Not met Fail Pass Credit Distinction High Distinction

Not met Fail Pass Credit Distinction High Distinction

Intake/Referral 0

Did not include. 0

Confused or unclear. 0.5

Basic description of intake & referral.

Satisfactory description of intake and referral. 1

Clear and appropriate description of intake and referral. 1

Outstanding description of intake and referral clear and concise.

Presenting Issue 0

Did not include. 0.5

Confused or unclear. 1.5

Basic description of presenting issue. 2

Satisfactory description of presenting issue. 2.5

Clear and appropriate description of presenting issue. 3

Outstanding description of presenting issue clear and concise.

Family/Social History

*Culture

*Genogram. 0

Did not include. 2

Confused or unclear. No consideration of culture. Limited or no literature. Genogram unclear. 4

Basic Family/Social history information. Culture considered. Minimal literature.

Basic genogram. 5

Satisfactory Family/Social history information. Culture considered in a sound manner. Appropriate literature integrated. Straightforward genogram. 6

Clear and appropriate Family/social history information. Culture considered in a thoughtful manner. Appropriate literature integrated.

Clear, relevant genogram. 8

Clear, appropriate and concise Family/social history information. Culture considered in a nuanced manner. Sophisticated integration of literature. Clear, detailed genogram.

Risk factors 0

Did not include 1

Confused, unclear or inappropriate identification of risk factors. No consideration of culture. Limited or no literature. 2

Basic identification and description of risk factors, limited analysis. Culture attended to in a basic manner. Limited or no literature. 2.5

Satisfactory identification and description of risk factors, basic analysis. Culture explored in a straightforward manner. Appropriate literature integrated. 3

Clear and appropriate identification, description and analysis of risk factors. Culture explored in a relevant manner. Appropriate literature integrated. 4

Outstanding identification, description and analysis of risk factors. Culture explored in a nuanced manner, sophisticated integration of literature.

Protective factors 0

Did not include 1

Confused, unclear or inappropriate identification of risk factors. No consideration of culture. Limited or no literature. 2

Basic identification and description of protective factors, limited analysis. Basic consideration of culture. Limited or no literature.

2.5

Satisfactory identification and description of protective factors, basic analysis, including culture. Appropriate literature integrated. 3

Clear and appropriate identification and description and analysis of protective factors. Culture explored in an appropriate manner, appropriate literature integrated. 4

Outstanding identification, description and analysis of protective factors. Culture explored in a nuanced manner, sophisticated integration of literature.

Client goals 0

Did not include 0.5

Confused, unclear or inappropriate. 1

Basic consideration of client goals 1.25

Competent consideration of client goals. 1.5

Appropriate consideration of client goals. 2

Nuanced consideration of client goals.

History (Case note)

Max 300 words 0

Did not include 1

Confused, unclear or poorly written casual language, judgemental, opinions, jargon. 2

Basic case note, some issues with writing and language: casual language, judgemental, opinions, jargon. 2.5

Competent case note, mostly clear and appropriate. Some issues with writing and language: casual, judgemental, opinions, jargon. 3

Professional case note, clear and appropriate. Minor issues with writing and language: casual, judgement, opinions, jargon. 4

Outstanding, professional case note, clear, concise and appropriate. No issues with writing and language: professional, non-judgemental, no opinions, descriptive and no use of jargon.

Social Work Intervention 0

Did not include. 1

Confused or inappropriate plan for SW intervention. No consideration of Aboriginal ways of working and/or family centred practice. Limited or no literature. 2

Basic plan for SW intervention, including Aboriginal ways of working and family centred practice. Minimal literature. 2.5

Competent intervention, including Aboriginal ways of working and family centred practice. Appropriate literature integrated. 3

Appropriate plan for SW intervention, including Aboriginal ways of working and family centred practice Appropriate literature integrated well. 6

Outstanding plan for SW intervention, including Aboriginal ways of working and family centred practice. Literature integrated in a sophisticated manner.

Evaluation 0

Did not include 0.5

Confused or inappropriate plan for evaluation of social work practice, no literature. 1

Basic plan for evaluation of social work practice, minimal supporting literature. 1.25

Competent plan for evaluation of social work practice using appropriate literature. 1.5

Clear and appropriate plan for evaluation of social work practice using appropriate literature. 2

Outstanding plan for evaluation of social work practice, using appropriate literature.

Academic merit 0

Did not include 10 academic sources. Very confused/unclear writing/format. 2

Did not include 10 academic sources. Confused/unclear writing/format/structure. 3

10 academic sources. Basic writing demonstrated, significant issues with writing/format/structure and referencing. 4

10 academic sources. Writing mostly clear and professional, some issues with writing/format/structure and referencing. 5

>10 academic sources. Writing clear and professional, minor issues with writing /format/structure and referencing. 6

>10 academic sources. Writing clear and professional. Outstanding writing/format/structure and referencing.

Total /40

Feedback: