Assignment 3: Final assignment
Assignment 3: Final assignment
ASSIGNMENT OVERVIEW
Due Date Due date Monday, beginning of Week 7, at 14:00 AWST
Point Value 20%
Description Create a 5-minute-long Panopto video reflecting program time and budget management and the program management office concepts within program management.
Length Maximum 5-minutes.
Submission guidelines Submit your video via the upload media option at the bottom of the current page. Click the yellow button below for instructions on how to submit your video component.
How to record and submit a media assignment using Panopto
Assessment policies Click on the button below for information onAcademic integrity
Academic IntegrityClick on the button below for ECU's policy onlate submissions
Late submissions policyClick on the button below for ECU's policy onExtensionsand the link to submit your application for an extension.
Extensions policyAssessment Q&A Click on the button below to ask any questions relating to this assessment.
Assessment Q&ASAVING THIS PAGE FOR OFFLINE VIEWING
To save this (or any) page for offline viewing, follow the steps depending on the device you are using. Remember to always use the latest version of eitherChromeorFirefoxbrowsers when accessing your unit.
Using a Windows PC or Mac to save a page for offline viewing
Using an iPhone or iPad to save a page for offline viewing
ASSESSMENT RATIONALE
The appropriate management of a project with respect to maintaining an accurate schedule is aligned with the designated program budget. Ongoing quality and continuous improvement are essential to the success of programs, and the closely linked risk management framework should form a key element to use to track throughout the program lifecycle.
Communicating and reporting information to key stakeholders about a programs status, using a range of performance metrics to keep the sponsor updated on program developments, and encouraging buy-in and decision-making, which ultimately leads to overall customer satisfaction. The performance of component project teams, when managed as a project, and conveying regular commentary and feedback to a range of stakeholders across a range of environments in a clear, succinct and carefully managed program landscape, is an essential skill for program managers to master.
Succinctly presenting oral information which is carefully crafted and pitched towards the target audience requires practice, and to be done well requires significant planning, knowledge of the underlying concepts and project, and presentation skills. These issues are captured in the design of the assessment.
INSTRUCTIONS
Overview:
You are required to create a 5-minute recorded video where you will provide your response to a topic statement provided in the instructions below. To do this effectively you will need to understand how quality and continuous improvement link to the management of a program.
The skill in producing an exemplary video for this assessment is in detailed preparation, knowledge of the topics linked to the instructions, and a clear understanding of the arguments you wish to make and their relevance to the instructions. The best submissions also involve technical knowledge of communicating by video including good audio, minimal distractions (noise and background), and a professional on-screen presence. Reading from a script, ambiguous arguments, and repetition often detract from a professional video presentation.
Assessment instructions:
Discuss to what extent the following statement is correct:
'Program management and its structures and offices can increase complexity, be a drain on resources, encourage bureaucratic tendencies, and remove the focus from individual projects. These issues can present challenges to cross-functional collaboration, can risk cost overruns, and can limit project agility.'
Support your ideas with reference to established approaches, theories, practices and contemporary literature, and interpret the material in week 5 and week 6 against the topic statement's focus area.
Deliverables:
Deliverable: Video which uses a maximum of three slides to guide the presentation. Ensure your face is visible on screen throughout the video.
Format: Panopto videolength 5 minutes maximum
Note: Ensure you know how to use Panopto and how to submit a Panopto assessment in Canvas. Avoid leaving this until the last minute as it may delay your submission. See the 'Assignment resources' section below for a Panopto video creation guide.
Additional requirements:
Assignment references:
Your video work must include APA 7th referencing where appropriate.
Consider including a slide (in addition to the 3 permitted for use in the presentation) which displays at the end of the presentation and shows the end text references.
Any use of Artificial Intelligence (such as ChatGPT) should be cited as a reference and indicated where it is being used.
Video length: Please pay attention to the video length. Part of the skill that you are being assessed on is your ability to communicate effectively with stakeholders using an oral format.
PREPARATION ACTIVITIES
Carefully examine the activities and resources in Week 5: Program time and budget management and Week 6: The role of the program management office.
ASSIGNMENT RESOURCES
Click on the yellow links below to access support resources to help you with your assignment.
How to record and submit a media assignment using PanoptoAcademic Writing skillsAcademic researching skillsReferencingLEARNING OUTCOMES
Course Learning Outcomes
CLO2 - Apply high level critical thinking, strategic awareness and technical skills to address authentic business problems using project management.
Unit Learning Outcomes
ULO3 - Assess drivers required to inform program decisions and deliver sustained competitive advantage including strategy, leadership, governance, ethical stakeholder engagement and the management of uncertainty.
MARKING CRITERIA
Please carefully review the assessment rubric to gain insight on the criteria required to gain a good mark. The rubric and criteria can be accessed below.
FEEDBACK
Feedback and marks will be provided within 14 calendar days after the submission of the assessment task. Find instructions on how to view feedback from your facilitator after your assessment has been graded here:
https://courses.ecu.edu.au/courses/8492/pages/canvas-grades-and-feedbackView Rubric
Assessment 3: Final Presentation
Assessment 3: Final Presentation
Criteria Ratings Points
Vocabulary.
view longer description 25 to >19.9 pts
High distinction
Fluently uses a sophisticated and varied business vocabulary, incorporating academic and program management specific terminology with ease.
19.9 to >17.4 pts
Distinction
Fluently uses a wide and varied business vocabulary, correctly incorporating some academic program management specific terminology.
17.4 to >14.9 pts
Credit
Uses a wide range of business vocabulary and program management terminology correctly and consistently.
14.9 to >12.4 pts
Pass
Uses business vocabulary, with limited use of program management terminology. Some word choices create confusion.
12.4 to >0 pts
Fail
Uses a limited business vocabulary and/or confusing word choices. program management terminology is not used and/or used out of context. / 25 pts
Structure & flow.
view longer description 25 to >19.9 pts
High distinction
The presentation orders and fully develops many complex ideas. Multiple concepts and sections are linked in a highly logical sequence with seamless transitions. The overall structure is finely balanced and cohesive.
19.9 to >17.4 pts
Distinction
The presentation orders and develops many complex ideas. Multiple concepts and sections are linked in a logical sequence with smooth transitions. The overall structure is well-balanced and cohesive.
17.4 to >14.9 pts
Credit
The presentation orders and develops complex ideas. Concepts and sections are linked in a logical sequence with smooth transitions. The overall structure is cohesive.
14.9 to >12.4 pts
Pass
The presentation orders and develops ideas that are sometimes complex. Concepts and sections are linked in a logical sequence with obvious and mostly smooth transitions. The overall structure is sound.
12.4 to >0 pts
Fail
The presentation does not order or develop complex ideas. Concepts and sections are not logically sequenced, and the transitions are too often abrupt and/or disjointed. The overall structure is not readily apparent and/or is loosely assembled. / 25 pts
Analysis and use of references.
view longer description 25 to >19.9 pts
High distinction
Presentation displays deep understanding of the content and context. Evidenced by the careful selection and sophisticated integration of persuasive and compelling analysis and references to significantly enhance meaning
19.9 to >17.4 pts
Distinction
Presentation displays comprehensive understanding of the content and context. Evidenced through the selection and integration of highly relevant analysis and references to convey meaning.
17.4 to >14.9 pts
Credit
Presentation displays understanding of the content and context. Evidenced by the selection and deployment of analysis and references to convey meaning.
14.9 to >12.4 pts
Pass
Presentation conveys simple understanding of the content and context. Evidenced by the selection and deployment of mostly relevant analysis and references.
12.4 to >0 pts
Fail
Presentation reveals a limited understanding of the content and context. Evidenced by poor selection and deployment of analysis and references. / 25 pts
Genre, style, and audience.
view longer description 25 to >19.9 pts
High distinction
A highly informative and persuasive presentation that uses the format or genre to impressive effect. Application of technical skills are advanced and not only enhance the communication but compels the virtual audience to react and consider the content in a thoughtful way. The overall presentation is compelling, polished and an immersive experience for a virtual audience.
19.9 to >17.4 pts
Distinction
An informative and persuasive presentation that effectively uses the format or genre. Application of technical skills are well-developed and fully enhance the overlaying communication. The overall presentation is compelling, polished, and engaging for a virtual audience.
17.4 to >14.9 pts
Credit
An informative presentation that follows the format or genre. Application of technical skills to the form enhances the overlaying communication. The overall presentation is well put together and engaging for a virtual audience.
14.9 to >12.4 pts
Pass
A presentation that follows the format or genre in the main. Application of technical skills does not distract from the underlying communication. There are some lapses into casual or inappropriate language. The overall presentation is basic and virtual audience engagement inconsistent.
12.4 to >0 pts
Fail
The intent of the presentation is unclear and strays too far from the format or genre. Application of technical skills distracts from the underlying communication. There are too many lapses into casual or inappropriate language. The overall presentation is poorly put together and fails to engage a virtual audience. / 25 pts
Total points: 0
Assignment 2: Program management case study
ASSIGNMENT OVERVIEW
Due Date Due Date Monday, beginning of Week 5, at 14:00 AWST
Point Value 40 %
Description Complete a detailed case study into the applied aspects of a program in the project management domain.
Length Written answer, 1500 (+/- 10%) words.Use single spaced size 11 Calibri or Arial font.
Submission guidelines Submit a Microsoft Word document (not PDF) file as a file upload at the bottom of this current page. Select the submit assignment button once you have chosen the file to upload. This will automatically submit via Turnitin.
Assessment policies Click on the button below for information onAcademic integrity
Academic IntegrityClick on the button below for ECU's policy onlate submissions
Late submissions policyClick on the button below for ECU's policy onExtensionsand the link to submit your application for an extension.
Extensions policyAssessment Q&A Click on the button below to ask any questions relating to this assessment.
Assessment Q&ASAVING THIS PAGE FOR OFFLINE VIEWING
To save this (or any) page for offline viewing, follow the steps depending on the device you are using. Remember to always use the latest version of eitherChromeorFirefoxbrowsers when accessing your unit.
Using a Windows PC or Mac to save a page for offline viewing
Using an iPhone or iPad to save a page for offline viewing
ASSESSMENT RATIONALE
This assessment will evaluate your critical review and thinking skills as applied to concepts linked to strategic program management principles and practices. You will do this using global program management standards, guides, and approaches including, as a minimum, The Standard for Program Management (4th EDT.) Knowing how to analyse, evaluate, interpret and synthesise information in written format is a key industry skill to master. It is also essential for strategic program management since the role traverses corporate and applied functions and has broad and diverse stakeholders.
INSTRUCTIONS
Assessment instructions:
Step 1:Select a program to review and analyse from Infrastructure Australias project priority list via the link below. You must ensure that it is a program, and not a project, and that it provides a sufficiently robust environment to analyse and address all the assessment deliverables.
infrastructure priority listLinks to an external site.
Step 2:Research your chosen case study and provide a written response of 1500 words which outlines best practice for establishing a program management governance environment which supports effective team development and management.
In your case study response, you must ensure that you address, identify and analyse:
the specific features of a suitable environment for Program Management that relate to your case study (refer to the texts and supporting reference material in your response), and discuss the strategic, sustainable and social consequences of this organisation.
any techniques and tools for stakeholder engagement relevant to your case study.
the influence of risk on program management delivery.
program management issues, and critically review their effectiveness on realising organisation-wide strategic benefits and change.
Refer to the material in weeks 3 and 4 as a starting point to help you shape your research efforts.
While blogs and textbooks are useful, you are encouraged to find seminal articles about applied program management concepts in academic journals. Some of these are more specialised towards IT, whereas other journals including the International Journal of Project Management, the Project Management Journal, or the International Journal of Managing Projects in Business are targeted more towards project management across a range of industries and sectors. You should decide which ones are the most appropriate for this case study.
Deliverables:
Deliverable: Written case study response produced in Microsoft Word. The case study should include suitable academic and professional sources which are referenced appropriately.
Format: Written answer, 1500 (+/- 10%) words including references using single-spaced size 11 Calibri or Arial font.
