HDS301 Project Proposal Assessment Rubric
- Subject Code :
HDS301
- University :
Deakin University Exam Question Bank is not sponsored or endorsed by this college or university.
- Country :
Australia
At 2 hds301 Project Proposal Assessment Rubric |
Details of criteria / things to address |
Marks allocated across performance levels |
||||
High Distinction |
Distinction |
Credit |
Pass |
Fail |
||
Explain and justify project focus (e.g. need or problem) |
Links to ILC, NDIS, and/or other policy areas and/or conventions Links to ILC requirements (e.g. ILC streams, and explains target group/s Provides convincing evidence of need (literature, statistics etc.) and/or provides clear explanation of how need will be further evidenced (e.g. planned data collection/needs analysis etc.) Logical and realistic understanding of the problem and the solution considered and explained the main issues Identification and explanation of problem or issue to be addressed reflects contemporary understandings of inclusion (as discussed in HDS301 and echoed in ILC policy) |
16-20 |
14-15 |
12-13 |
10-11 |
0-9 |
Explain and justify the project design (response/ methodology for implementation) |
Links to ILC requirements (e.g. ILC streams) Justifies approach/ implementation method in terms of known best practice (link to literature and possibly policy) Clearly explains project design (who, where, what, when, why this approach etc.) Logical and realistic understanding of the problem and the solution considered and explained the main issues Explains role / involvement of people with disability in the project (e.g. as participants, advisors, on governance committee, staff, consulted with etc.) Project design reflects contemporary understandings of inclusion (as discussed in HDS301 and echoed in ILC policy) |
16-20 |
14-15 |
12-13 |
10-11 |
0-9 |
Identify the project outcomes |
Links outcomes to ILC requirements (e.g. ILC outcomes areas) Identifies the target groups for outcomes (who the outcomes will be experienced by) Realistic and well linked to project design (i.e. will the activities of the project be likely to result in the outcomes named, is the link clear?) |
8-10 |
7 |
6 |
5 |
0-4 |
Clear, professional presentation of proposal |
Has a clear (possibly catchy) title that sums up the project Organised and logical presentation Uses literature and evidence well Fully cited and referenced correctly Clearly written, interesting, compelling |
4-5 |
3.5 |
3 |
2.5 |
0-2 |
