Week 8: Internship Activity Portfolio Part 2 (PSEL 6-10)

Week 8: Internship Activity Portfolio Part 2 (PSEL 6-10)

Part 2 of the portfolio will cover the remaining standards and build on the previous work.

Again, use the template provided:Internship Portfolio Part 2 TemplateThe second part of the portfolio will include:

A one-page overview for each remaining standard that includes;what the standard means to you (approx. one sentence)

a brief description of each of three activities (one sentence each)

A brief description of HOW each activity shows your mastery of the standard (1-2 sentences each).

Three artifacts for each standard, with each artifact on a separate page;A two-page discussion of how the activities you completed over the course of your internship have (or will) directly impact student achievement at the school. As an educational leader, every action should directly impact students;A one-page reflection describing your growth as a leader throughout the process of completing the program and the internship. The reflection should provide evidence of your leadership voice.

Be sure to follow APA and scholarly writing expectations and include a reference page (if needed).

Use the template provided:Internship Portfolio Part 2 TemplateRubric

Portfolio Part II Rubric PSEL

Portfolio Part II Rubric PSEL

Criteria Ratings Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeStandard 6: Professional Capacity of School Personnel

Essential Question: How did you develop the professional capacity and practice of school personnel to promote each students academic success and well-being? How did you assess and monitor their growth? 20to >17.0pts

Mastery

The summary of the standard is insightful and original. Three or more internship activities are directly aligned with the standard. Rationale includes explicit and strong connections between the activities, artifacts, and essential question for the standard. Three or more relevant artifacts are submitted as evidence to demonstrate mastery of the standard. 17to >14.0pts

Proficient

The standard summary is accurate. Three internship activities are aligned with the standard. Rationale identifies connections between the activities, artifacts, and essential question for the standard. Three relevant artifacts are submitted as evidence to demonstrate mastery of the standard. 14to >11.0pts

Marginal

The state standard is copied without elaboration. At least two activities and two artifacts are included. General explanations of the activities or artifacts are included but lack sufficient detail. Alignments between the standard, activities, and artifacts are inconsistent and/or rationale are weak. The essential question for the standard is addressed superficially. 11to >0.0pts

Needs Improvement

The standard submission has less than two activities or activities included for the standard. Several of the required elements or discussions are missing or incomplete. 0pts

No submission

20pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeStandard 7: Professional Community for Teachers and Staff

Essential Question: What strategies did you use to foster a professional community of teachers and other professional staff to promote each students academic success and well-being? 20to >17.0pts

Mastery

The summary of the standard is insightful and original. Three or more internship activities are directly aligned with the standard. Rationale includes explicit and strong connections between the activities, artifacts, and essential question for the standard. Three or more relevant artifacts are submitted as evidence to demonstrate mastery of the standard. 17to >14.0pts

Proficient

The standard summary is accurate. Three internship activities are aligned with the standard. Rationale identifies connections between the activities, artifacts, and essential question for the standard. Three relevant artifacts are submitted as evidence to demonstrate mastery of the standard. 14to >11.0pts

Marginal

The state standard is copied without elaboration. At least two activities and two artifacts are included. General explanations of the activities or artifacts are included but lack sufficient detail. Alignments between the standard, activities, and artifacts are inconsistent and/or rationale are weak. The essential question for the standard is addressed superficially. 11to >0.0pts

Needs Improvement

The standard submission has less than two activities or activities included for the standard. Several of the required elements or discussions are missing or incomplete. 0pts

No submission

20pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeStandard 8: Meaningful Engagement of Families and Community

Essential Question: How did you effectively make connections, build partnerships, and consult and seek solutions through the community? 20to >17.0pts

Mastery

The summary of the standard is insightful and original. Three or more internship activities are directly aligned with the standard. Rationale includes explicit and strong connections between the activities, artifacts, and essential question for the standard. Three or more relevant artifacts are submitted as evidence to demonstrate mastery of the standard. 17to >14.0pts

Proficient

The standard summary is accurate. Three internship activities are aligned with the standard. Rationale identifies connections between the activities, artifacts, and essential question for the standard. Three relevant artifacts are submitted as evidence to demonstrate mastery of the standard. 14to >11.0pts

Marginal

The state standard is copied without elaboration. At least two activities and two artifacts are included. General explanations of the activities or artifacts are included but lack sufficient detail. Alignments between the standard, activities, and artifacts are inconsistent and/or rationale are weak. The essential question for the standard is addressed superficially. 11to >0.0pts

Needs Improvement

The standard submission has less than two activities or activities included for the standard. Several of the required elements or discussions are missing or incomplete. 0pts

No submission

20pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeStandard 9: Operations and Management

