Portfolio

Assignment 2

Portfolio

NURS 5167 and SCNRC 90007

Allergy Nursing

<YOUR NAME>

Portfolio, Part A approx. 1400 words total for part A

Portfolio, Part A (1)

Your online discussion forum post

Insert here

Your response to another students post on the topic you selected

Insert here

Portfolio, Part A (2)

Your online discussion forum post

Insert here

Your response to another students post on the topic you selected

Insert here

Portfolio, Part A (3)

Your online discussion forum post

Insert here

Your response to another students post on the topic you selected

Insert here

Portfolio, Part A (4)

Your online discussion forum post

Insert here

Your response to another students post on the topic you selected

Insert here

Portfolio, Part B

Approx. 2100 words inc summary.

Reflecting on what you have learnt from the course lectures, readings, materials, discussion forums and peers, and how will you apply this learning to your clinical practice. Using a reflective framework (e.g. Bortons Framework for Reflection (Ingham-Broomfield 2021) describe your reflection. The following headings provide cues aligning with Bortons framework.

What?

(Describing the process; approximately 630 words)

What did I hope to learn?

What have I learnt?

What surprised me?

So What?

(Thinking and analysis, and then drawing conclusions; approximately 630 words)

So, what is the importance of this learning?

So, what more do I need to know about this?

So, what have I learnt about this?

So, what was different to what I knew previously?

Now What?

(Future goals and actions; approximately 630 words)

Now what can I do?

Now what do I need to do?

Now what might I do to improve or enhance the care I give to my patients?

Now what might be the consequences of this actions?

Summary

Briefly summarise your goals (TWO (2) short term and ONE (1) long term goal) and/or actions; approximately 210 words)

References

<add references for entire document here>

<please tidy up and edit any document formatting that has changed with the addition of your work, so that the assignment is neat and presentable>

Assignment 2

Portfolio

NURS 5167 and SCNRC 90007

Allergy Nursing

<YOUR NAME>

Portfolio, Part A approx. 1400 words total for part A

Portfolio, Part A (1)

Your online discussion forum post

Insert here

Your response to another students post on the topic you selected

Insert here

Portfolio, Part A (2)

Your online discussion forum post

Insert here

Your response to another students post on the topic you selected

Insert here

Portfolio, Part A (3)

Your online discussion forum post

Insert here

Your response to another students post on the topic you selected

Insert here

Portfolio, Part A (4)

Your online discussion forum post

Insert here

Your response to another students post on the topic you selected

Insert here

Portfolio, Part B

Approx. 2100 words inc summary.

Reflecting on what you have learnt from the course lectures, readings, materials, discussion forums and peers, and how will you apply this learning to your clinical practice. Using a reflective framework (e.g. Bortons Framework for Reflection (Ingham-Broomfield 2021) describe your reflection. The following headings provide cues aligning with Bortons framework.

What?

(Describing the process; approximately 630 words)

What did I hope to learn?

What have I learnt?

What surprised me?

So What?

(Thinking and analysis, and then drawing conclusions; approximately 630 words)

So, what is the importance of this learning?

So, what more do I need to know about this?

So, what have I learnt about this?

So, what was different to what I knew previously?

Now What?

(Future goals and actions; approximately 630 words)

Now what can I do?

Now what do I need to do?

Now what might I do to improve or enhance the care I give to my patients?

Now what might be the consequences of this actions?

Summary

Briefly summarise your goals (TWO (2) short term and ONE (1) long term goal) and/or actions; approximately 210 words)

References

<add references for entire document here>

<please tidy up and edit any document formatting that has changed with the addition of your work, so that the assignment is neat and presentable>

122555000

NURS 5167and SCNRC 90007 Allergy Nursing STUDENT NAME: ID:

Feedback for ASSESSMENT 2: DISCUSSION FORUMS (X4); Response posts (X4) plus REFLECTION 3500 word count

Assignment 2 PART A (40%) & B (60%) designed to demonstrate your learning and achievement of the following course objectives:

CO2. Explain the allergic response and how allergic conditions manifest and progress in clients across the lifespan

CO3. Critically analyse the role of the nurse in the evidence-based investigations required to identify and manage allergic conditions in clients across the lifespan

CO5. Demonstrate the problem solving and critical thinking skills to competently perform nursing interventions in the management of allergic conditions in clients across the lifespan

Criteria HD

(100-85)

Advanced D

(84-75)

Well developed C

(74-65)

Sound P1

(64-55)

Adequate P2

(54-50)

Limited F1

(49-40)

Inadequate F2

(39-0)

Inadequate/ unclear

Online forum discussion posting activities: Student selects 4 of their discussion posts, each from a different topic (1-7) PLUS 4 posts where they responded to another student, each from different topic (1-7).

Part A Discussion Forum & response to other student posts word count +/- 1400 (40%) /40

.

Your 4 discussion posts selected demonstrate critical thinking & reflection of the topic/activities of allergies, nursing practice, knowledge building & learning supported by course materials, scholarly evidence, clinical/ professional docs. Evoked further posts from other students (team/ peer communication) /20

4 of your responses to other students

Posts were timely, generated/ furthered growth & meaning to each respective topic discussion also showed peer communication & teamwork /15

Writing in discussion forum & response posts as per assignment 2 task requirements, postgraduate (PG) academic writing guidelines & APA 7 referencing style /5

TOTAL PART A /40 4 outstanding quality discussion posts, each from different topic, answering questions /activities in topics 1-7. Shows advanced comprehension of topic/activity issues. Exemplary critical thinking, self-evaluation of practice: content evoking discussion & team/peer communication. High quality evidence supporting posts.

Selected 4 response posts to others made in different topic weeks 1-7. Highly respectful, constructive, made at inciteful timepoint in weekly discussion. Very thought provoking, engaging, generating multiple further discussions & team/peer discussion.

Excellent logical flow of discussion, writing & succinct sentence structure. No errors in grammar, punctuation spelling or referencing, PG writing guideline. Inclusive language and APA 7 reference style.

4 Excellent quality discussion posts selected. Answers questions /activities in 4 different topics 1-7. Each post shows significant comprehension of issues in topics /activities. Very well developed critical thinking, self-evaluation of practice: Sound knowledge building. Posts content evoked discussion & team communication. Good quality evidence supporting posts.

Selected 4 response posts to others each from different topics. Respectful, constructive made at suitable timepoint in weekly discussion. Thought provoking, engaging, generating growth ang 1-2 further team/ peer discussion.

Good logical discussion flow of writing & succinct sentence structure. No errors in grammar, spelling, punctuation or referencing, PG writing guideline. APA 7 reference style. Inclusive language. 4 sound quality discussion posts selected. Answering questions /activities in 4 different topics 1-7. Clear coherent comprehension of issues in topics /activities. Sound critical thinking, self-evaluation of practice, knowledge building but content evoked limited team discussion & communication. Posts supported by mostly quality evidence but some lesser quality.

Selected 4 response posts to others each from different topics. Mostly respectful, mostly constructive made at timepoint each week to generate some further discussion. Adequately thought provoking/ engaging to encourage generation of further team/ peer discussion.

Sound logical flow discussion writing, succinct sentence structure,1-2 errors in grammar, spelling punctuation or referencing, in APA 7 reference style. PG writing guide mostly followed. Inclusive language. 4 brief, satisfactory quality discussion posts answering questions/activities in 4 different topics 1-7. Mostly clear, mostly coherent, but somewhat limited comprehension of issues in topics /activities. Basic critical thinking & self-evaluation of practice which invited limited team discussion, communication. Posts supported by relevant but lesser quality evidence.

4 response posts to others from different topics. Mostly respectful, mostly constructive 1-2 posts were vague, generating minimal further peer discussion. Posts also made at timepoint not ideal in weeks discussion to enable/invite further team/peer discussion.

Adequate logical flow of writing, generally succinct sentence structure, grammar, punctuation, spelling. Inclusive language. APA 7 style of referencing & PG writing guide used but 4 errors. 3 of 4 posts selected from different topics 1-7. Some posts were vague/ incomplete. Very limited critical thinking & self-evaluation of practice & knowledge building. Posts evoked minimal team discussion, communication. Some posts supported by non-relevant & /or poor quality evidence.

Two posts selected were from same topic. Response posts to other people were not constructive/ engaging/ lacked respect. Posts made at unsuitable timepoint each week to enable other students to respond & generate further team/peer discussion.

Lapses logical writing flow, succinct sentence structure, grammar, spelling, punctuation. Non-Inclusive language. APA 7 referencing style used but with multiple errors in list or intext. Missed multiple PG writing aspects. Over/under word count. Discussion posts from same topic OR less than 4 discussion posts selected. Most discussion posts showed inadequate, incorrect comprehension of question /activities in Topics 1-7. Vague or incomplete responses, reflecting minimal critical thinking & self-evaluation, knowledge building. Posts evoked no communication /discussion by other students. Non relevant / poor quality literature.

Multiple responses from same topic. Response posts content incorrect or irrelevant. Posts made at unsuitable timepoint to enable responses from other students to generate /enable team/peer discussion.

Inadequate, illogical flow of writing, not succinct. Poor sentence structure, grammar punctuation, Non-inclusive language. Multiple APA 7 style referencing errors in list & intext. Adhered to few PG writing requirements. Over/under word count. Discussion posts from same topic OR less than 4 discussion posts selected. Posts showed no comprehension of any of the content of topics 1-7. No critical thinking, self-evaluation, knowledge building evident. Content of posts of very poor quality, not prompting any response by other students.

No/ or 1 response post selected OR selected posts were offensive, had inappropriate content, or content disruptive to peer discussions. No demonstration of team/peer discussion.

Evidence posts created by artificial Intelligence (AI)/ were plagiarised. Report to AIO.

No PG writing requirements followed. Responses offensive. No references/ or non APA 7 reference style used. Very over/under word count.

PART B Reflection (60% of total assignment 2 marks) equivalent /approx. 2100 words (+/-10%) (what, so what, now what)

WHAT?

(Describing the process)

Course learning and practice reflection framework by examining the WHAT, describe the process of learnings from the allergy course. /18

An outstanding / exemplary level of clarity & understanding of the forums, course materials, practice reflection by examining the WHAT, describe the process of learnings from allergy course.

Demonstrates outstanding critical thinking & discussion, based on course content,

literature & succinctly explained. An excellent level of clarity & understanding of the forums, course materials, practice reflection by examining the WHAT, describe the process of learnings from allergy course.

Demonstrates excellent critical thinking discussion, based on course content, literature & logically explained.

A high performance / sound level of clarity & understanding of forums, course materials, practice reflection by examining the WHAT, describe the process of learnings from allergy course.

Demonstrates sound level critical thinking discussion, based on course content, literature & logically explained.

Satisfactory level of clarity evident but incomplete understanding of some key concepts of forums, course materials, practice reflection by examining the WHAT, describe the process of learnings from allergy course.

Demonstrates a couple of missed opportunities for making relevant

arguments based on the literature. Couple of

unsubstantiated generalisations. Limited clarity evident & incomplete understanding of some key concepts of forums, course materials, practice reflection by examining the WHAT, describe the process of learnings from allergy course.

Demonstrates satisfactory but quite limited critical thinking discussion, missed opportunities for making relevant arguments based on the literature. Several

unsubstantiated generalisations.

Inadequate level of knowledge, understanding

evident with many concepts of forums, course materials & practice for allergy not utilised.

Demonstrates unsatisfactory / inadequate critical thinking discussion of the concepts

Contains many unsubstantiated generalisations. Poor/ no level of knowledge & understanding of concepts within the allergy course evident/ demonstrated.

Demonstrates unsatisfactory / no / poor critical thinking discussion of the concepts & changes (potential changes) to practice.

Contains innumerable

unsubstantiated generalisations.

SO WHAT?

(Thinking and analysis, and

then drawing conclusions)

Course learning and practice reflection framework by examining the SO WHAT, describe ones thinking and analysis, and then drawing conclusions on learnings from the allergy course. /18 An outstanding / exemplary level of knowledge & understanding of the course materials & practice reflection by examining the SO WHAT, describe ones thinking & analysis, & then drawing conclusions on learnings from the course.

Demonstrates an outstanding / exemplary critical thinking discussion & changes to practice, based on the literature and succinctly explained. An excellent level of knowledge & understanding of the course materials & practice reflection by examining the SO WHAT, describe ones thinking & analysis, & then drawing conclusions on learnings from the course.

Demonstrates an excellent critical thinking discussion, & changes to practice based on the literature & logically explained.

A high performance / sound level of knowledge & understanding of the course materials & practice reflection by examining the SO WHAT, describe ones thinking & analysis, & then drawing conclusions on learnings from the course.

Demonstrates a high performance / sound critical thinking discussion, & changes to practice based on the literature & logically explained.

Satisfactory / adequate level of knowledge is evident but incomplete understanding of the course materials & practice reflection by examining SO WHAT, describe ones thinking & analysis, & then drawing conclusions on learnings from the course.

Demonstrates a couple of missed opportunities for making relevant

arguments based on the literature. Couple of

unsubstantiated generalisations.

Satisfactory / limited level of knowledge is evident but incomplete understanding of the course materials & practice reflection by examining the SO WHAT, describe ones thinking & analysis, & then drawing conclusions on learnings from the course.

Demonstrates a satisfactory / limited critical thinking discussion, some missed opportunities for making relevant arguments based on the literature. Several unsubstantiated generalisations. Unsatisfactory / inadequate level of knowledge & understanding

is evident with many concepts

Demonstrates unsatisfactory / inadequate critical thinking discussion of the concepts & changes to practice. Contains many unsubstantiated generalisations. Unsatisfactory / no/ poor level of knowledge & understanding is evident with innumerable concepts thoroughly understood

Demonstrates no / unsatisfactory / poor critical thinking discussion of the concepts & changes to practice. Contains innumerable

unsubstantiated generalisations.

NOW WHAT?

(Future goals and actions)

Allergy Course learning & practice reflection framework, by examining

the NOW WHAT,

describe 1 short term & 1 long term goal & actions from the allergy course learnings.

/18 An outstanding practice reflection in examining the NOW WHAT describing ones future goals & actions from the course learnings.

Reflection demonstrates an outstanding level of critical thinking, changes to practice, 1 short & 1 long term goal, & actions based on course learnings, the literature, succinctly & logically explained

An excellent practice reflection in examining the NOW WHAT, describing ones future goals & actions from the course learnings.

Reflection demonstrates an excellent critical thinking discussion, changes to practice, 2 future goals and actions based on course learnings, the literature & logically explained.

A high performance / sound practice reflection in examining the NOW WHAT, describing ones future goals actions from the course learnings.

Reflection demonstrates a high performance / sound critical thinking discussion, changes to practice, 2 future goals and actions based on course learnings, the literature & logically explained.

A satisfactory / adequate practice reflection in examining the

NOW WHAT, describing ones future goals & actions from the course learnings.

Reflection demonstrates a couple of missed opportunities for critical thinking, changes to practice, 2 future goals & actions. Explanation was based on course learnings, mostly relevant literature.

Limited practice reflection by examining the NOW WHAT, not describing clearly ones future goals & actions from the course learnings.

Reflection demonstrates limited critical thinking, some unsubstantiated generalisations. Unclear changes to practice, future goals & actions. Explanation missed key course learnings. Mostly relevant literature. Unsatisfactory/ inadequate level of practice reflection in examining NOW WHAT Poorly describing ones future goals & actions from the course learnings.

Reflection demonstrates inadequate critical thinking discussion of the concepts & changes to practice. Only 1 goal & /OR 1 action provided. Contains many unsubstantiated generalisations.

Very poor level practice reflection in examining NOW WHAT. Lacks descriptions of ones future goals & actions from the course learnings.

Reflection demonstrates unsatisfactory level of critical thinking of the concepts, changes, goals and actions. Explanation not on course learnings &

innumerable unsubstantiated generalisations.

Part B writing requirements & presentation guidelines /6

TOTAL PART B /60 Adheres to guidelines.

Part B outstandingly sequenced, presented at

an outstanding level. No errors in sentence & paragraph structure, punctuation, grammar, spelling or APA 7 style

referencing. Inclusive language. Adhered to word limit (within 10%). Adheres to guidelines.

Part B very well presented at an excellent level. No errors in sentence & paragraph structure, grammar, spelling, punctuation or APA 7 style referencing. Inclusive language.

Adhered to word limit

(within 10%). Adheres to guidelines.

Part B well sequenced, presented at sound level sentence & paragraph structure, grammar, spelling punctuation. No errors APA 7 style

referencing. Inclusive language. Adhered to word limit (within 10%). Generally adheres to guide-lines. Part B mostly well sequenced, presented at a satisfactory / adequate level sentence, paragraph

structure, grammar, punctuation, spelling. Inclusive language. 1-2 errors in APA 7 style

referencing. Adhered to word limit (within 10%). Adheres to most guidelines. Part B partly well sequenced, but with 1-2 lapses. Minimally acceptable level of

sentence & paragraph structure, grammar, spelling punctuation.

Inclusive language. 2-5 errors APA 7 style

Referencing. Adhered to word limit

(within 10%). Adheres to some guidelines, but multiple lapses. Part B poorly sequenced & difficult to follow. Unsatisfactory

sentence, paragraph structure, grammar, spelling, punctuation and APA 7 reference style. Poor use of inclusive language.

Major errors in APA 7 style references. 10 -20% variation to word limit. Presentation guidelines not followed. Difficult to follow, poor level of sentence & paragraph structure, grammar, punctuation. spelling. APA7 style referencing not used. No use of inclusive language.

Evidence of AI use/ plagiarism. Report to AIO

>20% variation to word limit.

TUTOR Feedback summary Mark Part A= /40 Part B= /60 TOTAL GRADE: