Assessment 1 - Written essay
Assessment 1 - Written essay
Assessment 1 is designed to demonstrate your learning and achievement of the following course objectives:
CO1. Describe the bio-psycho-social, cultural and historical factors that shape the conceptualisation of mental health, mental illness and mental health care.
CO2. Explain the statutory regulations that apply to people experiencing serious mental illness.
CO3. Explain how recovery values and attitudes and strengths-based approaches inform contemporary person-centred mental health nursing care.
CO5. Differentiate between the clinical presentations associated with mental health conditions.
CO6. Apply pathophysiological knowledge of mental health conditions to inform nursing care and clinical decision making in responding to the mental health needs of a person.
CO7. Apply principles of quality, safety and risk management in the nursing care of people with mental health conditions.
Assessment Description
Word count: 3,000 words
APA 7 style referencing: 12-15 academic references
This assessment incorporates course content focused on contemporary nursing care which promotes recovery principles and considers the historical underpinnings which continue to challenge health professionals attitudes today. In this assignment you will refer to course readings to answer the assignment questions and apply the concepts to the case scenario of Mark, a person you will meet in your first Online Workshop in Week 2.
You will be required to watch the video of the nurses handover of Mark and meet Mark in your Online Workshop and complete the activities with your class.
You will need to read thecomprehensive mental health assessmentand analyse Marks case to identify common symptoms of mental health challenges present and describe Marks strengths in coping with the complications of his illness.
You will describe the use of statutory regulations (inpatient treatment orders) in providing treatment to people like Mark and how to best support the consumers' ability to engage in decision making as part of their care planning using the Registered Nurse Practice Standards andNational Safety and Quality Health Service Standards (2018).
Finally, you will reflect on your learning from the course so far in reference to your first reflective statement which you will complete in Week 1 of the course during your first tutorial.
Instructions
To complete this written assignment, you will need to address the following criteria in Parts A, B and C. You will begin your assignment with an introduction and conclude your assignment with a conclusion. You will need to include a reference list at the end of the assignment.
Introduction should include a general statement about the topics of the assignment and background information. Outline the structure of the assignment including the main points to be addressed in the essay
(approx. 200 words)
Part A
-Describe one of the critical historical factors that have influenced the development of contemporary approaches in mental health care today and how stigma was represented in the handover of Mark in the Online Workshop.
-Analyse the principles of the Recovery model and the ways they support the human rights of people like Mark, accessing mental health care today.
(1000 words, 5-8 references)
(Weighting30%)
Part B
-Review the comprehensive mental health assessment of Mark and using a person-centred approach, identify the specific mental health issues that are impacting Mark including challenges and strengths.
-Explain how the impact statutory regulations (inpatient treatment orders) have on the person experiencing serious mental illness and ways the decision-making processes of the health care team should inform the person's care plan usingprinciples from the National Safety and Quality Health Service Standards (2018).
(1000 words, 5-8 references)
(Weighting30%)
Part C
Reflect on your learning process throughout this course and assignment.
In your first tutorial, you were asked to write a short paragraph, reflecting on your knowledge and assumptions about mental health care. You will use this statement in Part C to reflect on your learning so far.
-Describe which concepts have impacted your learning the most and developed your understanding of the lived experience of people with mental illness.
-How has this course changed your thinking about mental health care delivery? In what ways has your understanding of Recovery in mental health changed?
-What questions do you have now as a result of what you have learnt in the course so far?
(600 words, no references)
(Weighting30%)
Conclusion should include an evaluation on the main findings of the assignment and a statement that shows your position or thoughts on the main topics. Only include ideas that were developed and supported in the body of the assignment. No new concepts are to be included in the conclusion.
