PSY3105 Quantitative Report (1)

PSY3105 Quantitative Report (1)

Criteria Ratings Points

Results

view longer description The results should include the reporting of the overall ANOVA, along with statement of the measures of central tendency and variability. There should also be detailed reporting of the post hoc comparisons that look at the Football Code and Helmet factors. / 4 pts

Results - Post hocsview longer description The post hoc comparisons should be reported to indicate the relationship between Football Code and Helmet Use. There is an interaction between these factors. Generally, Helmet use results in lower CRT5 scores. / 15 pts

Graph

view longer description The graph needs to be clear, readable, and formatted in APA style. / 4 pts

Table

view longer description The table needs to be formatted in APA style and should have the individual cells reported (e.g., Helmet use at Australian Rules, Rugby Union, and Flag Football codes; No Helmet use at Australian Rules, Rugby Union, and Flag Football codes. / 4 pts

Discussion

view longer description While there is a significant interaction, the results should be discussed fully in relation to the question posed in the background information: Was there a reduction of concussion scores with helmet use and did it affect different football codes differently? Given the finding described above, you should back up your interpretation of the results with evidence that you've considered, including the results of the post-hoc pairwise comparisons. / 30 pts