Essential Question: How have you managed school operations and resources to promote each students academic success and well-being? 20to >17.0pts

Mastery

The summary of the standard is insightful and original. Three or more internship activities are directly aligned with the standard. Rationale includes explicit and strong connections between the activities, artifacts, and essential question for the standard. Three or more relevant artifacts are submitted as evidence to demonstrate mastery of the standard. 17to >14.0pts

Proficient

The standard summary is accurate. Three internship activities are aligned with the standard. Rationale identifies connections between the activities, artifacts, and essential question for the standard. Three relevant artifacts are submitted as evidence to demonstrate mastery of the standard. 14to >11.0pts

Marginal

The state standard is copied without elaboration. At least two activities and two artifacts are included. General explanations of the activities or artifacts are included but lack sufficient detail. Alignments between the standard, activities, and artifacts are inconsistent and/or rationale are weak. The essential question for the standard is addressed superficially. 11to >0.0pts

Needs Improvement

The standard submission has less than two activities or activities included for the standard. Several of the required elements or discussions are missing or incomplete. 0pts

No submission

20pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeStandard 10: School Improvement

Essential Question: How have you act as an agent of continuous improvement to promote each students academic success and well-being? 20to >17.0pts

Mastery

The summary of the standard is insightful and original. Three or more internship activities are directly aligned with the standard. Rationale includes explicit and strong connections between the activities, artifacts, and essential question for the standard. Three or more relevant artifacts are submitted as evidence to demonstrate mastery of the standard. 17to >14.0pts

Proficient

The standard summary is accurate. Three internship activities are aligned with the standard. Rationale identifies connections between the activities, artifacts, and essential question for the standard. Three relevant artifacts are submitted as evidence to demonstrate mastery of the standard. 14to >11.0pts

Marginal

The state standard is copied without elaboration. At least two activities and two artifacts are included. General explanations of the activities or artifacts are included but lack sufficient detail. Alignments between the standard, activities, and artifacts are inconsistent and/or rationale are weak. The essential question for the standard is addressed superficially. 11to >0.0pts

Needs Improvement

The standard submission has less than two activities or activities included for the standard. Several of the required elements or discussions are missing or incomplete. 0pts

No submission

20pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeImpact on Student Achievement 20to >17.0pts

Mastery

A thorough and detailed analysis of specific internship activities and their impact of internship activities on student achievement is provided. Specific evidence and data are used to support the impacts. Multiple (4 or more) detailed examples of activities are explicitly connected to specific impacts on identified student groups. 17to >14.0pts

Proficient

Direct impacts on student achievement made through internship activities are described. Multiple (at least 3) examples of specific activities are connected to specific impacts on student achievement. 14to >11.0pts

Marginal

Two or more examples of internship activities are connected to student achievement. Connections may be inferred or weak. General impacts on student achievement are discussed. 11to >0.0pts

Needs Improvement

The impacts of internship activities on student achievement are missing or vague. A lack of alignment between activities and student achievement is evident. 0pts

No submission

20pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeProfessional Growth 20to >17.0pts

Mastery

The reflection is insightful and detailed. Specific examples of evidence are provided to demonstrate professional growth as a leader in a variety of areas. Connections between specific internship experiences and the acquisition of leadership knowledge, skills, and dispositions are detailed. 17to >14.0pts

Proficient

The reflection identifies areas of leadership growth connected to specific internship or program experiences. Multiple examples of professional growth are described. 14to >11.0pts

Marginal

One or more general examples of professional growth are aligned with internship activities or program components. Additional details and/or elaboration are needed. 11to >0.0pts

Needs Improvement

The professional growth reflection is missing or incomplete. Information may be irrelevant to leadership in an educational setting. 0pts

No submission

20pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFormat and Writing Mechanics 10to >8.5pts

Mastery

Submission is free of spelling, formatting, and grammatical errors. Submission is well-formatted and professional. 8.5to >7.0pts

Proficient

Submission contains minimal spelling, formatting, and grammatical errors that do not impede the understanding of the concepts and plans. 7to >5.5pts

Marginal

Submission contains multiple spelling, formatting, and/or grammatical errors. 5.5to >0.0pts

Needs Improvement

Submission contains extensive spelling, formatting, and grammatical errors that significantly impede the understanding and presentation of ideas. 0pts

No submission

10pts

Total Points:150

Week 8: Internship Activity Portfolio Part 2 (PSEL 6-10)

Part 2 of the portfolio will cover the remaining standards and build on the previous work.

Again, use the template provided:Internship Portfolio Part 2 TemplateThe second part of the portfolio will include:

A one-page overview for each remaining standard that includes;what the standard means to you (approx. one sentence)

a brief description of each of three activities (one sentence each)

A brief description of HOW each activity shows your mastery of the standard (1-2 sentences each).

Three artifacts for each standard, with each artifact on a separate page;A two-page discussion of how the activities you completed over the course of your internship have (or will) directly impact student achievement at the school. As an educational leader, every action should directly impact students;A one-page reflection describing your growth as a leader throughout the process of completing the program and the internship. The reflection should provide evidence of your leadership voice.

Be sure to follow APA and scholarly writing expectations and include a reference page (if needed).

Use the template provided:Internship Portfolio Part 2 TemplateRubric

Portfolio Part II Rubric PSEL

Portfolio Part II Rubric PSEL

Criteria Ratings Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeStandard 6: Professional Capacity of School Personnel

Essential Question: How did you develop the professional capacity and practice of school personnel to promote each students academic success and well-being? How did you assess and monitor their growth? 20to >17.0pts

Mastery

The summary of the standard is insightful and original. Three or more internship activities are directly aligned with the standard. Rationale includes explicit and strong connections between the activities, artifacts, and essential question for the standard. Three or more relevant artifacts are submitted as evidence to demonstrate mastery of the standard. 17to >14.0pts

Proficient

The standard summary is accurate. Three internship activities are aligned with the standard. Rationale identifies connections between the activities, artifacts, and essential question for the standard. Three relevant artifacts are submitted as evidence to demonstrate mastery of the standard. 14to >11.0pts

Marginal

The state standard is copied without elaboration. At least two activities and two artifacts are included. General explanations of the activities or artifacts are included but lack sufficient detail. Alignments between the standard, activities, and artifacts are inconsistent and/or rationale are weak. The essential question for the standard is addressed superficially. 11to >0.0pts

Needs Improvement

The standard submission has less than two activities or activities included for the standard. Several of the required elements or discussions are missing or incomplete. 0pts

No submission

20pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeStandard 7: Professional Community for Teachers and Staff

Essential Question: What strategies did you use to foster a professional community of teachers and other professional staff to promote each students academic success and well-being? 20to >17.0pts

Mastery

The summary of the standard is insightful and original. Three or more internship activities are directly aligned with the standard. Rationale includes explicit and strong connections between the activities, artifacts, and essential question for the standard. Three or more relevant artifacts are submitted as evidence to demonstrate mastery of the standard. 17to >14.0pts

Proficient

The standard summary is accurate. Three internship activities are aligned with the standard. Rationale identifies connections between the activities, artifacts, and essential question for the standard. Three relevant artifacts are submitted as evidence to demonstrate mastery of the standard. 14to >11.0pts

Marginal

The state standard is copied without elaboration. At least two activities and two artifacts are included. General explanations of the activities or artifacts are included but lack sufficient detail. Alignments between the standard, activities, and artifacts are inconsistent and/or rationale are weak. The essential question for the standard is addressed superficially. 11to >0.0pts

Needs Improvement

The standard submission has less than two activities or activities included for the standard. Several of the required elements or discussions are missing or incomplete. 0pts

No submission

20pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeStandard 8: Meaningful Engagement of Families and Community

Essential Question: How did you effectively make connections, build partnerships, and consult and seek solutions through the community? 20to >17.0pts

Mastery

The summary of the standard is insightful and original. Three or more internship activities are directly aligned with the standard. Rationale includes explicit and strong connections between the activities, artifacts, and essential question for the standard. Three or more relevant artifacts are submitted as evidence to demonstrate mastery of the standard. 17to >14.0pts

Proficient

The standard summary is accurate. Three internship activities are aligned with the standard. Rationale identifies connections between the activities, artifacts, and essential question for the standard. Three relevant artifacts are submitted as evidence to demonstrate mastery of the standard. 14to >11.0pts

Marginal

The state standard is copied without elaboration. At least two activities and two artifacts are included. General explanations of the activities or artifacts are included but lack sufficient detail. Alignments between the standard, activities, and artifacts are inconsistent and/or rationale are weak. The essential question for the standard is addressed superficially. 11to >0.0pts

Needs Improvement

The standard submission has less than two activities or activities included for the standard. Several of the required elements or discussions are missing or incomplete. 0pts

No submission

20pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeStandard 9: Operations and Management

Essential Question: How have you managed school operations and resources to promote each students academic success and well-being? 20to >17.0pts

Mastery

The summary of the standard is insightful and original. Three or more internship activities are directly aligned with the standard. Rationale includes explicit and strong connections between the activities, artifacts, and essential question for the standard. Three or more relevant artifacts are submitted as evidence to demonstrate mastery of the standard. 17to >14.0pts

Proficient

The standard summary is accurate. Three internship activities are aligned with the standard. Rationale identifies connections between the activities, artifacts, and essential question for the standard. Three relevant artifacts are submitted as evidence to demonstrate mastery of the standard. 14to >11.0pts

Marginal

The state standard is copied without elaboration. At least two activities and two artifacts are included. General explanations of the activities or artifacts are included but lack sufficient detail. Alignments between the standard, activities, and artifacts are inconsistent and/or rationale are weak. The essential question for the standard is addressed superficially. 11to >0.0pts

Needs Improvement

The standard submission has less than two activities or activities included for the standard. Several of the required elements or discussions are missing or incomplete. 0pts

No submission

20pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeStandard 10: School Improvement

Essential Question: How have you act as an agent of continuous improvement to promote each students academic success and well-being? 20to >17.0pts

Mastery

The summary of the standard is insightful and original. Three or more internship activities are directly aligned with the standard. Rationale includes explicit and strong connections between the activities, artifacts, and essential question for the standard. Three or more relevant artifacts are submitted as evidence to demonstrate mastery of the standard. 17to >14.0pts

Proficient

The standard summary is accurate. Three internship activities are aligned with the standard. Rationale identifies connections between the activities, artifacts, and essential question for the standard. Three relevant artifacts are submitted as evidence to demonstrate mastery of the standard. 14to >11.0pts

Marginal

The state standard is copied without elaboration. At least two activities and two artifacts are included. General explanations of the activities or artifacts are included but lack sufficient detail. Alignments between the standard, activities, and artifacts are inconsistent and/or rationale are weak. The essential question for the standard is addressed superficially. 11to >0.0pts

Needs Improvement

The standard submission has less than two activities or activities included for the standard. Several of the required elements or discussions are missing or incomplete. 0pts

No submission

20pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeImpact on Student Achievement 20to >17.0pts

Mastery

A thorough and detailed analysis of specific internship activities and their impact of internship activities on student achievement is provided. Specific evidence and data are used to support the impacts. Multiple (4 or more) detailed examples of activities are explicitly connected to specific impacts on identified student groups. 17to >14.0pts

Proficient

Direct impacts on student achievement made through internship activities are described. Multiple (at least 3) examples of specific activities are connected to specific impacts on student achievement. 14to >11.0pts

Marginal

Two or more examples of internship activities are connected to student achievement. Connections may be inferred or weak. General impacts on student achievement are discussed. 11to >0.0pts

Needs Improvement

The impacts of internship activities on student achievement are missing or vague. A lack of alignment between activities and student achievement is evident. 0pts

No submission

20pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeProfessional Growth 20to >17.0pts

Mastery

The reflection is insightful and detailed. Specific examples of evidence are provided to demonstrate professional growth as a leader in a variety of areas. Connections between specific internship experiences and the acquisition of leadership knowledge, skills, and dispositions are detailed. 17to >14.0pts

Proficient

The reflection identifies areas of leadership growth connected to specific internship or program experiences. Multiple examples of professional growth are described. 14to >11.0pts

Marginal

One or more general examples of professional growth are aligned with internship activities or program components. Additional details and/or elaboration are needed. 11to >0.0pts

Needs Improvement

The professional growth reflection is missing or incomplete. Information may be irrelevant to leadership in an educational setting. 0pts

No submission

20pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFormat and Writing Mechanics 10to >8.5pts

Mastery

Submission is free of spelling, formatting, and grammatical errors. Submission is well-formatted and professional. 8.5to >7.0pts

Proficient

Submission contains minimal spelling, formatting, and grammatical errors that do not impede the understanding of the concepts and plans. 7to >5.5pts

Marginal

Submission contains multiple spelling, formatting, and/or grammatical errors. 5.5to >0.0pts

Needs Improvement

Submission contains extensive spelling, formatting, and grammatical errors that significantly impede the understanding and presentation of ideas. 0pts

No submission

10pts

Total Points:150

centercenter[Document title]

8820090900[Document title]

Internship Portfolio Part I

Subtitle if Needed

Student Name

American College of Education

Course Number

Course Instructor Name

Assignment Due Date

My Experiences and Leadership Philosophy

Internship Setting

Standard 1 Overview

Standard 1, Artifact 1

Standard 1, Artifact 2

Standard 1, Artifact 3

Standard 2 Overview

Standard 2, Artifact 1

Standard 2, Artifact 2

Standard 2, Artifact 3

Standard 3 Overview

Standard 3, Artifact 1

Standard 3, Artifact 2

Standard 3, Artifact 3

Standard 4 Overview

Standard 4, Artifact 1

Standard 4, Artifact 2

Standard 4, Artifact 3

Standard 5 Overview

Standard 5, Artifact 1

Standard 5, Artifact 2

Standard 5, Artifact 3

References