diff_months: 5

PSY10005 Introduction to Research Methods Assignment

Flat 50% Off Order New Solution
Added on: 2025-06-02 08:51:36
Order Code: LD522532
Question Task Id: 0

PSY10005 Introduction to Research Methods

Assignment 2: Research proposal

Word limit: 1500 (+/- 10%)

Weighting: 35%

Due date: 12pm AEDT20 January 2025(Week 10)

Individualtask

After you have read this information, head over to theAssignment 2 Q&Adiscussion board to ask any questions and see what your peersare saying about this assignment.

Assignment details

This assignment aims to help you develop skills in selecting appropriateresearch designs and methods to address a research problem. You will prepare a researchproposal that will involve applying your knowledge of scientific research, researchapproaches and data collection methods, research formulation, ethics of scientific research,measurement and sampling methods.

For this assignment, you will develop a research proposal. You will choose and narrow your research question, review the literature, pose one or more hypotheses, and propose your research methods. You will draw on the critical reading abilities you developed inAssignment 1: Critical reviewandthe understanding of various research approaches you developed in Weeks 59.

In preparing a research proposal, you will develop your ability to evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of various experimental and non-experimental designs. You will also develop your ability to select the appropriate research methods for various research questions. These abilities will help you evaluate claims made in various academic and non-academic contexts throughout your unit and everyday life.

This assignment supportsunit learning outcomes 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6.

Possible topics



  • Evaluate the effectiveness of mental health/wellbeing services for vulnerable/at-risk young people.

  • Explore the predictors of wellbeing for university students who are parents.

  • Investigate the role of identity development for young adults who are gender diverse.

  • Explore the role of acculturation on mental health outcomes in young refugees and asylum-seekers.



NB: These aregeneral topics, and you are free to address either broad or specific aspects of each topic.For example, one might look at the effectiveness of mental health and wellbeing services for young people, or the correspondence between implicit and explicit attitudes toward vocational education and higher education, etc.

Step 1: Before you write

A research proposal is a document that informs others of a research project that you intend to conduct.This would typically be used when applying
for a postgraduate psychology degree or working in industry. This proposal shouldhighlight the potential significance and feasibility of the research project. Moreover, writing a research proposal often helps individuals structure their thoughts, identify the purpose of their research and what is involved in conducting the project, and help develop a plan and specify the expected outcomes.

Before you write, you will need to:



  1. Choose your topic from thislist of research proposal topics
  2. Review the relevant literature on your topic.
  3. Write a draft of your research question.



Thisguide to writing research proposalswill assist you in breaking the assignment down into manageable steps. It includes formatting instructions and links to detailed APA format guides.The APA format(pp. 470491) in your eText andQuick answersformattingLinks to an external site.(APA Style, 2019). (Tip: Set aside a reasonable amount of time to conduct your literature review and write your research question.)

Step 2: Writing your proposal

When you are ready to start writing your proposal, follow this general structure:



  • Title Page(not included in word count):Criterion 1



    • The title page should be in APA format and include an informative title that makes sense and provides relevant information about the variables/topic.The title needs to be brief. Include the key terms that relate to yourproposal.



  • Introduction (suggested word count: 200):Criterion 2



    • Present the relevant background information for the research project. Introduce the general field of research and definitions of key terms, then narrow it to the specific area of your research project. This section should lead logically to either a gap in the existing research or the research problem you believe needs to be addressed.




  • Aims (suggested word count: 100): Criterion 3



    • Present the research question and/or hypothesis you will investigate and answer to fill the gap in research. The hypothesis must reflect the gap identified in the introduction/literature review.





  • Literature review (suggested word count: 400):Criterion 4



    • Provide relevant past research studies that you found in your review of the literature. Highlight the major issues, gaps in the research and the need for your particular research (i.e., 'Here is what wecaninfer, and here is what wecannot yetinferor cannot yet infer with confidenceand why'). You will also need to highlight where your research overlaps and differs from existing research.



  • Significance of the research (suggested word count: 200): Criterion 5
    Outline how your research will change an area of research or respond to a particular problem.This differs from thejustification as it explains how the research will lead to certainoutcomes.In particular, highlight the:



    • theoretical contributions, and

    • practical outcomes.



