Reading 3: Wolfgang Sachs, The Sustainable Development Goals andLaudato si: varieties of Post-Development?Third World Quarterly38 (2017) 25732587
Reading 3: Wolfgang Sachs, The Sustainable Development Goals andLaudato si: varieties of Post-Development?Third World Quarterly38 (2017) 25732587
Reading 1: Christopher P. Vogt, Laudato Si: Social Analysis and Political Engagement in the Tradition of Catholic Social Thought"
Pope Francis, Laudato Si'Links to an external site.
Reading 3: Wolfgang Sachs, The Sustainable Development Goals andLaudato si: varieties of Post-Development?Third World Quarterly38 (2017) 25732587
Write afeature articlethatanalyseshowonetarget(from the three options below) accounts for human dignity and the common good in the context of a specificglobalcommunitythat is related to yourcourse of studyat ACU.
It is a requirement that you:
choose a target from these three options only:
SDG 4 Quality EducationLinks to an external site.,or
SDG 10 Reduced InequalitiesLinks to an external site.,or
SDG 14 Life Below WaterLinks to an external site.,
provide explanations of human dignity and the common good.
demonstrate engagement withModule 2: Sustainable Development Goals.
citeat leastthe followingfourresources:
Wolfgang Sachs, The Sustainable Development Goals andLaudato si: varieties of Post-Development?Third World Quarterly38 (2017) 25732587.
United Nations,The Sustainable Development Goals Report 2022:https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/report/2022/Links to an external site..
oneLEO resource (e.g., LEO book, a linked article, reading (other than the Sachs reading), a YouTube video clip, etc.) that is included in the LEO folder/tile forModule 2: Sustainable Development Goals.
onecourse of study-specific reading/resource fromModule 2: Sustainable Development Goals.
identify yourcourse of study,chosenSDG, chosentarget, andchosen specificglobalcommunity.
adhere to all the Assessment writing and research instructions as above when preparing to submit this assessment task.
Further instructions:
Generative-artificial intelligence applications (e.g., ChatGPT), paraphrasing and translation tools arenotpermitted to be used to prepare this assessment task.
Please refer to Key glossary for this unit above for definitions ofanalyse,course of study,chosenSDG, chosentarget, andchosen specificglobalcommunity.
Due date: Thursday, 21 December 2023, 11:00pm AEDT
Weighting:30%
Length and/or format: 1,100 words
Purpose: Students analyse the UN Sustainable Development Goals from a global perspective.
Learning outcomes assessed: LO1, LO2
How to submit: This assessment task must be submitted electronically via Turnitin on Canvas.
Return of assignment: This assessment task will be graded electronically, and your numerical mark and feedback (Turnitin) will be provided on Canvas. An announcement will be posted on Canvas when your numerical mark and feedback is available.
Assessment criteria:
Marking Rubric for Assessment Task 2: Analytic Task
UNCC300: Justice and Change in a Global World
Assessment Task 2: Analytic Task (30%)
Marking Rubric
Grades and grade descriptors
Criteria Refer toACU Assessment Policy Fail (NN)
Didnot provide an acceptablestandard of learning achievement Pass (PA)
Acceptablestandard of learning achievement Credit (CR)
Soundstandard of learning achievement Distinction (DI)
High qualitystandard of learning achievement High Distinction (HD)
Exceptionally high-qualitystandard of learning achievement
Overall numerical mark range (/100) 049/100 5064/100 6574/100 7584/100 85100/100
Specific weighted numerical mark range (/30) 014.9/30 1519.4/30 19.522.4/30 22.525.4/30 25.530/30
Criterion 1:EXPLANATION:
Explanation of human dignity and the common good in the context of a specific global community that is related to your course of study at ACU, based on effective engagement with appropriate sources. Did not provide an acceptable standard of explanation of human dignity and the common good in the context of a specific global community that is related to your course of study at ACU, based on effective engagement with appropriate sources. Acceptable standard of explanation of human dignity and the common good in the context of a specific global community that is related to your course of study at ACU, based on effective engagement with appropriate sources. Sound standard of explanation of human dignity and the common good in the context of a specific global community that is related to your course of study at ACU, based on effective engagement with appropriate sources. High quality standard of explanation of human dignity and the common good in the context of a specific global community that is related to your course of study at ACU, based on effective engagement with appropriate sources. Exceptionally high-quality standard of explanation of human dignity and the common good in the context of a specific global community that is related to your course of study at ACU, based on effective engagement with appropriate sources.
7 marks 03.4/7 3.54.5/7 4.65.2/7 5.35.9/7 67/7
Criterion 2:
ANALYSIS:
Analysis of how one target (from prescribed options) accounts for human dignity and the common good in the context of a specific global community that is related to your course of study at ACU, based on effective engagement with appropriate sources. Did not provide an acceptable standard of analysis of how one target (from prescribed options) accounts for human dignity and the common good in the context of a specific global community that is related to your course of study at ACU, based on effective engagement with appropriate sources. Acceptable standard of analysis of how one target (from prescribed options) accounts for human dignity and the common good in the context of a specific global community that is related to your course of study at ACU, based on effective engagement with appropriate sources. Sound standard of analysis of how one target (from prescribed options) accounts for human dignity and the common good in the context of a specific global community that is related to your course of study at ACU, based on effective engagement with appropriate sources. High quality standard of analysis of how one target (from prescribed options) accounts for human dignity and the common good in the context of a specific global community that is related to your course of study at ACU, based on effective engagement with appropriate sources. Exceptionally high-quality standard of analysis of how one target (from prescribed options) accounts for human dignity and the common good in the context of a specific global community that is related to your course of study at ACU, based on effective engagement with appropriate sources.
12 marks 05.9/12 67.8/12 7.98.9/12 910.1/12 10.212/12
Criterion 3:
EXPRESSION:
Writing style suited to a feature article, dynamic quality, grammar, punctuation, structure and flow, clarity, and readability, balanced and strategic use of word allocation.
Did not provide an acceptable standard of writing style suited to a feature article, dynamic quality, grammar, punctuation, structure and flow, clarity, and readability, balanced and strategic use of word allocation.
Acceptable standard of writing style suited to a feature article, dynamic quality, grammar, punctuation, structure and flow, clarity, and readability, balanced and strategic use of word allocation.
Sound standard of writing style suited to a feature article, dynamic quality, grammar, punctuation, structure and flow, clarity, and readability, balanced and strategic use of word allocation.
High quality standard of writing style suited to a feature article, dynamic quality, grammar, punctuation, structure and flow, clarity, and readability, balanced and strategic use of word allocation.
Exceptionally high-quality standard of writing style suited to a feature article, dynamic quality, grammar, punctuation, structure and flow, clarity, and readability, balanced and strategic use of word allocation.
7 marks 03.4/7 3.54.5/7 4.65.2/7 5.35.9/7 67/7
Criterion 4:
REFERENCING:
Citing appropriate sources accurately and consistently.
Did not provide acceptable standard of citing appropriate sources accurately and consistently. Acceptable standard of citing appropriate sources accurately and consistently. Sound standard of citing appropriate sources accurately and consistently. High quality standard of citing appropriate sources accurately and consistently. Exceptionally high-quality standard of citing appropriate sources accurately and consistently.
4 marks 01.9/4 22.5/4 2.62.9/4 33.3/4 3.44/4
PreviousNext