Resources: Use the ECU library to find suitable journal articles. Consider using Google Scholar for conducting high-level searches and to find the most highly cited relevant works. Additional sources to help you are set out in the resources section below.
Additional requirements:
Assignment references:
Your written work must comply with APA 7th referencing protocols including font type and size.
You should include at least 3 sources to support your work. For example, these could relate to the online sources you have accessed or could be a reference to Didinsky or the Standard for Program Management (4th EDT.). Unit texts should not be the only sources used, research contemporary program management theory widely for a greater depth of analysis.
Consider using Endnote to automate your referencing.
Any use of Artificial Intelligence (such as ChatGPT) should be cited as a reference and indicated where it is being used.
Report length:Please pay attention to the length of your work and ensure it is in line with the constraints set out above. Part of the skill that you are developing is that of covering the most important points in a set number of words/minutes.
PREPARATION ACTIVITIES
Carefully examine the activities and resources in Week 3: Program stakeholder engagement and Week 4: Program governance and team management.
ASSIGNMENT RESOURCES
Click on the yellow links below to access support resources to help you with your assignment.
Academic Writing skillsAcademic researching skillsReferencingSee below a list of further discipline-specific resources: Click the heading to see more.
Program Management Resources
LEARNING OUTCOMES
Course Learning Outcomes
CLO6: Justify decisions and judgements that address a complex project management issue considering the ethical, sustainable and social consequences.
Unit Learning Outcomes
ULO1: Analyse program issues and determine their impact on realising organisation-wide strategic benefits and change.
ULO4: Critically review authentic program management issues using strategic program management concepts.
MARKING CRITERIA
Please carefully review the assessment rubric to gain insight on the criteria required to gain a good mark. The rubric and criteria can be accessed below.
FEEDBACK
Feedback and marks will be provided within 14 calendar days after the submission of the assessment task. Find instructions on how to view feedback from your facilitator after your assessment has been graded here:
https://courses.ecu.edu.au/courses/8492/pages/canvas-grades-and-feedbackView Rubric
Assessment 2: Program Management Case Study
Assessment 2: Program Management Case Study
Criteria Ratings Points
Research and execution.
view longer description 12.5 to >9.9 pts
High distinction
Fully conceptualises the research related to the program management case study demonstrating rigorous research, detailed analysis, and synthesis of ideas/theories from diverse perspectives in the case study deliverables.
9.9 to >8.65 pts
Distinction
Conceptualises the research related to the program management case study thoroughly, demonstrating very good research, sound analysis and synthesis of ideas/theories from different perspectives in the case study deliverables.
8.65 to >7.4 pts
Credit
Conceptualises the research related to the program management case study soundly, demonstrating relevant research, good analysis, and synthesis of ideas/theories from different perspectives in the case study deliverables.
7.4 to >6.15 pts
Pass
Partially conceptualises the research related to the program management case study demonstrating limited research, analysis and synthesis of ideas and theories in the case study deliverables.
6.15 to >0 pts
Fail
Does not conceptualise the research related to the program management case study sufficiently and/or research the area in enough depth. Little or no analysis of ideas and theories in the case study deliverables. / 12.5 pts
Analysis.
view longer description 37.5 to >29.9 pts
High distinction
Case study submission displays deep understanding of the content and context. Evidenced by the careful selection and sophisticated integration of persuasive and compelling material for analysis.
29.9 to >26.15 pts
Distinction
Case study submission displays comprehensive understanding of the content and context. Evidenced through the selection and integration of highly relevant material for analysis.
26.15 to >22.4 pts
Credit
Case study submission displays understanding of the content and context. Evidenced by the selection and deployment of material for analysis.
22.4 to >18.65 pts
Pass
Case study submission conveys simple understanding of the content and context. Evidenced by the selection and deployment of material for analysis.
18.65 to >0 pts
Fail
Case study submission reveals a limited understanding of the content and context. Evidenced by poor selection and deployment of material for analysis. / 37.5 pts
Synthesis and evaluation.
view longer description 25 to >19.9 pts
High distinction
Persuasive and compelling synthesis and evaluation of program management materials and citations to significantly enhance meaning.