  • Proposed research methodology (suggested word count: 400): Criterion 6
    Describe and justify the research methodology. Use the future tense to describe what you will do. Address the following:



    • participants

    • methodology (e.g. quantitative, qualitative, mixed methods)

    • design framework (e.g. experimental, non-experimental)

    • data collection method(s) (e.g. tests, questionnaires, interviews, focus groups, observations, existing data)

    • sampling method (e.g. random, non-random), and

    • ethical considerations.



  • Scope and problems (suggested word count: 200): Criterion 7
    Define the breadth of the research topic (That is, is theresearch focused on a broad research question, or will it focus on a particularissue or problem?). In this section, you will also identify any limitations or potential problems that may occur throughout the project.

  • Writing Style: Criterion 8



    • Please consider general spelling, grammar and paragraph structure. Must include relevant subheadings and use appropriate topic/linking sentences. All headings and formatting must conform to APA format.



  • Referencing(not included in word count):Criterion 9
    Include a reference list in APA style. It should be presented on its own page with a separate heading. You may find theAPA style guideLinks to an external site.helpful.



The word counts are guidelines only; you may need to alter these slightly depending on your chosen topic.

Supporting resources

The following resources will assist you with completing this assignment:






Assignment criteria

Submission details overview

Request assignment extension

Assessment declaration

All students must agree to the following declaration when submitting assignment items.

Declaration and Statement of Authorship



  1. I have not impersonated, or allowed myself to be impersonated by any person for the purposes of this assignment.
  2. This assignment is my/our original work and no part of it has been copied from any other source except where due acknowledgement is made.
  3. No part of this assignment has been written for me by any other person except where such collaboration has been authorised by the lecturer/teacher concerned.
  4. I have not previously submitted this work for this or any other course/unit.
  5. I give permission for my assignment response to be reproduced, communicated, compared and archived for plagiarism detection, benchmarking or educational purposes.



I understand that:



  • Plagiarism is the presentation of another person's work as though it is your own. It is a form of cheating and is a very serious academic offence that may lead to exclusion from the university.

  • Plagiarised material may be drawn from published and unpublished written documents, interpretations, computer software, designs, music, sounds, images, photographs, and ideas or ideological frameworks gained through working with another person or in a group.

  • Plagiarised material can be drawn from, and presented in, written, graphic and visual form, including electronic data and oral presentations. Plagiarism occurs when the origin of the material used is not appropriately cited.



I agree and acknowledge that:



  1. I have read and understood the Declaration and Statement of Authorship above.
  2. I accept that use of my Swinburne account to electronically submit this assignment constitutes my agreement to the Declaration and Statement of Authorship.
  3. If I do not agree to the Declaration and Statement of Authorship in this context, the assessment outcome may not be valid for assessment purposes and may not be included in my aggregate score for this unit.
  4. I am aware that it is not acceptable to resubmit the same piece of work (in part or as whole) for multiple assignments without permission from the Unit Coordinator.



Penalties forplagiarismrange from a formal caution to expulsion from the university, and are detailed in theStudent Academic Misconduct Regulations 2012.

Rubric

PSY10005 Assignment 2 rubric


PSY10005 Assignment 2 rubric


Criteria


Ratings


Pts


This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeTitle page


5%



5to >3.99pts


High Distinction


Title Page provided, that has a strong, creative, clear and searchable title, directly related to the research hypothesis. Title page correctly formatted according to APA.


3.99to >3.49pts


Distinction


Title Page provided, with informative title directly related to the research hypothesis. Title page correctly formatted according to APA.


3.49to >2.99pts


Credit


Title Page provided, with appropriate title, however missing details associated with the research question. Minor APA formatting errors remain.


2.99to >2.49pts


Pass


Title Page provided, however missing appropriate title that is directly associated with the research question. Several APA formatting errors present.


2.49to >0pts


No Pass


No title page presented.


5pts


This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIntroduction


10%



10to >7.99pts


High Distinction


The assignment includes an exceptionally succinct and well rounded introduction that explores the background context of the research problem before identifying the research gap and the significance of the research proposal in responding to the identified problem.