(200 words, no references)
Academic writing style and referencing using APA 7 style referencing
(Weighting 10%)
Academic Writing and Format Guidelines
This assignment must be written in an academic format that is 1.5 or double spaced using Arial font size 10, and be appropriately referenced using the APA 7 referencing style.References ought to be no older than 5 years unless you have found a significant referenceby a foundational theorist which was published prior.Please proofread and spell-check your assignment before submission. Please do not exceed or go below the prescribedword limit by more than 10% or you will attract a penalty grade deduction. Late assignments submitted withoutextensions are penalised at 2 marks per day. Please refer to the University's Assessment Policies and ProceduressectionPROCEDURE AB-68 P4relating to the remarking and resubmission of assignments.
CLINICAL INFORMATION
Part a). Comprehensive Mental Health Assessment
Introduction:
Mark is a 35 yr old man partnered with his girlfriend Jude for 2 years. Both live together in a house they are renting in Mile End.
Mark is employed full time as a tradesman carpenter. Jude is presently away interstate for work.
Situation:
* Reason for Referral * Presenting Issue * Recent Significant Events or Stressors
* Symptoms * Change in Frequency, Intensity, Duration of Symptoms * Collateral
Mark presented to the Emergency Department alone at approximately 10am, encouraged by his mother (Sue) who was concerned about his safety. At triage he described thoughts of suicide without a clear plan. He denies self-harm and denies overdose of medications.
Mark states he has a history of depression and anxiety which has worsened over the past 4 weeks. His symptoms are characterised by negative thinking with thoughts of suicide, poor sleep, anxiety with physical symptoms of psychomotor agitation, SOB, increased heart rate and thoughts of a fear of dying.
Marks mother Sue concurs that his symptoms have worsened over the past month as she has noticed his mood is low, he appears sad, tired and talks about wanting to quit his job which is unusual since he has moved to a job he has wanted to be in for the past year. Sue believes his mental state has been affected by news that his close friend Luke has been diagnosed with a medical condition, possibly leukemia. She has known Mark to be suicidal in the past (approx. 4 years ago) but that since engaging with a psychologist, his mental state has been much improved until recently.
Background:
* Current Living Situation * Significant Relationships * Developmental History * Psychiatric History * Current Medication
* Drug and Alcohol and Gambing History * Family History * Previous Treatment / Medication * Relevant Health / Medical Problems
* Domestic Violence * Psychosocial * Allergies
Mark lives in secure rental accommodation in Mile End with supportive girlfriend Jude. They have been partnered for 2 years in a supportive relationship. Jude is currently away interstate on business and intends on returning home tomorrow. No dependants.
Supports: Jude partner of 2 years
Mother Sue and Father David- very supportive and aware of Marks situation
Psychologist Amber Davies
GP Dr Raj
Developmental hx: Mark grew up in the family home with his mother Sue, his father David and younger brother Sam. Achieved expected developmental milestones. Described as a happy child with many friends at school. Enjoyed surfing and other outdoor activities such as playing soccer. During high school, a close friend of Marks struggled with mental health problems and their friendship impacted Marks mental state also. During this time, Mark began to struggle with his own anxiety which was supported with school counselling and GP. His self esteem was impacted negatively until adulthood.
Mark completed high school at the local public PS and high school, successfully completing year 12 and enrolling into a trade apprenticeship with a local carpentry company. Mark has worked hard with this team and was successfully promoted to new position in the past 2 weeks. Currently Mark feels he is not well enough to work in this promotional position and does not want to let his employer down given he is struggling and has difficulty focusing on learning the new role.
Psychiatric hx: History of depression and anxiety for the past 4 years managed in the community with supports including GP and psychologist. No hospital admissions for mental health. Suicidal ideation 4 years ago during an episode of depression. No self-harm or suicide attempt at this time.
Medication: Prescribed Escitalopram 10 mg daily. Adherent to treatment since being commenced by GP 6 months ago. No other medications prescribed.
Family psychiatric hx: David (Marks father) suffers from depression and his grandfather who is in a supported residential facility. No family history of suicide.
Drug and alcohol use: Alcohol use includes x2 standard drinks of beer after work each day. Recently increased to 6 beers per night in the past 4 weeks.
Drug use includes THC each weekend approx. 2-3 joints across the weekend. Usually this is less regular.
No gambling behaviours.
Medical history: No major health problems. Presents today with tachycardia which needs further investigation with regular observations, ECG and medical review.
Back pain commenced 6 months ago and treated with physiotherapy and paracetamol. Back pain worsened in the past 2 weeks causing headaches and difficulty sleeping.
Possible development of withdrawal symptoms (alcohol and THC) which need monitoring and treatment. No history of alcohol withdrawal seizures.
Denies allergies.
Mental State Examination:
* Appearance
35-year-old Caucasian male, casually dressed wearing clean clothing, blue tee shirt, jeans and casual lace up shoes. Within a healthy weight range. Short hair, blonde ends. Unshaven facial hair. Nose ring. Small tattoos on both hands. No visible scars.
* Behaviour
Sitting in a chair. Cooperative with mental health review. Answering questions and engaging in conversation. No obvious psychomotor agitation or retardation. Very good eye contact. Gesturing appropriately with his hands. No self harm.
* Mood
Describes mood as really low at the moment. Admits that he is feeling anxious and depressed.
* Speech
Normal volume, rate and flow to conversation. Speech is clear and coherent. Australian accent.
* Affect
Affect is anxious and reactive and congruent to stated mood.
* Thought (form and content).
Normal thought form- nil formal thought disorder. Thoughts are clear.
Thought content relates to negative thinking with guilt and thoughts of suicide without a clear plan, themes of feeling anxious with physical symptoms, and feeling supported by family and partner, wanting to access help for mental health.
* Perception
Nil perceptual abnormalities described or observed.
* Cognition function
Cognition is intact. Consumer is oriented to person, place and time. Memory is intact as consumer is able to recall recent events and historical events accurately. No cognitive deficits noted.
* Insight
Consumer presents with a good insight into his mental health as evidenced by his ability to identify unhelpful thinking patterns which are impacting his mood. He is able to recognise that his mental illness has relapsed and understands health promotion activities to support recovery.
* Judgement
Consumer demonstrates good judgement related to accessing health care and treatment for mental illness. Judgement related to suicidal thoughts remains intact as he does not wish to act on his thoughts and is following his Safety plan to ensure his own safety.
* Rapport
Rapport is established as consumer is trusting and engaging with health professionals in a collaborative manner and discussing the best treatment approach for his recovery.
"Strengths and skills"
* Please identify the consumer's strengths and coping skills when they are well.
* Please include the perspective of the consumer's family/carer.
Mark is a hard-working, successful carpenter recently promoted to a senior level position. He enjoys surfing and uses exercise as a coping mechanism along with psychological approaches such as ACT and mindfulness to manage his mental health and back pain.
Mark engages well with his supports and has good insight into his mental health and when he requires additional support. He is usually bright in his mood and has hope for the future but currently he is struggling with strong negative thoughts which impair his ability to rationalise.
Mark has a supportive network of family, friends, work colleagues and health professionals around him which he actively engages with when feeling unable to cope with symptoms of his mental illness.
Risk Categories:Assessed Level:
Suicide/Self-Harm Level: Low/Medium/High* (indicate which level applies)
Evidence to support assessed level:
Marks risk of suicide is moderate as he has thoughts of suicide which have escalated recently. He does not have a certain plan to end his life but remains a moderate risk as his negative thoughts could worsen and cause him to act on these thoughts. Mark has no access to means as he is in hospital and seeking help. His negative thoughts need monitoring by his nurse and daily mental state examination and risk assessment.
Mark has no history of suicide attempts or self-harm and this reduces his risk. No family history of suicide.
Mark has a current Safety Plan which he will forward on to the mental health team and add to his file.
Violence/Aggression/Criminal ActivityLevel: Low/Medium/High* (indicate which level applies)
Evidence to support assessed level:
Mark is a low risk of violence and aggression. He does not express any thoughts of wanting to harm others and is cooperative with nursing direction. He is not agitated but will need to be monitored for signs of withdrawal given recent increase in substance use and abrupt withdrawal in hospital.