19.9 to >17.4 pts
Distinction
Highly relevant synthesis and evaluation of program management materials and citations to convey meaning.
17.4 to >14.9 pts
Credit
Good synthesis and evaluation of program management materials and citations to convey meaning.
14.9 to >12.4 pts
Pass
Basic synthesis and evaluation of program management materials and citations.
12.4 to >0 pts
Fail
Poor synthesis and evaluation of program management materials and citations. / 25 pts
Referencing.
view longer description 25 to >19.9 pts
High distinction
APA referencing used with no errors. Weekly learning material examples and some academic sources are incorporated clearly into the submission. Secondary sources support and enhance the argument. Full adherences to APA referencing protocols with no errors.
19.9 to >17.4 pts
Distinction
APA referencing used with no errors. Weekly learning material examples and some academic sources are incorporated into the submission. Secondary sources support the argument. Full adherences to APA referencing protocols with no errors.
17.4 to >14.9 pts
Credit
APA referencing used with some or no errors. Weekly learning material examples and some academic sources are cited in the submission. Secondary sources connect to the argument. Broad adherences to APA referencing protocols but one or two minor errors are evident.
14.9 to >12.4 pts
Pass
APA referencing used with some or no errors. Weekly learning material examples and some academic sources are present in the submission. Some adherences to APA referencing protocols but minor errors are evident.
12.4 to >0 pts
Fail
No APA referencing or minimal reference to weekly learning material examples only. Significant failings in adherence to APA referencing protocols. / 25 pts
Total points: 0
ASSIGNMENT OVERVIEW
Due Date Due date Monday, beginning of Week 3, at 14:00 AWST
Point Value 40%
Description Produce a business report about program management fundamentals and foundations for a program board meeting. The report must include an A4 sized infographic.
Length Written answer, 1500 (+/- 10%) words.Infographic counts as 200 words within the 1500-word allowance.Use single spaced size 11 Calibri or Arial font.
Submission guidelines Submit a Microsoft Word document (not PDF) file as a file upload at the bottom of this current page. Select the submit assignment button once you have chosen the file to upload. This will automatically submit via Turnitin.
Assessment policies Click on the button below for information onAcademic integrity
Academic IntegrityClick on the button below for ECU's policy onlate submissions
Late submissions policyClick on the button below for ECU's policy onExtensionsand the link to submit your application for an extension.
Extensions policyAssessment Q&A Click on the button below to ask any questions relating to this assessment.
Assessment Q&ASAVING THIS PAGE FOR OFFLINE VIEWING
To save this (or any) page for offline viewing, follow the steps depending on the device you are using. Remember to always use the latest version of eitherChromeorFirefoxbrowsers when accessing your unit.
Using a Windows PC or Mac to save a page for offline viewing
Using an iPhone or iPad to save a page for offline viewing
ASSESSMENT RATIONALE
This assessment will evaluate your critical thinking, knowledge of technical skills, and an ability to assess different program management approaches. Knowing how to develop arguments and present them succinctly and logically to peers in both written and infographic formats is a key industry skill to apply. To complete the assessment successfully, you should have a sound understanding of the program management principles and practices, its values, and its principles, and contrast these against the perceptions offered by at least three authors.
INSTRUCTIONS
Overview:
Produce a business report about program management fundamentals and foundations to present to the Executive Board of a marine engineering consortium based in Western Australia. The consortium is called Marine Engineering Services Consortium (MESC). MESC consists of two long-established marine engineering companies and a new project management consultancy operating within the Australian Marine Complex (AMC). MESC companies are all working together to build two medium sized military vessels for the Australian Government.
For information about AMC, visithttps://developmentwa.com.au/projects/industrial-and-commercial/australian-marine-complexLinks to an external site.
When creating the report, assume that you are the program manager.
The report should:
outline, in a persuasive manner, how the assemblage of related projects offers improved value over managing projects individually;
consider the level of technical understanding of the target audience;
be crafted towards advancing the target audiences understanding of value and benefits, whilst also supporting the proposals made through sound scholarly research, academic theory, and project management practice;
be sufficiently detailed for the audience to make an informed decision on whether or not the introduction of program management will be of benefit to MESC.
The report must include an A4-sized infographic (information + graphics) to highlight and summarise complex information for your audience. Assume that the infographic carries a value of 200 words regardless of the actual word count within the infographic.
Note:The infographic can be created outside Microsoft Word but must be pasted in as an image. This is essential as you will submit only one document for this assessment.
Assessment instructions:
Name the business report 'The strategic value to MESC of managing component marine engineering projects as a program.
Begin researching the relevant parts of week 1 and week 2 that deal with program management fundamentals and frameworks.
Note that while the AMC is real, MESC is fictitious. You may assume/infer any reasonable information about MESC based on cited research. Do not dwell on MESCs structure or products.
Compare different frameworks and development approaches used in program management as proposed by at least three authors. See the Standard for Program Management (4th edition) and other supporting texts.
Consider key aspects of program strategy alignment and benefits realisation and develop this information around the organisation's needs as outlined in a business case.
Present your arguments in a succinct and logical way and use the power of your infographic to summarise complex information to help your audience understand the concepts you are describing.
Deliverables:
Deliverable:Business report with a focus on program management fundamentals and benefits that may be realised for the organisation wishing to adopt program management principles and practices. The article must include an A4-sized infographic, with APA 7th references.
Format:Written answer, 1500 (+/- 10%) words. The infographic counts as 200 words within the 1500-word allowance. References are not included within the word limit. Use single-spaced size 11 Calibri or Arial font.
Resources:Use Microsoft Word to produce your written text but consider creating your infographic in Canva, or Visme. Both websites have free accounts for students. Alternatively, Microsoft PowerPoint can be used to create basic infographics. Additional sources to help you are set out in the resources section below.
Additional requirements:
Assignment references:
Your written work must comply with APA 7th referencing protocols including font type and size.
You should include at least 3 sources to support your work. For example, these could relate to the online sources you have accessed or could be a reference to Didinsky or the Standard for Program Management (4th ed.). Unit texts should not be the only sources used, research contemporary program management theory widely for a greater depth of analysis.
Consider using Endnote to automate your referencing.
Any use of Artificial Intelligence (such as ChatGPT) should be cited as a reference and your submission should indicate where it has been used and what prompts were used.
Article length:Please pay attention to the length of your work and ensure it is in line with the constraints set out above. Part of the skill that you are developing is that of covering the most important points within defined constraints.
ASSIGNMENT RESOURCES
Click on the yellow links below to access support resources to help you with your assignment.
Academic Writing skillsAcademic researching skillsReferencingSee below a list of further discipline-specific resources: Click the heading to see more.
Program Management Resources
LEARNING OUTCOMES
Course Learning Outcomes
CLO1 - Demonstrate mastery of a global body of project management knowledge and practice, including knowledge of research principles and methods.CLO6 - Justify decisions and judgements that address a complex project management issue considering the ethical, sustainable and social consequences.
Unit Learning Outcomes
ULO1 - Analyse program issues and determine their impact on realising organisation-wide strategic benefits and change.
ULO2 - Evaluate the major alternative global approaches used to manage programs and the considerations involved in choosing which methodology to use.
MARKING CRITERIA
Please carefully review the assessment rubric to gain insight into the criteria required to gain a good mark. The rubric and criteria can be accessed below.
FEEDBACK
Feedback and marks will be provided within 14 calendar days after the submission of the assessment task. Find instructions on how to view feedback from your facilitator after your assessment has been graded here:
https://courses.ecu.edu.au/courses/8492/pages/canvas-grades-and-feedbackView Rubric
Assessment 1: Program Management Exercise
Assessment 1: Program Management Exercise
Criteria Ratings Points
Argument and content.
view longer description 25 to >19.9 pts
High distinction
Focal point of report is related to program management fundamentals and foundations is well defined and sophisticated. Each paragraph builds upon and supports the focal point or implied argument. Supports argument with exemplary examples. Analyses with sophistication how the examples from the weekly learning material and references support the argument. Infographic professionally set out and enhances written content.