7.99to >6.99pts


Distinction


The assignment includes a strong introduction that clearly covers background context, before identifying the research problem/gap. There may be further room to fully link and develop the background context with the research problem.


6.99to >5.99pts


Credit


The assignment includes an introduction that explores relevant background information and mentions the specific problem being addressed within the proposal. There may be further room to identify the research problem and gap in the literature by developing the background discussion.


5.99to >4.99pts


Pass


The assignment includes an introduction that begins to mention some relevant background info as well as what will be covered. But, there is further room to explore the research problem and gap in contextualizing the research proposal.


4.99to >0pts


No Pass


Did not meet the criterion.


10pts


This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAims


5%



5to >3.99pts


High Distinction


The assignment clearly and concisely explores the research aims in detail, while succinctly communicating the link between the background context and the research problem. It is made clear how the aims relate to the research gap.


3.99to >3.49pts


Distinction


The assignment includes a strong set of aims that are developed out of the research problem/gap. Moreover, it is clear how the aims are related to the discussion in the introduction in a coherent and developed way.


3.49to >2.99pts


Credit


The assignment includes a reasonable selection of aims and mentions how they may related to the research problem. But, there may be more room to fully explore all of the aims and how they are conceptually related to the identified research problem/gap.


2.99to >2.49pts


Pass


The assignment includes aims that are reflected in the introduction. But, there may be further room to consider the aims in full and how these relate to the identified research problem/gap, which are expressed in the introduction.


2.49to >0pts


No Pass


Did not meet the criterion.


5pts


This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLiterature review


20%



20to >15.99pts


High Distinction


The assignment includes a highly detailed, thorough and well researched literature review section that clearly identifies and links relevant past research and key definitions. There is evidence of how the proposed research is similar or different to existing research, which is clearly related to the research proposal.


15.99to >13.99pts


Distinction


The assignment includes a thorough and detailed literature review section that identifies and discusses relevant past research and key definitions. There is evidence of how the proposed research is similar or different to existing research, but there may be more room to further relate this literature to the research proposal.


13.99to >11.99pts


Credit


The assignment includes a literature review section that identifies and discusses relevant past research and key definitions that are relevant. There is evidence of how the proposed research is similar or different to existing research, but there may be more room to further relate this literature to the research proposal.


11.99to >9.99pts


Pass


The assignment includes a literature review section that mentions past research and key definitions that are relevant. There may be further room to explore past research and key definitions in more detail, as well as how the proposed research is similar or different to existing research.


9.99to >0pts


No Pass


Did not meet the criterion.


20pts


This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSignificance and contribution


10%




10to >7.99pts


High Distinction


The assignment includes a highly detailed, thorough and well justified significance and contribution section. Practical and theoretical outcomes are well justified and are clearly related to the research hypothesis.


7.99to >6.99pts


Distinction


The assignment includes a highly detailed, thorough and well justified significance and contribution section. Practical and theoretical outcomes are justified but there may be room to improve how they relate to the research hypothesis.


6.99to >5.99pts


Credit


The assignment includes a significance and contribution section. Practical and theoretical outcomes are justified but there may be room to improve how they relate to the research hypothesis.


5.99to >4.99pts


Pass


The assignment includes a significance and contribution section. An attempt is made to suggest practical and theoretical outcomes, however there is further room to include more detail and how they relate to the research hypothesis.


4.99to >0pts


No Pass


Did not meet the criterion.


10pts


This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeProposed methodology


30%



30to >23.99pts


High Distinction


Selected appropriate participant set, sampling and measurement methods for the research question. The choices are explained and justified. Selected appropriate design, framework, and methods for the research question. The choices are explained and justified. The methods chosen show consideration of ethical aspects (and the link is explained). At this level, the methodology is an integrated, cohesive whole, and addresses the research question strategically. Evidence of editing is present; the writing flows well and is persuasive.


23.99to >20.99pts


Distinction


Selected appropriate participant set, sampling and measurement methods for the research question. The choices are explained and justified. Selected appropriate design, framework, and methods for the research question. The choices are explained and justified. The methods chosen show consideration of ethical aspects (and the link is explained).


