Rubric Assessment 3 NURS 6900
Rubric Assessment 3 NURS 6900
Criterion High Distinction
(100- 85%) Distinction
(84-75%) Credit
(74-65%) Pass
(64- 50%) Fail
(49-0%) Marks
Background
Discuss the background for this qualitative study and provide a justification for why the research is needed (supported by high quality contemporary literature)
17 20 marks 15 16.9 marks 13 - 14.9 marks 10 - 12.9 marks 0 - 9.9 marks /20
Exceptional discussion of the background for the qualitative study, including a comprehensive justification for why the research is needed.
Justification is well-supported by high-quality contemporary literature.
Demonstrates a deep understanding of the current state of knowledge in the field and highlights the significance of the proposed research.
Detailed discussion of the background, with a clear justification for the research.
Justification is supported by relevant contemporary literature.
Demonstrates an understanding of the current state of knowledge in the field and the importance of the proposed research. Adequate discussion of the background, with a justification for the research.
Justification is supported by literature but may lack depth.
Demonstrates a basic understanding of the current state of knowledge in the field and the relevance of the proposed research. Basic discussion of the background with an attempt at justification.
The justification is rudimentary and may lack depth.
Demonstrates a limited understanding of the current state of knowledge in the field and the significance of the proposed research. Answer is unclear, missing, or not attempted, indicating a lack of understanding of the background and justification. Research Question:
State a qualitative research question on the selected topic that clearly identifies the study population and phenomenon of interest.
8.5 10 marks 7.5 - 8.4 marks 6.5 - 7.4 marks 5 - 6.4 marks 0 - 4.9 marks /10
Clearly stated qualitative research question on the selected topic that identifies the study population and phenomenon of interest.
The question is well-formulated and demonstrates a deep understanding of the research focus.
Articulates the research question in a manner that aligns with the overall research aim.
Clearly stated qualitative research question on the selected topic that identifies the study population and phenomenon of interest.
The question is well-formulated.
Articulates the research question with clarity, showing a detailed understanding of the research focus. Stated qualitative research question on the selected topic with identification of the study population and phenomenon of interest.
The question is adequately formulated.
Articulates the research question in a way that reflects a basic understanding of the research focus. Stated qualitative research question on the selected topic, but it may lack clarity or specificity in identifying the study population and phenomenon of interest.
The question is formulated at a basic level, reflecting a limited understanding of the research focus. Answer is unclear, missing, or not attempted, indicating a lack of understanding of formulating a research question. Study Design: Methodology
Describe an appropriate qualitative methodology to address the research question for this qualitative study.
8.5 10 marks 7.5 - 8.4 marks 6.5 - 7.4 marks 5 - 6.4 marks 0 - 4.9 marks /10
Exceptional description of an appropriate methodology to address the research question for this qualitative study.
Demonstrates a deep understanding of qualitative research methods and justifies the chosen approach.
Describes the methodology in detail with a exceptional consideration of its suitability for the research question. Detailed description of an appropriate methodology. to address the research question.
Demonstrates a solid understanding of qualitative research methods.
Describes the methodology clearly and provides reasons for its choice.
Detailed consideration of the methodology's suitability for the research question. Adequate description of an appropriate methodology.
Describes the chosen methodology for addressing the research question.
Provides a basic understanding of qualitative research methods.
Describes the methodology with some clarity but may lack depth.
Basic consideration of the suitability of the methodology for the research question.
Basic description of an appropriate methodology.
Describes the chosen methodology, demonstrating a limited understanding of qualitative research methods.
Describes the methodology at a basic level, lacking in detail.
Limited consideration of the suitability of the methodology for the research question. Answer is unclear, missing, or not attempted, indicating a lack of understanding of the methodology for qualitative study design.
