Operating Systems Project: Migration & Performance Tuning
- Subject Code :
CIT502
- University :
Auckland University of Technology Exam Question Bank is not sponsored or endorsed by this college or university.
- Country :
New Zealand
Programme
Certificate in Information Technology
(Level 5, 60 Credits)
Course
CIT502: Operating Systems
(15 Credits)
Assessment
Project
Weighting within the course:
100%
Assessment Tasks to Learning Outcome and GPOs mapping
Tasks |
Learning Outcomes |
GPO and Credits |
Marks |
Task1: |
LO1 |
GPO1 (5 Cr) GPO3 (2 Cr) |
44 |
Task2: |
LO2 |
GPO2 (3 Cr) |
20 |
Task3: |
LO3 |
GPO5 (2 Cr) |
14 |
Task4: |
LO4 |
GPO6 (1 Cr) |
7 |
Task5: |
LO5 |
GPO7 (2 Cr) |
15 |
Learning Outcomes
LO1: Select and manage operating systems using technical support practices in order to meet organisational requirements.
LO2: Support and enhance operating systems using applicable tools, models, and techniques in order to improve performance.
LO3: Apply professional and ethical practices to operating systems installation projects in order to enhance awareness of social responsibility as an emerging IT professional.
LO4: Resolve operating systems related issue using a collaborative approach in order to enhance communication skills.
LO5: Apply problem-solving and decision-making techniques to install and administer an operating system in order to support an innovative undertaking.
Qualification Graduate Profile Outcomes (GPOs) covered
GPO 1: Apply the fundamentals of IT technical support concepts and practice to securely manage hardware, software, and networking resources to support end users and meet security, ethical and organisational requirements. (LO1)
GPO 2: Apply the fundamentals of information systems concepts and practice, including business concepts, development life cycles, data modelling and administration, to support and enhance organisational processes and systems. (LO2)
GPO 3: Apply knowledge and concepts of business analysis, user experience and interface design to create accessible interactive digital media. (LO1)
GPO 5: Apply professional, legal, and ethical principles and practices in a socially responsible manner as an emerging IT professional. (LO3)
GPO 6: Apply communication, collaboration, teamwork, documentation, and customer service skills to enhance effectiveness in an IT role. (LO4)
GPO 7: Apply critical analysis and decision-making techniques to solve IT problems and provide relevant and timely outcomes. (LO5)
Assessment Conditions
- This is an open book To complete this assessment, utilise the course content, your personal notes, and external resources such as textbooks, online journals, or reliable sources.
- All work must be your own, any content from other sources must be cited and
- All tasks and task items must be successfully
- No limit on the time you can spend on However, must be submitted by the due date
- The purpose of this assessment is to assess your In the event Yoobee suspects collusion, this will be addressed. For more information, please refer to the Student Handbook.
- Submit your completed assessment online in the correct space provided. Some students are eligible for a change in the assessment conditions due to learning If you consider this applies to you, discuss it with your tutor before starting the assessment.
Success Criteria:
You need to meet all the requirements of each of the learning outcomes and receive 50% or more to pass this assessment. You are allowed a maximum of three attempts
To meet all the requirements of each of the learning outcomes, you must achieve PASS results for each task item.
Credits:
This assessment is worth 15 credits.
Grading:
The final grade will be determined by the score achieved in this assessment based on the following table. Should a second or third attempt be required the maximum contribution toward the overall mark for the tasks that required a second or third assessment attempt is 50%. A late submission is considered a second attempt, so the contribution will be capped at 50%.
Grade |
Mark Band Range |
A+ |
Meet all course requirements, mark range (90-100) |
A |
Meet all course requirements, mark range (85-89) |
A- |
Meet all course requirements, mark range (80-84) |
B+ |
Meet all course requirements, mark range (75-79) |
B |
Meet all course requirements, mark range (70-74) |
B- |
Meet all course requirements, mark range (65-69) |
C+ |
Meet all course requirements, mark range (60-64) |
C |
Meet all course requirements, mark range (55-59) |
C- |
Meet all course requirements, mark range (50-54) |
D |
Did not meet all course requirements, mark range (40-49) |
E |
Did not meet all course requirements, mark range (0-39) |
Submission requirements:
- Submit a Word or PDF document that contains your answers to all tasks This is to be submitted in the assessment section of Yoobee Online (the LMS) by the due date.
- The submission must have your name, and ID number clearly printed
- All answers must be labelled with a (heading) by task or subtask number and description, for example
- Task1 Research and Justification
- Task1 Migration Plan
- Task1 Risk Assessment
- Task1 Training and Documentation
Task 1: Strategic Operating System Selection and Migration to meet organisational requirements (44 marks):
LO1: Select and manage operating systems using technical support practices in order to meet organisational requirements.
Scenario:
TechSolutions Inc. is a mid-sized tech company specializing in software development. Through a comprehensive business analysis, it has been identified that the current operating system, Windows 8, poses challenges in effectively running the latest development tools, such as Integrated Development Environments (IDEs), Build Automation, Database Management, and Testing Tools. These issues have led to a decrease in productivity and compatibility concerns within the company's development processes.
In response to these challenges, a thorough business analysis has been conducted, taking into consideration the specific needs and requirements of TechSolutions Inc. The analysis revealed that migrating to the latest version of Windows is recommended, as it offers a more robust development environment support, enhanced features, and improved compatibility with a wide range of development tools commonly utilized by the company.
Using technical support practices to answer each of the following components: 1: Research and Justification (20 marks, 5 marks for each bullet point):
- Explain how a business analysis helps to identify and outline the specific organisational requirements for an operating system that aligns seamlessly with the goals and objectives of TechSolutions Inc.?
- Identify a suitable Windows version and provide a comprehensive overview of the chosen Windows version, emphasising its key features, benefits, and how it caters to the unique software development needs of TechSolutions Inc.
- Justify the selection of Windows over non-Windows based operating systems. Highlight its compatibility with common development tools and how this aligns with the business goals and preferences of TechSolutions Inc..
- Conduct business analysis to explore the implications and considerations of having multiple operating systems within TechSolutions How can a diverse operating system environment be strategically managed to meet varied software development requirements?
2: Migration Plan (8 marks):
- Develop a detailed plan for the migration process from Windows 8 to your chosen Windows, addressing key technical support practices.
- Include steps for data backup and user
3: Risk Assessment (8 marks):
- Conduct a risk assessment for the migration project, identifying potential risks and their impact on the organization.
- Propose mitigation strategies for each identified risk to minimize disruptions during the
4: Training and Documentation (8 marks):
- Develop a training plan for employees to adapt to the new Windows environment, covering essential skills and knowledge required for daily tasks.
- Create comprehensive documentation for employees, including guides for troubleshooting common issues and utilising development tools on your chosen Windows.
Task 2: Performance Analysis and Optimisation (20 marks):
LO2: Support and enhance operating systems using applicable tools, models, and techniques in order to improve performance.
Scenario:
Your organisation relies heavily on a Windows Server 2022-based file server to store and manage critical business data. Recently, several users have reported a noticeable degradation in performance when accessing files and folders on the file server. This performance issue is impacting daily operations, causing delays, and hindering productivity. As the IT administrator responsible for server management, you have been tasked with conducting a performance assessment to identify the root causes and propose optimisations within specified constraints.
You have been provided with a virtual machine (VM) configured as a file server with the following specifications:
CPUs: Maximum available
RAM: 1024MB (fixed)
OS Drive Capacity: 40GB (dynamic)
OS: Windows Server 2022 (Desktop Experience)
Network: External
The clint has complained about slow file access despite a limited number of files on the server. Your task is to replicate the problem by setting up a VM with the given specifications and then conducting a performance analysis. Following the analysis, you are required to provide a comprehensive document with your recommendations.
Complete each of the following components, and comment on tools, models, and techniques you used wherever appropriate.
Current Configuration Analysis (5 marks):
- Evaluate the allocated CPU, RAM, and disk
- Provide screenshots illustrating the VM's specifications, your screenshots must be labelled and commented on
Performance Issues (6 marks):
- Identify potential performance
- Discuss how the current configuration may contribute to slow file
- Include performance monitoring tool screenshots to support your findings, your screenshots must be labelled and commented on
Performance Enhancements (9 marks):
- Propose solutions to address performance issues within the given
- Justify the recommended
- Perform any adjustments to CPU, RAM, disk allocation, and network
- Provide screenshots illustrating the performance enhancements implementation, your screenshots must be labelled and commented on.
Task 3: Ethical Considerations and Social Responsibility (14 marks)
LO3: Apply professional and ethical practices to operating systems installation projects in order to enhance awareness of social responsibility as an emerging IT professional.
Scenario:
As part of an IT consultancy firm, you have been assigned to lead a team in upgrading the operating systems for a multinational corporation with offices worldwide. The company relies heavily on proprietary software for its day-to-day operations, and the upgrade is crucial for maintaining productivity.
Answer the following components to demonstrate applications of professionalism, ethical practices and social responsibility during the operating system upgrading process, refer to the ITP New Zealand Code of Ethics (or similar standard).
Professionalism and Ethical Considerations (8 marks):
- ProvIde a plan for obtaining the necessary software
- Explain why it is important to have legal permission to use the
- Clearly articulate the potential consequences of using software without proper
Social Responsibility (6 marks) :
- Explore and describe strategies within the operating system upgrade process that reduce the creation of outdated or unused software, promoting a more environmentally friendly approach.
- Discuss the implications of software waste within the operating system environment, emphasizing the importance of adopting measures to decrease the environmental footprint associated with obsolete software.
Task 4: Enhancing Communication Skills through Collaborative Problem Resolution (7 marks)
LO4: Resolve operating systems related issue using a collaborative approach in order to enhance communication skills.
Scenario:
Assume you are part of a small IT support team in a company that recently upgraded its operating systems across departments. After the upgrade, employees in the Finance department are experiencing compatibility issues with a critical financial software application. This issue is impacting their day-to-day operations, and immediate resolution is essential to maintain productivity.
Work in a team of at least two students, and engage in a collaborative discussion to identify the specific operating system issues affecting the Finance department.
Note: For effective collaboration and communication, you must utilise platforms like Microsoft Teams, Google workspace, Trello etc. These tools will aid in organising tasks, sharing ideas, and keeping everyone updated on your progress. You will be assessed based on your collaboration, communication and participation in the troubleshooting plan to resolve the Finance department's concern.
Task Components:
Collaborative Problem Identification, communication plan and Troubleshooting (7 marks):
- Clearly articulate the identified problems and potential reasons for the compatibilit
- Develop a communication plan outlining how you will inform the Finance department about the ongoing operating system issues.
- Collaborate with the team members to devise a troubleshooting plan for resolving the compatibility issues.
- Demonstrate evidence of utilising Trello for collaborative efforts in creating a comprehensive troubleshooting plan with the team Reflect on the improved communication skills and efficient task coordination achieved through the use of this collaborative platform.
Task 5: Launching an Innovative Data Analysis Platform (15 mark)
LO5: Apply problem-solving and decision-making techniques to install and administer an operating system in order to support an innovative undertaking.
Scenario:
You are part of a team tasked with setting up an innovative data analysis platform for a research project. The platform will involve extensive data processing, collaboration among team members, and the need for robust security measures due to the sensitive nature of the data. Your goal is to apply problem-solving and decision-making techniques to install and administer an operating system that supports this innovative undertaking.
Answer each of the following components demonstrating problem-solving and decision-making techniques .
Note: For the completion of this task please ensure that all task components are performed within a Hyper- V virtual environment. Clearly specify Hyper-V-related configurations, settings, and considerations in your responses. Take advantage of Hyper-V features such as snapshots or backups to preserve the virtual machine state. The goal is to address compatibility issues with the data analysis tool while operating within the context of the Hyper-V virtualisation platform.
Operating System Installation (4 marks):
- Select an operating system that supports data analysis tools and collaboration features, you can consider the requirement for the installation of the leading data analysis tools like: Python, R programming language, SQL Databases, Microsoft Excel, SAS, etc. Then create a step-by-step guide or video tutorial for the OS installation, emphasising components relevant to data analysis, and include screenshots throughout the process.
- Anticipate and explain briefly challenges such as compatibility issues with data analysis
- Suggest practical solutions, such as pre-installation checks and compatibility
System Configuration and Administration (5 marks):
- Adjust OS settings like memory allocation and processor priority to optimise performance for data analysis tasks.
- Implement security measures like data encryption, access controls and firewall configuration to safeguard sensitive research data.
- Create at least two individual user accounts with varying privileges based on team roles (e.g., analyst, project lead). Assign privileges based on roles. Analysts may have read-only access to certain datasets, while project leads may have full access.
- Implement secure password
- Develop a backup strategy to prevent data
Problem Solving and Decision-Making Scenario Application (6 marks):
As part of the innovative data analysis platform setup, your team has chosen a leading data analysis tool mentioned above, crucial for the success of the research project. However, upon attempting to install and integrate the tool into the operating system, you encounter unexpected compatibility issues that threaten to disrupt the entire data analysis workflow.
- Simulate the given scenario where a crucial data analysis tool encounters compatibility
- Investigate and identify the root cause of the compatibility
- Propose a step-by-step solution, which might involve adjusting settings or seeking an alternative
- Justify your choice of solution, considering impact and
- Explain why the chosen decisions were most suitable for the innovative data analysis
Submission requirements:
Create a Word or PDF document that contains your answers to the tasks below. This is to be submitted in the assessment section of Yoobee Online (the LMS) by the due date.
Task 1: Strategic Operating System Selection and Migration to meet organisational requirements (44 marks):
LO1: Select and manage operating systems using technical support practices in order to meet organisational requirements.
GPO1: Apply the fundamentals of IT technical support concepts and practice to securely manage hardware, software, and networking resources to support end users and meet security, ethical and organisational requirements.
Notes:- To pass this assessment, you must meet all the requirements of each of the learning outcomes (irrespective of the numerical grade awarded), and achieve PASS results for each task rubric item.
For a criterion, where a learner's evidence (answer) meets the evidence required across rubric bands, an average mark will be awarded.
Criteria |
Evidence Required |
||||
Pass |
Fail (Resubmit Required) |
||||
Mark |
5 |
4 |
2.5 |
0 |
|
Business |
Analysis |
Provided a thorough outline |
Outlined how business analysis |
Outlined how business |
The outline of how |
Explanation |
of how business analysis aids |
aids in identifying organisational |
analysis aids in identifying |
business analysis aids in |
|
in identifying organisational |
requirements effectively, |
organisational requirements |
identifying organisational |
||
requirements for an |
demonstrating a good |
accurately but demonstrated |
requirements was unclear |
||
operating system that |
understanding of TechSolutions |
limited understanding of TSI |
or unrelated to |
||
aligned seamlessly with |
Inc.'s goals. Some aspects like |
goals. Aspects like scalability, |
TechSolutions Inc.'s goals. |
||
TechSolutions Inc.'s goals |
scalability, security, or |
security, or compatibility |
Major factors like |
||
and objectives. |
compatibility could have been |
were considered but with |
scalability, security, or |
||
Consideration of scalability, |
more detailed. |
limited detail and/or |
compatibility were not |
||
security, and compatibility |
evidence of understanding. |
addressed or limited |
|||
was comprehensive. |
coverage provided. |
||||
Mark |
5 |
4 |
2.5 |
0 |
|
A Suitable Windows |
Provided a comprehensive |
Provided a good overview of |
Offered an overview of the |
The overview of the |
|
Version Identified |
overview of the selected |
the selected Windows, |
selected Windows, with |
selected Windows was |
|
Windows, highlighting key |
highlighting key features and |
correct but limited coverage |
insufficient or inaccurate. |
||
features and benefits |
benefits. Key functionalities |
of key features and benefits. |
Lacked clarity and failed to |
||
relevant to TechSolutions |
were covered. |
Most functionalities were |
convey the key features |
||
Inc.'s software development |
covered but with limited |
and benefits relevant to |
|||
needs. In-depth coverage of |
detail. |
TechSolutions Inc.'s |
|||
new functionalities was evident. |
software development needs. |
|||
Mark |
5 |
4 |
2.5 |
0 |
Selected Window Justification |
Justified the selection of Windows over non- Windows-based operating systems convincingly, emphasising its compatibility with common development tools. Specific examples and scenarios were effectively employed. |
Justified the selection of Windows over non-Windows- based operating systems clearly, emphasising compatibility with development tools. Some examples or scenarios were employed. |
Provided sound justification for the selection of Windows over non-Windows-based operating systems, emphasising compatibility with development tools. The examples employed were relevant and valid. |
The justification for the selected Windows was unclear or irrelevant. Failed to emphasize compatibility with common development tools, and examples or scenarios were absent or misleading. |
Mark |
5 |
4 |
2.5 |
0 |
Business Analysis |
Utilised business analysis techniques to thoroughly explore the implications and considerations of having multiple operating systems within TechSolutions Inc. Demonstrated a comprehensive understanding of how a diverse OS environment could be strategically managed to meet varied software development requirements. |
Utilised business analysis techniques to explore implications of multiple operating systems, but with some gaps in depth or clarity. Demonstrated an effective/clear? understanding of managing diverse OS environments. |
