Student ID: Surname: First Name: Course Name: Bachelor of Engineering Technology Civil

Subject Code: BET407 Subject Name: Integrated Management Systems

Lecturers Name: Nomer Angeles

Assessment Title: Group Report and Presentation: Critical examination and report on a specific management case

Due Date: 25/10/2022 (Week 13) Date submitted: Definitions: Academic Fraud Form of misconduct that enables a student(s) to obtain an unfair academic or general advantage through false representation.

Cheating Behaviour which is engaged in by a student or another person on behalf of a student (and / or students or persons acting in collusion) to provide that student or group of students with an academic advantage to which that student or group of students is not entitled.

Plagiarism The use of all or part of another person or entity's work without appropriate acknowledgment of the author or source.

Collusion Agreement between individuals (students / other persons) to act together secretly or without permission to achieve an unfair advantage.

Refer to the HigherEducation Academic Integrity Policy and Institute Rule: Student Discipline Rule for further information.

Privacy Statement: The information on this form is collected for the primary purpose of assessing your assignment. Other purposes of collection include recording your plagiarism and collusion declaration, attending to administrative matters and statistical analyses. You have a right to access personal information that Melbourne Polytechnic holds about you, subject to any exceptions in relevant legislation.

Refer to the Student Privacy Statement.

Late Submission: Assessment items submitted after the due date without an approved extension and / or special consideration will be penalised 5% per day off the mark awarded for a total of ten (10) working days. If the item is submitted after this time or not submitted, the item will not be marked and a fail grade awarded.

Higher Education Assessment Policy P/HE/D/3/040 Section 9. Submission of Assessment.

Student Declaration: I understand that:

If there is any doubt as to the authenticity of any piece of my assessment then I can be orally examined.

Assignments without cover sheets will not be marked.

Cheating, plagiarism and other acts of academic misconduct are subject to Melbourne Polytechnic disciplinary action.

Penalties apply for late submission of assessment and that this could result in a fail grade being awarded.

Student Signature: Date: Assignment Receipt

If you require a receipt for your assignment please complete the section below and have it signed/stamped at the Department Office.

Student Name: Student Id: Subject: Assessment Title: Group Report and Presentation

Scenario :

You have recently graduated and got a job in a newly formed civil construction company which provides services for civil infrastructure construction of land development projects. The company has won a project for the civil infrastructure works for new housing estates in four growth areas of Metropolitan Melbourne which are Whittlesea Council, Hume Council, Melton Council and Wyndham Council. This project package is in separate sites across the four growth areas.

The project scope is constructing the road network and the water network. The road network will include local residential streets, collector roads, arterial roads with necessary features and facilities like kerb and channel, individual lots access/driveway, footpaths, bus stops, bicycle lanes, street lights, etc. The water network will comprise the water mains, drainage and sewer channels (i.e. from individual house lots to housing subdivision main pipes for drainage and sewer, etc.).

These growth areas are the places mostly chosen by young families and new migrants deciding to reside in Melbourne. Some of them are located on previous agricultural areas and a few are sitting on areas with potential aboriginal and indigenous sensitive areas and listed flora and fauna.

A common characteristic is that because they are on the outer suburban areas of Melbourne, they do not have good public transport facilities and connectivity such as trains and buses.

The client specified that you have to adhere to water sensitive urban design guidelines, and smart and sustainable practices for road construction.

You along with other (i.e. 2 to 3) fresh graduate engineers have been assigned to prepare an Integrated Management Systems (IMS) manual that can be used for these multi-site projects.

The manual should accommodate all relevant concerns (quality, safety, environment, etc.) and action plans to achieve those.

You have to complete this manual by Tuesday, 25 October 2022 (Week 13) and present the outcomes to your management group.

Note: Use the following High Level Structure/report outline

Scope

Normative References

Terms and definitions

4.0 Context of the organisation

5.0 Leadership

6.0 Planning

7.0 Support

8.0 Operation

9.0 Performance Evaluation

10. Improvement

Fail (0-49) Pass (50-59) Credit (60-69) Distinction (70-79) High Distinction (80-100)

Executive Summary No executive summary provided and/or executive summary does not summarise the key aspects of the report. Adequate executive summary that provides basic context for the report. Summarises some, but not all key aspects of the report. Satisfactory executive summary that provides good context for the report. Includes a reasonable overview of key aspects of the report. Very good executive summary that clearly and concisely summarises the key aspects of the report. Outstanding executive summary that provides an excellent and convincing overview of the key aspects of the report.

Introduction No introduction provided and/or introduction not linked to the analysis provided in the body of the report. Adequate introduction that provides basic context for the report body.

Includes adequate topic statement outlining the reports purpose in a single sentence. Satisfactory introduction that provides good context for report body.

Includes a reasonable topic statement outlining the reports purpose in a single sentence. Very good introduction that provides effective context for report body.

Includes topic statement (clearly and concisely states the reports purpose in a single sentence). Outstanding introduction that provides excellent context for the report body. Includes a topic statement (clearly and concisely states the reports purpose in a single sentence, which is engaging, and thought provoking).

Evidence of research No substantial evidence of wider reading and research effort or heavy reliance on improvisation.

Provides little evidence/examples to support the report findings.

Less than 2 sources provided. Adequate/Basic evidence of wider reading and research effort.

Adequate examples/evidence used to support the report findings.

At least 4 sources provided. Good evidence of wider reading and research effort.

Good examples/evidence used to support the report findings.

6 or more references provided. Very good evidence of wider reading and research effort.

Very good examples/evidence used to support the report findings.

8 or more references provided Excellent evidence of wider reading and exhaustive research effort relating to the relevant topic(s). Excellent examples/evidence used to support the report findings.

10 or more references provided.

Analysis of information Poor or superficial demonstration of analysis. Issues identified were not linked to the analysis provided. Less than 2 sources provided. Adequate/Basic demonstration of analysis, however, not in sufficient depth. Basic range of issues provided. At least 4 sources provided. Sound demonstration of deep analysis relevant to the assessment. Good range of issues linked to the analysis provided. 6 or more references provided. Very good demonstration of deep analysis relevant to the assessment. Very good range of issues linked to the analysis provided. 8 or more references provided Excellent demonstration of deep and complex analysis relevant to the assessment. Excellent range of issues linked to the analysis provided. 10 or more references provided.

Conclusion No conclusions provided or recommendations not linked to the analysis provided. Basic conclusion somewhat linked to the analysis provided. Good conclusion linked to the analysis provided. Very good conclusion well linked to the analysis provided. Excellent conclusion strongly linked to the analysis provided.

Writing style Language is unclear and poorly expressed, making it difficult to understand. Serious and frequent problems with word choice and sentence structure. Spelling and grammar require major attention. Clear enough to be understood; some confused or unclear expression. Spelling, punctuation and grammar generally satisfactory but may need attention. Good variety of sentence structures, showing adequate control of word choice, however with an inconsistently clear writing style. Very good variety of sentence structures showing control of word choice with a clear style. Language use demonstrates precision and expressiveness as well as clarity. Excellent variety of sentence structures and lengths, showing an excellent control of word choice with a powerful, confident and precise use of language.

Referencing Harvard Reference Style Less than 2 references provided

Complete reliance on web references (non-academic)

Over reliance of one reference Basic use of references, basic variety of relevant (including academic) references sourced.

Mostly correctly referenced with some errors, at least 4 references appropriately applied within the report.

Reference list provided, listed in alphabetical order Good use of references, good variety of relevant (including academic) references sourced, correctly referenced with no errors, 6 references appropriately applied within the report.

Reference list provided, listed in alphabetical order Very Good use of references, wide variety of relevant (including academic) references sourced, correctly referenced with no errors, 8 references appropriately applied within the report.

Reference list provided, listed in alphabetical order Excellent use of references, wide variety of relevant (including academic) references sourced, correctly referenced with no errors, 10 or more references appropriately applied within the report.

Reference list provided, listed in alphabetical order

Incorporated Feedback from Draft No evidence that the report has incorporated the feedback for the draft to improve the quality of work. Some evidence that the report has incorporated the feedback for the draft to improve the quality of work. Satisfactory evidence that the report has incorporated the feedback for the draft to improve the quality of work. Very good evidence that the report has incorporated the feedback for the draft to improve the quality of work. Excellent evidence that the report has incorporated the feedback for the draft to improve the quality of work.

Academic Report Requirements Report does not include majority of the report requirements set out by this rubric. Many elements missing from report.

Table of contents

Correct headings used

Correct use of grammar and spelling.

Page numbers supplied