Demonstrates a lack of knowledge about qualitative research methods. Study Design: Population, Sampling and Recruitment
Describe the study population, eligibility criteria, study sample, sampling method and recruitment methods for this qualitative study 8.5 10 marks 7.5 - 8.4 marks 6.5 - 7.4 marks 5 - 6.4 marks 0 - 4.9 marks /10
Comprehensive description of the study population, eligibility criteria, study sample, sampling method, and recruitment methods
Provides a exceptional description of each component, demonstrating a deep understanding of the factors influencing sample selection and recruitment.
Clear description of the study population, eligibility criteria, study sample, sampling method, and recruitment methods
Provides a clear description of each component, showing a detailed understanding of the factors influencing sample selection and recruitment.
Adequate description of the study population, eligibility criteria, study sample, sampling method, and recruitment methods
Provides a basic understanding of each component, describing them adequately but may lack depth. Demonstrates a basic understanding of the factors influencing sample selection and recruitment.
Basic description of the study population, eligibility criteria, study sample, sampling method, and recruitment methods
Describes each component at a basic level, lacking in detail. Demonstrates a limited understanding of the factors influencing sample selection and recruitment. Answer is unclear, missing, or not attempted, indicating a lack of understanding of the components of the study population, sampling, and recruitment for qualitative study designStudy Design: Data Collection and Analysis
Describe what methods you will use to collect and analyse the data for this qualitative study.
8.5 10 marks 7.5 - 8.4 marks 6.5 - 7.4 marks 5 - 6.4 marks 0 - 4.9 marks /10
Exceptional description of methods for data collection and analysis for this qualitative study.
Provides a detailed and comprehensive description of data collection and analysis methods, demonstrating a deep understanding of qualitative research processes.
Exceptional Clear description of methods for data collection and analysis.
Provides a clear description of data collection and analysis methods, showing a detailed understanding of qualitative research processes.
Adequate description of methods for data collection and analysis.
Describes data collection and analysis methods with some clarity but may lack depth. Demonstrates a basic understanding of qualitative research processes. Basic description of methods for data collection and analysis.
Describes data collection and analysis methods at a basic level, lacking in detail.
Demonstrates a limited understanding of qualitative research processes. Answer is unclear, missing, or not attempted, indicating a lack of understanding of the methods for data collection and analysis in qualitative study. design Study limitations and rigour
Discuss the rigour/trustworthiness and limitations for this qualitative study (supported by high quality contemporary literature).
12.7 15 marks 11.2 12.6 marks 9.7 11.1 marks 7.5 9.6 marks 0 9.5 marks /15
Exceptional discussion of the rigour/trustworthiness and limitations for the qualitative study, supported by high-quality contemporary literature.
Demonstrates a deep understanding of the factors influencing the study's credibility, transferability, dependability, and confirmability.
Detailed discussion of the rigour/trustworthiness and limitations, supported by relevant contemporary literature.
Demonstrates a solid understanding of the factors influencing the study's credibility, transferability, dependability, and confirmability. Adequate discussion of the rigour/trustworthiness and limitations, supported by literature but may lack depth.
Demonstrates a basic understanding of the factors influencing the study's credibility, transferability, dependability, and confirmability. Basic discussion of the rigour/trustworthiness and limitations, with an attempt at understanding the factors influencing the study's credibility, transferability, dependability, and confirmability. Answer is unclear, missing, or not attempted, indicating a lack of understanding of study limitations and rigour in qualitative research.
Demonstrates a lack of knowledge about factors influencing the credibility, transferability, dependability, and confirmability of the study. Ethical Considerations
Discuss the ethical implications for this qualitative study including vulnerable populations (such as Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples) where applicable. This is to be supported by high quality contemporary literature and relevant state or national research polices. 12.7 15 marks 11.2 12.6 marks 9.7 11.1 marks 7.5 9.6 marks 0 9.5 marks /15
Exceptional discussion of ethical implications for the qualitative study, including considerations for vulnerable populations (such as Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples) where applicable. This is supported by high-quality contemporary literature and relevant state or national research policies.