Absconding Level: Low/Medium/High* (indicate which level applies)
Evidence to support assessed level:
Mark is a low risk of absconding as he voluntarily sought help from the hospital for this admission. He is cooperative and engaged with health professionals to manage his mental health. He will need to be monitored for any change to his decision to stay in hospital which may be prompted by withdrawal symptoms or increasing thoughts of suicide.
Self-Neglect/Exploitation/Vulnerability Level: Low/Medium/High* (indicate which level applies)
Evidence to support assessed level:
Mark is a medium risk of self-neglect or vulnerability as evidenced by his deteriorated mood, negative thinking and suicidal thoughts. He has considered quitting his job which is an unusual decision for him. He will
*L = Low (mild, limited frequency and intensity) M = Medium - (frequent but with limited intensity) and H = High (frequent, intense) N = No Risk
Risk Summary
See template PDF for prompts
Mark presents as a 35 yr old man with a relapse of depression and anxiety characterised by thoughts of suicide with no clear plan or self harm behaviours.
Marks static risk factors relate to his being a male gender, history of depression and thoughts of suicide. Recent stressor relates to news of his close friends illness which has triggered a decline in Marks mental health. Further static risk factors relate to Marks family history of depression in his paternal side (Father and Grandfather).
Marks dynamic risk factors relate to a relapse of symptoms of depression and anxiety with suicidal ideation. He has no access to means while in hospital and he remains a voluntary patient.
Further dynamic risk factors include active substance use with possible withdrawal symptoms while hospitalised which may contribute to a deterioration in his mood and level of agitation. Currently Mark does not present with agitation or irritability and so is assessed as a low risk of harm to others.
Further dynamic risk factors relate to physical comorbidity including back pain which is currently causing physical discomfort and impacting sleep and mood.
Mitigating factors or protective factors relate to Marks ability to seek out support from social networks and health care services. Mark has good insight into his mental health and has a safety plan which he follows when his mental health deteriorates. Mark has a strong family support unit but currently his partner is away interstate and due to return tomorrow. Mark has given consent for the health care team to speak with his partner Jude and his mother Sue about his health care.
Voluntary admission for mental health.
Setting:
Inpatient Community (tick whichever applies)
Care plan:
Monitor and document mental state and risk assessment on a daily basis and respond to any changes in a therapeutic manner. Review progress, reviewing strategies which are helpful to Marks recovery.
Provide regular support to Mark and maintain 15 minutely observations during first 2 hours and reduce to hourly observations thereafter.
Regularly review thoughts of suicide and self harm with Mark, communicate with compassion and ensure safety of consumer if thoughts of suicide/self harm escalate. Provide a safe environment, any potential dangerous objects should be removed from the immediate environment.
Monitor for signs and symptoms of withdrawal related to cessation of alcohol and THC and treat with antianxiety medication.
Review back pain and provide pain relief as required. Review from physiotherapy on exercises to treat injury.
Review tachycardia with medical team. ECG scheduled for later today.
Regular psychiatric review by the Mental Health team psychiatrist and medication review.
Therapeutic counselling skills will enhance communication by using open ended questions allowing Mark to feel he is being listened to without judgement, building trust and promoting a therapeutic relationship while building rapport.
Collaborative care- openly discuss treatment options with Mark and explore his therapeutic goals. This conversation should include psychotherapy and medication review. Share health information with Marks GP.
Exploration of Marks willingness and attitude towards medication as well as his concerns should be listened to and responded.
Encourage engagement with existing supports during hospitalisation such as family and partner and invite collaboration with care planning. Maintain regular communication between treating team and supports.
Promote resilience and problem-solving skills through a strengths-based approach to identify strengths and abilities and improve self-esteem. Explore personal interests and encourage Mark to slowly reintroduce pleasurable activities at his own pace, such as exercise.
