diff_months: 16

MGT201A Project Management Case Analysis

Download Solution Now
Added on: 2023-03-15 07:26:59
Order Code: 487316
Question Task Id: 0

Task Summary

The purpose of this assessment is to further analyse the project you selected in Assessment 1 to expand and demonstrate your knowledge, understanding and application of project management methodologies from the modules to your selected project.

NOTE: students must use the same project in Assessment 2 as they did in Assessment 1. Failure to do so will result in automatic failure of this assessment.

Please refer to the Task Instructions for details on how to complete this task.

Context

In Assessment 1 you started to think like a project manager. In Assessment 2 you will further research the project you looked at in Assessment 1 and address the four (4) key questions listed below under the Task Instructions.

Task Instructions

 Based on the information provided for the project, and from your understanding of the theories from the modules, you are required to address the following key areas:

  1. Is the project demonstrating Scope Creep? Justify your
  2. Based on the current stage of the project, discuss, and justify which Knowledge Areas from PMBoK apply to the project.
  3. For the project, create a risk matrix for the key risks and their
  4. Discuss and justify the particular personal competencies that are important for the project’s Project Manager to possess in order to be most effective in their

The assignment takes the form of a report with the following recommended format:

  • Cover page including student name and number
  • Executive Summary
  • Introduction
  • Discussion addressing the key four (4) questions listed above
  • Conclusion
  • References – MINIMUM 3 PROJECT MANAGEMENT REFERENCES
  • Appendices

Please use tables and exhibits from the course materials to support your assessment. The 1250-word count applies only to the body (Introduction, Discussion and Conclusion). Referencing

It is essential that you use appropriate APA style for citing and referencing research. Please

see more information on referencing here in the Academic Writing Guide found via the Academic Skills website.

Submission Instructions

Submit your Individual Case Analysis, by clicking on the Assessment link, in the main navigation menu in MGT201A Project Management. The learning facilitator will provide feedback via the Grade Centre in the LMS portal. Feedback can be viewed in My Grades.

Academic Integrity

 All students are responsible for ensuring that all work submitted is their own and is appropriately referenced and academically written according the Academic Writing Guide. Students also need to have read and be aware of Torrens University Australia Academic Integrity Policy and Procedure and subsequent penalties for academic misconduct. These are viewable online.

Students also must keep a copy of all submitted material and any assessment drafts.

  • Uploaded By : Katthy Wills
  • Posted on : March 15th, 2023
  • Downloads : 0
  • Views : 217

Download Solution Now

Can't find what you're looking for?

Whatsapp Tap to ChatGet instant assistance

Choose a Plan

Premium

80 USD
  • All in Gold, plus:
  • 30-minute live one-to-one session with an expert
    • Understanding Marking Rubric
    • Understanding task requirements
    • Structuring & Formatting
    • Referencing & Citing
Most
Popular

Gold

30 50 USD
  • Get the Full Used Solution
    (Solution is already submitted and 100% plagiarised.
    Can only be used for reference purposes)
Save 33%

Silver

20 USD
  • Journals
  • Peer-Reviewed Articles
  • Books
  • Various other Data Sources – ProQuest, Informit, Scopus, Academic Search Complete, EBSCO, Exerpta Medica Database, and more