Assessment 2A Software Project Proposal

Assessment 2A Software Project Proposal

Project Name WheelWorldGroup # 1

Group Members Names Last Name First Name Student ID

MajithiaMeet Jayesh A00131486

BhusalPramod A00121192

Tamang Roshan A00120769

Islam ArifulA00104940

Version 1.0.0

Date Created 2023-10-19

Table of Contents

TOC o "1-3" h z u 1. Title of the project PAGEREF _Toc148887611 h 32.Problem Description PAGEREF _Toc148887612 h 33.Proposed Solution PAGEREF _Toc148887613 h 34.Project Plan PAGEREF _Toc148887614 h 4

1. Title of the project"WheelWorld: Your ultimate vehicle marketplace"

Problem Description

Our project aims to address the challenges associated with trading vehicles, including.

2.1 Limited options and reach: When trading vehicles through traditional methods, such as local dealerships, classified ads, or word-of-mouth, the options available are often limited to the local market and have limited reach. Sellers are often restricted to a small pool of potential buyers within the local area, limiting the chances of finding the right buyer and getting a fair price for the vehicle (Lilyquist, 2019). This can make it difficult to find the exact make, model, or specifications desired, especially for rare or specialized vehicles.

2.2 Time-consuming process: Trading vehicles in person involves multiple steps, including researching, visiting dealerships, negotiating prices, and completing paperwork. This process can be time-consuming and inconvenient, requiring multiple trips and interactions with various parties (Lilyquist, 2019).

2.3 Lack of transparency: Traditional trading can often lack transparency, both for sellers and buyers. Sellers may have limited information about the market value of their vehicle, leading to the possibility of under-pricing or overpricing (Atkin & Florance, 2023). Buyers may also face challenges in verifying the condition and history of the vehicle, increasing the risk of purchasing a faulty or stolen vehicle (Marketing, A. 2020).

2.4 Security concerns: Traditional vehicle trading can pose security concerns for both parties involved. Meeting with unknown buyers or sellers in person can be risky, particularly if the transaction involves large sums of money. There have been instances of fraudulent activities, theft, and even physical harm associated with offline vehicle trading (Walton, 2019).

Proposed SolutionTo address the problem stated and improve the overall trading experience of the vehicles, we have proposed the development of the system (Patty et al., 2021). The system will offer overall following key features.

3.1 Increased options: Connect sellers with a larger pool of potential buyers, expanding their options and increasing the chances of a successful trade (Smith, J. 2020). Buyers also benefit from a wider selection of vehicles, allowing them to find the specific make, model, and condition they desire.

3.2 Expanding reach: Provide a wider reach allowing sellers to connect with potential buyers from various locations. This significantly increases the chances of finding the right buyer and obtaining a fair price for the vehicle.

3.3 Time-saving process: Simplify the vehicle trading process by providing a centralized platform where sellers can list their vehicles, upload detailed information and images, and communicate with potential buyers. This eliminates the need for multiple meetings and negotiations, saving time for both sellers and buyers. (Johnson, A. 2021)

3.4 Improved security: Offer secure payment options and verification processes, reducing the risks associated with offline trading. Buyers and sellers can conduct transactions ensuring a safe and secure exchange of funds and vehicle ownership.

3.5 Enhanced transparency: Provide detailed information about the vehicle's history, condition, and any reported issues. This transparency helps both parties make informed decisions and reduces the chances of fraudulent activities. (Nerad, 2021)

Project Plan

We will follow an Agile methodology for our project, with the following stages, phases, and an estimated timeline:

Week 1-2: Project Initiation and Sprint 1 (2 weeks)

Gather and analyse use cases, user stories, and requirements.

Make a basic backlog of initial features.

Week 3-4: Sprint 2 (2 weeks)

Design database architecture and system architecture.

Prototyping UI/UX designs.

Work on interfaces for users to use.

Adjust the project's scope or priorities as necessary.

Week 5-7: Sprint 3 and 4 (4 weeks)

Observe a midpoint review to gauge development.

Set a priority for and create the System's core feature.

Plan and hold regular sprint reviews and retrospectives.

Week 8-9: Sprint 4 (2 weeks)

Perform user acceptance, integration, and unit testing.

Fix any bugs or problems found during testing.

Complete all features, then review everything.

Week 10: Sprint 5(1 week).

Document the project.

Get ready to present the project.

Submit all project documentation and code.

Agile is the best method for our project because it gives us the flexibility to adapt to shifting requirements (Stellman & Greene, 2016). This strategy makes sure that our system is in line with what the end user wants.

References

Lilyquist, M. (2019, October 27). Traditional vs. internet marketing: Which one is best?. The Balance. https://www.thebalancemoney.com/types-of-marketing-traditional-and-internet-1794593Marketing, A. (2020, January 23). The Advantages Of Online Car Shopping. Autochek Africa. https://blog.autochek.africa/online-car-shopping/Atkin, M., & Florance, L. (2023, October 19). Damon spent $12,000 on his first car, but it soon cost him much more. ABC News. https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-10-19/cprc-survey-calls-for-fines-for-companies-selling-lemons/102973088?utm_campaign=newsweb-article-new-share-null&utm_content=link&utm_medium=content_shared&utm_source=abc_news_webDeloitte. (2019).Disruption in the automotive industry How digital is changing car sales. https://www2.deloitte.com/content/dam/Deloitte/uk/Documents/consumer-business/deloitte-uk-digital-changing-car-sales.pdf

Patty, M. J. B. P., Nurhayati, P., & Muhibuddin, F. W. (2021). Business development Strategy through Value Creation Analysis in Automotive E-Commerce Platform (Case study: XYZ Platform). Journal of Physics, 1764(1), 012037. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1764/1/012037Smith, J. (2020). How Car Dealerships Can Partner with Private Sellers for Mutual Benefit. Dealer Marketing Magazine. https://www.dealermarketing.com/how-car-dealerships-can-partner-with-private-sellers-for-mutual-benefit/

Johnson, A. (2021). Streamlining the Vehicle Trading Process: A Centralized Platform for Time-Saving Automotive E-Commerce. Journal of Automotive E-Commerce, 7(2), 123-135.

Nerad, J. R. (2021, February 12). Pros and Cons of Buying a Car Online. https://www.jdpower.com/cars/shopping-guides/pros-and-cons-of-buying-a-car-onlineMcKinsey Automotive. (n.d.). https://www.mckinsey.com/~/media/McKinsey/Industries/Automotive and Assembly/Our Insights/A future beyond brick and mortar Disruption in automotive retail/A-future-beyond-brick-and-mortar-Disruption-in-automotive-retail-vF.pdf

Stellman, A., & Greene, J. (2016). Learning agile. OReilly.