Provide psychoeducation/information related to Marks questions and encourage his input into the decisions related to his care and treatment
Challenging of core beliefs and reframing of negative cognitions will assist in identifying more positive perspectives to Marks thinking. CBT principles can be used in this strategy.
Promote hope and support future planning activities which enhance self-worth and achievement.
Discharge planning- consider supports in the community to maintain Marks recovery and design a discharge plan with Mark such as GP, psychology, regular exercise, cutting down alcohol and THC.
Mental Health Nursing: Assessment -Written Essay
Student: Lecturer:
Course objectives being assessed by this assignment are:
CO1. CO2. CO3. CO5. CO6. CO7 Students are required to complete an introduction and address each component of the assessment task including Parts A, B and C. Students will also include a conclusion and reference list at the end of this assessment. For a complete description of the assessment task, please refer to the course outline or course site and click on the Assessments tab.
Part A) Historical factors influencing stigma and Recovery in contemporary practice 30%
Criteria HD
(85-100%) Distinction
(75-84%) Credit
(65-74%) Pass 1
(55-64%) Pass 2
(50-54%) Fail 1
(40-49%) Fail 2
(39% or below)
Introduction clearly presented.
A clear description of how one critical historical factor has influenced the development of contemporary approaches in mental health care.
Accurately identifies stigmatising attitudes from the Mark case scenario.
Analyses and interprets the principles of the Recovery model and their application in supporting the human rights of people like Mark, accessing mental health care today.
Introduction, as D, plus
well-developed introduction which creates interest
Demonstrated an outstanding level of understanding, deep analysis and synthesis of the:
critical historical factor
theories and concepts of stigma & contemporary practice
principles of the Recovery model and the influence on the human rights of people accessing mental health care.
Outstanding level of interpretation and application of the case scenario with a strongly incorporating Marks unique needs.
Introduction is advanced level with very clear and relevant background and context of the discussion.
Demonstrated an advanced level of understanding and interpretation of the:
critical historical factor
theories and concepts of stigma & contemporary practice
principles of the Recovery model and the influence on the human rights of people accessing mental health care.
Advanaced level of interpretation and application of the case scenario with clear reference to Marks unique needs. Introduction is sound level with a clear background and context of the discussion.
Demonstrated a sound level of understanding and interpretation of the:
critical historical factor
theories and concepts of stigma & contemporary practice
principles of the Recovery model and the influence on the human rights of people accessing mental health care.
Sound level of interpretation and application of the case scenario with reference to Marks unique needs. Introduction is satisfactory level with some background and context of the discussion.
Demonstrated a satisfactory level of understanding of the:
critical historical factor
theories and concepts of stigma & contemporary practice
principles of the Recovery model and the influence on the human rights of people accessing mental health care.
Satisfactory level of interpretation of the case scenario with some references to Marks unique needs.
Introduction is limited level with background and context of the discussion had several missing elements
Demonstrated a limited level of understanding of the:
critical historical factor
theories and concepts of stigma & contemporary practice.
principles of the Recovery model and the influence on the human rights of people accessing mental health care.
A limited level of interpretation of the case scenario with few references to Marks unique needs.
Introduction is inadequate level with many important elements missing
Demonstrated an inadequate level of
understanding of the:
critical historical factor
theories and concepts of stigma & contemporary practice
principles of the Recovery model and the influence on the human rights of people accessing mental health care.
Inadequately developed and/or lacking in clarity about the case scenario and Marks unique needs.
No or poor introduction.
Poor or No use of evidence to support the answer to the question.
Poor or No demonstration of knowledge evident of the historical factors, theories, concepts of stigma related to contemporary practice.
Poor or No understanding of the topic, principles and/or terminology with the response undeveloped and lacking clarity.
Poorly or No case scenario application and/or Marks unique needs considered.