19.9 to >17.4 pts
Distinction
Focal point of the report is related to program management fundamentals and foundations is clearly expressed. Most paragraphs build upon and support the focal point or implied argument. Supports argument with relevant examples. Clearly analyses how the examples from the weekly learning material or references support the argument. Infographic informative and well set out.
17.4 to >14.9 pts
Credit
Argument in the report is related to program management fundamentals and foundations is implied or descriptive. Some paragraphs build upon and support the focal point or the implied argument. Infographic basic with no errors. Cites examples related to implied or descriptive argument. Uses description as analysis.
14.9 to >12.4 pts
Pass
Report has more than one focal point related to program management fundamentals and foundations. Few paragraphs connect to the focal point or the implied argument. Infographic basic with errors. Provides evidence of engagement with weekly learning material or references without focusing on examples. Uses description only.
12.4 to >0 pts
Fail
Report lacks an argument related to program management fundamentals and foundations. Paragraphs do not or rarely connect to the focal point or implied argument. No examples from the weekly learning material or references included. Inadequate use of descriptive material. Infographic missing or Inadequate. / 25 pts
Synthesis and evaluation.
view longer description 25 to >19.9 pts
High distinction
Persuasive and compelling synthesis and evaluation of program management materials and citations to significantly enhance meaning.
19.9 to >17.4 pts
Distinction
Highly relevant synthesis and evaluation of program management materials and citations to convey good meaning.
17.4 to >14.9 pts
Credit
Good synthesis and evaluation of program management materials and citations to convey basic meaning.
14.9 to >12.4 pts
Pass
Basic synthesis and evaluation of program management materials and citations conveys unclear meaning.
12.4 to >0 pts
Fail
Poor synthesis and evaluation of program management materials and citations resulting in confused meaning. / 25 pts
Report format and structure.
view longer description 25 to >19.9 pts
High distinction
All report paragraphs unified around a clear topic sentence. Report flows smoothly within and between paragraphs. Report has complex style and structure appropriate for audience and genre.
19.9 to >17.4 pts
Distinction
Most report paragraphs unified around a clear topic sentence. Good flow in report within and between paragraphs. Style and structure of report appropriate for task, audience, and genre.
17.4 to >14.9 pts
Credit
Most report paragraphs unified around one topic. Some attention to flow within and between paragraphs in the report. Style and structure of report mostly appropriate for audience and assessment type.
14.9 to >12.4 pts
Pass
Report paragraphs unified around one topic. Report flows well at times. Report shows understanding of audience and genre through basic organisation and style.
12.4 to >0 pts
Fail
Report paragraphs consistently contain more than one topic. Report consistently disjointed and lacks flow. Style/structure inappropriate for audience and assessment type. / 25 pts
Referencing.
view longer description 25 to >19.9 pts
High distinction
APA referencing used with no errors. Weekly learning material examples and some academic sources are incorporated clearly into the article. Secondary sources support and enhance the argument.
19.9 to >17.4 pts
Distinction
APA referencing used with no errors. Weekly learning material examples and some academic sources are incorporated into the article. Secondary sources support the argument.
17.4 to >14.9 pts
Credit
APA referencing used with some or no errors. Weekly learning material examples and some academic sources are cited in the article. Secondary sources connect to the argument.
14.9 to >12.4 pts
Pass
APA referencing used with some or no errors. Weekly learning material examples and some academic sources are present in the article.
12.4 to >0 pts
Fail
No APA referencing or reference to weekly learning material examples only. / 25 pts
Total points: 0
Choose a submission type
School: Business and Law
This unit information may be updated and amended immediately prior to semester. To ensure you have the correct outline, please check it again at the beginning of semester.
Unit Title
Program Management
Unit Code
PRJ6406
Year
2024
Enrolment Period
1
Version
1
Credit Points
20
Full Year Unit
N
Mode of Delivery
Online
Unit Coordinator
Mr Richard HUGHES
Description
A program is a collection of component projects, sub-programs and operational change actions that are grouped together to create organisation-wide strategic benefits. This is part of a wider system of value creation. One of the key differences between projects and programs is that a program will deliver resource and scheduling economies and organisational learning benefits that could not be achieved if projects are managed independently of each other. Programs may be organised into diverse portfolios with the aim of managing risk while achieving an overall desirable financial or strategic return. This unit examines the advantages of embedding program management in the organisational context, including engagement with the business, strategic business alignment and the challenges of multi-stakeholder management and resourcing. Students will critique the management of program related risks, with a focus on those associated with interdependencies between different projects.
Non Standard Timetable Requirements
This unit will be offered in an accelerated mode over seven weeks.
Equivalent Rule
This unit is equivalent to MAN6303.
Learning Outcomes
On completion of this unit students should be able to:
Analyse program issues and determine their impact on realising organisation-wide strategic benefits and change.
Evaluate the major alternative global approaches used to manage programs and the considerations involved in choosing which methodology to use.
Assess drivers required to inform program decisions and deliver sustained competitive advantage including strategy, leadership, governance, ethical stakeholder engagement and the management of uncertainty.
Critically review authentic program management issues using strategic program management concepts.
Unit Content
Program management and governance fundamentals.
Program strategy and benefits alignment.
Program stakeholder engagement.
Programs and people.
Programs, budgets, schedules, and success.
Learning Experience
Students will engage in learning experiences via ECUs LMS as well as additional ECU learning technologies
Assessment
GS1 GRADING SCHEMA 1 Used for standard coursework units
Students please note: The marks and grades received by students on assessments may be subject to further moderation. All marks and grades are to be considered provisional until endorsed by the relevant School Progression Panel.
ONLINE
Type Description Value
Exercise Program management exercise 40%
Case Study Program management case study 40%
Assignment Final assignment 20%
Disability Standards for Education (Commonwealth 2005)
For the purposes of considering a request for Reasonable Adjustments under the Disability Standards for Education (Commonwealth 2005), inherent requirements for this subject are articulated in the Unit Description, Learning Outcomes and Assessment Requirements of this entry. The University is dedicated to provide support to those with special requirements. Further details on the support for students with disabilities or medical conditions can be found at theAccess and Inclusion website.
Assessment
Students please note: The marks and grades received by students on assessments may be subject to further moderation. Informal vivas may be conducted as part of an assessment task, where staff require further information to confirm the learning outcomes have been met. All marks and grades are to be considered provisional until endorsed by the relevant School Progression Panel.
Academic Integrity
Integrtiy is a core value at Edith Cowan University, and it is expected that ECU students complete their assessment tasks honestly and with acknowledgement of other people's work as well as any generative artificial intelligence tools that may have been used. This means that assessment tasks must be completed individually (unless it is an authorised group assessment task) and any sources used must be referenced.
Breaches of academic integrity can include:
Plagiarism
Copying the words, ideas or creative works of other people or generative artificial intelligence tools, without referencing in accordance with stated University requirements. Students need to seek approval from the Unit Coordinator within the first week of study if they intend to use some of their previous work in an assessment task (self-plagiarism).
Unauthorised collaboration (collusion)
Working with other students and submitting the same or substantially similar work or portions of work when an individual submission was required. This includes students knowingly providing others with copies of their own work to use in the same or similar assessment task(s).
Contract cheating
Organising a friend, a family member, another student or an external person or organisation (e.g. through an online website) to complete or substantially edit or refine part or all of an assessment task(s) on their behalf.
Cheating in an exam
Using or having access to unauthorised materials in an exam or test.
Serious outcomes may be imposed if a student is found to have committed one of these breaches, up to and including expulsion from the University for repeated or serious acts.
ECU's policies and more information about academic integrity can be found on thestudent academic integrity website.
All commencing ECU students are required to complete the Academic Integrity Module.
Assessment Extension
In some circumstances, Students may apply to their Unit Coordinator to extend the due date of their Assessment Task(s) in accordance with ECU's Assessment, Examination and Moderation Procedures - for more information visithttps://askus2.ecu.edu.au/s/article/000001386.
Special Consideration
Students may apply for Special Consideration in respect of a final unit grade, where their achievement was affected by Exceptional Circumstances as set out in the Assessment, Examination and Moderation Procedures - for more information visithttps://askus2.ecu.edu.au/s/article/000003318.
PRJ6406|1|1
