Nursing Case Study

10 to >8.0 pts Exemplary

8 to >6.0 pts Good

6 to >4.0 pts Satisfactory

4 to >0 pts

Needs improvement

Use of Nursing

Framework (e.g. ADPIE)

and Health Framework/M odel for Patient/

Whanau Assessment

Demonstrates excellent use and a critical understanding of the chosen health framework/model in structuring the patient/whanau assessment. Integration of comprehensive relevant peer-reviewed literature to support the discussion. No or minor omissions errors in grammar, clear and logical structure, thorough content, clear and concise writing, rich vocabulary.

Demonstrates good use and understanding of the chosen health framework/model with minor deviations. Some integration of relevant peer-reviewed literature to support the discussion. Few minor errors, mostly clear structure, good content, mostly clear writing, varied vocabulary.

Demonstrates satisfactory use and understanding of the chosen health framework/model with some deviations. Minimal integration of relevant peer-reviewed literature to support the discussion. Several errors, somewhat clear structure, basic content, somewhat clear writing, limited vocabulary.

Demonstrates poor use or a lack of understanding of the chosen health framework/model with significant deviations. No integration of relevant peer-reviewed literature to support the discussion. Many errors, unclear structure, incomplete content, unclear writing, basic vocabulary.

10

Nursing Case Study

5 to >4.0 pts Exemplary

4.0 to >3.0 pts Good

3.0 to >2.0 pts Satisfactory

2.0 to >0 pts

Needs improvement

Formulation of

Nursing Diagnoses/ Problems (NANDA

Framework)

Formulates five accurate and relevant nursing diagnoses/problems using the NANDA framework, including actual and potential problems/diagnoses, ranked by priority. At least one diagnosis/problem takes the socio-economic context of the patient into consideration. No or minor omissions errors in grammar, clear and logical structure, thorough content, clear and concise writing, rich vocabulary.

Formulates five mostly accurate and relevant nursing diagnoses/problems with minor inaccuracies. Includes actual and potential problems/diagnoses, but ranking or socio-economic context may be missing or incomplete. Few minor errors, mostly clear structure, good content, mostly clear writing, varied vocabulary.

Formulates five nursing diagnoses/problems with some inaccuracies and irrelevancies. Actual and potential problems/diagnoses are included, but ranking and socio- economic context are largely missing or incomplete. Several errors, somewhat clear structure, basic content, somewhat clear writing, limited vocabulary.

Formulates less than five nursing diagnoses/problems or with significant inaccuracies and irrelevancies. Actual and potential problems/diagnoses, ranking, and socio-economic context are missing or significantly incomplete. Many errors, unclear structure, incomplete content, unclear writing, basic vocabulary.

5

Nursing Case Study

Nursing Interventions

20 to 17pts 16 to >13 pts

Exemplary Good

FIVE (5) comprehensive and effective FIVE (5) good interventions are interventions are outlined, ONE for each outlined. Understanding of the problem. Clear understanding of the problems/diagnoses. Good evidence- problems/diagnoses. Comprehensive based rationale provided with evidence-based rationale provided with reference. Good use of nursing reference. Excellent use of nursing knowledge knowledge and skills. Few minor

and skills. No or minor omissions errors in errors, mostly clear structure, good grammar, clear and logical structure, thorough content, mostly clear writing, varied content, clear and concise writing, rich vocabulary.

vocabulary.

12 to >9 pts Satisfactory

Some interventions are outlined. Some understanding of the problems/diagnoses. Rationale provided. Some use of nursing knowledge and skills. Several errors, somewhat clear structure, basic content, somewhat clear writing, limited vocabulary.

8 to >0 pts

Needs improvement

Limited interventions are outlined. Limited understanding of the problems/diagnoses. Rationale omitted. Limited use of nursing knowledge and skills. Many errors, unclear structure, incomplete content, unclear writing, basic vocabulary.

20

Nursing Case Study

Evaluation of the Plan and Interventions

5 to >4.0 pts 4 to >3.0 pts

Exemplary Good

Provides a full understanding of the Provides a good understanding of the plan's evaluation and intervention plan's evaluation and the effectiveness of implementation effectiveness. No or interventions with only minor omissions. minor omissions errors in grammar, Few minor errors, mostly clear structure, clear and logical structure, thorough good content, mostly clear writing, varied content, clear and concise writing, rich vocabulary.

vocabulary.

3 to >2.0 pts Satisfactory

Provides a satisfactory understanding of the plan's evaluation and the effectiveness of intervention implementation with some omissions. Several errors, somewhat clear structure, basic content, somewhat clear writing, limited vocabulary.

2 to >0 pts

Needs improvement

Inadequate understanding of the plans evaluation and/or implementation of interventions with significant omissions. Many errors, unclear structure, incomplete content, unclear writing, basic vocabulary.

5

Part A

Referencing: In-Text Citations and Reference List (APA 7th

Edition)

5 to >4.0 pts 4 to >3.0 pts

Exemplary Good

All in-text citations are correctly Most in-text citations are correctly formatted according to APA 7th formatted, with minor deviations from APA Edition guidelines. The reference list is 7th Edition guidelines. The reference list is complete and correctly formatted mostly complete and correctly formatted, according to APA 7th Edition with minor deviations from APA 7th Edition

3 to >2.0 pts Satisfactory

Some in-text citations are correctly formatted, but there are significant deviations from APA 7th Edition guidelines. The reference list is partially complete and/or contains significant

2 to >0 pts

Needs improvement

Few or no in-text citations are correctly formatted according to APA 7th Edition guidelines. The reference list is incomplete and/or incorrectly formatted. Many sources

5

guidelines. All sources cited in the text are included in the reference list.

guidelines. Almost all sources cited in the text are included in the reference list.

formatting errors. Some sources cited in the text may be missing from the reference list.

cited in the text are missing from the reference list.