Provided an exploration of the implications of multiple operating systems with limited depth or clarity. Demonstrated a basic understanding of managing diverse OS environments. |
Failed to analyse sufficiently the implications of multiple operating systems or lacked an understanding of how a diverse OS environment could be strategically managed. |
Mark |
8 |
6 |
4 |
0 |
Migration Plan |
Developed an exceptionally detailed migration plan from Windows 8 to selected |
Developed a detailed migration plan, addressing key technical support practices effectively, |
Presented a workable migration plan with limited detail, addressing key |
The migration plan is unclear or lacks sufficient detail. Key technical |
Windows, covering key technical support practices comprehensively, showcasing a profound understanding of the migration process. Outlined detailed steps for data backup and user training during the migration, ensuring users are well-prepared for the transition to new Windows. The training plan is comprehensive and effectively covers all necessary aspects. |
demonstrating a solid understanding of the migration process, with some aspects possibly needing more elaboration. Provided clear steps for data backup and user training, ensuring users are adequately prepared for the migration. The training plan is effective, but some details could have been more explicit. |
technical support practices with understanding, some aspects possibly needing more elaboration.
Presented steps for data backup and user training with limited detail, ensuring users are prepared for the migration. The training plan is accurate and basic but adequate to perform the data backup and for user training. |
support practices are not adequately addressed, and/or the plan lacks essential components, making it challenging to follow. User training data backup and steps are unclear, incorrect or insufficient. The outlined steps lack clarity, potentially leaving users unprepared for the migration from Windows 8 to the selected version of Windows. |
|
Mark |
8 |
6 |
4 |
0 |
Risk Assessment |
Conducted an extensive risk assessment for the migration project, identifying a comprehensive range of potential risks with clear explanations of their impact on the organisation.
Proposed highly effective and comprehensive mitigation strategies for each identified risk, demonstrating a deep understanding of potential |
Conducted a thorough risk assessment for the migration project, identifying a range of potential risks with well- explained impacts on the organisation.
Proposed effective mitigation strategies for each identified risk, demonstrating a good understanding of potential disruptions and providing clear plans to minimise them |
Conducted risk assessment for the migration project, identifying some potential risks with clear explanations of their impact on the organisation.
Proposed accurate but limited mitigation strategies for some identified risks, and briefly covered the plans to minimise disruptions. |
The risk assessment is unclear or incorrect. Potential risks are not adequately identified, and their impacts on the organisation are not explained.
Mitigation strategies are unclear, incorrect or insufficient. The proposed strategies lack effectiveness, detail, or clarity, leaving potential |
disruptions and providing detailed plans to minimise them. |
disruptions inadequately addressed. |
|||
Mark |
8 |
6 |
4 |
0 |
Training and Documentation |
Developed an exceptional training plan for employees to adapt to the new Windows environment. Covered essential skills and knowledge required for daily tasks comprehensively with a strategic and well- structured approach. Created highly comprehensive documentation for employees, including guides for troubleshooting common issues and utilising development tools on the chosen Windows. The documentation is clear, comprehensive, and easily accessible. |
Developed a thorough training plan for employees to adapt to the new Windows environment. Covered essential skills and knowledge required for daily tasks effectively with a clear and organised approach. Created detailed documentation for employees, including guides for troubleshooting common issues and utilising development tools on the chosen Windows. The documentation is clear and accessible. |
Developed a workable training plan for employees to adapt to the new Windows environment. Covered some essential skills and knowledge for daily tasks. Created documentation for employees, including guides for troubleshooting common issues and utilising development tools on the chosen Windows with limited details. |
The training plan is unclear, irrelevant, or insufficient. Essential skills and knowledge required for daily tasks are not adequately covered, and the plan lacks structure, making it challenging for employees to adapt. Documentation is unclear or insufficient. Guides for troubleshooting common issues and utilising development tools on the chosen Windows lack clarity, completeness, and user-friendliness. |
Task 2: Performance Analysis and Optimisation (20 marks)
LO2: Support and enhance operating systems using applicable tools, models, and techniques in order to improve performance.
