Programme Name: BSc (Hons) in Health and Social Care (with Foundation Year)
Programme Name: BSc (Hons) in Health and Social Care (with Foundation Year)
Cohort: September 2022
Module Code: FND3001
Module Title: Reading Modern Society
Assessment Title: Book Review Report
Module Tutor: ----------
Student ID Number: (University of Bolton ID)
Date of Submission: 25/01/2023
Word Count: (excluding cover page and references)
Table of Contents (Use a Separate Page)
(Title of the Book and Author)
Front Cover Page - Include: Course Name, Module Name, Tutor Name, Student ID, Date, Word Count etc.
Introduction: All good pieces of academic writing should have an introduction, and book reviews are no exception. Open with a general description of the topic and/or problem addressed by the work in question. Think, if possible, of a hook to draw your readers in. Also create a scene for the readers. (150-200)
Summary of argument: Your review should, as concisely as possible, summarise the books argument and intent. What, ultimately, is this books meaning? (300-350)
About the author: Some basic biographical information about the author of the book you are reviewing is necessary. Who are they? What are they known for? What particular sorts of qualifications and expertise do they bring to the subject? (150-200)
Context of the book: What was happening at the time the book was written? Does this influence the author? In what ways? Consider major cultural and political events that may have formed the context of the book. (200-250)
Summary of contents: What issues does the author raise? What the main themes of the book? How does it differ to what you currently consume in the media? (150-200)
Methods: Does the author use a particular approach to researching the book? Are there issues with ethics? What about reliability and validity? What kind of data informs the book? Are there any problems with this? (250-300)
Strengths and weaknesses: Identify one particular area in which you think the book does well. This could be a chapter or idea. Identify one particular area in which you think the book could be improved. While this weakness might be related to something you actually believe to be incorrect, it is more likely to be something that the author omitted, or neglected to address in sufficient detail. (350-400)
Conclusion: End your review with a concluding statement summarizing your opinion of the book. You should also explicitly identify a range of audiences whom you think would appreciate reading or otherwise benefit from the book. (150-200)
List of References: (Use a Separate Page)
Assignments should be referenced using the Harvard system of referencing (At least 5 to 10 references)
266700-306070004525505-11623700
Module Number: FND3001
Module Name: Reading Modern Society
Year: 22/23 Semester 1
Module Tutor/s:
Alex Avadanei (Group 3A1)
Geraldine Noel (Group 3N1)
Assignment Brief: April 2023
Assessment
Assessment Number 001
Assessment Type (and weighting) Written Report (100%)
Assessment Name Book Review
Assessment Submission Date 04/08/2023 (before 23:59hrsUK Time)
Learning Outcomes Assessed
Learning Outcomes Assessment
LO1: Develop academic reading skills through exploration of established social science literature.
Written Report
(Assessment 001)
LO2: Analyse information and experiences through reflection, review and evaluation, Written Report
(Assessment 001)
LO3: Plan, prepare and write a review of social science literature.
Written Report
(Assessment 001)
Assignment Brief
The assessment will take the form of a 2000 report- a review of one of the three texts covered in the module (The Road to Wigan Pier by George Orwell; Akala (2018) Natives: race and class in the ruins of empire London: Two Roads or The Man Who Mistook His Wife for a Hat by Oliver Sacks). The book review should be prepared in a report format following the template below. You will be expected to contextualise the book; provide details of the author; provide an overview of the books content, and the methods used by the author to research the topic. You will also be expected to assess the influence of the book and its contribution to the understanding of social issues. Reasoned arguments should be developed and supported with additional literature for each of the subheadings in the template.
Your review should show evidence that you have read and made use of appropriate supporting material beyond the book you have chosen to review.
*Please note- the LOs do not have to be addressed in order and it is sometimes better if they are not
Report Format
Front Cover Page - Include: Course Name, Module Name, Tutor Name, Student ID, Date, Word Count etc.
Introduction: All good pieces of academic writing should have an introduction, and book reviews are no exception. Open with a general description of the topic and/or problem addressed by the work in question. Think, if possible, of a hook to draw your readers in.
Summary of argument: Your review should, as concisely as possible, summarise the books argument and intent. What, ultimately, is this books meaning?
About the author: Some basic biographical information about the author of the book you are reviewing is necessary. Who are they? What are they known for? What particular sorts of qualifications and expertise do they bring to the subject?
Context of the book: What was happening at the time the book was written? Does this influence the author? In what ways? Consider major cultural and political events that may have formed the context of the book.
Summary of contents: What issues does the author raise? What the main themes of the book? How does it differ to what you currently consume in the media?
Methods: Does the author use a particular approach to researching the book? Are there issues with ethics? What about reliability and validity? What kind of data informs the book? Are there any problems with this?
Strengths and weaknesses: Identify one area in which you think the book does well. This could be a chapter or idea. Identify one particular area in which you think the book could be improved. While this weakness might be related to something you actually believe to be incorrect, it is more likely to be something that the author omitted or neglected to address in sufficient detail.
Conclusion: End your review with a concluding statement summarizing your opinion of the book. You should also explicitly identify a range of audiences whom you think would appreciate reading or otherwise benefit from the book.
Bibliography: Assignments should be referenced using the Harvard system of referencing
Minimum Secondary Research Source Requirements:
Level HE3 - It is expected that the Reference List will contain at least five sources. As a MINIMUM the Reference List should include three academic books.
Specific Assessment Criteria
(Please note that the General Assessment Criteria will also apply. Please see section 15)
First class (70%+): This piece of work showed evidence of wider research with reference to a number of differing academic viewpoints. The report has reviewed one of the three core books (by George Orwell, Akala and Oliver Sacks) given in the module guide and discussed in the class. The report has been prepared in a format following the template given in the brief. Several reasoned and logical arguments have been developed well and supported by a wide range of appropriately researched literature for each of the subheadings in the template. Your review should show good evidence that you have read and made use of appropriate supporting material beyond the book you have chosen to review.
Presentation is of a high standard, and in the appropriate report style. The high number of appropriate sources has been referenced accurately following university Harvard Referencing and to a high standard.
Second class (50-69%): A clear and informative piece of work with evidence of wider research and discussion. The report has reviewed one of the three core books (by George Orwell, Akala and Oliver Sacks) given in the module guide and discussed in the class. The report has been prepared in a format following the template given in the brief.
Some reasoned arguments have been developed and supported by a good number of appropriately researched literature for each of the subheadings in the template. Your report should show some evidence that you have read and made use of appropriate supporting material beyond the book you have chosen to review. Presentation is of a good standard, in the appropriate report style. A good number of appropriate sources have been referenced well, with most complying with the Harvard Referencing style.
Third class (40-49%): A reasonable attempt has been made at researching the report, but greater in-depth discussion and academic debate is required around the review of one of the three core books (by George Orwell, Akala and Oliver Sacks) given in the module guide and discussed in the class. The report has been prepared in a format following the template given in the brief. Your report showed few evidence that you have read and made use of appropriate supporting material beyond the book you have chosen to review.
Presentation of the report is limited, and only the minimum of 5 sources has been provided, with at least one academic text and two academic journals included.
Fail (<39): Students who do not meet the requirements of a third-class grade will not successfully complete the assessment activity.
2. General Assessment Criteria for Written Assessments
GENERAL ASSESSMENT GUIDELINES LEVEL 3
Relevance
Learning outcomes must be met for an overall pass Knowledge and UnderstandingAnalysis, Creativity and Problem-Solving Self-awareness and Reflection Research/
Referencing Written English Presentation and Structure
Class I (Exceptional Quality)
85% - 100% Work is directly relevant and expertly addresses the requirements of the brief.
Learning outcomes are met. Demonstrates breadth of knowledge and understanding of theory and practice beyond the threshold expectation for the level.
Demonstrates excellent understanding of key concepts in different contexts. Presents an excellent discussion of findings through the analysis of information sources.
Draws justified, relevant and thoughtful conclusions.
Demonstrates creative fair and initiative.
Applies excellent problem-solving skills. Provides insightful reflection and self-awareness in relation to the outcomes of own work and personal responsibility. A range of contemporary and relevant reference sources selected and drawn upon.
Sources cited accurately l in both the body of text and in the Reference List/ Bibliography.
Writing style is clear and appropriate to the requirements of the assessment. An exceptionally well written answer with competent spelling, grammar and punctuation. For example, paragraphs are well structured, include linking and signposting, and bullet points are used appropriately. Sentences are complete and different types are used. A wide range of appropriate vocabulary is used.
The presentational style and layout are correct for the type of assignment.
Evidence of planning and logically structured.
Where relevant, there is effective use of, and reference to, figures, tables and images.
Class I (Excellent Quality)
70% - 84% Work is relevant and comprehensively addresses the requirements of the brief.
Learning outcomes are met. Demonstrates an excellent breadth of knowledge and understanding of theory and practice for this level.
Demonstrates excellent understanding of concepts. Presents an excellent overview of findings through the interpretation of relevant information sources.
Draws justified, relevant and thoughtful conclusions.
Clear evidence of initiative.
Applies excellent problem-solving skills. Provides excellent reflection and self-awareness in relation to the outcomes of own work and personal responsibility. A range of relevant reference sources selected and drawn upon.
Sources cited well in both the body of text and in the Reference List/Bibliography. Writing style is clear and appropriate for the type of assignment. Paragraphs are well-structured with linking and signposting and bullet points are used appropriately. There are a few minor grammar, punctuation and spelling mistakes that do not pose difficulties for the reader. A very good range of vocabulary is demonstrated. Sentences are complete and a few different types are used. The presentational style and layout are correct for the type of assignment.
Evidence of planning and logically structured.
Where relevant, there is effective use of and reference to, figures, tables and images.
Class II/i (Very Good Quality)
60% - 69% Work is relevant and addresses most of the requirements of the brief well.
Learning outcomes are met. Demonstrates a thorough breadth of knowledge and understanding of theory and practice for this level.
Demonstrates very good understanding of concepts. Presents a perceptive overview of findings through the interpretation of relevant information sources.
Draws justified and relevant conclusions.
Demonstrates initiative.
Applies strong problem-solving skills.
Provides justified reflection in relation to the outcomes of own work and personal responsibility, as required by the assessment. A range of appropriate reference sources drawn upon.
Sources cited well in the main in the text and in the Reference List/ Bibliography. Writing style is mainly clear and appropriate for the type of assignment. Paragraphs are mostly well-structured with linking and signposting, and bullet points are used appropriately. Grammar, punctuation or spelling mistakes may be frequent, but do not pose difficulty for the reader. A good range of vocabulary is demonstrated. Sentences are complete with some attempt at different types.
The presentational style and layout are correct for the type of assignment.
Evidence of planning and logically structured in the main.
Where relevant, there is use of figures, tables and images.
Relevance
Learning outcomes must be met for an overall pass Knowledge and understanding Analysis, Creativity and Problem-Solving Self-awareness and Reflection Research/
Referencing Written English Presentation and Structure
Class II/ii (Good Quality)
50% - 59% Work addresses key requirements of the brief. Some irrelevant content.
Learning outcomes are met. Demonstrates a sound breadth of knowledge and understanding of theory and practice for this level.
Demonstrates sound understanding of key concepts. Presents a clear overview of findings through the interpretation of some relevant information sources.
Draws relevant conclusions.
Demonstrates some initiative.
Applies sound problem-solving skills. Provides some reflection in relation to the outcomes of own work and personal responsibility, as required by the assessment. Relevant reference sources drawn upon.
Some sources cited well in both the body of text and in the Reference List/Bibliography. Writing style is broadly appropriate for the type of assignment. Paragraphs are used and most contain some linking and signposting. Bullet points are not overused. Grammar, punctuation, or spelling mistakes may be frequent, but do not cause significant difficulty for the reader. A range of vocabulary is demonstrated. Sentences are complete. The presentational style and layout are largely correct for the type of assignment.
Logically structured in the most part.
Where relevant, effective placement of some figures, tables, and images.
Class III (Satisfactory Quality)
40% - 49% Work addresses the requirements of the brief, although superficially in places. Some irrelevant content.
Learning outcomes are met. Demonstrates a sufficient breadth of knowledge and understanding of theory and practice for this level.
Demonstrates a sufficient understanding of key concepts. Presents an overview of findings through the interpretation of a limited number of relevant information sources.
Draws some relevant conclusions.
Demonstrates limited initiative.
Applies some problem-solving skills. Provides limited reflection in relation to the outcomes of own work and personal responsibility, as required by the assessment. Some relevant reference sources selected and drawn upon.
Some weaknesses in referencing technique. Writing style is not appropriate in places for the type of assignment. There may be some over-reliance on bullet points, but attempts at paragraphs, signposting and linking are also evident. Grammar, punctuation or spelling mistakes may be frequent, and a few may pose minor difficulties for the reader. Vocabulary may be limited. Sentences are mostly complete. The presentational style and layout are largely correct for the type of assignment.
Adequately structured.
Inclusion of some figures, tables, and images but not always relevant and/or clear.
Borderline
Fail 35% - 39% Work addresses only some of the requirements of the brief. Irrelevant and superficial content.
One or more learning outcomes have not been met. Demonstrates limited knowledge and understanding of theory and practice for this level. Demonstrates a lack of understanding of key concepts. Presents a limited overview of findings with little consideration of the quality of information drawn upon.
Draws some irrelevant conclusions.
Demonstrates little initiative.
Problem-solving skills are lacking.
Provides scant reflection in relation to the outcomes of own work and personal responsibility, when required. Sources selected are limited and lack relevance.
Poor referencing technique employed. Writing style is unclear and does not match the requirements of the assessment in question.
Deficiencies in spelling, grammar and punctuation makes reading difficult and arguments unclear in places. Paragraphs are poorly structured. For the type of assignment the presentational style, layout and/or structure are lacking.
Figures, tables and images included when required but these lack clarity and relevance.
Fail
<34% Work does not address the requirements of the brief. Irrelevant and superficial content.
One or more learning outcomes have not been met. Demonstrates inadequate knowledge and understanding of theory and practice for this level.
Demonstrates insufficient understanding of key concepts. Presents a poor overview of findings with no consideration of the quality of information drawn upon.
Draws irrelevant conclusions.
Initiative and problem-solving skills are absent. Provides no reflection in relation to the outcomes of own work and personal responsibility, when required. There is an absence of relevant sources.
Poor referencing technique employed. Writing style is unclear and does not match the requirements of the assessment in question.
Deficiencies in spelling, grammar and punctuation makes reading difficult and arguments unclear. Unstructured paragraphs. For the type of assignment the presentational style, layout and/or structure are lacking.
Figures, tables and images are absent when required or lack relevance/clarity.
