Teacher Observation and Evaluation/Appraisal

Teacher Observation and Evaluation/Appraisal

Engaging with teachers in the process of teaching and learning is the goal of instructional leadership, and supervision and evaluation of instruction are at its core.

In this assignment, you will research the mandated teacher evaluation or appraisal process in your state. Then, using classroom video demonstrations, you will observe three teachers providing instruction and evaluate or appraise their performances. You will select areas on which to focus, complete each observation using formative evaluation techniques and tools and make notes on how you will respond and provide feedback to the teacher.Products are specified in the assignment steps.

Step 1Research the teacher evaluation or appraisal process mandated in WASHINGTON STATE. Make note of the key processes, tools, timelines, legal requirements, and ethical implications.

In a 1- to 2-page paper, introduce and summarize the teacher evaluation or appraisal process in your state. Include APA-formatted in-text citations and reference page so your instructor can easily locate the information.

Keep your states process in mind as you conduct observations of teacher performance using video lessons.

Step 2Select threeClassroom Instruction VideosLinks to an external site.from the Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education website for the teacher observations and evaluations/appraisals.

Access theACE Classroom Observation Toolsresource.

Preview at least a portion of each selected video lesson prior to deciding on thefocus areaandobservation technique/toolselection.

From the Formative Assessment of Classroom Practice table within the Classroom Observation Tools resource, decide on thefocus areafor each observation and evaluation/appraisal and the classroomobservation technique/toolyou will use.Vary your technique/tool selection for each observation.

Step 3For each observation, note the following information:

Name of teacher

Title of lesson

Your selected focus area

Your selected observation technique/tool

As you observe and evaluate/appraise each teacher, make notes on how you will respond to the teachers performance and provide feedback.

Before you begin each observation, use the information for your selected technique to create a blank template, chart, or notes document mirroring the example given in the Classroom Observation Tools resource. This will help you use the technique/tool appropriately.

Step 4Using the research you conducted on the teacher evaluation/appraisal process in your state (Step 1) and your observation notes (Step 2), self-evaluate and reflect on your own performance as an instructional leader in using observation to validate and/or improve teacher performance. Did you follow the state requirements in conducting the observations? Did you encounter any legal or ethical challenges? What did you do well? How would you improve your performance?

Capture your thoughts in a 1-page evaluation-reflection paper with a conclusion about this process.

Step 5Compile and submit the products created in this assignment as one document.Start each artifact on a separate page.

APA-formatted title page to include all topics and artifacts

Summary of state requirements related to teacher evaluation/appraisal (Step 1) with APA-formatted in-text citations

Three completed Classroom Observation Tools documents (Step 2)

Self-evaluation and reflection paper (Step 3)

APA-formatted reference page

PleasereadtheAssignment GuidelinesLinks to an external site.before you begin working.

Rubric

EL5623 Module 2 State Teacher Evaluation/Appraisal Summary, Evaluation/Appraisals, and Self-Evaluation/Reflection Rubric

EL5623 Module 2 State Teacher Evaluation/Appraisal Summary, Evaluation/Appraisals, and Self-Evaluation/Reflection Rubric

Criteria Ratings Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSummary of State Requirements Related to Teacher Evaluation/Appraisal 40to >34.0pts

Mastery

The 1- to 2-page, evidenced-based narrative summarizes a state-specific teacher evaluation/appraisal process, including the key processes, tools, timelines, and legal requirements. 34to >28.0pts

Proficient

The 1- to 2-page narrative summarizes a state-specific teacher evaluation/appraisal process, including the key processes, tools, timelines, and legal requirements. 28to >22.0pts

Marginal

Some, but not all, assignment requirements for the summary of a state-specific evaluation/appraisal process are met. 22to >0.0pts

Needs Improvement

Most assignment requirements for the summary of a state-specific evaluation/appraisal process are not met. 0pts

No Submission

40pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeClassroom Observation/Evaluation/ Appraisal Tools 40to >34.0pts