Criteria |
Evidence Required |
|||
Pass |
Fail (Resubmit Required) |
|||
Mark |
5 |
4 |
2.5 |
0 |
Current Configuration Analysis |
Provided a thorough evaluation of the allocated CPU, RAM, and disk space, demonstrating a deep understanding of their impact on the virtual machine's performance. Included detailed analysis and insights into optimisation possibilities. Provided labelled, commented, and relevant screenshots illustrating the VM's specifications, including CPU details, RAM allocation, and disk space. The screenshots offer a detailed representation of the virtual machine's configuration. |
Conducted a clear evaluation of the allocated CPU, RAM, and disk space, showing a good understanding of their impact on the virtual machine's performance. Provided insightful observations and suggestions for potential improvements. Provided labelled, commented and relevant screenshots illustrating the VM's specifications, including CPU, RAM, and disk space. The screenshots are clear offering a good visual representation of the virtual machine's configuration. |
Conducted a limited evaluation of the allocated CPU, RAM, and disk space, mentioning their impact on the virtual machine's performance.
Provided labelled and documented screenshots illustrating some aspects of the VM's specifications. The visual representation of the virtual machine's configuration covers the main representation only. |
Failed to evaluate the allocated CPU, RAM, and disk space adequately. The analysis is unclear or lacks consideration for their impact on the virtual machine's performance.
Insufficient or limited illustration of the VM's specifications. The absence of visual representation makes it challenging to assess the virtual machine's configuration accurately. |
Mark |
6 |
4 |
3 |
0 |
Performance Issues |
Identified potential performance bottlenecks, demonstrating a deep understanding of system components and their impact on overall performance. Offered comprehensive insights and recommendations for optimisation. Discussed in-depth how the current configuration may contribute to slow file access, supported by performance monitoring tool screenshots. The discussion demonstrated a profound understanding of system behaviour. |
Identified potential performance bottlenecks, showing a good understanding of system components and their impact on performance. Provided insightful observations and suggestions for potential improvements. Discussed how the current configuration may contribute to slow file access, accompanied by performance monitoring tool screenshots. The discussion showed a good understanding of system behaviour. |
Identified valid potential performance bottlenecks, showing a good understanding of system components and their impact on performance. Provided some observations and suggestions for potential improvements. Discussed the aspects of how the current configuration may contribute to slow file access with limited details and included some performance monitoring tool screenshots. The discussion showed a basic understanding of system behaviour. |
Failed to identify/incorrect identification of potential performance bottlenecks adequately. The analysis is unclear or lacks consideration for system components and their impact on overall performance. Inadequate discussion on how the current configuration may contribute to slow file access and did not include relevant performance monitoring tool screenshots. The discussion is unclear or lacks consideration for system behaviour. |
Mark |
9 |
7 |
4.5 |
0 |
Performance Enhancements |
Proposed comprehensive and innovative solutions to |
Proposed effective solutions to address performance |
Proposed suitable solutions to address performance |
Failed to propose solutions adequately to address |
address performance issues within the given constraints, demonstrating a deep understanding of system components. Justification was detailed, logical, and supported by a profound understanding of performance optimisation. Implemented and justified adjustments to CPU, RAM, disk allocation, and network settings effectively. Provided labelled, commented and relevant screenshots illustrating the performance enhancements, demonstrating a profound impact on system efficiency. Utilised many tools, two models, and two techniques and clearly stated. |
issues within the given constraints, showing a good understanding of system components. Justification was clear, logical, and supported by a solid understanding of performance optimisation. Implemented and justified adjustments to CPU, RAM, disk allocation, and network settings. Provided labelled, commented and relevant screenshots illustrating the performance enhancements, showing a good impact on system efficiency.
At least two tools, two models, and two techniques are utilised and clearly stated. |
issues within the given constraints, mentioning system components.
Implemented suitable adjustments to CPU, RAM, disk allocation, and network settings, with valid but limited justification. Screenshots show performance enhancements and impact on system efficiency.
At least two tools, two models, and two techniques are utilised and clearly stated. |
performance issues within the given constraints. The proposal is unclear or lacks consideration for system components and performance optimisation. Failed to implement or justify adjustments adequately to CPU, RAM, disk allocation, and network settings. Did not provide relevant screenshots illustrating the performance enhancements or unclear screenshots. The implementation and justification are unclear or lack consideration for system efficiency. The utilised tools, models, and techniques are not listed, inadequate or inaccurate. |
Task 3: Ethical Considerations and Social Responsibility (14 Marks)
LO3: Apply professional and ethical practices to operating systems installation projects in order to enhance awareness of social responsibility as an emerging IT professional.