20.99to >17.99pts


Credit


Specifies a participant set, sampling and measurement methods. The choices are described, but not explained or justified. Also specifies a design, framework, and methods. The choices are described, but not explained or justified. The methods chosen show consideration of ethical aspects (and the link is explained). Some of the methods could be better matched to the question.


17.99to >14.99pts


Pass


Specifies measurement and sampling method. The methodology section would benefit from further description and explanation of the methods chosen. Some of the methods could be better matched to the question.


14.99to >0pts


No Pass


Did not meet the criterion.


30pts


This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeScope


10%



10to >7.99pts


High Distinction


Both a scope and a list of potential problems are presented. Scope and problems section addresses scope of sample and of research question. Also addresses the proposed sample size, and any issues that may arise with the sampling, measurement, or participants. Scope and problems address the anticipated issues with the chosen research methods, covering most or all likely issues. Presents suggested strategies for overcoming obstacles. Notes limitations of current methodology that may not be possible to address (e.g. ethical limitations).


7.99to >6.99pts


Distinction


Both a scope and a list of potential problems are presented. Scope and problems section addresses scope of sample and of research question. Also addresses potential issues with methods, sampling, participants or measurement.


6.99to >5.99pts


Credit


Both a scope and a list of potential problems are presented. Scope and problems section addresses scope of sample and of research question. Also addresses potential issues with methods, sampling, participants or measurement. Some points may benefit from further consideration.


5.99to >4.99pts


Pass


Both a scope and a list of potential problems are presented. Requires further specificity about both scope and potential problems: scope of the sample size, scope of the research question itself, and potential issues with sampling, data collection or measurement.


4.99to >0pts


No Pass


Did not meet criterion.


10pts


This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting style


5%



5to >3.99pts


High Distinction


Evidence of proofing is present; any remaining errors in spelling, grammar, citations or references are inconsequential. Proposal content is arranged under the required headings. Topic and linking sentences to help the reader follow the proposal. Evidence of editing is present; the writing flows well and is persuasive.


3.99to >3.49pts


Distinction


Evidence of proofing is present; few errors remain in spelling, grammar, citations or references. Proposal content is arranged under the required headings. Topic and linking sentences to help the reader follow the proposal.


3.49to >2.99pts


Credit


There are no errors in structure, grammar or spelling that obscure the main points of the review, but some errors in grammar, punctuation and spelling still remain. Proposal content is arranged under the required headings.


2.99to >2.49pts


Pass


There are many errors in grammar that obscure the main points of the review. Proposal content is arranged under the required headings.


2.49to >0pts


No Pass


Did not meet criterion.


5pts


This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeReferencing


5%



5to >3.99pts


High Distinction


Evidence of proofing is present and references are thoroughly applied according to APA referencing.


3.99to >3.49pts


Distinction


Evidence of proofing is present; few errors remain in references that is formatted in APA style.


3.49to >2.99pts


Credit


Both the in-text citations and reference list are largely in APA style, but some errors remain.


2.99to >2.49pts


Pass


Both in-text citations and reference list are present, but there are several errors in format, or confusion of APA style with other referencing styles.


2.49to >0pts


No Pass


Did not meet criterion.


5pts


Total Points:100

  • Uploaded By : Akshita
  • Posted on : June 02nd, 2025
  • Downloads : 1
  • Views : 81

Order New Solution

Can't find what you're looking for?

Whatsapp Tap to ChatGet instant assistance

Choose a Plan

Premium

80 USD
  • All in Gold, plus:
  • 30-minute live one-to-one session with an expert
    • Understanding Marking Rubric
    • Understanding task requirements
    • Structuring & Formatting
    • Referencing & Citing
Most
Popular

Gold

30 50 USD
  • Get the Full Used Solution
    (Solution is already submitted and 100% plagiarised.
    Can only be used for reference purposes)
Save 33%

Silver

20 USD
  • Journals
  • Peer-Reviewed Articles
  • Books
  • Various other Data Sources – ProQuest, Informit, Scopus, Academic Search Complete, EBSCO, Exerpta Medica Database, and more