Mastery

Using three teaching video demonstrations, three classroom observations are completed; evidence of the observations provided in the completion of an evaluation/ appraisal tool for each teacher. Best practices are cited in the form of in-depth observation notes. 34to >28.0pts

Proficient

Using three teaching video demonstrations, three classroom observations are completed. An evaluation/ appraisal tool is completed for each teacher. Observation notes are taken. 28to >22.0pts

Marginal

Some, but not all, assignment requirements for the classroom observation and evaluation/appraisal tools are met. 22to >0.0pts

Needs Improvement

Most assignment requirements for the classroom observations and evaluation/appraisal tools are not met. 0pts

No Submission

40pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSelf-Evaluation and Reflection Paper 40to >34.0pts

Mastery

Based on a self-evaluation, the well-organized, the 1-page evaluation-reflection paper addresses a state-specific teacher-evaluation/appraisal process and the observation/evaluation notes developed during the classroom observations. 34to >28.0pts

Proficient

Based on a self-evaluation, the 1-page evaluation-reflection paper addresses a state-specific teacher-evaluation/appraisal process and the observation/evaluation notes developed during the classroom observations. 28to >22.0pts

Marginal

Some, but not all, assignment requirements for the self-evaluation and evaluation/reflection paper are met. 22to >0.0pts

Needs Improvement

Most assignment requirements for the self-evaluation and evaluation/reflection paper are not met. 0pts

No Submission

40pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeApplications of Technology

(CAEP RA1.1) 10to >8.5pts

Mastery

Demonstrates a comprehensive understanding of appropriate applications of technology in educational settings. Skillfully plans for and/or uses a variety of technology tools to enrich the educational environment. Critically evaluates and justifies the use of technology for the identified task(s). 8.5to >7.0pts

Proficient

Appropriately employs technology tools for use in educational settings. Identified technology is clearly aligned with school-based practices. Presents a clear rationale for the application of technology to school-based practices. 7to >5.5pts

Marginal

At least one technology tool is identified for educational use. A general description or discussion is provided but clarity or elaboration is needed on the alignment between the technology tool(s) and school-based practices. 5.5to >0.0pts

Needs Improvement

Technology use is missing, minimal, or vague. Technology tool(s) may be inappropriate for application in educational settings. 0pts

No Submission

10pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeProfessional Dispositions, Laws, Ethics, and Professional Standards

(CAEP RA1.1) 10to >8.5pts

Mastery

Demonstrates exceptional application of relevant dispositions, laws, ethics, and/or professional standards in education. Clearly justifies practice with relevant professional expectations. Practices align with the highest professional standards, legal compliance, and exemplary ethical behaviors and connections are explicit and detailed. 8.5to >7.0pts

Proficient

Demonstrates appropriate application of relevant dispositions, laws, ethics, and/or professional standards in education. Practices represent legal and professional behaviors. The applications of laws, ethics, or professional standards to practice are aligned, appropriate, and accurate. 7to >5.5pts

Marginal

Applications of professional dispositions, laws, ethics, or standards are addressed. Some connections between the legal and professional expectations are identified but practices/behaviors may be inaccurate or irrelevant. 5.5to >0.0pts

Needs Improvement

Application of professional dispositions, laws, ethics, or standards is missing or inappropriate. Some applications may be illegal or unethical. 0pts

No Submission

10pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA Format and Writing Mechanics 10to >8.5pts

Mastery

Submission is free of spelling, formatting, and grammatical errors. Submission is well-formatted and professional. 8.5to >7.0pts

Proficient

Submission contains minimal spelling, formatting, and grammatical errors that do not impede the understanding of the concepts and plans. 7to >5.5pts

Marginal

Submission contains multiple spelling, formatting, and/or grammatical errors. Some ideas are unclear due to errors in writing mechanics, or multiple elements of APA format are not followed. 5.5to >0.0pts

Needs Improvement

Submission contains extensive spelling, formatting, and grammatical errors that significantly impede the understanding and presentation of ideas. 0pts

No Submission

10pts

Total Points:150

PreviousNext