Criteria |
Evidence Required |
|||
Pass |
Fail (Resubmit Required) |
|||
Mark |
8 |
6 |
4 |
0 |
Ethical Considerations |
Provided a comprehensive and strategic plan for obtaining the necessary software licenses. Demonstrated thorough consideration of licensing requirements, vendors, and potential cost-saving strategies. Clearly explained the legal importance of having permission to use software. Articulated potential consequences of using software without proper licensing with a deep understanding of legal implications. Linked the answer to the relevant contents of the ITP |
Provided an effective plan for obtaining the necessary software licenses, showing a good understanding of licensing requirements and vendors. Considered key aspects, such as budget constraints and vendor negotiations. Clearly explained the legal importance of having permission to use software. Articulated potential consequences of using software without proper licensing, showing a good understanding of legal implications. Linked the answer to the contents of the Linked the answer to the contents of the |
Presented a valid plan with limited details for obtaining software licenses, covering key considerations. Provided accurate but limited explanation of the legal importance of having permission to use software, mentioning potential consequences of using software without proper licensing, showing a clear understanding of legal implications. Linked the answer to the contents of the ITP New Zealand Code of Ethics (or similar standard). |
provided an inadequate plan for obtaining software licenses. The plan is unclear or lacks consideration for key aspects such as licensing requirements, vendors, and budget constraints. Inadequate explanation of the legal importance of having permission to use software and the potential consequences of using unlicensed software. The explanation is unclear or lacks consideration for legal implications. |
New Zealand Code of Ethics (or similar standard). |
ITP New Zealand Code of Ethics (or similar standard). |
|||
Mark |
6 |
4 |
3 |
0 |
Social Responsibility |
Demonstrated thorough exploration and in-depth description of strategies within the operating system upgrade process to minimize the creation of outdated or unused software, showcasing an environmentally friendly approach. Discussed in detail the implications of software waste in the operating system environment and covered the importance of adopting measures to decrease the environmental footprint associated with obsolete software. |
Described strategies with good coverage and understanding of their impact on reducing outdated or unused software, and linked strategies to environmental benefits.
Provided a good overview of the implications of software waste in the operating system environment. |
described strategies with limited coverage and understanding of their impact on reducing outdated or unused software, and linked strategies to environmental benefits.
Presented an overview of the implications of software waste in the operating system environment with limited details. |
Failed to discuss adequate strategies or provided inaccurate information. Failed to recognise or articulate the implications of software waste. |
Task 4: Enhancing Communication Skills through Collaborative Problem Resolution (7 Marks)
LO4: LO4: Resolve operating systems related issue using a collaborative approach in order to enhance communication skills.
Criteria |
Evidence Required |
|||
Pass |
Fail (Resubmit Required) |
|||
Mark |
7 |
5 |
3.5 |
0 |
Collaborative Problem Identification, communication plan and Troubleshooting |
Clearly articulated and identified specific operating system issues affecting the Finance department. Demonstrated a deep understanding of the problems and potential reasons for compatibility issues. Developed a comprehensive communication plan involving sending out a detailed email to the Finance department outlining the identified issues and troubleshooting plan. Collaborated very effectively with team members using suggested collaboration tools to devise a clear troubleshooting plan and |
Clearly identified and articulated specific operating system issues affecting the Finance department. Showed a good understanding of the problems and potential reasons for compatibility issues. Developed an effective communication plan involving sending out a clear email to the Finance department outlining the identified issues. Collaborated well with team members using suggested collaboration tools to devise a clear troubleshooting plan, and provided good |
Identified operating system issues affecting the Finance department correctly, the problems and potential reasons for compatibility issues are articulated with limited details.
Presented an appropriate communication plan involving sending out an email to the Finance department outlining the identified issues. Collaborated appropriately with the team members using suggested collaboration tools to devise a troubleshooting plan, and provided a valid but limited reflection on their experience. |
Lack identification or articulation of operating system issues affecting the Finance department adequately. The identification and articulation are unclear or lack consideration for potential reasons. Failed to develop an adequate communication plan or troubleshooting plan. The plans are unclear, ineffective, or lack consideration for key aspects such as informing the Finance department and addressing compatibility issues. |
provided a detailed reflection on their experience. |
reflection on their experience. |
Task 5: Launching an Innovative Data Analysis Platform (15 Marks)
LO5: Apply problem-solving and decision-making techniques to install and administer an operating system in order to support an innovative undertaking.
