HLSC120 Indigenous Health and Culture. Assessment Task 3: Project

DESCRIPTION HIGH DISTINCTION DISTINCTION CREDIT PASS FAIL

Section A Knowledge and application of evidence

CRITERION 1 12.75 - 15 11.25 12.6 9.75 11.1 7.5 9.6 0 7.35

Critical thinking and knowledge

Question 1) Discussion of either the political or historical or social context of the establishment of Deadly Choices is outlined.

15% Discussion of the political/historical or social context of the establishment of Deadly Choices is articulated, and seamlessly supported by a wide range of relevant and credible sources.

No use of direct quotes, except for emphasis. Discussion of the political/historical or social context of the establishment of Deadly Choices is credible, clear, and carefully constructed and supported by a range of relevant and credible sources.

Limited use of direct quotes.

Discussion of the political/historical or social context of the establishment of Deadly Choices is clearly discernible and logically sequenced and supported by mostly credible sources.

Some use of direct quotes. Discussion of the political/historical or social context of the establishment of Deadly Choices is relevant and credible, but limited, and constructed by using some paraphrasing and some use of direct quotes.

Some relevant and credible sources are used. Discussion of the political/historical or social context of the establishment of Deadly Choices is insufficient and it is not constructed by using appropriate paraphrasing and excessive use of direct quotes.

The content is not supported by relevant and credible sources.

CRITERION 2 12.75 - 15 11.25 12.6 9.75 11.1 7.5 9.6 0 7.35

Critical thinking and knowledge

Question 2) Explanation of the self-determination principle of support, how it has been applied into the program to improve health and an example of Deadly Choices is provided.

15% The explanation of the self-determination principle of support, how it has been applied to improve health and an example of this from Deadly Choices is comprehensively articulated, and seamlessly supported by a wide range of relevant and credible sources.

No use of direct quotes, except for emphasis. The explanation of the self-determination principle of support, how it has been applied to improve health and an example of this from Deadly Choices is credible, clear, and carefully constructed and supported by a range of relevant and credible sources.

Limited use of direct quotes. The explanation the self-determination principle of support, how it has been applied to improve health and an example of this from Deadly Choices is clearly discernible and logically sequenced and supported by mostly credible sources.

Some use of direct quotes. The explanation of the self-determination principle of support, how it has been applied to improve health and an example of this from Deadly Choices is relevant and credible, but limited, and constructed by using some paraphrasing and some use of direct quotes.

Some relevant and credible sources are used. The explanation of the self-determination principle of support, how it has been applied to improve health and an example of this from Deadly Choices is insufficient and it is not constructed by using appropriate paraphrasing and excessive use of direct quotes.

The content is not supported by relevant and credible sources.

CRITERION 3 12.75 - 15 11.25 12.6 9.75 11.1 7.5 9.6 0 7.35

Critical thinking and knowledge

Question 3) Explanation of the Cultural Safety principle: 'ensure that you do not diminish, demean and disempower others through your actions, how it has been applied in the program to improve health and an example of this from the Deadly Choices is evident.

15% The explanation of the Cultural Safety principle: 'ensure that you do not diminish, demean and disempower others through your actions, how it has been applied to improve health and an example of this from the Deadly Choices is comprehensively articulated, and seamlessly supported by a wide range of relevant and credible sources.

No use of direct quotes, except for emphasis. The explanation of Cultural Safety principle: 'ensure that you do not diminish, demean and disempower others through your actions, how it has been applied to improve health and an example of this from Deadly Choices is credible, clear, and carefully constructed and supported by a range of relevant and credible sources.

Limited use of direct quotes. The explanation of Cultural Safety principle: 'ensure that you do not diminish, demean and disempower others through your actions, how it has been applied to improve health and an example of this from Deadly Choices is clearly discernible and logically sequenced and supported by mostly credible sources.

Some use of direct quotes. The explanation of Cultural Safety principle: 'ensure that you do not diminish, demean and disempower others through your actions, how it has been applied to improve health and an example of this from Deadly Choices is relevant and credible, but limited, and constructed by using some relevant and credible sources.

Some paraphrasing and some use of direct quotes. The explanation of Cultural Safety principle: 'ensure that you do not diminish, demean and disempower others through your actions, how it has been applied to improve health and an example of this from Deadly Choices is insufficient and it is not constructed by using appropriate paraphrasing and excessive use of direct quotes.

The content is not supported by relevant and credible sources.

DESCRIPTION HIGH DISTINCTION DISTINCTION CREDIT PASS FAIL

CRITERION 4 12.75 - 15 11.25 12.6 9.75 11.1 7.5 9.6 0 7.35

Critical thinking and knowledge

Question 4) Two strengths of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples: (i) Language and (ii) Respect for Elders, are outlined and an example of the use of these by Deadly Choices is evident.

15% Outline of (i) Language and (ii) Respect for Elders, as cultural strengths and an example of the use of these by Deadly Choices is comprehensively articulated, and seamlessly supported by a wide range of relevant and credible.

No use of direct quotes, except for emphasis. Outline of (i) Language and (ii) Respect for Elders, as cultural strengths and an example of the use of these by Deadly Choices is credible, clear, and carefully constructed and supported by a range of relevant and credible sources.

Limited use of direct quotes. Outline of (i) Language and (ii) Respect for Elders, as cultural strengths and an example of the use of these by Deadly Choices is clearly discernible and logically sequenced and supported by mostly credible sources.