Part B) Person centred mental health assessment and decision making in mental health care (30%)
Criteria HD
(85-100%) Distinction
(75-84%) Credit
(65-74%) Pass 1
(55-64%) Pass 2
(50-54%) Fail 1
(40-49%) Fail 2
(39% or below)
Provides a clear definition of the concept of person-centred care and refers to this model to analyse and interpret the mental health issues present in Marks scenario, outlining the psychosocial challenges and strengths described.
A theoretical understanding of statutory regulations (inpatient treatment orders) & their impact on the person experiencing serious mental illness within the Australian context.
Describes how collaborative care is used to guide decision-making processes informing the person's care plan.
Principles of safety and quality are referred to support this argument. Demonstrated an outstanding level of understanding & application of the person-centred approach and Marks lived experience.
Outstanding level which promotes original ideas to provide interpretations of the use of the Mental Health Act or statutory regulations.
Outstandingly organises and synthesises evidence exploring
collaborative care
decision-making processes
principles of safety and quality.
Demonstrated an advanced level of understanding & application of the person centred approach and Marks lived experience.
Advanced level which provides a balanced view to interpret the use of the Mental Health Act or statutory regulations.
Advancedly organises and analyses evidence to describe
collaborative care
decision-making processes
principles of safety and quality.
Demonstrated a sound level of understanding of the application of person centred care approach and Marks situation.
Sound level which provides a general interpretation of the Mental Health Act or statutory regulations.
Soundly describes
collaborative care
decision making processes
principles of safety and quality.
.
Demonstrated a
satisfactory level of understanding of the application of person centred care and Marks situation.
Satisfactory level which provides a general interpretation of the Mental Health Act or statutory regulations.
Saftisfactorily describes
collaborative care
decision making is aligned
principles of safety and quality
Demonstrated a limited understanding of the principles of person centred care and Marks situation.
Limited level which provides a simple interpretation of the Mental Health Act or statutory regulations.
Limitedly descsribes
colaborative care
decision making partly aligned.
principles of safety and quality
Demonstrated an inadequate described the basic principles of person centred care and Marks situation could be more clearly described.
Inadequate level of understanding of the Mental Health Act or statutory regulations.
Inadeqaualty describes
collaborative care and
decision making not aligned.
principles of safety and quality
Poor and /or Unsatisfactory description of the principles of person centred care and Marks situation.
Poor or absent description of the Mental Health Act or statutory regulations; collaborative care and decision making.
Poor or No use of evidence to support the answer to the question.
.
Ambiguous or illogical statements throughout this question/section.
Part C) Student reflection of learning (30%)
A detailed reflective statement identifying initial assumptions about mental health, understanding of key concepts of recovery in mental health.
An analysis on which mental health concepts have impacted your learning and developed your understanding of the lived experience of people with mental illness.
Conclusion clearly presented.
Demonstrated an outstanding conscientious and deep reflection of the impact of course content on the students understanding of mental health key concepts.
Outstanding quality of reflective writing is evident, analysing and applying key concepts of the course and succinctly explained.
Outstanding level conclusion was summarized succinctly. Demonstrated an advanced level reflection of the students understanding of mental health key concepts and how the students learning has developed.
Advanced level and standard of reflective writing is evident, drawing on key concepts within the course and logically explained.
Advanced level conclusion, summarized the major points in a non-repetitive manner
Demonstrated a sound level of reflection of the students understanding of mental health key concepts and how the students learning has developed.
Sound level and standard of reflective writing is evident, drawing on key concepts within the course and soundly explained.
Sound level conclusion summarized the major points. Demonstrated a
satisfactory level with a simple reflection of the students understanding of mental health key concepts and how the students learning has changed.
satisfactory level and standard of reflective writing required a couple more key concepts of the course.
Satisfactory level conclusion, summarized most of the major points. Demonstrated a limited level with a superficial reflection of the students understanding of mental health key concepts and how the students learning has changed.
Limited standard of reflective writing needs further development with a few key concepts of the course.
