025 at 11:59 PM

Assignment Overview:

This assignment requires students to critically analyse a landmark Australian legal case. The task focuses on examining the procedural background, key legal principles, and judicial reasoning behind the decision. Additionally, students must investigate how the chosen case has influenced later legal rulings.

Instructions:

Step 1 Choose one of the following High Court cases:

• Roach v Electoral Commissioner(2007) 233 CLR 162

• Secretary, Department of Health and Community Services (NT) v JWB and SMB (Marions Case)(1992) 175 CLR 218

• Dietrich v The Queen(1992) 177 CLR 292

Step 2 Address the following in your assignment:

1. Procedural History:

   • Outline how the case progressed through the courts before reaching the High Court.

   • Include any significant appeals or previous judgments.

2. Material Facts:

   • Identify the key facts that gave rise to the legal dispute.

   • Highlight any unique circumstances relevant to the court's decision.

3. Legal Issues:

   • Discuss the core legal questions the court had to resolve.

   • Explain why these issues were important in the broader context of Australian law.

4. Judgment(s):

   • Summarise the majority judgment and its reasoning.

   • Include dissenting opinions if applicable, and explain the differences in interpretation.

5. Case Influence:

   • Provide at least one example of how the case has been used in subsequent legal decisions.

   • Indicate whether it has beenapplied,distinguished, oroverturnedin later judgments.

Submission Requirements:

• Word limit:1000 words

• Referencing:APA or AGLC (check course guidelines)

• Academic integrity: Ensure all work is properly cited and free from plagiarism

• Format: Submit as a Word document or PDF via the course portal

Helpful Tips:

• Use legal databases such as AustLII, Jade.io, or LexisNexis for accurate case references.

• Focus on clarity and critical analysis rather than summary alone.

• Consider the broader impact of the case on Australian constitutional or human rights law, if relevant.

Assessment Two Rubric