Some use of direct quotes. Outline of (i) Language and (ii) Respect for Elders, as cultural strengths and an example of the use of these by Deadly Choices is relevant and credible, but limited, and constructed by using some paraphrasing and some relevant and credible sources.

Some paraphrasing and some use of direct quotes. Outline of (i) Language and (ii) Respect for Elders, as cultural strengths and an example of the use of these by Deadly Choices is insufficient and it is not constructed by using appropriate paraphrasing and excessive use of direct quotes.

The content is not supported by relevant and credible sources.

CRITERION 5 12.75 - 15 11.25 12.6 9.75 11.1 7.5 9.6 0 7.35

Critical thinking and knowledge

Question 5) How Deadly Choices addresses two of the social determinants within the Cultural Safety learning map is effectively outlined.

15%

Discussion on how two appropriate social determinants is addressed Deadly Choices is comprehensively articulated, and seamlessly supported by a wide range of relevant and credible sources.

No use of direct quotes, except for emphasis.

A wide range of relevant and credible sources is used.

Discussion on how two appropriate social determinants is addressed by Deadly Choices is credible, clear, and carefully constructed and supported by a range of relevant and credible sources.

Limited use of direct quotes. Discussion on how two appropriate social determinants is addressed by Deadly Choices is clearly discernible and logically sequenced and supported by mostly credible sources.

Some use of direct quotes. Discussion on how two appropriate social determinants is addressed by Deadly Choices is relevant and credible, but limited, and constructed by using some paraphrasing relevant and credible sources.

Some paraphrasing and some use of direct quotes.

Discussion on how two appropriate social determinants is addressed by Deadly Choices is insufficient and it is not constructed by using appropriate paraphrasing and excessive use of direct quotes.

The content is not supported by relevant and credible sources.

CRITERION 6 8.5-10 7.5-8.4 6.5-7.4 5.0-6.4 0-4.9

Knowledge & application of evidence - referencing

Use of APA 7th Edition required.

10%

Accurate use of APA referencing style on all occasions: in-text and reference list (no errors).

A wide range of in-text citation formats has been used. Accurate use of APA referencing style on most occasions: in-text and reference list (1-2 errors).

A range of in-text citation formats has been used. Accurate use of APA referencing style on some occasions: in-text and reference list (3-4 errors).

There is limited use of a range of in-text citation formats. Accurate use of APA referencing style on a few occasions: in-text and reference list (5-6 errors).

There is no variation of in-text citation format. Substantial inaccuracies with APA referencing style: in-text and reference list (>7 errors).

DESCRIPTION HIGH DISTINCTION DISTINCTION CREDIT PASS FAIL

Section B Answer construction

CRITERION 7 4.25 - 5 3.75 - 4.2 3.25 3.7 2.5 3.2 0 2.4

Culturally safe language

Culturally appropriate

language

Consistency of language and safety/appropriate use

5%

Culturally safe and appropriate language used. Terminology is well informed, respectful and considers diverse peoples, cultures, histories, and experiences.

All language use is culturally appropriate and safe throughout the paper. Culturally safe and appropriate language used. Terminology is consistent, and choices allow for diversity and do not generalise Indigenous peoples or cultures.

Language used is not culturally appropriate/safe on 2-3 occasions throughout the paper.

Culturally safe and appropriate language is used in most instances. Any racial or historical terms used are accompanied by an explanation. Language is not culturally appropriate/safe on 3-4 occasions throughout the paper. Use of culturally safe and appropriate language is developing Language is not culturally appropriate/safe on 5-6 occasions throughout the paper.

No evidence of consideration of culturally safe and appropriate language. Common disrespectful and discriminatory language issues are evident on at least 6 occasions, such as deficit-based language, essentialising or generalising language, non-capitalisation, historicising language, use of abbreviations and acronyms, use of inappropriate words without context or explanation, use of collective pronouns e.g. they their.

CRITERION 8 4.25 - 5 3.75 - 4.2

3.25 3.7 2.5 3.2 0 2.4

Sentence and paragraph structure

5% The writing is organised into paragraphs, and the information is well structured and fluent.

Paragraphs relate to a discrete idea and content flows from one paragraph to the next. The writing is organised into paragraphs, and the information is structured and mostly fluent.

Most paragraphs relate to a discrete idea and content mostly flows from one paragraph to the next. The writing is organised into paragraphs, and the information is mostly structured and fluent.

Some paragraphs relate to a discrete idea and some content flows from one paragraph to the next. The writing is organised into paragraphs, and the information is sometimes structured and fluent.

A few paragraphs relate to a discrete idea and minimal content flows from one paragraph to the next. The writing is organised into paragraphs, but the information is poorly structured and/or awkward.

Paragraphs do not relate to a discrete idea and content does not flow from one paragraph to the next.

CRITERION 9 4.25 - 5 3.75 - 4.2 3.25 3.7 2.5 3.2 0 2.4

Grammar, spelling and punctuation

5% There are no errors with grammar, spelling and punctuation, and the meaning is easily discernible. There are minimal (1-2) errors with grammar, spelling and punctuation. However, the meaning is easily discernible. There are some (3-4) errors with grammar, spelling and punctuation. The errors detract somewhat, but the meaning is easily discernible. There are multiple (5-6) errors with grammar, spelling and punctuation. The errors detract, but the meaning is discernible with some effort. There are substantial (>7) errors with grammar, spelling and punctuation, such that the errors detract significantly from the meaning.