Critical Evaluation of Morton-Cooper & Palmer Supervision Model in Community Services COMS3010
- Subject Code :
COMS3010
- University :
University of New south Wales Exam Question Bank is not sponsored or endorsed by this college or university.
Assessment 1: Written Report 25%
Due Date: Week 4
Word Count: 1500-1800 words
You are required to submit a detailed evaluation report on ONE of two supervision models: Kadushin OR Morton-Cooper & Palmer. The report should critically assess the chosen model, including its principles, application, strengths, limitations, and relevance to contemporary practice in community services.
The report should have a clear structure with a title and a table of contents. Begin with an introduction that outlines the role of supervision in professional practice and introduces your chosen model. Include the aim of your report. Next, provide an overview of the model, detailing its key features, theoretical framework, and application context from the literature. Include a critical evaluation that addresses the model's strengths and limitations, supported by scholarly evidence. Conclude with a discussion on how the model can be applied in the community service context, with specific considerations on how you would integrate its principles into your future practice, both from the perspective of a supervisor and a supervisee.
Your submission must include at least ten (10) scholarly journal articles in addition to any relevant textbook references. Use APA 7 referencing style. Do NOT utilise sources such as www.tutor2u.com and other such web materials as these in no way constitute academic references for the purpose of your assignments. If you rely on such sources for theoretical support you will be deemed NOT to have met the requirements of the assessment.
Criteria |
Weighting 100% |
Analysis of literature on topic |
35% |
Conclusions derived from analysis and assessment of the topic application |
30% |
Use and depth of research |
20% |
Presentation and referencing effective and organised essay structure with correct referencing of up-to-date resources |
15% |
Total |
100% |
Rubric
Assessment 1
Criterion |
HD 80-100% |
D 70-79% |
C 60-69% |
P 50-59% |
NN 0-50% |
Analysis of literature on topic |
Provides accurate and complete explanations of how potential issues can be identified and drawing on most recent scholarly literature. |
Provide accurate and complete explanations of how potential issues can be identified and drawing on relevant literature. |
Explanations of how potential issues can be identified and their impact provision of supervision and often cites the relevant literature. |
Explanation of how potential issues can be identified and are not always accurate and sometimes incomplete, sometimes cites the relevant literature. |
Explanations of how potential issues can be identified, and research are inaccurate or incomplete, does not cite the relevant literature. |
Conclusions derived from analysis and assessment of the topic and application |
Shows an excellent understanding of how potential issues can be identified and their impact on the targeted population. |
Shows a strong understanding of how potential issues can be identified and their impact on the targeted population. |
Shows a good understanding of how potential issues can be identified and their impact on the targeted population. |
Shows a basic understanding of how potential issues can be identified and their impact on the targeted population. |
Shows an insufficient understanding of how potential issues can be identified and their impact on the targeted population. |
Use of depth of research |
A comprehensive analysis is developed. Summarises and shows insightful synthesis of the literature information including analysis of gaps and/or limitations of the research. |
A string analysis is developed. Summarises and shows insightful synthesis of the literature information, including analysis of gaps and/or limitations of the research. |
A good analysis is developed. Summarises and shows some insightful synthesis of the literature information, identified some limitations of the research. |
Analysis is basically developed. It summarises the overall information obtained from the literature reviews and synthesises adequately the knowledge gained. |
Analysis is not well developed. It lacks summary and/or any synthesis of the relevant literature. |
Presentation and referencing effective and organised essay structure with correct referencing of up-to-date resources |
All levels of content are covered in depth. There is a wide range of contemporary references and sources are well cited when specific statements are made in APA7 format. |
High level of content is covered in depth. Wide range of good references and sources are well cited when specific statements are made in APA7 format. |
Appropriate content is covered in reasonable depth. Sources are generally well cited when specific statements are made in APA7 format. |
Most major sections of the relevant content are included but not covered in as much depth or as thoroughly as expected. References were basic and there ser some errors in citing as not all references were in APA7 format. |
Major sections of the relevant content have been omitted or missed. There is inadequate referencing and poor citation. |
