EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY EDUC210
- Subject Code :
EDUC210
- University :
University of the Sunshine Coast Exam Question Bank is not sponsored or endorsed by this college or university.
- Country :
Australia
EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY
DUE 7/4/2023
LENGTH 1500 WORDS
ASSIGNMENT - Students will create a thematic portfolio to present three case studies. The students will dedicate a separate entry for each case study. Each case study should describe and analyse a different learning issue. The context of the first case study is the student (themselves); the second is a peer; and the third is another learner external to the unit who may be an older child or adolescent. The participant is expected to profile the context of learning of each case study and provide concrete examples as evidence of learning and frame their profiles within the premises of an adopted learning theory and be informed by a review of related literature.
TEXTS AND REFERENCES Required text(s)
Textbook
ODonnell, A. M., Dobozy, E., Bartlett, B., Nagel, M. C., & Smala, S. (2018). Educational psychology (3rd Australian ed.). John Wiley & Sons Australia.
Australian Curriculum https://www.australiancurriculum.edu.au/
Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority (ACARA) www.acara.edu.au
Australian Institute for Teaching and School Leadership (AITSL) Australian Professional Standards for Teachers https://www.aitsl.edu.au/teach/standards
Relevant State and Territory curriculum documents.
Recommended referencesChurchill, R., Ferguson, P., Godinho, S., Johnson, N. F., Keddie, A., Letts, W., ... & Vick, M. (2019). Teaching: Making a difference. Wiley. Milton
Duchesne, S., & McMaugh, A. (2019). Educational psychology for learning and teaching (6th edition.). Cengage Learning Australia.
Egeberg, H. M., McConney, A., & Price, A. (2016). Classroom management and national professional standards for teachers: A review of the literature on theory and practice. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 41(7). pp: 1-18.
Halpern, D. F. (2013). Sex differences in cognitive abilities (4th ed.). Psychology Press. McInerney, D., & Putwain, D. (2017). Developmental and educational psychology for teachers:
An applied approach. Routledge.
Pritchard, A. (2014). Ways of learning: Learning theories and learning styles in the
classroom (3rd ed.). Routledge.
Roblyer, M. D. (2016). Integrating educational technology into teaching (7th ed.). Pearson.
Snowman, J., & McCown, R. (2015). Psychology applied to teaching (14th ed.). Cengage Learning.
Verenikina, I., Lysaght, P., & Vialle, W. (2011). Understanding learning and development. David Barlow Publishing.
Further references
Downs, K. R., Caldarella, P., Larsen, R. A. A., Charlton, C. T., Wills, H. P., Kamps, D. M., & Wehby, H. (2019). Teacher Praise and Reprimands: The Differential Response of Students at Risk of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 21(3), 135147. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098300718800824
Royer, D. J., Lane, K. L., Dunlap, K. D., & Ennis, R. P. (2019). A Systematic Review of Teacher-Delivered Behavior-Specific Praise on K12 Student Performance. Remedial and Special Education, 40(2), 112128. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932517751054
Whitney, T., & Ackerman, K. B. (2020). Acknowledging Student Behavior: A Review of Methods
Mavilidi, M. F., & Zhong, L. (2019). Exploring the development and research focus of cognitive load theory, as described by its founders: Interviewing John Sweller, Fred Paas, and Jeroen van Merrie?nboer. Educational Psychology Review, 1-10.
Mayer, R. E. (2019). Thirty years of research on online learning. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 33(2), 152-159.
Advice for Assessment Task 1: Learning Portfolio
Purpose of assessment:
In order to develop your understanding of the nature of learning, it is beneficial to examine and critically reflect on yourself and others as learners based on seminal and contemporary theories. This assessment will give you the opportunity to show that you have thought deeply about different learning experiences and reflected on those learning experiences in the light of learning theories that we have studied this semester.
Approach:
You will reflect on how you and others learn based on the set and optional readings; lecture materials and activities; your own extended readings; and reflections this semester. Therefore, the topics that we have covered each week, for example, behavioural theory of learning or constructivist theories of learning are the theories that you will draw on when you are reflecting on how you and others learn.
Your portfolio will contain THREE case studies: yourself, a peer within the unit, and another person. Note: the description for this task says it may be an older child or adolescent but for ethical approval it is much better to choose someone over 18.