Criteria |
Evidence Required |
|||
Pass |
Fail (Resubmit Required) |
|||
Mark |
4 |
3 |
2 |
0 |
Operating System Installation |
A suitable OS is selected. Created a comprehensive step-by-step guide or video tutorial for OS installation, emphasising key components relevant to data analysis, and include screenshots throughout the process. Anticipated and explained key possible challenges in detail, especially compatibility issues with data analysis tools, and provided detailed practical solutions such as pre- |
A suitable OS is selected. Developed an effective step- by-step guide or video tutorial for OS installation, covering key components for data analysis. Anticipated and explained possible challenges, including compatibility issues with data analysis tools, and suggested practical solutions to address the issues. |
A suitable OS is selected. Presented a basic step-by-step guide or video tutorial for OS installation, with a sound coverage of data analysis components. Anticipated and explained some challenges, including compatibility issues with data analysis tools, and suggested suitable solutions. |
Failed to select a suitable OS and to create an adequate step-by- step guide or video tutorial. The guide or tutorial is unclear or lacks coverage of key components for data analysis. Failed to anticipate challenges adequately or provide practical solutions. The anticipation and suggestions are unclear or lack consideration for |
installation checks and compatibility testing. |
compatibility issues with a data analysis tool. |
|||
Mark |
5 |
3 |
2.5 |
0 |
System Configuration and Administration |
Successfully adjusted all OS settings to optimise performance for data analysis tasks. Demonstrated a deep understanding of relevant settings and their impact on system performance. Implemented robust security measures to safeguard sensitive research data, considering encryption, users access controls, firewalls and backup strategy. Screenshots included and effectively illustrate adjustments made in OS settings for data analysis and showing the implementation of security measures. |
Adjusted most of the OS settings to optimize performance for data analysis tasks effectively. Showed a good understanding of relevant settings and their impact on system performance. Implemented effective security measures to safeguard sensitive research data, showing a good understanding of encryption, users access controls, firewalls and backup strategy. Screenshots are included to support adjustments in OS settings for data analysis and showing the implementation of security measures. |
Implemented and adjusted some of the OS settings for optimising performance in data analysis tasks. Implemented security measures to safeguard sensitive research data. The implementation may lack depth or specificity in considering encryption, users access controls, firewalls and backup strategy. Some screenshots are included to support adjustments in OS settings for data analysis and showing the implementation of security measures. |
Failed to adjust OS settings adequately for optimising performance in data analysis tasks. The adjustments are unclear or lack consideration for relevant settings. Failed to implement adequate security measures to safeguard sensitive research data. The implementation is unclear or lacks consideration for encryption, users access controls, and firewalls. No screenshots were provided or are unclear and not relevant to adjustments in OS settings. No screenshots were provided to show the |
implementation of security measures. |
||||
Mark |
6 |
4 |
3 |
0 |
Problem-solving and Decision- Making Scenario |
Successfully investigated and identified the root cause of the compatibility problem with the data analysis tool. Demonstrated a deep understanding of the underlying issues. Proposed a comprehensive step-by-step solution for resolving the compatibility problem, considering adjustments or alternative tools. The justification was clear and considered impact and feasibility. Explained why the chosen decisions were most suitable for the innovative data analysis project. |
Investigated and identified the root cause of the compatibility problem with the data analysis tool effectively. Showed a good understanding of the underlying issues. Proposed an effective step- by-step solution for resolving the compatibility problem, considering adjustments or alternative tools. Justification showed a good consideration of impact and feasibility. |
Correctly Identified the root cause of the compatibility problem with the data analysis tool. Presented a basic but adequate step-by-step solution for resolving the compatibility problem, mentioning adjustments or alternative tools. A brief justification was provided. |
Failed to identify the root cause of the compatibility problem adequately. The identification is unclear or lacks consideration for underlying issues. Failed to propose an adequate step-by-step solution for resolving the compatibility problem. The proposal is unclear or lacks consideration for adjustments, alternative tools, impact, and feasibility. |
