WELF 1019 Communication Skills in Social Work and Human Services
- Subject Code :
WELF-1019
- University :
University of South Australia Exam Question Bank is not sponsored or endorsed by this college or university.
- Country :
Australia
Assessment 2 Feedback Sheet |
||||||||
WELF 1019 Communication Skills in Social Work and Human Services Assessment 2: Learning Portfolio 2,700 words (60%)
|
||||||||
This assessment task will help students to develop and demonstrate the knowledge and skills required to meet the objectives in this course. |
||||||||
Marking Criteria |
HD Exemplary competency in all criteria |
D Higher level competency all criteria PLUS exemplary competency on most criteria |
C Basic competence all criteria PLUS demonstrates higher level competency on some criteria |
P1 Basic competence in all criteria |
P2 Basic competence on most criteria. Some requirements for pass have been reached |
F1 Insufficient competence on some criteria. Deficiencies in meeting Pass requirements |
F2 Competence not demonstrated on most criteria. Requirements for Pass clearly not met. |
|
PART A Career Development, Planning & Management Online module 10% |
Non-graded
Uploaded completed certificate |
Non-graded |
Non-graded |
Non-graded |
Non-graded |
Non-graded |
Non-graded |
|
PART B Professional Writing Skills 30% Demonstration of professional writing skills in the construction of
communication, which is appropriate to the context, ability to communicate well in writing
|
Excellent evidence of very strong professional writing skills in the email and formal letter. Excellent rationales provided |
Very good evidence of strong professional writing skills in the email and formal letter Excellent rationales provided
|
Good evidence of strong professional writing skills in the email and formal letter. Good rationales provided |
Satisfactory evidence of for professional writing skills in the email and the formal letter. Good rationales provided |
Limited evidence of professional writing skills in the email and the formal letter. Limited rationales provided |
Inconsistent evidence of professional writing skills for the email and formal letter for Part B and no/or limited rationales provided |
No evidence provided on professional writing skills for the email and formal letter for Part B and no rationales provided |
|
PART C Body of Knowledge 30% Demonstration of reflection and comprehension of readings in the completion of the assessment. All sources to be cited and included in the reference list |
1 strength and 1 area that needs personal development clearly described and linked to preparatory work. Excellent range of examples to support discussion. |
1 strength and 1 area that needs personal development described and linked to preparatory work. A very good range of examples to support discussion |
1 strength and 1 area that needs personal development described and linked to preparatory work. A good range of examples to support discussion. |
1 strength and 1 area that needs personal development described and linked to preparatory work. Some examples from text and e-readings support discussion. |
1 strength and 1 area that needs personal development described but not linked to preparatory work. One or two examples used to support discussion. |
1 strength and 1 area that needs personal development not described or are not linked to preparatory work. Limited examples support discussion. |
1 strength and area that needs personal development not identified There is no evidence of preparatory work. No examples from text book and e-readings to support discussion. |
|
Critical Reflection and Becoming a Professional 30% The work contains an authentic critical self-reflection with strong links to evidence to support claims made and inherent competencies. |
Excellent evidence of analysis and reflection on the impact of learning on emerging professional identity. |
Very good evidence of analysis of the impact of learning emerging professional identity. |
Good evidence of analysis and reflection on the impact of learning on emerging professional identity. |
Satisfactory evidence of analysis and reflection on the impact of learning on emerging professional identity. |
Limited evidence of analysis and reflection on the impact of learning on emerging professional identity. |
Inconsistent evidence of analysis and reflection on the impact of learning on emerging professional identity. |
No evidence of analysis and reflection on the impact of learning on emerging professional identity. . |
|
Literacy, academic soundness
The work contains evidence of integrated references and is referenced according to the APA referencing system to cite and list sources. |
Excellent integration of a range of references. Referenced consistently and correctly according to APA referencing system |
Very good integration of references. Referenced
consistently and correctly according to APA referencing system. |
Good integration of references. Referenced consistently and correctly according to APA referencing system. |
Satisfactory integration of references. Generally referenced consistently and correctly according to APA referencing system. |
Limited integration of references. Referenced according to APA referencing system but not consistently or correctly. |
Minimal integration of appropriate. Referencing inconsistent and/or incorrect, APA system not used at all or inconsistently. |
No integration of appropriate references. Referencing inconsistent and incorrect. APA system not used at all. |
|
Final Comments:
Grade: |
||||||||