Demonstrates a deep understanding of ethical considerations.
Detailed discussion of ethical implications, including considerations for vulnerable populations, supported by relevant contemporary literature and relevant state or national research policies.
Demonstrates a solid understanding of ethical considerations. Adequate discussion of ethical implications, including considerations for vulnerable populations, supported by literature but may lack depth. Demonstrates a basic understanding of relevant state or national research policies.
Demonstrates n basic understanding of ethical considerations. Basic discussion of ethical implications, with an attempt at considerations for vulnerable populations. The discussion may lack depth. Demonstrates a basic understanding of relevant state or national research policies.
Demonstrates a limited understanding of ethical considerations. Answer is unclear, missing, or not attempted, indicating a lack of understanding of ethical considerations in qualitative research.
Demonstrates a lack of knowledge about ethical implications and considerations for vulnerable populations. Academic Writing and Expression
Writing is authentic and clearly expresses ideas.
Uses correct spelling and paragraph structure throughout.
Structured as per requirements in Course outline.
4.3 - 5 marks 3.8 4.2 marks 3.3 - 3.7 marks 2.5 3.2 marks 0 2.4 marks /5
Exemplary writing with very high levels of authenticity and independent thought. Ideas are clearly expressed.
Introductory sentence used at the start of paragraphs. Main subject matter is developed within each paragraph. Concluding sentence used at the end of paragraphs.
Exemplary spelling, grammar and syntax with no errors. Meets all style requirements.
Evidence of superior academic writing skills. Authentic and original writing that clearly synthesises the key points of the assignment. Expression is clear.
Correct use of paragraphs. Discussion in each paragraph provides sufficient depth to demonstrate understanding.
Superior spelling, grammar and syntax < 5 minor errors. Meets all style requirements Evidence of sound academic writing. Authentic and original writing that clearly addresses the key points of the assignment. Expression is appropriate.
Paragraphs are 5-7 sentences in length and sentences are clear and concise.
Minor errors only in syntax, spelling and grammar. Meets all style requirements. Authentic writing that attempts to show independent thought. May struggle with written expression.
Attempts to use paragraphs. Some sentences may be too long/short.
Meets almost all style requirements including spacing, page numbers, font, headings. Disorganised and lacks any sense of cohesion or alignment
Language hinders the effective flow of ideas and meaning. Sentences lack structure and are consistently too short or too long.
Multiple errors in spelling, grammar and style. Not structured as per requirements in Course Outline Literature sources and referencing
Wide range of contemporary relevant sources are used in text and listed in references.
Uses APA 7th ed. referencing style4.3 - 5 marks 3.8 4.2 marks 3.3 - 3.7 marks 2.5 3.2 marks 0 2.4 marks /5
Sources are appropriate, contemporary and from a range of journals and databases.
Complies with all the referencing style requirements. There are no errors in referencing throughout. Sources are appropriate, contemporary and from a range of journals and databases.
APA 7 referencing style is consistently accurate. Less than 5 minor referencing errors. Sources are appropriate, mostly contemporary and from a narrow range of journals and databases.
Complies with referencing style requirements. Some referencing errors in in-text and/or referencing list (5-7). Sources are mostly relevant however there are too few to demonstrate wide reading.
Attempts to use APA 7 style. Some errors in in-text and/or referencing list (8-10). Sources are inappropriate and/or absent.
In-text referencing may be absent and/or reference list and contains major errors (>10).
0 marks if absent intext referencing and/or reference list Total Mark /100
Weighted Grade /50
NURS6900 Assessment 3: Qualitative Research Plan
Template
Background (approximately 500 words)
Research Question (approximately 50 words)
Study Design (approximately 700 words)
Methodology
Study population, eligibility criteria, study sample, sampling method and recruitment methods
Data Collection and Analysis
Study limitations and rigour (approximately 150 words)
Ethical Considerations (approximately 200 words)
References (APA 7th edn.)