What to include about each case study/learner:
In your portfolio you will dedicate a separate entry for each case study. You have approximately 500 words for each entry so you must be concise. Consider using headings and dot points where possible. Headings will not be counted in your word count.
Each entry will include the following:
- Profile the context of learning (this is not included in word count). Provide details about the learning (e.g., who the learner is; where learning took place, the purpose of learning, when it took place etc). Include any details here which you think might be important for later analysis of learning. This might be written in present tense or past tense depending on whether the learning situation is finished or ongoing. Note: Make sure to use pseudonyms and deidentify any documents you might put in the portfolio.
- Provide concrete example/s of evidence of learning (this is not included in word count). This could take many forms. It might be an image of before and after test results, it might be a reflection from the learner of their learning experience, it might be a short video of a skill learned. Note: You can choose to put the evidence of learning in the appendix if it is overly lengthy but make sure to tell your marker to refer to appendix.
- Critically analyse the learning issue within the premises of a framework of the nature of learning and learning theory informed by literature ( 500 words). It is in this section that you show your depth of understanding of learning theories covered this semester. Make sure to include the assumptions, concepts and principles of the learning theories that you write about. Note: It is likely to be beneficial to choose quite varied learning experiences for your three case studies so you can show your understanding of different aspects of a theory or theories.
How many theories? What your marker will be looking for is depth and critical reflection on the experience and the relevant learning theories. There is no strict rule here but trying to cover many learning theories would likely mean your reflection is shallow. At most, you may decide to focus on one major theory for each learning experience. Or you might choose only one theory of learning and cover different elements of this theory when writing about the three learning experiences. Again, it is depth in critical reflection and understanding of the theory that your markers will be looking for.
MARKING RUBRIC FOR ASSESSMENT TASK 1: Learning Portfolio. Weighting 30%
Criterion |
HD |
D |
Cr |
PASS (Expected satisfactory performance) |
Unsatisfactory |
Understanding of Issue |
The learning issue has been clearly identified and the rationale for the choice of issue has been explained exceptionally well. Examples provided are very clearly relevant and specific and offer great insight into the learners experience. |
The learning issue has been clearly identified and the rationale for the choice of issue has been explained well. Examples provided are clearly relevant and specific and offer very good insight into the learners experience |
The learning issue has been identified and the rationale for the choice of issue has been explained well most of the time. Examples provided are mostly clear, relevant, and/or specific and offer insight into the learners experience most of the time. |
The learning issue has been adequately identified. A rationale for the choice of issue has been explained to some extent, however more detail can be provided to offer greater insight into the learners experience. |
The learning issue may or may not have been identified. The rationale provided for the choice of issue has not been adequately explained. Insight into the learners experience has not been sufficiently explored. |
Application to classroom setting |
Provides a sophisticated analysis of how learning theory can be used to address the issue within a classroom setting. Examples given are very clear and relevant and are supported with reference to evidence-based research. |
Provides a very good analysis of how learning theory can be used to address the issue within a classroom setting. Examples given are clear, relevant, and almost always supported with reference to evidence- based research. |
Provides a sound analysis of how learning theory can be used to address the issue within a classroom setting. Examples given are mostly clear, relevant, and supported with reference to evidence- based research most of the time. |
Provides a satisfactory analysis of how learning theory can be used to address the issue within a classroom setting. Adequate examples have been given, however these can be explored in greater detail and/or better supported with reference to evidence-based research. |
Does not provide a satisfactory analysis of how learning theory can be used to address the issue within a classroom setting. Information presented has not adequately been supported with reference to evidence-based research. |
/10 |
|||||
Constructive organisation and observation of task conditions /10 |
APA referencing requirements have been consistently adhered to. A level of sophistication is evident in the writing style, expression and structure of the portfolio enhancing the quality of the submission. |
APA referencing requirements have been almost always adhered to. The writing style, expression and structure of the portfolio are very good enhancing the quality of the submission. |
APA referencing requirements have been adhered to most of the time. The writing style, expression, and structure of the portfolio are good at enhancing the quality of the submission. |
APA referencing requirements have been met to some extent. The writing style, expression and structure of the portfolio are adequate. |
Clear violations of APA referencing requirements and/or grammatical errors are evident throughout the portfolio. |