diff_months: 9

EL5723 Module 4: Conducting a Technology Audit and Needs Assessment

Download Solution Now
Added on: 2024-12-15 18:30:21
Order Code: SA Student Harveen Arts and Humanities Assignment(6_24_43282_318)
Question Task Id: 509585

MODULE 4 COURSE OBJECTIVES

  • Describe the processes that impact adequate and equitable school funding.
  • Connect allocation of resources for teaching, learning, and school improvement priorities.
  • Connect budgeting and allocation of resources for teaching, learning, and school improvement priorities.
  • Recognize the role of leadership in effective financial decision-making.

MODULE 4 MODULE OBJECTIVES

  • Describe techniques that result in the hiring and retention of high-quality personnel.
  • Conduct a technology audit and needs assessment.

Conducting a Technology Audit

Technology audits empower school principals to identify strengths and weaknesses in their tech infrastructure, ensuring students have the tools they need for a modern education. By regularly auditing technology, principals optimize resource allocation, maximize security, and ensure their school stays ahead of the curve in a rapidly evolving digital landscape.

In this assignment, you will use the how-to guide you created in the Module 3 assignment to conduct a technology audit at your school. Then, you will assemble your findings in a report.

Step 1
Using the how-to guide you created in the Module 3 assignment, follow evidence-based best practices to complete the technology audit using an audit checklist.

Select the principal, assistant principal, and/or the schools IT expert to serve as your guide in this process. Gather background information and insights from them regarding the schools technology needs.

Step 2
Compose a 1- to 2-page technology audit report that states the needs you noted during the facilities audit and provides an evidence-based, in-depth rationale for what is needed and why. The report must clearly identify the resources and other supportive materials listed as background information to demonstrate collaboration occurred during the audit process. It must also align with the highest professional standards, legal compliance, and exemplary ethical behaviors.

Attach your completed technology audit checklist after the facilities audit report. The checklist is not part of the page count.

Your technology audit report should look like something created for your professional setting. Instead of an essay, your report should appear like a document you would share with decision-making stakeholders for the school. It can contain headings, subheadings, text, bullets, and other features to communicate complex information clearly. When information requires a citation, include in-text citations and a reference list.

Step 3
Proofread your work and use the assignment rubric to ensure you have met all requirements.

Submit the technology audit report and completed checklist.

PleasereadtheAssignment Guidelines Links to an external site.before you begin working.

Rubric

EL5723 Module 4 Conducting a Technology Audit and Needs Assessment Rubric

EL5723 Module 4 Conducting a Technology Audit and Needs Assessment Rubric

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Technology Audit Checklist

50to >42.0pts

Mastery

The technology audit checklist is complete and clearly evidences the use of resources and other supportive materials listed in the background information.

42to >35.0pts

Proficient

The technology audit checklist is complete.

35to >27.0pts

Marginal

The technology audit addresses most areas.

27to >0.0pts

Needs Improvement

The technology audit is missing most areas.

0pts

No Submission

50pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Technology Audit Report

50to >42.0pts

Mastery

The 1-page report addresses the needs noted during the technology audit and provides an evidence-based, in-depth rationale for what is needed and why. The report clearly identifies the resources and other supportive materials listed as background information.

42to >35.0pts

Proficient

The 1-page report addresses the needs noted during the technology audit and provides a rationale for what is needed and why.

35to >27.0pts

Marginal

The 1-page report addresses some, but not all, needs noted during the facilities audit.

27to >0.0pts

Needs Improvement

The report is missing most information required for the assignment.

0pts

No Submission

50pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Professional Dispositions, Laws, Ethics, and Professional Standards

(CAEP RA1.1)

20to >17.0pts

Mastery

Demonstrates exceptional application of relevant dispositions, laws, ethics, and/or professional standards in education. Clearly justifies practice with relevant professional expectations. Practices align with the highest professional standards, legal compliance, and exemplary ethical behaviors and connections are explicit and detailed

17to >14.0pts

Proficient

Demonstrates appropriate application of relevant dispositions, laws, ethics, and/or professional standards in education. Practices represent legal and professional behaviors. The applications of laws, ethics, or professional standards to practice are aligned, appropriate, and accurate.

14to >11.0pts

Marginal

Applications of professional dispositions, laws, ethics, or standards are addressed. Some connections between the legal and professional expectations are identified but practices/behaviors may be inaccurate or irrelevant.

11to >0.0pts

Needs Improvement

Application of professional dispositions, laws, ethics, or standards is missing or inappropriate. Some applications may be illegal or unethical.

0pts

No Submission

20pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Leading/Participating in Collaborative Activities

(CAEP RA1.1)

20to >17.0pts

Mastery

Detailed information is provided to demonstrate meaningful collaboration with multiple stakeholder groups occurred. Multiple stakeholders are identified, and explicit examples illustrate how stakeholder input informed decisions, plans, or activities to demonstrate collaboration occurred.

17to >14.0pts

Proficient

Presents evidence of meaningful collaboration with appropriate stakeholders (peers, colleagues, students, families, or community members). Stakeholders are identified and feedback/input is evident in the assignment or activity to demonstrate collaboration occurred.

14to >11.0pts

Marginal

Stakeholder collaboration is vaguely described or limited. Elaboration is needed to clearly demonstrate stakeholder involvement in decisions, plans, or activities. Descriptions of collaboration need further development.

11to >0.0pts

Needs Improvement

Collaboration is not addressed in the assignment or activities. Minimal evidence is presented to suggest collaboration occurred.

0pts

No Submission

20pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome APA Format and Writing Mechanics

10to >8.5pts

Mastery

Submission is free of spelling, formatting, and grammatical errors. Submission is well-formatted and professional.

8.5to >7.0pts

Proficient

Submission contains minimal spelling, formatting, and grammatical errors that do not impede the understanding of the concepts and plans.

7to >5.5pts

Marginal

Submission contains multiple spelling, formatting, and/or grammatical errors. Some ideas are unclear due to errors in writing mechanics, or multiple elements of APA format are not followed.

5.5to >0.0pts

Needs Improvement

Submission contains extensive spelling, formatting, and grammatical errors that significantly impede the understanding and presentation of ideas.

0pts

No Submission

10pts

Total Points:150

  • Uploaded By : Nivesh
  • Posted on : December 15th, 2024
  • Downloads : 0
  • Views : 126

Download Solution Now

Can't find what you're looking for?

Whatsapp Tap to ChatGet instant assistance

Choose a Plan

Premium

80 USD
  • All in Gold, plus:
  • 30-minute live one-to-one session with an expert
    • Understanding Marking Rubric
    • Understanding task requirements
    • Structuring & Formatting
    • Referencing & Citing
Most
Popular

Gold

30 50 USD
  • Get the Full Used Solution
    (Solution is already submitted and 100% plagiarised.
    Can only be used for reference purposes)
Save 33%

Silver

20 USD
  • Journals
  • Peer-Reviewed Articles
  • Books
  • Various other Data Sources – ProQuest, Informit, Scopus, Academic Search Complete, EBSCO, Exerpta Medica Database, and more