ETE525 Primary Technologies Assignment

Assignment 1

Title

Digital Project

Value

35%

Due date

11:59 pm Sunday Week 7 30^th April 2023

Length

1500 words (equivalent)

Learning Outcomes

1, 2, 4, 5

Task Description

Reference

1. Sign in to your Code.org account.

2. Navigate to https://studio.code.org/join and type in the following section codes:

Course A: RDZQJF

Course B: XWTQXJ

Course C: RJTFNR

Course D: MZCFRH

Course E: BKZRLZ

Course F: XQDDTS

3. Once you press the "Go" button, you will be added to the relevant section and can begin

your MOOC.

4. Once you have completed the assigned courses, download the certificate of completion,

add it to a word document.

Project

Digital Project

Drawing on your newly acquired skills in coding, design and create a digital artefact and either write or source a unit of work teaching students to code, utilising one of the topics in the Digital Technologies curriculum. You will use the principles of digital learning design to develop a student-centred project that provides opportunities for collaboration and communication.

Your digital project will include:

A specific class group (eg, F-2, or Year 3, or 4, or 5, or 6)

Digital artefact developed using Scratch / Minecraft / Tynker / Escape Room/ Decktoys / etc

A reflective statement about the design process for the digital artefact

A digital presentation for students introducing the unit of work and the digital artefact (3 slides max.) which you will share with classmates via the showcase class.

An integrated unit of work spanning 4-6 lessons and including:

An overview of the topic

A context statement

Learning Intentions and success criteria mapped to Content Descriptors

A statement outlining/justifying pedagogical strategies.

Student activities and teacher activities

One lesson (at least) on computational thinking

One lesson (at least) should be unplugged

Inclusion strategy

Indigenous perspectives

Resources

Submission

Submit via Learnline with file name as per instructions. Your text document must be either Word.docx or PDF

Marking Criteria

High Distinction

Distinction

Credit

Pass

Fail

Digital Artefact 25%

The digital artefact is exceptional, highly innovative, and engaging, demonstrating exceptional originality, and effectively engaging and captivating the audience in a remarkable way.

The digital artefact is highly creative and engaging, demonstrating a high level of originality, and effectively captivating the targeted audience

The digital artefact is mostly creative and engaging, demonstrating a good level of originality, and holding the attention of the targeted audience for the most part.

The digital artefact shows some creativity and is somewhat engaging, but it could benefit from further development to enhance originality and captivate the targeted audience.

The digital artefact does not demonstrate creativity OR is a direct remix/reuse of someone elses creation OR is not suitable for the targeted audience.

Presentation 10%

The presentation is exceptional and highly innovative in demonstrating digital learning design, with exceptional structure, use of digital tools, clarity, and creativity

The presentation is highly effective in demonstrating digital learning design, with a clear and engaging structure, effective use of digital tools, and excellent clarity.

The presentation mostly demonstrates effective digital learning design, with a clear structure, effective use of digital tools, and good clarity.

The presentation shows some evidence of effective digital learning design, but it could benefit from further development to enhance its structure, clarity, and effective use of digital tools.

The presentation does not demonstrate effective digital learning design, and it lacks structure, clarity, and effective use of digital tools.

Unit of Work 40%

The unit of work is exceptional, cohesive, student-centred, and engaging, demonstrating exceptional learning intentions and success criteria mapped to the relevant content descriptors, highly innovative and engaging learning activities, appropriate and highly effective assessment strategies, and includes all required elements at a very high level.

The unit of work is highly cohesive, student-centred, and engaging, with clear and challenging intentions and success criteria mapped to the appropriate content descriptors, highly engaging and relevant learning activities, and appropriate and effective assessment strategies, and includes all required elements at a high level.

The unit of work is mostly cohesive, student-centred, and engaging, with clear learning intentions and success criteria mapped to the content descriptors, effective learning activities, and appropriate assessment strategies, and includes all required elements at a reasonable.

The unit of work shows some evidence of cohesion, student- centredness, and engagement, but it could benefit from further development to enhance learning intentions and success criteria, learning activities, and assessment strategies, and includes some required elements at a reasonable level.

The unit of work lacks cohesion, is not student- centred nor engaging, and it does not include learning intentions and success criteria, effective learning activities, or appropriate assessment strategies AND/OR is not mapped to the curriculum AND/OR is missing required elements

Reflective Statement 15%

The reflective statement is exceptional and highly innovative, demonstrating exceptional critical thinking, originality, creativity, and a remarkable understanding of the project and its implications.

The reflective statement is highly insightful, demonstrating excellent critical thinking, originality, and creativity, and a deep understanding of the project and its implications.

The reflective statement is mostly insightful, demonstrating good critical thinking, originality, and creativity, and a clear understanding of the project and its implications.

The reflective statement shows some evidence of insightfulness, demonstrating some critical thinking, originality, and creativity, and a basic understanding of the project and its implications.

The reflective statement lacks insight, and/or critical thinking and/or originality and creativity, and it does not demonstrate a deep understanding of the project and its implications.

Academic Writing Referencing Presentation

10%

Exceptional clarity and organisation of project presentation with excellent written documentation, including accurate referencing to APA 7th guidelines

Very good clarity and organisation of project presentation with high- quality written documentation, including accurate referencing to APA 7th guidelines

Good clarity and organisation of project presentation with well- written documentation, including mostly accurate referencing to APA 7th guidelines

Some organisation of project presentation with reasonably clear documentation, including an attempt at referencing to APA 7th guidelines

No evidence of organisation AND/OR no clarity AND/OR no attempt to reference.