Limited level conclusion but not clearly presented, OR, few major points of the paper are summarised Inadequately reflected on the mental health key concepts of the course or how the students learning has changed.
Inadequately standard of reflective writing with many important concepts missing from the course.
Inadequate level conclusion is vague and missing many key points. No reflective writing
Poorly reflected on the mental health key concepts of the course or how the students learning has changed.
Poor standard of reflective writing and was incomplete or missing concepts of the course.
No conclusion provided.
Academic writing and referencing requirements (10%)
Criteria HD
(85-100%) Distinction
(75-84%) Credit
(65-74%) Pass 1
(55-64%) Pass 2
(50-54%) Fail 1
(40-49%) Fail 2
(39% or below)
Adheres to writing guidelines
Discussion is clear and logical and supported by relevant academic literature from the course readings.
Referencing adheres to the APA 7 Style and incorporates in-text citations and a reference list of current academic literature
Adheres to writing guidelines, and assignment presented at an outstanding level:
sentence & paragraph structure,
grammar, spelling
punctuation,
use of 1st and/or 3rd person.
Inclusive language,
Very well sequenced.
Outstanding integration and use of relevant, relevant, current and peer-reviewed the course literature, includes many high quality & credible references additional to course readings.
Referencing adheres to APA 7th referencing guidelines.
Uses evidence to support
sophisticated thinking and findings.
Adheres to writing guidelines, and assignment presented at a advanced level:
sentence & paragraph structure,
grammar, spelling
punctuation,
use of 1st and/or 3rd person.
Inclusive language,
well sequenced.
Excellent
integration and use of relevant, relevant, current and peer-reviewed course
literature, includes some high quality & credible references additional to course readings
Referencing adheres to APA 7th referencing guidelines. Adheres to writing guidelines and assignment presented at a sound level
sentence & paragraph structure,
grammar, spelling
punctuation,
use of 1st and/or 3rd person.
Inclusive language, well sequenced.
A sound integration and use of the relevant, current and peer-reviewed course
literature.
Referencing adheres to APA 7th referencing guidelines Adheres to most of the writing guidelines, and assignment presented at a satisfactory level:
sentence & paragraph structure,
grammar, spelling
punctuation,
use of 1st and/or 3rd person.
Inclusive language.
Mostly well sequenced.
A satisfactory attempt at integrating some
relevant, and peer-reviewed course
literature.
Couple of areas require in-text referencing
Referencing adheres to APA 7th referencing guidelines with minor errors. Adheres to most of the writing guidelines, and assignment presented at a limited level:
sentence & paragraph structure,
grammar, spelling
punctuation,
use of 1st and/or 3rd person.
Inclusive language.
Partly well sequenced.
A limited attempt at integrating course literature.
Few areas require in-text referencing
Occasional quote that could have been paraphrased.
Referencing with limited adherence to APA 7th referencing guidelines with few errors or omissions. Adheres to some of the writing guidelines, and assignment presented at an inadequate level:
sentence & paragraph structure,
grammar, spelling
punctuation,
use of 1st and/or 3rd person.
Inadequate use of inclusive language.
Poorly sequenced & difficult to follow.
Inadequately integration of course literature.
Many areas require in-text referencing
Limited paraphrasing.
Many referencing issues and does not adhere to APA 7th referencing guidelines.
Reference list:
Incorrect
Incomplete Adheres to very few/no writing guidelines, and assignment presented at a poor level:
sentence & paragraph structure,
grammar, spelling
punctuation.
Inappropriate use of 1st and/or 3rd person.
No/poor use of inclusive language.
Not sequenced well and difficult to follow.
Poor / No references
Used /reference material, course textbooks
and resources not used.
Most areas require in-text referencing.
Numerous direct quotes
with no paraphrasing.
Referencing does not adhere to APA 7th referencing guidelines.
Reference list:
Incorrect and incomplete
Not provided
Evidence of plagiarism possible Academic Integrity referral
Grade:
Summary comments:
