Working in Health and Social Care Provision

Module Code:

HSC4004-20

Module Title:

Collaborative Working in Health and Social Care Provision

Assignment:

S1: Individual Presentation

Word Count:

S1: 5-8 minutes (1500-word equivalent)

Contribution to Module Mark:

S1: 40%

Assessment outline (from the Module specification):

S1:Individual Presentationwithaudio embeddedin the slides

Learning outcome assessed:

1.Demonstrate connections between different theoretical perspectives in integrated care.

Deadline

27^thApril 2025 by 5pm

Audio embedded presentation should be submitted on FSB connect, however if you encounter any issues and you do not have time to discuss with IT department, please submit pdf version of your presentation and email your audio embedded PowerPoint to your lecturer.

Assessment Guidance

1.Present a 5-8-minute PowerPoint slideshow either in person or digitally with between 5 8 slides.

2.In the presentation show that you understand2 theoretical perspectives on integrated care

3.In the presentation explain how the 2 theoretical perspectives are connected to each other

4. Include references on the final slide (minimum six references)- Recommended to use at least one text book, two articles, and academic websites etc.

The Individual Presentation-(S1) will be graded using the marking criteria as indicated below.

PLEASE DON'T USE FOOTNOTE AS IT DOESNT SHOW IN TURNITIN WHEN MARKING

For all policies regarding submission of your work please refer to the Programme and Student Handbooks.

Elements of Criteria

Fail 0-39

Poor Quality

D. 40-49

Satisfactory Quality (Low Pass)

C. 50-59

Sound Quality

(High Pass)

B. 60-69

Good quality

(Low Merit)

A. 70-79

Excellent quality

(High Merit)

A. 80-100

Outstanding quality

(Distinction)

Ability to explain different theoretical perspectives underpinning.

integrated care in the health and social care sector.

40%

Key concepts are misunderstood.

Explanations are confusing.

The work does not cover any knowledge or skills of change management.

Mostly adequate explanations and coverage of the key questions. Some minor misunderstandings or confusing explanations.

Demonstrates a sound grasp of all themes implied by the key questions.

Good understanding of the literature read

Clearly explains the concepts implied by the key questions.

Very good understanding of the literature read

Excellent grasp of all the concepts implied by the key questions.

Excellent understanding of the literature read; ability to digest complex ideas and arguments

Outstanding engagement with main concepts and beyond. Outstanding insight into a wider literature, which has led to an inspirational level of engagement of complex ideas and arguments.

Ability to critically reflect and discuss.

how effective team working contributes to transforming and sustaining delivery of person-centred care.

30%

No critical evaluation for example, all authors ideas and opinions are taken at face value and are simply described.

Some attempts at critical evaluation although sometimes the arguments may be unclear.

Some of the critical evaluation in the work is derived from other sources it is not the students own thinking, and especially disconnected from own professional experience.

Clear evidence of critical judgement in selecting, ordering and analysing content and tries to construct a sound argument.

The work attempts to integrate all the key questions as part of a whole piece, i.e., between theoretical understanding of change management and own professional practice.

Clear evidence of critical judgement in selecting, ordering and analysing content to construct a sound argument which reveals occasional insight and/or originality.

There is a flow to the work and discussion of all the key questions fits together, in the context of own professional practice.

There is some excellent evidence of originality and insight and an ability to sustain an argument based on critical analysis and/or evaluation of own professional practice.

There is an outstanding ability to synthesise material effectively and the potential for skilled innovation in thinking and own professional practice is to be evident.

Amount of research and range of sources used.

10%

No, or little evidence, of reading from Reading Group articles.

No or little evidence of reading outside the sources provided. Inappropriate sources used, i.e., no connection to key literature on knowledge or skills of change management.

Clear evidence of reading from the articles provided.

Some additional reading also.

There may be some limitations in ability to select appropriate material.

Little evidence of using examples from own professional practice to illustrate theoretical concepts from the domains of change management.

Clear evidence of reading from the articles provided, appropriately used.

Additional reading appropriately used.

Some evidence of using examples from own professional practice to illustrate theoretical concepts from the domains of change management.

Clear evidence of thorough reading from articles provided, appropriately used. Very good breadth and depth of reading from outside those sources provided. Used examples from own professional practice to illustrate theoretical concepts from the domains of change management.

An excellent reach of important literature (theories, concepts and principles related to change management) and an excellent critical engagement with these sources as well as own professional practice.

An outstanding reach of important literature way beyond the given reading list on theories, concepts and principles related to change management- and an outstanding ability to critical engage with these sources to find solutions for own professional challenges from health and social care.

Written and verbal communication skills:

spelling, punctuation, grammar, paragraphing and

structure (including word count) & appearance

20%

The work is poorly organised. The structure is confusing. The visual appearance is poor.

The structure is fairly clear.

Although rather standard, there are no problems with the visual appearance.

The structure is clear.

The work is well presented.

The structure is very clear. Care and thought have gone into visual presentation of the work

The structure is very clear. The work is beautifully presented - real care and thought has gone into it.

An innovative presentation of ideas in the context of health and social care practice.